|
Assignment Criteria
|
A
Outstanding or Highest Level of Performance
|
B
Very Good or High Level of Performance
|
C
Competent or Satisfactory Level of Performance
|
F
Poor or Failing or Unsatisfactory Level of Performance
|
| Demographics
5 points
|
Initials, job title, & date of interview are provided.
5 points
|
Initials, job title, or date of interview is missing.
4 points
|
Name is provided instead of initials. Job title or date of interview is missing.
3 points
|
Name is provided but no job title or date of interview.
0–2 points
|
| Required Question #1(Career Path)
30 points
|
Clearly describes career path including education and experiences.
28–30 points
|
Describes career path but, education OR experiences are not provided.
25–27 points
|
Describes career path but does not include experiences and educational background.
23–24 points
|
Briefly describes career path.
0–22 points
|
| Required Question #2(Value of Evidence)
30 points
|
Clearly states value of best practice as a driving force.
28–30 points
|
States value of best practice as a driving force but may have omitted key elements.
25–27 points
|
Briefly describes value of best practice as a driving force.
23–24 points
|
Does not discuss value of best evidence.
0–22 points
|
| Required Question #3(Support Tools)
30 points
|
Clearly describes safeguards and decision-making support tools that support safe practices.
28–30 points
|
Describes safeguards and decision-making support tools that support safe practices but may have omitted key elements.
25–27 points
|
Briefly describes safeguards and decision-making support tools that support safe practice.
23–24 points
|
Does not describe safeguards and decision-making support tools that support safe practice.
0–22 points
|
| Required Question #4(Pt. Care Technologies)
30 points
|
Names or lists 4 or more technologies that improve patient care.
28–30 points
|
Names or lists 3 technologies that improve patient care.
25–27 points
|
Names or lists 2 technologies that improve patient care.
23–24 points
|
Names or lists 0–1 technology(ies) that improve(s) patient care.
0–22 points
|
| Required Question #5(Groups & Utilization)
30 points
|
Names or lists 3 or more groups that rely on information/data AND describes how information is utilized.
28–30 points
|
Names or lists 1–2 groups that rely on information/data AND briefly describes how information is utilized.
25–27 points
|
Names or lists groups but does not describe how information is utilized.
23–24 points
|
Does not name or list groups and does not describe how information is utilized.
0–22 points
|
| Optional Question
30 points
|
Clearly indicates WHICH optional question was asked. Clearly describes answer to optional question.
28–30 points
|
Does not indicate WHICH optional question was asked. Briefly provides answer to optional question.
25–27 points
|
Indicates WHICH question was asked but does not provide answer.
23–24 points
|
Does not include optional question or answer.
0–22 points
|
| Follow-Up Question #1(Practice Impact)
30 points
|
Clearly summarizes what was learned from interaction with interviewee answers. Clearly describes how personal nursing practice will change as a result of learning about roles and responsibilities of interviewee.
28–30 points
|
Briefly summarizes what was learned from interaction with interviewee answers.Briefly describes how personal nursing practice will change.
25–27 points
|
Includes summary OR describes how personal nursing practice will change. Does not include both.
23–24 points
|
Fails to summarize what was learned AND fails to describe how personal nursing practice will change.
0–22 points
|
| Follow-Up Question #2(Scholarly Resources Utilized)
30 points
|
Specifically names two scholarly resources reviewed PRIOR to interview.Clearly states how EACH resource helped prepare for interview.
28–30 points
|
Specifically names twoscholarlyresources reviewed PRIOR to interview.Briefly states how EACH resource helped prepare for interview.
25–27 points
|
Specifically names only one scholarlyresource reviewed PRIOR to interview.Briefly states how resource helped prepare for interview.
23–24 points
|
Names scholarlyresources but does not indicate how resources helped prepare for interview.OR
Fails to indicate resources.
0–22 points
|
| Scholarly Writing
5 points
|
Name of student and date of interview appears on Interview Form. Punctuation and sentence structure are correct. Evidence of spell and grammar check.
5 points
|
Name of student and date of interview appears on Interview Form.Minimal punctuation, sentence structure errors noted.
No indications of grammar or spelling errors (wavy lines) noted.
4 points
|
Name of student or date of interview is missing.Several punctuation, sentence structure errors noted.
Several indications of grammar or spelling errors (wavy lines) noted.
3 points
|
Name of student or date of interview is missing.Multiple punctuation or sentence structure errors noted.
Spellcheck “errors” not corrected prior to submission of assignment.
0–2 points
|
|
|
Total Points Possible = _____/250
|
