environmental factors that can affect the health of infants.

To prepare for this assignment view the following brief video from the American Medical Association titled, “Health Literacy and Patient Safety: Help Patients Understand.” The video can be accessed th

To prepare for this assignment view the following brief video from the American Medical Association titled, “Health Literacy and Patient Safety: Help Patients Understand.” The video can be accessed through the following link:

Part I: Pamphlet

  1. Develop a pamphlet to inform parents and caregivers about environmental factors that can affect the health of infants.
  2. Use the “Pamphlet Template” document to help you create your pamphlet. Include the following:
  3. Select an environmental factor that poses a threat to the health or safety of infants.
  4. Explain how the environmental factor you selected can potentially affect the health or safety of infants.
  5. Offer recommendations on accident prevention and safety promotion as they relate to the selected environmental factor and the health or safety of infants.
  6. Offer examples, interventions, and suggestions from evidence-based research. A minimum of three scholarly resources are required.
  7. Provide readers with two community resources, a national resource, and a Web-based resource. Include a brief description and contact information for each resource.
  8. In developing your pamphlet, take into consideration the healthcare literacy level of your target audience.

Part II: Pamphlet Sharing Experience

  1. Share the pamphlet you have developed with a parent of an infant child. The parent may be a person from your neighborhood, a parent of an infant from a child-care center in your community, or a parent from another organization, such as a church group with which you have an affiliation.
  2. Provide a written summary of the teaching / learning interaction. Include in your summary:
  3. Demographical information of the parent and child (age, gender, ethnicity, educational level).
  4. Description of parent response to teaching.
  5. Assessment of parent understanding.
  6. Your impressions of the experience; what went well, what can be improved.

Submit Part I and Part II of the Accident Prevention and Safety Promotion for Parents and Caregivers of Infants assignment by the end of Topic 1.
While APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

How will descriptive statistics assist you in evaluating your outcome?

DNP Project – Final Phase – Weekly discussion Week 2 – Data Analysis (graded)The discussion for this week is focused on data analysis. Describe your plans for data analysis. How will descriptive

DNP Project – Final Phase – Weekly discussion
Week 2 – Data Analysis (graded)
The discussion for this week is focused on data analysis. Describe your plans for data analysis. How will descriptive statistics assist you in evaluating your outcome? Does your question require looking at the difference between two (or more) groups? What statistical test will you use which is consistent with your question and the type of data produced by your evaluation method/tool?
Week 4 – Dissemination (graded)
The discussion for this week is focused on your final plans for dissemination. You have considered this issue when you developed your project proposal but your plans have likely changed. Describe your plan for sharing the results of your project with the stakeholders at your practicum/project setting. Also, describe plans for conference poster or podium presentation and publication. Do you have a specific regional or national conference in mind? Which journal are you considering for submission of your manuscript? Which of these will be most crucial for you to focus on to assure dissemination of your DNP Project results?
Week 5 – Sustainability (graded)
The discussion for this week is focused on sustainability. Will the change that you initiated for your DNP Project be sustained, modified, or discontinued? How is that being determined? What plans have you made for your exit? Will you continue work related to your practice problem? What are your next steps?
Week 6 – Portfolio (graded)
The discussion for this week is focused on the experience of developing a professional portfolio. How do you anticipate using your professional portfolio? As you reflected on your career while developing your professional portfolio, you likely reviewed your strengths and opportunities for growth. Please share anything you are comfortable with as a result of that self-evaluation. Also, share your long-term career goals and your plan for achieving those goals.
Week 7 – Transformation (Required, not graded)
The discussion for this week is focused on your transformation. As you complete your DNP Project final paper and presentation, and your portfolio, share with your instructor and your peers how you have been transformed through your entire DNP program experience.

Explain the level of privacy that would be required according to an IRB for participants in your Final Project research program intervention, and explain why

DUE 7/8 10 P,M EST2 PAGES APA NOT INCLUDING MIN 4 REFERENCESTOPIC: HIV/AIDS IN LOWER INCOME COMMUNITIESAssignment: Final Project: Stage III—The Institutional Review Board ProcessThe medical practice

DUE 7/8 10 P,M EST
2 PAGES APA NOT INCLUDING MIN 4 REFERENCES
TOPIC: HIV/AIDS IN LOWER INCOME COMMUNITIES
Assignment: Final Project: Stage III—The Institutional Review Board Process
The medical practice rule of “first do no harm” can be applied to health science research as “first do no harm to your study participants.” Harm in this instance means not only physical harm but also the emotional harm that might be caused by unethical research practices.
Despite such lofty ideals, until the 1960s and 1970s, many studies centered on the use of uninformed human subjects. According to Moon and Khin-Maung-Gyi, even after the Nuremberg trials exposed the Nazi war crimes and the Nuremberg Code provided a clear statement of standards for research on human subjects, unethical research programs continued to be designed and conducted (Moon & Khin-Maung-Gyi, 2009). Well-known examples of egregious unethical research in the United States include the Willowbrook study of hepatitis transmission in a hospital for “mentally impaired” children and the Jewish Chronic Disease Hospital case in which chronically ill patients were injected with cancer cells to monitor rejection. In each of these studies, investigators were confident that the ends of research justified the means (Walkup & Bock, 2009).
These and other studies led to the creation of the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research and its seminal Belmont Report, which cited three foundational principles of ethical research on humans: respect for persons, beneficence, and justice (Moon & Khin-Maung-Gyi, 2009). These studies also led to the development of Institutional Review Boards, or IRBs, which were designed to provide oversight on all government-funded research studies. IRBs are in wide use today.
To prepare
Review the Keiser Institutional Review (IRB) process and requirements described in the Keiser Center for Research Quality. Consider how these IRB processes and requirements for ethical practice might apply to your Final Project, which is a proposal for an intervention that addresses a health problem identified in a particular community and that is of interest to you. (H.I.V/AIDS In lower income communities)
Submit a 2-page paper in which you do the following: (ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS)
· Explain ethical issues related to your Final Project research program intervention.
· Explain whether these issues are actual or potential and provide a rationale for your answer.
· Explain the level of privacy that would be required according to an IRB for participants in your Final Project research program intervention, and explain why.

Evaluate the effectiveness of the modern systems in monitoring the disease

DUE 7/8 10 P.M EST  2 PAGES MOT INCLUDING MIN 3 REFERENCESScholar-Practitioner Project: Surveillance System ComparisonTITLE HIV/AIDSScholar-Practitioner Project: Surveillance System ComparisonThis se

DUE 7/8 10 P.M EST
2 PAGES MOT INCLUDING MIN 3 REFERENCES
Scholar-Practitioner Project: Surveillance System Comparison
TITLE HIV/AIDS
Scholar-Practitioner Project: Surveillance System Comparison
This section of your Scholar-Practitioner Project prompts you to explore modern surveillance systems applied at different levels of government related to the disease you selected (HIV/AIDS). In addition, you describe the government’s responsibility to monitor and report at the four political levels. By understanding the reporting requirements of government, you are able to design your surveillance system to meet those requirements.
(ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS)
To complete this portion of your Scholar-Practitioner Project, write a 2-PAGE paper that addresses the following:
· Identify modern surveillance systems implemented at the local, state, regional, and national levels related to the disease you selected.
· Evaluate the effectiveness of the modern systems in monitoring the disease you selected.
· Analyze the government’s responsibilities for monitoring the disease/condition you selected at the different political levels (local, state, regional, and national). Include an explanation of how the reporting requirements differ at each level.
· Suggest how you would apply any lessons learned in this exercise to the system you are constructing.
Your written assignments must follow APA guidelines. Be sure to support your work with specific citations from this week’s Learning Resources and additional scholarly sources as appropriate. Refer to the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association to ensure your in-text citations and reference list are correct.