provide a visual representation of your public health leadership theory. It can be a table, schematic diagram, graph, or any other representation you choose

 
Nursing homework help
Having a Public Health Leadership Theory is essential to any public health leader. With a well-constructed theory, you integrate leadership perspectives into practice in order to offer solutions to public health problems. Also, with a visual representation of your theory, you may present another way to highlight your research with effective design and theory implementation.
For this Project Assignment, you complete another part of your Public Health Leadership Theory based upon your understanding of leadership perspectives you have reviewed in this course. In addition, you must use a systems thinking approach in the development of your visual representation of your personal Public Health Leadership Theory. As you post your visual representation, you may find using a computer scanner helpful in scanning your image and attaching it to your post.
The Assignment (3–4 pages):
This week you will provide a visual representation of your public health leadership theory. It can be a table, schematic diagram, graph, or any other representation you choose. Please feel free to be creative. However, the focus MUST be on leadership. Be sure to provide a narrative explanation that shows how the developed theory can close the “gap” identified in the first part of the project. Additionally explain how it incorporates system thinking. Remember your theory can be based on those that we have learned about or your own. There is no wrong theory. What matters is the explanation of how it addresses the gap and uses system thinking. While this doesn’t have to be addressed now, keep in mind the last part of the project will involve presenting a methodology that tests the developed theory empirically. Let’s help one another with the project. Post your questions and thoughts in the “Contact the Instructor” area. Please feel free to weigh in on your colleagues comments.
Nahavandi, A. (2014). The art and science of leadership (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Chapter 3, “The Foundations of Modern Leadership”
Davies, A., Wong, C. A., & Laschinger, H. (2011). Nurses’ participation in personal knowledge transfer: The role of leader-member exchange (LMX) and structural empowerment. Journal of Nursing Management, 19(5), 632–643.
Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.
Sin, H-P., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. (2009) Understanding why they don’t see eye to eye: An examination of leader-member exchange (LMX) agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(4), 1048–1057.

Quality Measurement and Assessment

 
Nursing homework help
THIS IS A 2 PART ASSIGNMENT. THE ORGANIZATION THAT I NEED THIS TO BE ON IS : Regional One Health, located in Memphis, TN. The quality improvement issue is RN/nurse Retention.
Project: Promoting Health Care
Section 3: Quality Measurement and Assessment
This week you continue working on Section 3 of your Course Project, which was introduced in Week 6. Through your work in previous weeks of this course, you have likely gained critical insights into the organization that serves as the focus for your quality improvement plan. Integrating this knowledge of the organization into your plan for addressing a quality improvement issue is essential for successfully facilitating change.
As you deepen your analysis of your selected organization, consider how the information presented in this week’s Learning Resources relates to strategic priorities as well as to the uniquely collaborative and competitive dynamic that binds organizations in health care.
To prepare:
Think about the quality improvement issue that you are addressing and the associated plan that you are developing. Consider the following:
What is the overall purpose, or aim, of doing this work?
What would you hope to achieve for the organization by undertaking this project? What are the objectives of this initiative?
What value would this work add to the organization?
How would this work improve practice and create outcomes with impact?
Review Chapter 7 of the Sadeghi, Barzi, Mikhail, and Shabot course text. Consider how addressing this quality improvement issue would align with the organization’s mission, vision, values, and strategic goals and objectives. How does it relate to regulatory issues, and other matters that are significant for the organization? If you notice a misalignment, use this as an opportunity to refine your focus.
With this in mind, continue to hone your development of this Assignment, integrating the concepts addressed here into Section 3.
To complete:
Write a 3- to 5-page paper that includes:
An introduction to your quality improvement plan, including the overarching aim of this initiative and an explanation of how it aligns with the mission, vision, values, and strategic goals and objectives of the organization, as well as regulatory issues and other matters that are significant for the organization
An overview of the current situation with regard to this quality improvement issue in the organization
A description of measures and indicators
A presentation on data related to this issue, including:
Actual historical and current data and/or a description of the methods that you would use to collect and analyze the data
Methods for collecting and analyzing data in the future, including when you would do this
A description of realistic, evidence-based targets
Be sure to cite evidence from the literature to justify your selection of the measures and indicators, as well as the performance targets. This section of the Course Project serves as the Portfolio Assignment for this course.
Due by Day 7 of Week 8.
Section 4: Quality Improvement Strategies
Through your work on Section 3 of the Course Project, you have examined the gap between current performance and evidence-based targets and considered how addressing this gap relates to organizational priorities and large-scale aims for quality improvement.
In this section of the Course Project, you begin to think about quality improvement strategies that could help to bridge this gap. As noted in the Sadeghi, Barzi, Mikhail, and Shabot text, this is referred to as performance-driven planning.
Since the publication of the Institute of Medicine’s report “Crossing the Quality Chasm,” a good deal of attention has been paid to the need to examine processes that contribute to outcomes (Ernst, Wooldridge, Conway, Dressman, Weiland, Tucker, and Seid). As the USAID has noted, interventions “will not create the desired outcome to improve the quality of care unless the overall process of care delivery is also improved.” Therefore, attention to process redesign is a central aspect of cultivating strategies for improvement.
To prepare:
Refer to the modified Donabedian model (access, structure, process, outcome, and patient experience) presented in Chapter 9 of the Sadeghi, Barzi, Mikhail, and Shabot text.
Recall the performance targets that you identified for Section 3 (in Week 6). What does the recommendation that performance-driven planning should “begin with the end in mind” suggest given your established goals?
Review the information presented in Chapter 9 of the Sadeghi, Barzi, Mikhail, and Shabot text, and think about how you would assess the organization’s strengths and weaknesses related to the performance gaps you identified in Section 3 (Week 6).
Based on the above, start to think of specific evidence-based strategies that could be implemented to close/minimize the performance gaps you have identified. Consider both interventions (what) and processes (how). Focus on strategies that are supported by the latest research and could create systems-level change. These may be tentative for now, but be sure to identify at least one that specifically lends itself to a change in process (i.e., practice, protocol, pathway, activity).
Additional instructions for Section 4 are presented next week. To complete this Assignment, you will create a process map and write a paper describing quality improvement strategies. This Assignment is due by Day 7 of Week 8.
PART 2 OF THIS ASSIGNMENT:
Respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days using one or more of the following approaches:
Ask a probing question, substantiated with additional background information or research.
Share an insight from having read your colleagues’ postings, synthesizing the information to provide new perspectives.
Validate an idea with your own experience and additional resources.
Submission and Grading Information
Grading Criteria
To access your rubric:
Week 8 Discussion Rubric
Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6
To participate in this Discussion:
Week 8 Discussion
Project 1: Promoting Health Care Quality
Section 3: Quality Measurement and Assessment
By Day 7
Review the complete Assignment description presented in Weeks 6 and 7. Submit Section 3.
Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Project for review and grading, do the following:
Please save your Project using the naming convention “WK8Proj1+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
Click the Week 8 Project Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Project.
Click the Week 8 Project link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK8Proj+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
Grading Criteria
To access your rubric:
Week 8 Project 1 Rubric
Check Your Project Draft for Authenticity
To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:
Submit your Week 8 Project 1 draft and review the originality report.
Submit Your Project by Day 7
To submit your Project:
Week 8 Project 1
Project 2: Promoting Health Care Quality
Section 4: Quality Improvement Strategies
Throughout this course you have been considering the relationship between structure, process, and outcomes as it relates to health care quality. Looking at outcomes, alone, may not tell the “whole story.” For instance, if you are concerned with improving fall rates, evaluating the process—related activities or practices—can help you identify factors that contribute to outcomes and develop strategies for improving them.
For this section of your Course Project, you create a process map to examine a current process related to your quality improvement issue. You will use the results of the process mapping to redesign a process to help minimize or close the performance gap(s). As you proceed, keep in mind the importance of maintaining a patient-centered focus so the patient experience is not negatively affected by any changes in process.
To prepare:
Review the instructions provided in the Learning Resources for creating a process map.
With your quality improvement issue in mind, as well as the other work you have completed on your Course Project thus far, think about how creating a process map could help you to better understand your quality improvement issue and redesign an associated process.
Create a process map using Microsoft Word or PowerPoint.
Refine the strategies for promoting systems-level change to minimize or close the performance gap(s) that you began to think about in Week 7. As part of this, identify a way to redesign at least one process based on your analysis of the process map that you have created.
To complete:
Write a 2- to 3-page paper in which you describe quality improvement strategies that you selected related to your quality improvement issue.
Finalize your process map, which will be submitted along with the paper.
By Day 7
Submit your paper and process map.
Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Project for review and grading, do the following:
Please save your Project using the naming convention “WK8Proj2+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
Click the Week 8 Project Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Project.
Click the Week 8 Project link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK8Proj+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
Grading Criteria
To access your rubric:
Week 8 Project 2 Rubric

Types of Nursing Models and Frameworks of EBP

Nursing homework help

Week 1: Types of Nursing Models and Frameworks of EBP
2 2 unread replies. 2 2 replies.
What are some of the models and frameworks of EBP currently in use? How does the strength of the evidence determine translation into practice? Why is it important to integrate both evidence-based practice and patient and family preferences? What is the nurse’s responsibility when EBP and patient and  family practice do not match?
Identifying Research and Evidence-Based Practice and Quality Improvement models
There are many challenges in nursing today. As a registered nurse, you practice in complex and ever-changing environments. You must be knowledgeable about these changes in order to ensure that your nursing practice evolves in a positive direction. Healthcare professionals must be educated to deliver patient-centered care while functioning as members of interdisciplinary teams. Ability to analyze and synthesize research, integrate evidence-based practice (EBP), quality improvement (QI) approaches, and informatics are all critically important for patient safety and improved patient outcomes. The approach to changing the current situation or problem depends on many factors, such as your facility preference, and the setting or the type of problem itself.
Why should nursing focus on raising the standard or bar of practice? By raising the bar, quality, safe, patient-centered care can be administered in an environment where nurses can provide the best nursing care, think critically, ask clinical questions, and initiate change to improve outcomes for the patients and themselves. During this course, we’ll consider healthcare environments and problems within these environments as well as what can be done to resolve these problems. As you read this material, consider your experience with these types of situations. You will reflect on how to verify the dimensions of a problem within your work setting. As you reflect, try to identify specific strategies that might be used to produce a more positive outcome.
So, what are research, EBP, and QI, and what are the differences?
Research requires systematically investigating numerous sources and materials over time in order to establish new conclusions for a problem. This can take years to be able to come up with the best conclusion to report.
EBP uses current best conclusions or evidence produced by current research efforts to make decisions about patients’ care.
QI consists of a systematic and data -driven approach to find measurable improvement in healthcare services, processes, and outcomes (Conner, 2014).
There are four QI principles.
· QI work as systems and processes
· Focus on patients
· Focus on being part of a team
· Focus on the use of data
See if you can correctly choose the correct principles in the exercise below.
View the models below and determine if it is Research, EBP or QI
Enter “1” for Research, “2” for EBP, and “3” for QI in the space provided.
The input textbox will turn green if you enter the correct answer and red if you enter the wrong answer.
Improve diabetes rates in American Indian populations
Effect of education for prevention of readmission of heart failure
Effect of routine aspirin in prevention of myocardial infarction
Improve process for education for patients with kidney disease
Prenatal breast-feeding education and effect on breast-feeding rates
Improve discharge process
Obesity in school children
Transcript
Moving Nursing Research Into Evidence-Based Practice to Improve Patient Outcomes

Whenever an issue seems to be a problem, one of the first steps in addressing the issue is assessment of the presence, extent, and seriousness of the issue. In some healthcare organizations today, there are individuals, committees, and departments charged with collecting data related to identifying problems, tracking the data over time, and establishing strategies for improving the outcomes related to problem areas.
What about the bedside nurse? What can the nurse do to move newly discovered knowledge onto the clinical setting much quicker than waiting for a long, proper procedural committee to take action?
The first activity in this internal data collection process is to recognize that a situation exists with the potential to create a problem in a structure or process that can affect the outcome of providing care. The next activity is to identify the possible data that verify the existence of the problem, as well as the extent, causes, and consequences of the problem. The third activity is analysis of the data—a method that reveals whether the problem is related to the structure (building, equipment, personnel) or the processes (policies and procedures) of the healthcare organization. This analysis leads directly to the identification of the specific nature of the problem.
In order to verify the extent of the problem, the internal data should be compared to relevant data from other sources. These sources can be within the institution itself or extracted from outside sources. For example, similar data from different departments might be compared to identify variations in outcomes. Or data may be compared to another organization that provides similar services in the local or regional market. At the national level, an organization can compare its performance against data collected and published by official agencies or in research reports.
Reflection
Think about how you would go about identifying a problem or area that needs to be changed within your work environment. Then consider how you would collect data to determine the extent of the problem.
Overview of Different EBP Models
Although no one likes change, it often becomes necessary to try new strategies for improvement due to newly discovered research. New research on the topic of interest gives us a broader look at possibilities that could possibly improve our way of delivering nursing care.
As with anything else, we need to know what we are going to do and how we are going to accomplish it, such as with a road map, a set of directions, or a blueprint. Nursing models give us direction and are what we will use to change practice. These models are specifically designed for nursing situations in many aspects of nursing and nursing settings.
Evidence-based nursing models include, but are not limited to, the following.
The Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Model (JHNNEBP) (Dearholt & Dang, 2012) has a main focus of translation of research into practice. This model has a team approach to determining the evidence-based question for inquiry. The model uses three major steps.
· P: Practice question
· E: Collection of evidence
· T:  Translation of the evidence to use in practice
The Stetler Model (Schaffer, Sandau, & Diedrick, 2013) considers characteristics of individual evidence-based users. This model focuses on critical thinking and emphasizes evaluation of the evidence. In this model, evidence may include data from the consensus of experts or quality improvement data.
According to Schaffer, Sandau, and Diedrick (2013), the Advancing Research and Clinical Practice Through Close Collaboration (ARCC) model emphasizes evidence-based implementation at a system level. One of the major differences in this model is the use of an EBP mentor. The focus is on the organizational environment but with less emphasis on evidence appraisal.
Schaffer, Sandau, and Diedrick (2013) identify that the EBP Iowa Model focus is at the organizational level. The model has defined decision points and feedback loops represented as an algorithm. The model addresses translation and implementation of EBP.
Finally, the Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services Framework (PARIHS) model has three elements: evidence, context, and facilitation. This model has applicability for engaging stakeholders (Schaffer, Sandau, & Diedrick, 2013).

The ACE Star Model of Knowledge Transformation (Schaffer, Sandau, & Diedrick, 2013) is defined as an interdisciplinary approach for translating research into practice and attaining quality improvement. The model, which is illustrated above as a five-point star, has five steps that represent
1 discovery of new knowledge;
2 summary of the evidence;
3 translation of the evidence;
4 integrating change into practice; and
5 evaluation of the change.
This sounds very similar to the nursing process that bedside nurses are familiar with in practice, doesn’t it?
Summary

Not all nursing models of EBP will fit all organizations. Nursing models help guide nurses into planning an EBP or change projects in the most productive manner. The ACE Star Model focus is on knowledge transformation and this is one model that bedside nurses can identify with because it so closely resembles the nursing process. We will be discussing the ACE Star Model’s five points next week!
References
Conner, B. T. (2014). Differentiating research, evidence-based practice and quality improvement. American Nurse Today, 9(6). Retrieved from https://americannursetoday.com/differentiating-research-evidence-based-practice-and-quality-improvement/
Dearholt, S. L., & Dang, D. (2012). Johns Hopkins nursing evidence-based practice: Model and guidelines (2nd ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Sigma Theta Tau International.
Gawlinski, A., & Rutledge, D. (2008). Selecting a model for evidence-based practice changes: A practical approach. AACN Advanced Critical Care, 19(3), 291–300. Retrieved from http://www.kau.edu.sa/Files/0004020/Subjects/EBP%20Changes%20project.pdf#page=6&zoom=auto,-116,706

QI Guide on Improved Nursing Care. (2015).  Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). Retrieved from http://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/systems/monahrq/myqi/nursing.html

Schaffer, M. A., Sandau, K. E., & Diedrick, L. (2013). Evidence-based practice models for organizational change: Overview and practical applications. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 69(5), 1197–1209. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.06122.x

Previous
Next

Role of Research and the Importance of the Searchable Clinical Question

Nursing homework help

Week 1: Role of Research and the Importance of the Searchable Clinical Question
No unread replies. No replies.
The practice of nursing is deeply rooted in nursing knowledge, and nursing knowledge is generated and disseminated through reading, using, and creating nursing research. Professional nurses rely on research findings to inform their practice decisions; they use critical thinking to apply research directly to specific patient care situations. The research process allows nurses to ask and answer questions systematically that will ensure that decisions are based on sound science and rigorous inquiry. Nursing research helps nurses in a variety of settings answer questions about patient care, education, and administration.
As you contemplate your role in the research process, read the following article.
Kumar, S. (2015). Type 1 diabetes mellitus-common cases. Indian Journal of Endocrinology & Metabolism, 19, S76–S77. doi:10.4103/2230-8210.155409. http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=102354944&site=eds-live (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
Choose one case study, and formulate one searchable, clinical question in the PICO(T) format. There are several potential questions that could be asked.
Identify whether the focus of your question is assessment, etiology, treatment, or prognosis.
Remember to integrate references.