Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section A: Organizational Culture and Readiness Assessment

/in /by

Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section A: Organizational Culture and Readiness Assessment
View Rubric
Due Date: Sep 05, 2018 23:59:59       Max Points: 60Details:
Before making a case for an evidence-based project, it is essential to understand the culture of the organization in order to begin assessing its readiness for EBP implementation. Select an appropriate organizational culture survey tool and use this instrument to assess the organization\\\’s readiness.

  1. Develop an analysis of 250 words from the results, addressing your organization\\\’s readiness level, possible project barriers and facilitators, as well as how to integrate clinical inquiry.
  2. Make sure to include the rationale for the survey categories scores that were significantly high and low, incorporating details and/or examples. Also explain how to integrate clinical inquiry into the organization, providing strategies that strengthen the organizations weaker areas.
  3. Submit a summary of your results. The actual survey results do not need to be included.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Upon receiving feedback from the instructor, revise \\\”Section A: Organizational Culture and Readiness Assessment\\\” for your final paper submission. This will be a continuous process throughout the course for each section.
 
Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section A: Organizational Culture and Readiness Assessment
1Unsatisfactory0.00%
2Less than Satisfactory80.00%
3Satisfactory88.00%
4Good92.00%
5Excellent100.00%
100.0 %Organizational Culture and Readiness Assessment
100.0 %Describe the results from the organizational culture survey you selected, addressing the readiness level of your organization. Provide an analysis of any possible project barriers and facilitators, and describe how to integrate clinical inquiry into your organization.
The survey results are listed without an in-depth explanation. Analysis of the project barriers and facilitators is not outlined or is outlined poorly. Clinical inquiry is defined and/or broad statements are made about it, but the individual organization being assessed is not specifically addressed. Inaccurate comprehension of material is revealed, as is the lack of ability to apply information. Subject matter is absent, inappropriate, and/or irrelevant. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.
The survey results are listed without an in-depth explanation. The project barriers and facilitators are ignored or superficially evaluated. Unwarranted conclusions are drawn. Clinical inquiry is defined and/or broad statements are made about it, but the individual organization being assessed is not specifically addressed. A lack of comprehension is displayed, but there is an attempt to apply information. There is weak, marginal coverage of subject matter with large gaps in presentation. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.
A basic survey overview is provided, but any rationale, details, and/or examples are minimally included. A surface level of evaluation of the possible project barriers and facilitators is conducted. Very narrow focus is provided. Claims and ideas of the criteria are supported but not developed in-depth. How to integrate a basic idea of clinical inquiry into the organization is explained but does not specifically address the individual organization being assessed. Comprehension of the material is exhibited and there is clearly an attempt to integrate and apply information. All subject matter is covered in minimal quantity and quality. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.
Information in relation to the survey categories which scored high and low on the survey is provided. The rationale for the scores, including details and/or examples, is stated. Analysis on the project barriers and facilitators is direct, competent, and appropriately aligned to the survey. How to integrate a basic idea of clinical inquiry into the organization is explained, and strategies that broadly encompass many issues of concern are provided. Integrative and accurate comprehension is demonstrated and information is applied as appropriate. There is comprehensive coverage of subject matter. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.
Detailed information in relation to the survey categories that scored high and low on the survey is provided. The rationale for the scores, including details and/or examples, is provided. The major project barriers and facilitators are thoughtfully analyzed and evaluated. Warranted conclusions are drawn. An informed position on how to integrate clinical inquiry into the organization is developed and explained, providing strategies which align to the weaker areas of the organization. Clarity and specificity of comprehension are demonstrated, and all relevant information is synthesized. Coverage extends beyond what is needed to support subject matter. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
100 %Total Weightage
 

Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section B: Problem Description

/in /by

Evidence-Based Practice Proposal – Section B: Problem Description
View Rubric
Due Date: Sep 05, 2018 23:59:59       Max Points: 60Details:
Write a paper of 500-750 words (not including the title page and reference page) on your proposed problem description for your EBP project. The paper should address the following:

  1. Describe the background of the problem. Tell the story of the issue and why it deserves attention.
  2. Identify the stakeholders/change agents. Who, or what organizations, are concerned, may benefit from, or are affected by this proposal. List the interested parties, patients, students, agencies, Joint Commission, etc.
  3. Use the feedback from the Topic 2 main forum post and refine your PICOT question. Make sure that the question fits with your graduate degree specialization.
  4. State the purpose and project objectives in specific, realistic, and measurable terms. The objective should address what is to be gained. This is a restatement of the question, providing focus. Measurements need to be taken before and after the evidence-based practice is introduced to identify the expected changes.
  5. 5) Provide supportive rationale that the problem or issue is an important one for nursing to resolve using relevant professional literature sources.
  6. Develop an initial reference list to assure that there is adequate literature to support your evidence-based practice project. Follow the \\\”Steps to an Efficient Search to Answer a Clinical Question\\\” box in chapter 3 of the textbook. Use \\\”NUR-699 Search Method Example\\\” to assist you.
  7. 7) The majority of references should be research articles. However, national sources such as Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), Department of Health and Human Resources (HHS), or the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) and others may be used when you are gathering statistics to provide the rationale for the problem.
  8. Once you get into the literature, you may find there is very little research to support your topic and you will have to start all over again. Remember, in order for this to be an evidence-based project, you must have enough evidence to introduce this as a practice change. If you find that you do not have enough supporting evidence to change a practice, then further research would need to be conducted.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Upon receiving feedback from the instructor, refine \\\”Section B: Problem Description\\\” for your final submission. This will be a continuous process throughout the course for each section.

What are the best practices of creating an informed consent?

/in /by

Nursing homework help
Clinical Trials

1. Introduction
2. Research the ethical and legal implications of clinical research in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
3. Understand international principles and guidelines which have to be followed when performing clinical trials
4. What aspects of clinical research design helps to protect the human subjects?
5. Name key principles of ethical considerations during clinical research and development
6. Discuss ethical concerns for designing, conducting and reporting the results obtained through the conduct of clinical trials
7. What are the best practices of creating an informed consent?
8. Create an informed consent and include all the components that you have found are necessary to protect the patient.
9. Conclusion
Write a paper 5 pages not including the title and references. (Explain each answer for a minimum of 100 words for question)
Use bullet points to 3-5 words for headings and include your discussion (100 word for each section) explaining your findings for each slide.
Your presentation should meet the following structural requirements:
· Provide support for your statements with in-text citations from a minimum of seven scholarly articles.
·
This is good introduction but need paraphrase
The implementation of clinical research projects requires conscientious review of research projects not only in terms of their scientific quality but also in regard to their ethical adequacy and appropriateness. How can we balance the risk-benefit of our projects? Given the importance of ethics for the conduct of drug development and research, it should come as no surprise that many different professional associations, government agencies, and universities have adopted specific codes, rules, and policies relating to research ethics. Each of these aspects will be carefully considered and discussed in the context of international and national principles and guidelines. These issues need to be carefully adhered to strengthen the health of the clinical trial enterprise to the benefit of patients and the overall health of the public.
References
· Kwan, C., & Walsh, C. A. (2018). Ethical issues in conducting community-based participatory research: A narrative review of the literature. The Qualitative Report, 23(2), 369-386.
· Lin, K. (2016). Integrating ethical guidelines and situated ethics for researching social-media-based interactions: Lessons from a virtual ethnographic case study with Chinese youth. Journal of Information Ethics, 25(1), 114-131,150.
· Powell, M. A., Graham, A., & Truscott, J. (2016). Ethical research involving children: Facilitating reflexive engagement. Qualitative Research Journal, 16(2), 120-144.
· Bazarbashi, S., Hassan, A., Eldin, A. M., Soudy, H., & Hussain, F. (2015). Awareness and perceptions of clinical trials in cancer patients and their families in saudi arabia. Journal of Cancer Education, 30(4), 655-659. doi:10.1007/s13187-015-0797-0
· Jamjoom, A. B., Jamjoom, A. M., Samman, A. M., & Gahtani, A. Y. (2015). Fate of registered clinical trials performed in saudi arabia. Saudi Medical Journal, 36(10), 1245-1248. doi:10.15537/smj.2015.10.12506
· Almutairi, K. M., Alonazi, W. B., Alodhayani, A. A., Vinluan, J. M., Moussa, M., Al-Ajlan, A. S., . . . Alotaibi, N. E. (2017). Barriers to cancer clinical trial participation among saudi nationals: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Religion and Health, 56(2), 623-634. doi:10.1007/s10943-016-0306-8
· Al-Tannir, M. A., Katan, H. M., Al-Badr, A. H., Al-Tannir, M. M., & Abu-Shaheen, A. K. (2018). Knowledge, attitudes, practices and perceptions of clinicians towards conducting clinical trials in an academic tertiary care center. Saudi Medical Journal, 39(2), 191-196. doi:10.15537/smj.2018.2.21093
· Al-Tannir, M. A., El-Bakri, N., & Abu-Shaheen, A. K. (2016). Knowledge, attitudes and perceptions of saudis towards participating in clinical trials. PloS One, 11(2), e0143893. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0143893

Analyze and describe whether gender-bender missions still exist

/in /by

Contemporary Context of Gender

The feminist view of gender argues against biological determinism and the claim that gender is socially constructed. You have discussed the factors that influence the distinct masculine and feminine roles and gender typing. You will now have the opportunity to share your views and support them with research-based materials.
In this discussion, evaluate a case study and analyze your own gender development. Share factors and influences in your own personal development as well as new information gleaned from research. Demonstrate your grasp of relevant terms and theories by utilizing them in this assignment content.
In the preparation for the analysis paper, complete the following:

  • Evaluate the following case study from The Baby Boomer’s Handbook for Women.Case Study: Darlene’s StoryThese political times greatly impacted my life and personality. Boomer women were demanding equal rights as they discarded their girdles and garter belts and burned their bras. It was during this era when the civil rights legislation brought new opportunities for women. We were attending graduate school and working at well-paying careers. We had demonstrated the ability to juggle home, children, and careers.
    It was also during this time when many of us began our gender-bender missions. We were challenging the stereotypical image of the 1950s. I, myself, entered the military in the 1970s, which was during a time when women were not totally accepted, even though we played an important role in the Vietnam era. After the military, I entered law enforcement and again pushed the gender role stigma. At the time of my law enforcement career, there were only five women in a department of three hundred men. Later, the department grew to five hundred men and still had only seven women. As women boomers, we were accessing many nontraditional roles and employment opportunities that had previously been considered “male only.” There were also men entering the nursing field during this era. Unfortunately, they too were subjected to the same type of stereotypical comments. I would ask myself, “Why can’t men be receptionists, hairdressers, and nurses, or why can’t women work as construction crews?” (Eastman, 2008).
    Reference:
    Eastman, L. E. (2008). The baby boomer’s handbook for women (pp. 541–550). Prospect, KY: PWN Books.
  • In a 2- to 3-page analysis paper in a Microsoft Word document, address the following:
    • Compare the contemporary context and theories of gender, gender development, and gender identity with the case study viewpoint.
    • Analyze and describe whether gender-bender missions still exist. Identify the areas where you see that the lines of gender roles are being blurred or are no longer relevant.
    • Support your response with research references to gender theories.

Cite all sources using APA format on a separate page and ensure that the document is free of plagiarism.