Comparison of Two Nursing Theorists

/in /by

Comparison of Two Nursing Theorists
For this paper you will evaluate two nursing theorists in the professionally recognized four
main concept paradigm areas of: nurse, person, health, and environment. You may not use
Orem or Watson for this assignment.This paper provides you with the opportunity to reflect
upon the various theorists that we have reviewed this term and possibly revise your own nursing
theoretical framework.
This is to be a 5-8 page APA style paper (excluding title & reference pages) that reflects your
ability to synthesize and paraphrase the works of other writers. Although you may use some
direct quotes, I would prefer you mainly paraphrase the author/theorists’ concepts.
This paper has three essential parts:
1. You must address each theorist’s key concepts and how they address/define the paradigm
areas listed above. In other words how do each of them define their main building blocks of the
theory.
2. You are then to compare and contrast the two theorists in regards to their key concepts and
how they address the four areas. How do the theorists see the four main concepts in their
theory relating to each other?
3. Finally, you must determine if the two nursing theories you selected are relevant and apparent
in today’s practice realm. Examples of how the theories maybe used in nursing can be explained.
Include at least 4 reference citations in the body of the paper . You may use your textbook, but it
does NOT count as one of your sources. You may cite an older original source of the author’s
theory (textbook or article), but the remainder should be from articles or books from 20011-2017.
If the location of newer articles becomes problematic in your literature search, please let me
know. Youmay NOT use websites. You will need at least 4-6 scholarly references which are
directly relevant to the topic at hand.
The paper will be evaluated according these guidelines:
1. Clarity: Clear and precise descriptions (5 points)
2. Completeness: Adequate coverage of the literature (10 points)
3. Analysis: Analysis and discussion points are sound (10 points)
4. Presentation: Organization, quality of writing, APA style, grammar/spelling (5 points)
The paper will be submitted in the assignments area of the course entitled Nurse Theorists Paper.
This paper will also need to be submitted to the Turnitin program.

Healthy people 2020

/in /by

Healthy people 2020

Question descriptionThis assignment is aligned with the module objective “Demonstrate community assessments and apply the principles of epidemiology.” As part of the written assignment, you will complete the following tasks:

  • Identify one health problem you believe to be the most prevalent in your community. You may want to check with your local health department or a community health nurse. Also consider researching the morbidity/mortality rates health problems in your community. School nurses and are an excellent resource person to contact.
  • Analyze the problem using Milio’s framework for prevention from the module 1 readings (Chapter three in your text, pp 41)
  • Choose one of your nursing diagnoses and describe how your identified community health problem applies.
  • Consult Healthy People 2020 to find the national goals that are closely related to your chosen diagnosis (p.90)
  • One long-term goal, minimum of three short-term goals and Intervention(s) (p.89)

Points: 40
Due Date: Sun, Jan 28 by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Standard Time (EST) of the US.
References
Minimum of four (4) total references: two (2) references from required course materials and two (2) peer-reviewed references. All references must be no older than five years (unless making a specific point using a seminal piece of information)
Peer-reviewed references include references from professional data bases such as PubMed or CINHAL applicable to population and practice area, along with evidence based clinical practice guidelines. Examples of unacceptable references are Wikipedia, UpToDate, Epocrates, Medscape, WebMD, hospital organizations, insurance recommendations, & secondary clinical databases.
Style
Unless otherwise specified, all the written assignment must follow APA 6th edition formatting, citations and references. Click here to download the Microsoft Word APA 6th edition template. Make sure you cross-reference the APA 6th edition book as well before submitting the assignment.
Number of Pages/Words
Unless otherwise specified all papers should have a minimum of 600 words (approximately 2.5 pages) excluding the title and reference pages.

Analyzing the Aggregate Strengths and Weaknesses and Risk Assessment

/in /by

Analyzing the Aggregate Strengths and Weaknesses and Risk Assessment

Question description

Turnitin OriginalityCheck enabled

Phase 3: Analyzing the Aggregate Strengths and Weaknesses

For Phase 3 of the Capstone project, analyze and describe the strengths and weaknesses of the aggregate
and the community where the aggregate resides.
Be sure to apply Mobilize, Assess, Plan, Implement, Track (MAP-IT) in your assessment process.

  • By the due date assigned, submit your response in a 1-page Microsoft Word document.
  • Support your responses with examples.
  • Cite all sources in APA format.

PHASE 4: RISK ASSESSMENT

For Phase 4 of your project, you will select a family in your aggregate and complete a risk assessment in
the field using the information from chapter 18 “Community as Client: Assessment and Analysis” and
“Appendix D Friedman Family Assessment Model (Short Form)” as a guide. Describe how the family,
environment, home, and risk assessments were conducted, using your course textbook as a reference.
Describe the results of the assessments, drawing conclusions about the health risks to the aggregate as you
see them.

  • By the due date assigned, submit your response in a 2- to 3-page Microsoft Word document.
  • Support your responses with examples.
  • Cite all sources in APA format.

SUBMISSION DETAILS:

Combine Phase 3 and Phase 4 documents into one paper. Use bold sub-headings in the paper to distinguish
Phase 3 from Phase 4.
Phase 3: Analyzing the Aggregate Strengths and Weaknesses and Phase 4: Risk Assessment

Week 3 Nursing Technology Response, health and medicine homework help

/in /by

Week 3 Nursing Technology Response, health and medicine homework help

Question descriptionThere are two different postings below. Can you please paraphrase both of the postings below. Being sure not to plagiarize them. APA format. The references are listed below. You can use additional references if you need to. I just need you to change the way they are worded so its not plagerized .
1) I think there is no question that nurses across the board should use a standardized nursing language, and that each specialty area can then expand upon that standardization for their particular needs. Having one set standard of documentation across the world allows a more fluid communication and understanding of practice between nurses everywhere.
In many hospitals now, electronic health records (EHR’s) are the standard form of charting versus paper charting. There needs to be a standardization across these EHR’s for any nurse to be able to come from one facility to another and understand the plan of care, teaching, testing and so on done for their patients. “Standardizing the language of care (developing a taxonomy) with commonly accepted definitions of terms allows a discipline to use an electronic documentation system.” (Marjorie A. Rutherford, 2008)
In nursing we are constantly learning and growing in our practice every day and to be able to access information across different spectrums that all use a standardized language helps us grow and learn from mistakes. “Consistency in accessing and communicating information throughout the continuum is important, and by having a standardized language to do so helps facilitate and improve this process.” (McGonigle & Mastrian, 2012)
Having this standard documentation for patient outcomes and plans allows me to better describe the patients needs for treatment, that’s why i feel it is so important for all RN’s across the board to be able to coherently understand one another in our charting.
References
Rutherford, M. (2008). Standardized nursing language: What does it mean for nursing
practice? The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 13(1). Doi: 10.3912/OJIN.Vo113
No01PPT05.
McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2012). Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge
(2nd ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning
2) Applying Standardized Terminologies
The standardized language is an essential part of nursing studies and application. It helps in creating awareness of the nursing language and helps in supporting the learning processes in nursing. Knowing standardized language helps in providing consistency in practicum and developing of critical thinking knowledge. Furthermore, it improves communication skills, which is essential in diagnoses, interventions and outcomes classifications. In this context, we discuss three terminologies that include NANDA, NIC and NOC[BS1] . The term NANDA represents the definitions and classification of nursing diagnoses. NIC represents the classification of nursing interventions, while NOC represents the classification of nursing outcomes. Ineffective breathing patterns are among conditions whose nursing responses apply NANDA, NIC and NOC terminologies[BS2] .