“What Should Psychologists Do about Psychoanalysis?

DESCRIBE THE PROCESSING AND PSYCHODYNAMIC THEORIES OF PERSONALITY.

Weekly Discussion 2
Analyzing Psychoanalysis
After you have read the assigned reading for this week (Chapter 2 in Lecci & Magnavita and “What Should Psychologists Do about Psychoanalysis?”), do you agree or disagree with Murray’s analysis?
If you could discuss the article with him, what questions would you ask and why?
Post should be at least 300 words.
Weekly
Week 3 Introduction
Introduction
Learning Outcomes
Overview
Resources
Self Checks
Introduction
This week students will focus on the concepts of understanding the human being as their own personal processor. In addition, we will discuss Freud’s theory of psychoanalysis. Students are expected to read Chapters 2 and 6 in the Lecci & Magnavita text, complete the discussion questions, and complete the written assignment. The text will focus on the various concepts such as the person as a processor. These concepts will include, but are not limited to, a complete overview of Freud’s theory of psychoanalysis and the theories of Pinker, Mischel and Bandura. Students will also be reading the Schustack & Friedman text to explore the concept of explanatory style and the debate over what psychoanalysis is or should be.
Learning Outcomes
Describe the processing and psychodynamic theories of personality. (Aligns with CLOs 1, 3)
Analyze the applicability of these theories to the current profession of psychology. (Aligns with CLOs 2)
Overview
AssignmentDue DateFormatPoint ValuePerson as a ProcessorDay 3 (1st post)Discussion Forum2Analyzing PsychoanalysisDay 3 (1st post)Discussion Forum3Explanation in Personality TheoryDay 7Written Assignment10
Resources
Required Resources
Lecci, L.B. & Magnavita, J.J. (2013). Personality Theories: A Scientific Approach. San Diego: Bridgepoint Education, Inc.
Chapter 2: Psychoanalytic and Neo-Analytic Theories of Personality
Chapter 4: Neurobiological Models of Personality (review)
Chapter 6: Cognitive and Cognitive-Behavioral Approaches to Personality
Freud on Freud – YouTube clip: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sj2JFI4BsRQ (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
Murray, H.A. (1940). What should psychologists do about psychoanalysis? First published in Journal of Abnormal Psychology, Retrieved from EBSCO Host PsycARTICLES
Peterson, C. (2010). Good Hope and Bad Hope. The Good Life, July 24, 2010, Retrieved from http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-good-life/201007/good-hope-and-bad-hope (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
Peterson, C. (2011). There are no accidents. The Good Life, August 8, 2011, Retrieved from http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-good-life/201108/there-are-no-accidents (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

Was it ethical to do the prison study in the way that Zimbardo conducted it?  Why or why not?  

BEFORE RESPONDING TO THE QUESTIONS BELOW, CLICK ON THE “LESSONS” LINK ON THE LEF

Before responding to the questions below, click on the “Lessons” link on the left and complete the Week 7: Topic 1 – Social Psychology lesson. After completing the lesson, return to the forum here, click the “Post New Conversation” link at the top Week 7 Forum screen, and respond to the following questions.
One of the most famous psychological experiments of all time, was conducted by Dr. Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University. To read more of the details of this experiment, visit http://www.prisonexp.org. Take some time to watch the video on the Zimbardo Prison Experiment by clicking here. After reading about the experiment, exploring the website and watching the video, answer the following:
1. Was it ethical to do the prison study in the way that Zimbardo conducted it?  Why or why not?  Explain your position substantively.
2. What social psychological constructs did the study reveal? Would the same information have been learned if the study had been conducted differently? If yes, how might you adapt the study to address ethical concerns and still obtain results relevant to our understanding of behavior in social settings?
3. How do the social psychology concepts of conformity and the power of the social situation that we are studying this week relate to what happened during the brief period of time that the prison study ran.  Where in the description of how the study unfolded did we see evidence of these concepts?

Submit summaries on two more articles on your topic, using the questions outlined previously (Week 2)

  ASSIGNMENT SUBMIT SUMMARIES ON TWO MORE ARTICLES ON YOUR TOPIC, USING THE QUE

Assignment
Submit summaries on two more articles on your topic, using the questions outlined previously (Week 2)
Click the Submit Assignment button below to upload your assignment to Turnitin
This assignment is worth 30 points
Plagiarism
Three common types of plagiarism you need to be aware of as a student:
Recycling a paper; “double-dipping”; self-plagiarism: Reusing a paper you have written for a previous course
Copying directly from a source without proper quotations or paraphrasing: When you try to pass something off as your own work
Not using proper citations
topic to focus on the impact of bullying behaviors on children both as bullies and victims/Questions to be answered in Summary
· Was the study correlational, experimental, or some combination of both?
· How do you know?
· Was it done in the laboratory or the field?
· What conclusions can be drawn from the study?
· What conclusions cannot be drawn from the study?
· What are some strengths and limitations of the research design?
· Name two areas for future research based on the article (either those listed in the paper or your own ideas)
References to be summarized
Dake, J. A., Price, J. H., & Telljohann, S. K. (2003). The nature and extent of bullying at school. The Journal of School Health, 73(5), 173-80.
Juvonen, J., & Graham, S. (2014). Bullying in schools: The power of bullies and the plight of victims. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 159.

Explain how scholarly research findings support the course of action for treatment recommended by the forensic psychologist in the selected case study.

 

EXPLAIN HOW SCHOLARLY RESEARCH FINDINGS SUPPORT ONES THINKING ON THE COURSE OF ACTION FOR TREATMENT RECOMMENDED BY FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGIST.

Juvenile Case Studies – Treatment and Ethics
Overview
This assignment supports this unit’s readings and discussions on ethical standards and principles for juvenile offenders. You will select one of two case studies focused on the ethical concerns and treatment of juveniles to complete this assignment.
By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies:
Describe the field of forensic psychology.
Explain a course of action for treatment that may be recommended by a forensic psychologist in the selected case study.
Apply psychological principles to topics in forensic psychology.
Apply psychological principles and concepts to the selected case study.
Apply scholarly research findings to topics in forensic psychology.
Explain how scholarly research findings support the course of action for treatment recommended by the forensic psychologist in the selected case study.
Apply psychological and legal ethics in the field of forensic psychology.
Explain the ethical issues faced by the forensic psychologist in the selected case study.
Apply ethical principles and standards to address the ethical concerns in the selected case study.
Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for professionals in the field of psychology.
Write coherently to support a central idea with correct grammar, usage, and mechanics as expected of a psychology professional.
Use APA style and formatting.
Assignment Instructions
For this assignment, review the Juvenile Case Studies – Treatment and Ethics media piece. Choose oneof the case studies, either Kyle or Jessica, to use for your assignment. Describe acts of the case in your own words as needed to complete the paper. (Please do not copy and paste the case study into your paper). You may also want to review Table 2.2 Comparison of the Three Current Major Denitions of Mental Retardation on page 81 of your Introduction to Forensic Psychology text, which provides an overview of mental IQ.
Write a paper in which you respond to the following:
Applying relevant psychology principles and concepts, explain a course of action for treatment that may be recommend in court. For example, should the forensic psychologist recommend that the individual remain in jail and be charged as an adult, be adjudicated as a juvenile and receive inpatient treatment at a secure facility, or be adjudicated as a juvenile and receive outpatient treatment?
Explain how scholarly research findings support your thinking on the course of action for treatment recommended by the forensic psychologist.
Consider the ethics of the case study in general, and consider the ethical concerns for the forensic psychologist in the case. Due to the age of the client, explain the ethical issues faced by the forensic psychologist.
Apply ethical principles and standards to address the ethical concerns in the selected case study.
Write coherently to support a central idea with correct grammar, usage, and mechanics as expected of a psychology professional.
Use APA style and formatting.
Submission Requirements
Written communication: Written communication is in professional style with correct grammar, usage, and mechanics.
Resources: Support your recommendations with information from professional sources, including your textbook and the APA Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. Use a minimum of 4 sources (at least two professional and at least two scholarly).
APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to APA style and formatting.
Length: 4–5 double-spaced, typed pages.
Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.