Week 6 Developing a Care Plan, health and medicine homework help

Week 6 Developing a Care Plan, health and medicine homework help


Question descriptionI need someone to finish at least one page of my paper. You will be responsible for creating a disaster plan from the paper that I have already started on underage drinking. I will send it once a tutor has been chosen. You will complete this section in a separate document and not the one my original paper that I send you. You will need to use 2 journal APA style formatted references within the last 7 years (nothing later than that). Below are the instructions for the paper. I need this completed in less than 3 hours.
Week 6 paper Instructions
Phase 5: Developing a Care Plan—Continued
Last week, you began working on a comprehensive care plan for the aggregate. The care plan is due this week.
Propose a nursing diagnosis and suggest interventions that address the major health risks identified from the risk assessment. In your care plan, include a list of disasters that may affect the aggregate and a disaster management plan.
Your comprehensive care plan should be in a 4- to 5-page Microsoft Word document.
Support your responses with examples.
Cite all sources in APA.
Submission Details
Name your document SU_NSG4075_W6_A2_LastName_FirstInitial_Phase5.doc.
Submit your document to the W6 Assignment 2 Dropbox by Week 6, Day 6.

Assignment 2 Grading Criteria Maximum Points
Applied Mobilize, Assess, Plan, Implement, Track (MAP-IT) in the assessment process. 24
Identified priority nursing diagnosis. 28
Identified appropriate strategies to address nursing diagnosis and identified risks of aggregate. 28
Created a disaster management plan with at least two disasters addressed following the assignment criteria. 28
Cited at least two journal articles as references for ideas in the plan. 12
Written components. 40
Total: 160

Plan effectiveness criteria

Plan effectiveness criteria


Question description

Evaluation of Plan Effectiveness Criteria
In the evaluation component of the Capstone project, you are expected to discuss how you would evaluate the effectiveness of the interventions.
Some questions you should seek answers to are:

  1. Would I be able to implement the interventions? If not, what barriers exist?
  2. What visible signs of success (for example, reduced health issues) would I look for? What is your projected effectiveness?

The evaluation component of the final paper should describe your evaluation of the implementation. Include responses to points 1 and 2 above. The evaluation component of the final Microsoft Word submission document should be a minimum of 2 pages.
The complete summary document should use the Mobilize, Assess, Plan, Implement, Track (MAP-IT) steps used in pulling together your project.
Over the past nine weeks, you selected an aggregate and conducted a risk assessment of its health, developed a care plan to address those health risks, and considered the effectiveness of the interventions on the health of the aggregate. It’s time now for you to present your final submission of this Capstone project.
Your final submission should include: the documentation of the work accomplished through your Capstone project, a Microsoft Word Document that contains the evaluation and summary, and a Microsoft PowerPoint presentation highlighting the main aspects of the project including the key things learned during the 10 weeks of working with this project.
The summary document should use the Mobilize, Assess, Plan, Implement, Track (MAP-IT) steps used in pulling together your project. The complete documentation of the work accomplished over the course of the project should contain a minimum of 6–7 pages in a Microsoft Word document and should include the following information:

  • A detailed description of the aggregate
  • A description of the aggregate’s strengths and weaknesses
  • A risk assessment of the aggregate
  • Diagnoses based on the risk assessment
  • A detailed care plan for the aggregate
  • A description of how at least one intervention might be implemented in the aggregate to address an identified issue
  • An evaluation of the effectiveness of the intervention

The Power Point presentation should be concise and should include the highlights of the Capstone project and the key things learned over the course of this project, from developing, planning interventions, and evaluating the care plan. Your presentation should not exceed 15 slides.
Submit your final Microsoft Word document containing the evaluation and complete summary to the W10 Assignment 2 Dropbox by Tuesday, December 12, 2017. Use bold sub-headings in the paper to differentiate between the evaluation and the summary information.
Phase 7 and 8: Final Submission
Name your Microsoft Word document SU_NSG4075_W10_A2_LastName_FirstInitial_Phase7and8.doc
Name your PowerPoint presentation
SU_NSG4075_W10_A2_LastName_FirstInitial.ppt
Submit your Microsoft Word document and PowerPoint presentation to the W10 Assignment 2 Dropbox by Tuesday, December 12, 2017.

Assignment 2 Grading Criteria Maximum Points
Presented the evaluation of the implementation plan. 20
Described plan for implementation of interventions and anticipated signs of success. 20
Cited at least two journal articles as references for ideas in the work. 12
Submitted the complete documentation of the Capstone project including a description and analysis of the aggregate and a comprehensive care plan based on the results of the risk assessment. 52
Presentation highlighted the main aspects of the Capstone project, such as a description of the aggregate, the results of the risk assessment, the major health risks, a summary of the strategies included in the care plan, a description of at least one intervention that might be implemented, and a note about the anticipated effectiveness of the plan. 32
Presentation included the key learning from the Capstone project. 24
Written components. 40
Total: 200

Defenses to Criminal Liability – Andrea Yates case,  homework help

Defenses to Criminal Liability – Andrea Yates case,  homework help


Question descriptionDUE BY 5PM EASTERN STANDARD TIME THURSDAY- (11/24/2016)
** BLUEBOOK CITATIONS
** 750 WORDS MIN
** CAN USE OTHER OUTSIDE SOURCES- SCHOLARLY
QUESTION: Was Yates insane? Does her (ex) husband bear any responsibility in the crime? Why or why not? Remember to respond to two of your classmates’ postings and cite all sources in Bluebook format.
Education and Achievements:
Andrea (Kennedy) Yates was born on July 2, 1964 in Houston, Tex. She graduated from Milby High School in Houston in 1982. She was the class valedictorian, captain of the swim team and an officer in the National Honor Society. She completed a two-year pre-nursing program at the University of Houston and then graduated in 1986 from the University of Texas School of Nursing in Houston. She worked as a registered nurse at the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center from 1986 until 1994.
Andrea Meets Rusty Yates:
Andrea and Rusty Yates, both 25, met at their apartment complex in Houston. Andrea, who was usually reserved, initiated the conversation. Andrea had never dated anyone until she turned 23 and prior to meeting Rusty she was healing from a broken relationship. They eventually moved in together and spent much of their time involved in religious study and prayer. They were married on April 17, 1993. They shared with their guests that they planned on having as many children as nature provided.
Andrea Called Herself “Fertile Myrtle”:
In their eight years of marriage, the Yates had five children; four boys and one girl. Andrea stopped jogging and swimming when she became pregnant with her second child. Friends say that she became reclusive. The decision to home-school the children seemed to feed her isolation.
The Yates Children:
Feb. 26, 1994 – Noah Yates, Dec. 12, 1995 – John Yates, Sept. 13, 1997 – Paul Yates, Feb. 15, 1999 – Luke Yates, and on Nov. 30, 2000 – Mary Yates was the last child to be born.
Their Living Conditions:
Rusty accepted work in Florida in 1996 and the family moved into a 38-foot travel trailer in Seminole, FL While in Florida, Andrea got pregnant, but miscarried. In 1997 they returned to Houston and lived in their trailer because Rusty wanted to “live light.” The next year. Rusty decided to purchase a 350-square-foot, renovated bus which became their permanent home. Luke was born bringing the number of children to four. Living conditions were cramped and Andrea’s insanity began to surface.
Michael Woroniecki:
Michael Woroniecki was a traveling minister from whom Rusty purchased their bus and whose religious views had influenced both Rusty and Andrea. Rusty only agreed with some of Woroniecki’s ideas but Andrea embraced the extremist sermons. He preached, “the role of women is derived from the sin of Eve and that bad mothers who are going to hell create bad children who will go to hell.” Andrea was so totally captivated by Woroniecki that Rusty and Andrea’s family grew concerned.
Andrea’s First Suicide Attempt :
On June 16 1999, Andrea called Rusty and begged him to come home. He found her shaking involuntarily and chewing on her fingers. The next day, she was hospitalized after she tried to commit suicide by taking an overdose of pills. She was transferred to the Methodist Hospital psychiatric unit and diagnosed with a major depressive disorder. The medical staff described Andrea as evasive in discussing her problems. However, on June 24 she was prescribed an antidepressant and released.
Spiraling Downward:
Once home, Andrea did not take the medication and as a result she began to self mutilate and refused to feed her children because she felt they were eating too much. She thought there were video cameras in the ceilings and said that the characters on television were talking to her and the children. She told Rusty about the hallucinations, yet neither of them informed Andrea’s psychiatrist, Dr. Starbranch. On July 20, Andrea put a knife to her neck and begged her husband to let her die.
Warned About the Risks of Having More Babies :
Andrea was again hospitalized and stayed in a catatonic state for 10 days. After being treated with an injection of different drugs that included Haldol, an anti-psychotic drug, her condition immediately improved. Rusty was optimistic about the drug therapy because Andrea appeared more like the person he first met. Dr. Starbranch warned the Yates that having another baby might bring on more episodes of psychotic behavior. Andrea was placed on out-patient care and prescribed Haldol.
New Hopes for the Future :
Andrea’s family urged Rusty to buy a home instead of returning Andrea to the cramped space of the bus. He purchased a nice home in a peaceful neighborhood. Once in her new home, Andrea’s condition improved to the point that she returned to past activities like swimming, cooking and some socializing. She was also interacting well with her children. She expressed to Rusty that she had strong hopes for the future but still viewed her life on the bus as her failure.
The Tragic End:
In March of 2000, Andrea, on Rusty’s urging, became pregnant and stopped taking the Haldol. On November 30, 2000, Mary was born. Andrea was coping but on March 12, her father died and immediately her mental state digressed. She stopped talking, refused liquids, mutilated herself, and would not feed Mary. She also frantically read the Bible.
By the end of March Andrea returned to a different hospital. Her psychiatrist, Dr. Mohammed Saeed, treated her briefly with Haldol but discontinued it, saying that she did not did not seem psychotic. Andrea was released only to return again in May. She was released in 10 days and in her last follow-up visit with Saeed, she was told to think positive thoughts and to see a psychologist.
Two days later, Rusty left for work and before his mother arrived to help, Andrea began to put into action the thoughts that had consumed her for two years.
Andrea filled the tub with water and beginning with Paul, she systematically drowned the three youngest boys, then placed them on her bed and covered them. Mary was left floating in the tub. The last child alive was the first born, seven-year-old Noah. He asked his mother what was wrong with Mary, then turned and ran away. Andrea caught up with him and as he screamed, she dragged him and forced him into the tub next to Mary’s floating body. He fought desperately, coming up for air twice, but Andrea held him down until he was dead. Leaving Noah in the tub, she brought Mary to the bed and laid her in the arms of her brothers.
During Andrea’s confession she explained her actions by saying that she wasn’t a good mother and that the children were “not developing correctly” and she needed to be punished.
Her controversial trial lasted three weeks. The jury found Andrea guilty of capital murder, but rather then recommending the death penalty, they voted for life in prison. At the age of 77, in the year 2041, Andrea will be eligible for parole.
Source: Charles Montaldo, Profile of Andrea Yates, crime.about.com, http://crime.about.com/od/current/p/andreayates.ht… (last visited March 10, 2010).

Discussion: Transitioning from Closed to Open System

Question description
Discussion: Transitioning from Closed to Open System
How do effective nurse leaders and others approach problem solving and decision making in organizations? As suggested in this week’s Learning Resources, systems theory provides a valuable way to assess situations and prepare to address problems.
For this week’s Discussion, you identify an issue or process that could be improved and apply knowledge and strategies related to systems theory.
Note: You may find it helpful to view the Assignment instructions and use the same problem for this Discussion.
To prepare:
Review the information presented in this week’s Learning Resources on systems theory and the difference between open and closed systems.
Reflect on the practices and processes with which you are familiar in your organization. Identify one problematic issue or process that could be improved.
Consider the problem from a closed-system perspective. Then think about how the issue or process you selected could be addressed by viewing it from an open-system perspective. How would the transition from a closed- to an open-system view help you and others to address the problem and improve outcomes?
Post a description of the problem that you identified in your selected organization. Explain the problem from a closed-system perspective. Then, describe how the problem could be addressed by viewing it from an open-system perspective, and explain how this modification would help you and others improve health care outcomes.
Note: please follow the rubrics with 3 or more references within 5 years.