Write a 700- to 1,050-word paper discussing statistical analyses used in the selected study. Include the following in your paper:

/in /by

Statistical analyses paper

Research in the University Library for a peer-reviewed research article related to human services that uses inferential statistical analysis. For example, you might search social work and quantitative research or peer counseling and quantitative research. Be sure that your results include statistics using inferential analysis.
Write a 700- to 1,050-word paper discussing statistical analyses used in the selected study. Include the following in your paper:

  • Summarize in 100 to 150 the content of the research study discussed in the article. Provide an APA-formatted citation.
  • Discuss in 250 to 400 words the statistical analyses in the article.
  • Does the article incorporate graphs or tables that facilitate understanding of the data?
  • What descriptive statistics were used in the study? Are the descriptive statistical analyses appropriate for the subject?
  • Identify the inferential statistics used, and comment on whether the analyses support the research problem or hypothesis. (For example, do they support the conclusions reached by the author or authors? Are the statistics misleading or biased?)

Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines, and include a title page and a reference page (no abstract is necessary).

How can we be “in check” with our emotions?  What are some consequences of not being “in check” with our emotions?

/in /by

Emotional Intelligence (EQ) Paper

Complete “Management Stress Assessment” located on the McGraw-Hill website (http://www.mhhe.com/business/management/buildyourmanagementskills/updated_flash/topic5a/quiz.html)
Compose a GCU style paper (750-1,000 words), describing your Emotional Intelligence (EQ) findings. Being aware of what emotional responses look like and its importance when interacting in social settings.
Compare and contrast your EQ to someone you interact with.
Please include three to four references from the readings and videos this week to support your ideas. Use appropriate citation and referencing.
Address the following in your paper:

  1. How can we be “in check” with our emotions?  What are some consequences of not being “in check” with our emotions? What are some strategies for managing our emotions?  How do we ensure that our emotional state is appropriate when interacting with our family, friends, significant others, and peers?
  2. Compare and contrast your EQ results to someone you interact with? How does this impact your relationship with that individual?

Refer to the Topic 2 readings to assist in completing this assignment.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the GCU Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the Student Success Center for directions.
PSY100.T2EmotionalIntelligence_1-5-15.docxMy score was 76/100 self awareness was my highest area. Please use proper template and indentations for the style of paper
Read “Characteristics of an Emotionally Healthy Person” from the Mobility Forum: The Journal of the Air Mobility Command’s Magazine (2002), located in the GCU eLibrary.  https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=8634490&site=ehost-live&scope=site
Read “Intelligence, Emotional” from Encyclopedia of Special Education: A Reference for the Education of the Handicapped and Other Exceptional Children and Adults (2006), located in the GCU eLibrary.  https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.credoreference.com/content/entry/wileyse/intelligence_emotional/0
Read:  Harmon-Jones, E., & van Honk, J. (2012). Introduction to a Special Issue on the Neuroscience of Motivation and Emotion. Motivation And Emotion, 36(1), 1-3.
doi:10.1007/s11031-012-9281-x  https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2012-06287-001&site=ehost-live&scope=site
Read Do You See What I See? Learning to Detect Micro Expressions of Emotion. Motivation & Emotion, 36(3), 371-381. doi:10.1007/s11031-011-9257-2
https://lopes-idm-oclc-org.library.gcu.edu:2443/login?url=http://search.proquest.com.library.gcu.edu:2048/docview/1030207021?accountid=7374
Read:  Bower, B. (2013). The Bright Side of Sadness: Bad Moods Can Have Unappreciated Mental Upsides. Science News, 184(9), 18-21.  https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ulh&AN=91557200&site=ehost-live&scope=site

 Tell what you think should be done to save Social Security, so that it will be around when YOU want to retire.

/in /by

Part A
1. Read text “Work and Retirement” in Section 3 of Chapter 12 (Late Adulthood). Read the websites related to Social Security and retirement in Module 4 Resources. Do a little of your own research on the internet about Social Security (how it started and original intention, current and longterm projections, etc.)
2. Tell what you think should be done to save Social Security, so that it will be around when YOU want to retire. Or should we not “save” it, but rather come up with a better idea? What steps have YOU taken (or plan to take) to save for your own retirement years?(Share as you are comfortable.) Please offer creative solutions;don’t just vent. Brainstorm with us on this critically important.
300 words
Part B
Search the internet for information about Alzheimer’s Disease. Summarize in your own words what you learned by writing TWO good paragraphs. First paragraph: What are the major symptoms and how is it diagnosed?How can adefinitivediagnosis be made?
Second paragraph: Briefly discuss some of the latest theories regarding possible causes of Alzheimer’s. What is the treatment?
300 words
16usd due in 24 hours …. must be 100% orginal.  APA

your paper should demonstrate the ability to construct a deductively valid or inductively strong argument, clearly and accurately explain your reasoning, use high-quality academic sources to support the premises of your argument, fairly and honestly evaluate contrary arguments and objections, and identify fallacies and biases that occur within the arguments or objections presented.

/in /by

Final Argument Paper
This final assignment is designed to involve all of the main skills that you have learned during this course. In particular, your paper should demonstrate the ability to construct a deductively valid or inductively strong argument, clearly and accurately explain your reasoning, use high-quality academic sources to support the premises of your argument, fairly and honestly evaluate contrary arguments and objections, and identify fallacies and biases that occur within the arguments or objections presented.
You will continue to build on the arguments that you are presented in your previous two papers. In particular,, you will present a final improved version of your argument for your thesis that you begin for the Week One Assignment and fully address the objection that you developed for your Week Three Assignment. You will need to research a minimum of three scholarly sources from the Ashford University Library. (For further information about discovering and including scholarly research, take a look at the FindIt@AU Tutorialinstructional resource.)
Write: in your paper

  • Explain the topic you are addressing and your position on it. Provide a preview of your paper and a statement of your thesis in your opening paragraph. [Approximately 100 words]
    • For help crafting a good thesis statement, go to the Ashford Writing Center.
  • Present your main argument for your thesis in standard form, with each premise and the conclusion on a separate line. Clearly indicate whether your argument is intended to be inductive or deductive. Follow up the presentation of your argument by clarifying the meaning of any premises that could use some explanation. [About 150 words]
    • If your argument is deductive, then it shouldbevalid(in the strict logical sense of the word); if it is inductive, then it should bestrong. Make sure to avoid committing logical fallacies within your argument (e.g., begging the question). Additionally, the premises should be true, to the best of your knowledge. If one of your premises has a pretty obvious counter-example, then you should either fix the argument so that it does not have this flaw, or later, in your paper (steps three through five) you should address the apparent counter-example (showing that it does not really refute the truth of your premise). Arguments that are not valid, not very strong, commit fallacies, or that have counter-examples that are not adequately addressed will not receive full credit.
  • Provide supporting evidence for the premises of your argument. [Approximately 350 words]
    • Pay special attention to those premises that could be seen as controversial. Evidence may include academic research sources, supporting arguments (arguments whose conclusions are premises of the main argument), or other ways of demonstrating the truth of those premises. This section should include at least one scholarly research source.
  • Explain a strong objectionto your argument. [Approximately 250 words]
    • Study what people on the other side of this question think about your reasoning and present the best possible objection that someone could have to your argument. Do not commit the straw man fallacy here. Reference at least one scholarlyresearch source. See the “Practicing Effective Criticism” section of Chapter 9 of the course text for more information.
  • Defend your argument against the objection. [Approximately 200 words]
    • Once you have presented the objection, indicate clearly how you might respond to it. It is acceptable to admit that reasonable people might disagree with you or that there might be an area in which your argument could be further strengthened, but you should do your best to explain why your argument is sound or cogent despite the objections.
  • Provide an appropriate conclusion. [Approximately 75 words]
    • For guidance about how to develop a conclusion see the Introductions and Conclusion resource from the Ashford Writing Center.

For further instruction on how to create arguments, see the How to Construct a Valid DeductiveArgument and Tips for Creating an Inductively Strong Argument documents as well as the Contructing Valid Arguments Video. For an example of a completed Final Paper, see the Annotated Example The Ethics of Elephants in Circuses. Let your instructor know if you have questions about how to complete this paper.
The Final Argument Paper

  • Must be 1,100 to 1,400 words in length, double-spaced, (not including the title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
  • Must include a separate title page with the following:
    • Title of paper
    • Student’s name
    • Course name and number
    • Instructor’s name
    • Date submitted
  • Must use at least three scholarly sources in addition to the course text.
    • The Scholarly, Peer Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources table offers additional guidance on appropriate source types. If you have questions about whether a specific source is appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor. Your instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source for a particular assignment.
  • Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center (for more information about how to create an APA reference list see the Ashford Writing Center APA References List webpage).
  • Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

Carefully review the Grading Rubric for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.