Conditions of the Cardiovascular System Essay Assignment Papers

Conditions of the Cardiovascular System Essay Assignment Papers

Jeff Cole was hospitalized at age 60 for cardiomyopathy with congestive heart failure. As a result of a timely evaluation and diagnosis, Cole had a more positive health outcome than the majority of other patients with his condition. By working closely with Cole to develop a personalized treatment plan, his health care provider was also able to improve his long-term prognosis (St. Anthony’s Medical Center, 2014).

After the initial recovery, patients like Cole often struggle to adhere to treatment plans. However, by collaborating with patients and developing regimes that consider their lifestyle needs, you can help improve health outcomes for patients with cardiovascular conditions.
ORDER A CUSTOM-WRITTEN PAPER NOW
This week, as you explore the etiology and clinical presentations of cardiovascular conditions in acute care settings, you will examine strategies for assessing, diagnosing, and treating patients with cardiovascular conditions.

Learning Objectives

By the end of this week, students will:
  • Evaluate patients with cardiovascular conditions
  • Develop differential diagnoses for patients with cardiovascular conditions
  • Develop treatment plans for patients with cardiovascular conditions

Photo Credit: thelinke/E+/Getty Images


Learning Resources

Required Readings

Colyar, M. R. (2015). Advanced practice nursing procedures. Philadelphia, PA: F.A. Davis Company.
 

  • Section 6, “Cardiovascular Procedures”
    • Chapter 89, “Doppler Technique”
    • Chapter 90, “Electrocardiogram (ECG) Interpretation”
    • Chapter 91, “Electrocardiogram (ECG) Lead Placement”
    • Chapter 92, “Holter Monitor Application: Continuous 24-Hour Ambulatory Cardiac Monitoring”
    • Chapter 93, “Stress Testing”
    • Chapter 96, “Blood Culture Specimen Collection”
    • Chapter 97, “Capillary Blood Collection: Heel/Finger Stick”
    • Chapter 99, Defibrillation: Unna’s Boot Application”
    • Chapter 100, “Venipuncture”

Papadakis, M. A., McPhee, S. J., & Rabow, M. W. (2018). Current medical diagnosis & treatment (57th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
 

  • Chapter 10, “Heart Disease” (pp. 328-446)
  • Chapter 11, “Systemic Hypertension” (pp. 447-478)
  • Chapter 12, “Blood Vessel & Lymphatic Disorders” (pp. 479-506)
  • Chapter 28, “Lipid Disorders” (pp. 1269-1277)

Weber, E. C., Vilensky, J. A., & Fog, A. M. (2013). Practical radiology: A symptom-based approach. Philadelphia, PA: F.A. Davis Company.
 

  • Chapter 6, “Chest” (pp. 125–149)

American Heart Association. (2013). Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Retrieved from http://www.heart.org/HEARTORG/Conditions/More/Cardiomyopathy/Hypertrophic-Cardiomyopathy_UCM_444317_Article.jsp

Duvvuir, P., & Moghekar, A. (2014). Bedside applications of ultrasound. Retrieved from http://www.clevelandclinicmeded.com/medicalpubs/diseasemanagement/pulmonary/bedside-applications-of-ultrasound/

SkillStat Learning Inc. (2014). The 6 second ECG. Retrieved from http://www.skillstat.com/tools/ecg-simulator#/-home. Conditions of the Cardiovascular System Essay Assignment Papers

University of Virginia. (2013g). Interpretation of the ICU chest radiograph. Retrieved from http://www.med-ed.virginia.edu/courses/rad/chest/index.html

University of Virginia. (2013j). Introduction to conventional cardiac radiography. Retrieved from http://www.med-ed.virginia.edu/courses/rad/cardiacplain/

Required Media

i-Human Patient Cases. (2014). Retrieved from https://ih2.i-human.com/users/sign_in

Optional Resources

Dubin, D. (2000). Personal quick reference sheets. In Rapid interpretation of EKG’s (pp. 333–346). Tampa, FL: Cover Publishing Co. Retrieved from http://tmedweb.tulane.edu/portal/files/open-access/clinical-diagnosis/ekg_reference_sheets.pdf

Godara, H., Hirbe, A., Nassif, M., Otepka, H., & Rosenstock, A. (2014). The Washington manual of medical therapeutics (34th ed.). Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Sullivan, D. D. (2012). Guide to clinical documentation (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: F.A. Davis.

Yale University. (1999a). Atlas of echocardiography: Coronal section through chest.

Yale University. (1999b). Atlas of echocardiography: Left parasternal long axis view.

Yale University. (1999c). Atlas of echocardiography: Normal function.

Yale University. (1999d). Atlas of echocardiography: Radiography of the heart.

Cardiovascular conditions are among the leading causes of hospitalization, and they are of particular importance because they often require immediate medical responses. This makes it essential that you not only be able to identify quickly signs and symptoms of these conditions but also be fluent in current evidence-based treatment guidelines. For this Assignment, as you examine this week’s i-Human patient case study, consider how you might evaluate and treat patients who present with cardiovascular conditions. Conditions of the Cardiovascular System Essay Assignment Papers
To prepare:

  • Review this week’s Learning Resources. Consider how to assess, diagnose, and treat conditions of the cardiovascular system.
  • Review this week’s i-Human case study. Based on the patient information provided, think about the health history you would need to collect from each patient
  • Consider what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be appropriate to help you gather more information about the patient’s condition. Reflect on how the results would be used to make a diagnosis.
  • Identify three to five possible conditions to consider in a differential diagnosis for the patient.
  • Consider the patient’s diagnosis. Think about clinical guidelines that might support this diagnosis.
  • Reflect on a treatment plan for the patient that includes health promotion and patient education strategies.

To complete:
As you interact with this week’s i-Human patient, complete the assigned case study. For guidance on using i-Human, refer to the i-Human Patients Case Player Student Manual in the Week 1 Learning Resources.

By Day 7

This Assignment is due.

Submission and Grading Information

Week 4 Assignment Rubric


Practicum Reminder: Week 4 Time Log

Time Logs

You are required to keep a log of the time you spend related to your practicum experience and enter every patient you see each day. You can access your time log from the Welcome Page in your Meditrek account. You will track time individually for each patient you work with. Please make sure to continuously input your hours throughout the term.
Conditions of the Cardiovascular System Essay Assignment Papers

Assessment and Care of Patients With Conditions of the Head, Neck, Esophagus, and Diaphragm

Assessment and Care of Patients With Conditions of the Head, Neck, Esophagus, and Diaphragm

Health conditions involving the head, neck, esophagus, and diaphragm can disrupt patients’ daily lives, making surgical interventions necessary. Consider Janice Savage-Martin, who frequently experienced impaired breathing, congestion, and headaches. These symptoms and the pain associated with them put a strain on her normal routine and ability to work. After being diagnosed with turbinates and a deviated septum, providers recommended surgery to shrink the blood vessels in the turbinates. Like many surgical patients, however, Janice was concerned that her recovery would be painful and might lead to further health complications (Methodist Health System, 2015). As an advanced practice nurse who cares for surgical patients like Janice, you will play significant role in educating patients, easing concerns, and providing evidence-based care. Assessment and Care of Patients With Conditions of the Head, Neck, Esophagus, and Diaphragm

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW
This week, as you explore the pre- and post-operative care of patients with conditions related to the head, neck, esophagus, and diaphragm, you examine strategies for assessment, diagnosis, and treatment.

Learning Objectives

By the end of this week, students will:
  • Evaluate medical and surgical patients with conditions related to the head, neck, esophagus, and diaphragm
  • Develop differential diagnoses for medical and surgical patients with conditions related to the head, neck, esophagus, and diaphragm
  • Develop treatment plans for medical and surgical patients with conditions related to the head, neck, esophagus, and diaphragm

Photo Credit: Mario Gh/EyeEm/EyeEm/Getty Images


Learning Resources

Required Readings

Colyar, M. R. (2015). Advanced practice nursing procedures (1st ed.). Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis Company.
 

  • Chapter 69, “Occipital Nerve Block”
  • Chapter 72, “Corneal Abrasion and Foreign Body Removal—Eye”
  • Chapter 73, “Eye Drop Insertion”
  • Chapter 74, “Eye Irrigation”
  • Chapter 75, “Eye Trauma Stabilization”
  • Chapter 78, “Auricular Hematoma Evacuation”
  • Chapter 81, “Epistaxis Control”
  • Chapter 82, “Laryngoscopy”
  • Chapter 83, “Nasal Lavage”
  • Chapter 84, “Removal of Foreign Body—Ear and Nose”
  • Chapter 85, “Frenotomy for Ankyloglossia”
  • Chapter 86, “Lip Laceration Repair”
  • Chapter 87, “Tongue Laceration Repair”

Doherty, G. M. (2015). Current diagnosis and treatment: Surgery (14th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
 

  • Chapter 15, “Otolaryngology—Head & Neck Surgery”
  • Chapter 16, “Thyroid and Parathyroid”
  • Chapter 20, “Esophagus & Diaphragm”
  • Chapter 37, “The Eye & Ocular Adenxa”

Weber, E. C., Vilensky, J. A., & Fog, A. M. (2013). Practical radiology: A symptom-based approach. Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis Company.
 

  • Chapter 5, “EENT Imaging”

Javan, R., Machin, J. E., McGinnis, R. S., Moinuddin, M., & Sarti, M. (2013). Thyroid ultrasound top 10 pathology. Retrieved from http://www.med-ed.virginia.edu/courses/rad/Thyroid_Ultrasound/index.html, Assessment and Care of Patients With Conditions of the Head, Neck, Esophagus, and Diaphragm

Wipperman, J. L., & Dorsch, J. N. (2013). Evaluation and management of corneal abrasions. American Family Physician, 87(2), 114–120. Retrieved from http://www.aafp.org/afp/2013/0115/p114.html

Required Media

i-Human Patient Cases. (2014). Retrieved from https://ih2.i-human.com/users/sign_in

Seger, D. (2010). EGD (upper endoscopy) [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZvudWuvMjtA

There are many common health conditions associated with the head, neck, esophagus, and diaphragm. Although these conditions and their related symptoms usually are managed easily, a delay in treatment can result in sensory debility such as hearing loss or sight loss. For this Assignment, as you examine this week’s i-Human patient case study, consider how you might evaluate and treat pre- and post-operative patients who present with health conditions related to the head, neck, esophagus, and diaphragm.
To prepare:

  • Review this week’s Learning Resources. With the head, neck, esophagus, and diaphragm in mind, consider how to assess, diagnose, and treat patients in pre- and post-operative care.
  • Review this week’s i-Human case study. Based on the patient information provided, think about the health history you would need to collect from the patient.
  • Consider what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be appropriate to gather more information about the patient’s condition. Reflect on how the results would be used to make a diagnosis.
  • Identify three to five possible conditions to consider in a differential diagnosis for the patient.
  • Consider the patient’s diagnosis. Think about clinical guidelines that might support this diagnosis.
  • Develop a treatment plan for the patient that includes health promotion and patient education strategies for medical and surgical patients with conditions related to the head, neck, esophagus, and diaphragm.

To complete:
As you interact with this week’s i-Human patient, complete the assigned case study. For guidance on using i-Human, refer to the i-Human Patients Case Player Student Manual in the Week 2 Learning Resources.

By Day 7

This Assignment is due.

Grading Information

Week 3 i-Human Rubric


Assignment 2: Fitzgerald Health Education Associates (FHEA) AGPCNP 150 University Exit Comprehensive Exam

The Fitzgerald Health Education Associates (FHEA) AGACNP 150 University Exit Comprehensive Exam is a learning activity used to guide your preparation for your national certification exams. The results of the exam will help you understand how well prepared you are for your national certification exams and the areas in which you need to further prepare.
In Weeks 1 or 2 of this course, you should have received an email from Fitzgerald Health Education Associates (FHEA) explaining how to access the Fitzgerald Health Education Associates (FHEA) AGACNP 150 University Exit Comprehensive Exam. Please follow the directions FHEA provided and complete the exam. Assessment and Care of Patients With Conditions of the Head, Neck, Esophagus, and Diaphragm
This exam is graded on a S/U basis. You must complete the exam by Day 7 of Week 3 to receive the grade of ‘S’.

By Day 7

Complete the Fitzgerald Health Education Associates (FHEA) AGACNP 150 University Exit Comprehensive Exam.


Week in Review

This week you evaluated medical and surgical patients with head, neck, esophagus and diaphragm conditions/injuries with the realization that delays in treatment could result in hearing or sight loss, and developed differential diagnoses and treatment plans for these conditions.
Next week you will study the pre- and post-operative care of patients with cardiovascular conditions and examine strategies for assessment, diagnosis, and treatment.
Assessment and Care of Patients With Conditions of the Head, Neck, Esophagus, and Diaphragm

Assessment and Care of Patients With Adrenal and Urogynecologic Conditions Essay Assignment Papers

Assessment and Care of Patients With Adrenal and Urogynecologic Conditions Essay Assignment Papers

Week 9: Assessment and Care of Patients With Adrenal and Urogynecologic Conditions

From severe abdominal pain to urinary frequency, urinary incontinence, sexual health issues, and the overproduction of hormones, adrenal and urogynecologic symptoms often cause frustration and embarrassment for patients. These feelings might cause patients to hold back information, making assessment and diagnosis of adrenal and urogynecologic conditions challenging. Because patients may require surgery to minimize the impact of these conditions on their daily lives, it is essential that you establish trust with patients and carefully ask questions to quantify complaints appropriately.

This week, as you examine the pre- and post-operative care of patients with adrenals and urogynecology conditions, you explore strategies for assessment, diagnosis, and treatment.
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

Learning Objectives

By the end of this week, students will:
  • Evaluate medical and surgical patients with adrenal and urogynecologic conditions
  • Develop differential diagnoses for medical and surgical patients with adrenal and urogynecologic conditions
  • Develop treatment plans for medical and surgical patients with adrenal and urogynecologic conditions

Photo Credit: Andrew Brookes/Cultura/Getty Images. Assessment and Care of Patients With Adrenal and Urogynecologic Conditions Essay Assignment Papers

 Learning Resources

Required Readings

Colyar, M. R. (2015). Advanced practice nursing procedures (1st ed.). Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis Company.

  • Chapter 42, “Breast Biopsy (Fine Needle Aspiration)”
  • Chapter 44, “Colposcopy (Endocervical Curettage and Cervical Biopsy)”
  • Chapter 45, “Endometrial Biopsy”
  • Chapter 49, “Bartholin Cyst Abscess (Incision and Drainage)”
  • Chapter 51, “Cervical Lesions—Cryotherapy”
  • Chapter 52, “Circumcision and Dorsal Penile Nerve Block”
  • Chapter 58, “Paracervical Nerve Block”
  • Chapter 61, “Vasectomy”

Doherty, G. M. (2015). Current diagnosis and treatment: Surgery (14th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

  • Chapter 17, “Breast Disorders”
  • Chapter 33, “Adrenals”
  • Chapter 38, “Urology”
  • Chapter 39, “Gynecology”

Weber, E. C., Vilensky, J. A., & Fog, A. M. (2013). Practical radiology: A symptom-based approach. Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis Company.
 

  • Chapter 7, “Breast”
  • Chapter 9, “Male and Female Urinary Tract and Male Genital Tract”
  • Chapter 10, “Female Pelvic Imaging”

American Cancer Society. (2014). American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer. Retrieved from http://www.cancer.org/healthy/findcancerearly/cancerscreeningguidelines/american-cancer-society-guidelines-for-the-early-detection-of-cancer. Assessment and Care of Patients With Adrenal and Urogynecologic Conditions Essay Assignment Papers

Required Media

i-Human Patient Cases. (2014). Retrieved from https://ih2.i-human.com/users/sign_in

Optional Resources

Massad, L. S., Einstein, M. H., Huh, W. K., Katki, H. A., Kinney, W. K., Schiffman, M. … Lawson, H. W. (2013). 2012 updated consensus guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors. Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease, 17(5), S1–S27.

Many genitourinary (GU) disorders such as kidney disease start developing during adolescence (Johns Hopkins Children’s Center, 2010). This early onset of disease makes it essential for you, as the advanced practice nurse caring for adolescent patients, to identify potential signs and symptoms. Although some adolescent GU disorders require long-term treatment and management, other disorders such as urinary tract infections are more common and frequently require only minor interventions. In your role with adolescent patients, you must evaluate symptoms and determine whether to treat patients or refer them for specialized care. For this Discussion, consider potential diagnoses, treatment, and/or referral options for the patients in the following 3 case studies. Assessment and Care of Patients With Adrenal and Urogynecologic Conditions Essay Assignment Papers

Case Study 1

Alicia is an 18-year-old female who is brought into urgent care by her mother. She is complaining of dizziness. She recently started to lift weights for softball season. She has been healthy up to this point. Vitals are: temp 101.9°F, HR 120, RR 24, BP 90/54. She has lower extremity edema and decreased skin turgor. She states that her shoulders, thighs, and lower back hurt. She is having trouble moving her arms and legs. She also complains of vague abdominal pain, with nausea and vomiting. Labs came back with CK 10,000, uric acid 40 mg/dl, WBC 14.3, BUN:creatinine ratio 6:1, K 5.8. Urinalysis shows a presence of myoglobin of more than 25. Assessment and Care of Patients With Adrenal and Urogynecologic Conditions Essay Assignment Papers

Case Study 2

Mark is a 15-year-old male with a complaint of acute left scrotal pain with nausea. The pain began approximately 6 hours ago as a dull ache and gradually has worsened such that he can no longer stand without doubling over. He is afebrile and in marked pain. Physical exam results are negative except for elevation of the left testicle, diffuse scrotal edema, and the presence of a blue dot sign. Assessment and Care of Patients With Adrenal and Urogynecologic Conditions Essay Assignment Papers

Case Study 3

Maya is a 16-year-old female who presents to the ER for urinary pain. She is a healthy adolescent with complaints of lower abdominal pain, low back pain, and burning with urination. She had a fever of 102°F at home. Physical examination results are normal. Routine urinalysis indicates 2+ proteinuria; specific gravity 1.020; negative for glucose, blood. Leukocytes are moderate and nitrites, moderate. Her blood pressure is normal, and she is at the 60th percentile for height and weight. Vitals are: temp 103.1°F, HR 116, RR 18, BP 100/58. P Ox is 98% (Johns Hopkins Children’s Center, 2010).
To prepare:

  • Review and select 1 of the 3 provided case studies. Analyze the patient information.
  • Consider a differential diagnosis for the patient in the case study you selected. Think about the most likely diagnosis for the patient.
  • Think about a treatment and management plan for the patient. Be sure to consider appropriate dosages for any recommended pharmacologic and/or nonpharmacologic treatments.
  • Consider strategies for educating patients and families on the treatment and management of the genitourinary disorder.

By Day 3

Post an explanation of the differential diagnosis for the patient in the case study you selected. Explain which is the most likely diagnosis for the patient and why. Include an explanation of unique characteristics of the disorder you identified as the primary diagnosis. Then, explain a treatment and management plan for the patient, including appropriate dosages for any recommended treatments. Finally, explain strategies for educating patients and families on the treatment and management of the genitourinary disorder. Assessment and Care of Patients With Adrenal and Urogynecologic Conditions Essay Assignment Papers
Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses.

By Day 6

Respond to at least two of your colleagues on 2 different days in both of the ways listed below. Respond to colleagues who selected different case studies from yours. Assessment and Care of Patients With Adrenal and Urogynecologic Conditions Essay Assignment Papers

  • Describe how culture might affect the diagnosis, management, and follow-up care of patients with the genitourinary disorders your colleagues discussed.
  • Based on your personal and/or professional experiences, expand on your colleagues’ postings by providing additional insights or different perspectives.​

Discussion Part II: Pharmacology

Read the following articles to enhance your knowledge of commonly prescribed medications:

Daley, B. (2015, February 23). Peritonitis and abdominal sepsis. Retrieved from http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/180234-overview

Shahedi, K., Chudasama, Y. N., Dea, S. K., & Cooperman, A. (2015, January 14). Diverticulitis treatment and management. Retrieved from http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/173388-treatment

Tobias, J. D., & Leder, M. (2011). Procedural sedation: A review of sedative agents, monitoring, and management of complications. Saudi Journal of Anasthesia, 5(4), 395–410. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3227310/

All of the following groups of medications are commonly prescribed in the acute care setting. Choose one of the topics below to discuss. If it is a medication group, select a specific drug within that group. (This is a good way for you to prepare for clinical practice, because you will get to know the drugs you will prescribe for patients.). Focus your discussion on the hospital or ICU setting and IV usage.

  • Sedation
    1. Diazepam
    2. Fentanyl
    3. Ketamine
    4. Lorazepam
    5. Midazolam
    6. Propofol
    7. Benzodiazepines
  • Nonsedation
    1. Chlorpromazine
    2. Peritonitis—what antibiotics are chosen for peritonitis?
    3. Nerve blocks—what drugs are used with nerve blocks?
    4. Diverticulitis—what drugs are used with diverticulitis?

Note: When sharing your initial post, select a topic that has not yet been discussed. If all topics have been discussed, then you may select that topic again, but select a different drug within the medication group. Assessment and Care of Patients With Adrenal and Urogynecologic Conditions Essay Assignment Papers

By Day 3

For this Discussion, address 1 of the following options:

Option 1

Post a description of a patient you have taken care of (inpatient as an RN, or as an NP student) who has been prescribed the medication you selected. Include the scenario, indication, dosing, complications, and outcome. Then explain whether or not you would have ordered the same drug and same dose.

Option 2

Conduct an evidence-based drug search on the drug you selected and post an explanation of any possible issues. Are there any drug interactions? Any black box warnings? To what type of patient would you prescribe this medication?

Option 3

Post an explanation of the properties of the drug you selected, including usages and dosing in the hospital or ICU. Describe a patient to whom you would prescribe this medication.

Note: To be considered as one of your required responses, your pharmacology rationale must include a supporting reference.

Note: For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the “Post to Discussion Question” link and then select “Create Thread” to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts, and you cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Submit! Assessment and Care of Patients With Adrenal and Urogynecologic Conditions Essay Assignment Papers

Submission and Grading Information

Grading Criteria

Week 9 Discussion Rubric

Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6

To participate in this Discussion:
Week 9 Discussion


Assignment: Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients – Adrenal and Urogynecologic Conditions

While some adrenal and urogynecologic conditions are specific to male or female patients, many are common among both. The presentations of these common conditions, however, can vary greatly depending on sex. Because such variations may lead to challenges in assessment and diagnosis, it is essential for you to have strong examination and diagnostic skills. For this Assignment, as you examine this week’s i-Human patient case study, consider how you might evaluate and treat pre- and post-operative patients who present with adrenal and urogynecologic conditions.
To prepare:

  • Review this week’s Learning Resources. With adrenal and urogynecologic conditions in mind, consider how to assess, diagnose, and treat patients in pre- and post-operative care.
  • Review this week’s i-Human case study. Based on the patient information provided, think about the health history you would need to collect from the patient.
  • Consider what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be appropriate to gather more information about the patient’s condition. Reflect on how the results would be used to make a diagnosis.
  • Identify three to five possible conditions to consider in a differential diagnosis for the patient.
  • Consider the patient’s diagnosis. Think about clinical guidelines that might support this diagnosis.
  • Develop a treatment plan for the patient that includes health promotion and patient education strategies for medical and surgical patients with adrenal and urogynecologic conditions. Assessment and Care of Patients With Adrenal and Urogynecologic Conditions Essay Assignment Papers

To complete:
As you interact with this week’s i-Human patient, complete the assigned case study. For guidance on using i-Human, refer to the i-Human Patients Case Player Student Manual in the Week 2 Learning Resources.
Assessment and Care of Patients With Adrenal and Urogynecologic Conditions Essay Assignment Papers

Outstanding Performance Excellent Performance Competent Performance Proficient Performance Room for Improvement
Main Posting:
Response to the discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
44 (44%) – 44 (44%)
Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s)
is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
supported by at least 3 current, credible sources
40 (40%) – 43 (43%)
Responds to the discussion question(s)
is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth
supported by at least 3 credible references
35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to most of the discussion question(s)
is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth
supported by at least 3 credible references
31 (31%) – 34 (34%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s)
one to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed
is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis
somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references
(0%) – 30 (30%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s)
lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria
lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis
does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
contains only 1 or no credible references
Main Posting:
Writing
(6%) – 6 (6%)
Written clearly and concisely
Contains no grammatical or spelling errors
Fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)
Written clearly and concisely
May contain one or no grammatical or spelling error
Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
(5%) – 5 (5%)
Written concisely
May contain one to two grammatical or spelling error
Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)
Written somewhat concisely
May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors
Contains some APA formatting errors
(0%) – 4 (4%)
Not written clearly or concisely
Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors
Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style
Main Posting:
Timely and full participation
10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Meets requirements for timely and full participation
posts main discussion by due date
(0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
(0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
(0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
(0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirement for full participation
First Response:Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.
(9%) – 9 (9%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings
responds to questions posed by faculty
the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives
8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings
7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)
Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting
6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)
Response is on topic, may have some depth
(0%) – 6 (6%)
Response may not be on topic, lacks depth
First Response:
Writing
(6%) – 6 (6%)
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues
Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources
Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English
5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues
Response to faculty questions are answered if posed
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources
Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English
(5%) – 5 (5%)
Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues
Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed
Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources
Response is written in Standard Edited English
4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication
Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed
Few or no credible sources are cited
(0%) – 4 (4%)
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective
Response to faculty questions are missing
No credible sources are cited
First Response:
Timely and full participation
(5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for timely and full participation
posts by due date
(0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
(0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
(0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
(0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirement for full participation. Assessment and Care of Patients With Adrenal and Urogynecologic Conditions Essay Assignment Papers
Second Response:
Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.
(9%) – 9 (9%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings * responds to questions posed by faculty
the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives
8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings
7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)
Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting
6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)
Response is on topic, may have some depth. Assessment and Care of Patients With Adrenal and Urogynecologic Conditions Essay Assignment Papers
(0%) – 6 (6%)
Response may not be on topic, lacks depth
Second Response:
Writing
(6%) – 6 (6%)
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues
Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources
Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English
5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues
Response to faculty questions are answered if posed
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources
Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English
(5%) – 5 (5%)
Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues
Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed
Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources
Response is written in Standard Edited English
4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication
Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed
Few or no credible sources are cited
(0%) – 4 (4%)
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective
Response to faculty questions are missing
No credible sources are cited
Second Response:
Timely and full participation
(5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for timely and full participation
Posts by due date
(0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
(0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
(0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
(0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirement for full participation

Assessment and Care of Patients With Adrenal and Urogynecologic Conditions Essay Assignment Papers

 

Novice Emerging Proficient
HPI Statement
(0%) – 5 (5%)
Poorly written HPI statement. Incomplete ideas and sentences. Lacks basic history taking skills
(6%) – 10 (10%)
Well written HPI statement but may be missing 1-2 key components from the history
11 (11%) – 15 (15%)
Clearly written HPI statement with comprehensive information gathering from case questions.
Objective testing and physical exam
(0%) – 5 (5%)
Poorly written physical examination. May be missing 3 or more key exam findings that are critical to patient’s diagnosis. Includes 3 or more inappropriate exams or tests.
(6%) – 10 (10%)
Well written physical examination but may be missing 1-2 key exam findings critical to patient’s diagnosis. May include 1-2 unnecessary exams or tests.
11 (11%) – 15 (15%)
Clearly written physical examination covering all critical components of a focus exam. Tests that are ordered are appropriate for patient and cost effective.
Assessment
(0%) – 10 (10%)
Differential diagnosis list too brief and inconclusive. May be missing 3 or more critical components. Priority list may be out of order. Primary diagnosis may be wrong.
11 (11%) – 19 (19%)
Well written differential diagnoses. May be missing 1-2 critical components. Correct primary diagnosis identified.
20 (20%) – 25 (25%)
Clearly written differential diagnoses. Primary diagnosis identified.
Plan for patient
(0%) – 15 (15%)
Poorly written plan. May be missing 3 or more key issues that are critical to patient’s diagnosis.
16 (16%) – 25 (25%)
Well written plan but may be missing 1-2 key issues critical to patient’s diagnosis.
26 (26%) – 30 (30%)
Clearly written plan covering all critical components for patient’s final diagnosis.
Clinical Questions
(0%) – 10 (10%)
Correctly answered 0-69% of the clinical question
11 (11%) – 13 (13%)
Correctly answered 70-89% of the clinical question
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Correctly answered 90-100% of the clinical questions

Assessment and Care of Patients With Adrenal and Urogynecologic Conditions Essay Assignment Papers

Assessment and Care of Patients with Neurologic and Orthopedic Conditions and Plastic/Reconstructive Surgery Essay Assignment Papers

Assessment and Care of Patients with Neurologic and Orthopedic Conditions and Plastic/Reconstructive Surgery Essay Assignment Papers

Week 10: Assessment and Care of Patients with Neurologic and Orthopedic Conditions and Plastic/Reconstructive Surgery

Jill Joyce experienced years of back pain that prevented her from completing even the most basic tasks. Bulging discs and degenerative changes in her spine were affecting nerve function, which caused pain that could be alleviated only with surgery (Healthy Life, 2008). Like Jill’s back pain, many conditions related to neurology, orthopedics, and plastic/reconstructive surgery may affect patients’ function and mobility. In your role as advanced practice nurse, you must not only diagnose and treat these patients but also help them manage changes in their function and mobility. Assessment and Care of Patients with Neurologic and Orthopedic Conditions and Plastic/Reconstructive Surgery Essay Assignment Papers

Learning Objectives

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

By the end of this week, students will:
  • Evaluate medical and surgical patients with conditions related to neurology, orthopedics, and plastic/reconstructive surgery
  • Develop differential diagnoses for medical and surgical patients with conditions related to neurology, orthopedics, and plastic/reconstructive surgery
  • Develop treatment plans for medical and surgical patients with conditions related to neurology, orthopedics, and plastic/reconstructive surgery

Learning Resources

Required Readings

Colyar, M. R. (2015). Advanced practice nursing procedures (1st ed.). Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis Company.
 

  • Chapter 28, “Bone Marrow Aspiration and Biopsy”
  • Chapter 29, “ Lumbar Puncture”
  • Chapter 31, “Arthrocentesis”
  • Chapter 32, “Assessment for Compartment Syndrome and Pressure Testing”
  • Chapter 35, “Dislocation Reduction”
  • Chapter 36, “Ganglion Cyst Aspiration and Injection”

Doherty, G. M. (2015). Current diagnosis and treatment: Surgery (14th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

  • Chapter 36, “Neurosurgery”
  • Chapter 40, “Orthopedic Surgery”
  • Chapter 41, “Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery”
  • Chapter 42, “Hand Surgery”

Weber, E. C., Vilensky, J. A., & Fog, A. M. (2013). Practical radiology: A symptom-based approach. Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis Company.
 

  • Chapter 2, “Shoulder, Pelvis, and Limbs”
  • Chapter 3, “Spine and Spinal Cord”
  • Chapter 4, “Brain”
  • Chapter 11, “Imaging of Bone Disease and Endocrine Disorders”

Kuntz, A. F., Lai, W.-S., Norton, P. T., Yao, L. L., & Gay, S. B. (2013). Skeletal trauma radiology. Retrieved from http://www.med-ed.virginia.edu/courses/rad/ext/index.html

Shonka, D. C., Gay, S. B., Marx, W. F., Frederick, J. A., Vu, Q. D. M., Higginbotham, J., … Rehm, P. K. (2013). Introduction to head CT. Retrieved from http://www.med-ed.virginia.edu/courses/rad/headct/index.html

Required Media

i-Human Patient Cases. (2014). Retrieved from https://ih2.i-human.com/users/sign_in

AshtonMoh. (2011). Lumbar puncture 2 [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QoUGM4wqUU0

Doe, J. (2012). Knee aspiration [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jx8HmJJOGas

Optional Resources

American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. (2015). Broken bones & injuries. Retrieved from http://orthoinfo.aaos.org/menus/injury.cfm

American Society of Plastic Surgeons. (2015). Evidence-based practice guidelines and practice parameters. Retrieved from http://www.plasticsurgery.org/for-medical-professionals/legislation-and-advocacy/health-policy-resources/evidence-based-guidelinespractice-parameters.html

Boyd, A. S., Benjamin, H. J., & Asplund, C. (2009). Splints and casts: Indications and methods. American Family Physician, 80(5), 491–499. Retrieved from http://www.aafp.org/afp/2009/0901/p491.html

This week, you study neurologic and orthopedic conditions with plastic surgery considerations. Both neurologic and orthopedic conditions are seen in the trauma areas of the hospital. These conditions encompass cardiovascular, pulmonary, and metabolic aspects of care in the ICU. For this Discussion, focus on adolescent patients, and consider potential diagnoses, treatment, and/or referral options for the patients in the following 3 case studies.

Case Study 1

A 17-year-old male was celebrating his birthday with friends and alcohol. At one point he jumped into the hotel pool three stories below, hitting the side of the pool with his chest. EMS arrived and packaged him with spinal support. He arrives in the ER with breathing difficulty, chest pain, GCS 10, and O2 sat of 94%. You do initial assessment in the first 10 minutes and find that his chest is asymmetric for breathing and contusions are noted all over his chest. His CXR shows multiple rib fractures on both sides and pulmonary contusions. His cervical spine is stable in a collar. His thoracic and lumbar films are negative for fractures. In the next hours, what are your priorities, and what plan would you have for this patient as he moves to the ICU? At what stage of development is he, and how does that affect his care? Assessment and Care of Patients with Neurologic and Orthopedic Conditions and Plastic/Reconstructive Surgery Essay Assignment Papers

Case Study 2

A 13-year-old female restrained passenger of a vehicle was involved in an MVA at 60 mph on the highway. The vehicle experienced a frontal impact. The patient arrived in the ER with closed fractures of the left tibia and fibula with angulation, dislocation of the right ankle, multiple pelvic fractures, and femur fracture on the left side. Her BP is 92/54 with pulse of 130. What is your plan for this patient, and what are the considerations to prevent further morbidity? At what stage of development is she, and how does that impact her care?

Case Study 3

A 19-year-old male private in the U.S. Air Force was driving with friends when they dared him to “surf the car.” He fell off the roof of the car while it was moving at a speed of approximately 40 mph. He landed face first. He is now in the ICU with a closed head injury. His intracranial pressure is elevated, and his pupillary response is slowing. At this time, what medications do you recommend, and what other medical treatments do you recommend? In addition, after the acute situation is controlled and the patient awakens, what medication do you use for his agitation?
To prepare:

  • Review and select 1 of the 3 provided case studies. Analyze the patient information.
  • Consider a differential diagnosis for the patient in the case study you selected. Think about the most likely diagnosis for the patient.
  • Think about a treatment and management plan for the patient. Be sure to consider appropriate dosages for any recommended pharmacologic and/or nonpharmacologic treatments.
  • Consider strategies for educating patients and families on the treatment and management of the trauma care.

By Day 3

Post an explanation of the differential diagnosis for the patient in the case study you selected. Explain which is the most likely diagnosis for the patient and why. Include an explanation of unique characteristics of the disorder you identified as the primary diagnosis. Then, explain a treatment and management plan for the patient, including appropriate dosages for any recommended treatments. Finally, explain strategies for educating patients and families on the treatment and management of neurologic and orthopedic conditions.
Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses.

By Day 6

Respond to at least two of your colleagues on 2 different days in both of the ways listed below. Respond to colleagues who selected different case studies from yours.

  • Describe how culture might affect the diagnosis, management, and follow-up care of patients with the neurological, orthopedic, or plastics disorders your colleagues discussed.
  • Based on your personal and/or professional experiences, expand on your colleagues’ postings by providing additional insights or different perspectives.​ Assessment and Care of Patients with Neurologic and Orthopedic Conditions and Plastic/Reconstructive Surgery Essay Assignment Papers

Discussion Part II: Pharmacology

To prepare:
Read the following articles to enhance your knowledge of commonly prescribed medications:

Family Practice Notebook. (2015). Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory. Retrieved from http://www.fpnotebook.com/Pharm/Analgesic/NnstrdlAntInflmtry.htm

Press, C. D. (2013, September 10). Infiltrative administration of local anesthetic agents.Retrieved from http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/149178-overview

All of the following groups of medications are commonly prescribed in the acute care setting. Choose one of the topics below to discuss. If it is a medication group, select a specific drug within that group. (This is a good way for you to prepare for clinical practice, because you will get to know the drugs you will prescribe for patients.). Focus your discussion on the hospital or ICU setting and IV usage.

  1. Glycopeptides
  2. Oxazolidinones (Bs)
  3. Monobactams
  4. Ansamycins
  5. Metronidazole
  6. Lincosamides (Bs)
  7. Tinidazole
  8. Lidocaine
  9. Marcaine
  10. NSAIDs

Note: When sharing your initial post, select a topic that has not yet been discussed. If all topics have been discussed, then you may select that topic again, but select a different drug within the medication group.

By Day 3

For this Discussion, address 1 of the following options:

Option 1

Post a description of a patient you have taken care of (inpatient as an RN, or as an NP student) who has been prescribed the medication you selected. Include the scenario, indication, dosing, complications, and outcome. Then explain whether or not you would have ordered the same drug and same dose. Assessment and Care of Patients with Neurologic and Orthopedic Conditions and Plastic/Reconstructive Surgery Essay Assignment Papers

Option 2

Conduct an evidence-based drug search on the drug you selected and post an explanation of any possible issues. Are there any drug interactions? Any black box warnings? To what type of patient would you prescribe this medication?

Option 3

Post an explanation of the properties of the drug you selected, including usages and dosing in the hospital or ICU. Describe a patient you would prescribe this medication to. Assessment and Care of Patients with Neurologic and Orthopedic Conditions and Plastic/Reconstructive Surgery Essay Assignment Papers

Note: To be considered as one of your required responses, your pharmacology rationale must include a supporting reference.

Note: For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the “Post to Discussion Question” link and then select “Create Thread” to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts, and you cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Submit!

Submission and Grading Information

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:
Week 10 Discussion Rubric

Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6

To participate in this Discussion:
Week 10 Discussion

Assignment: Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Pre- and Post-Operative Care Patients – Neurologic and Orthopedic Conditions and Plastic/Reconstructive Surgery

Neurologic and orthopedic conditions and plastic/reconstructive surgery often affect patients’ function and mobility. Changes in function and mobility sometimes are subtle and might not be identified immediately, requiring you to monitor patients closely for signs and symptoms. For this Assignment, as you examine this week’s i-Human patient case study, consider how you might evaluate and treat pre- and post-operative patients who present with neurologic and orthopedic conditions and plastic/reconstructive surgery.
To prepare:

  • Review this week’s Learning Resources. With neurology, orthopedics, and plastic/reconstructive surgery in mind, consider how to assess, diagnose, and treat patients in pre- and post-operative care.
  • Review this week’s i-Human case study. Based on the patient information provided, think about the health history you would need to collect from the patient. Assessment and Care of Patients with Neurologic and Orthopedic Conditions and Plastic/Reconstructive Surgery Essay Assignment Papers
  • Consider what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be appropriate to gather more information about the patient’s condition. Reflect on how the results would be used to make a diagnosis.
  • Identify three to five possible conditions to consider in a differential diagnosis for the patient.
  • Consider the patient’s diagnosis. Think about clinical guidelines that might support this diagnosis.
  • Develop a treatment plan for the patient that includes health promotion and patient education strategies for medical and surgical patients with conditions related to neurology, orthopedics, and plastic/reconstructive surgery. Assessment and Care of Patients with Neurologic and Orthopedic Conditions and Plastic/Reconstructive Surgery Essay Assignment Papers

To complete:
As you interact with this week’s i-Human patient, complete the assigned case study. For guidance on using i-Human, refer to the i-Human Patients Case Player Student Manual in the Week 2 Learning Resources.

By Day 7

This Assignment is due.

Grading Information

Week 10 i-Human Rubric


Practicum Reminder: Week 10 Time Log

Time Logs

You are required to keep a log of the time you spend related to your practicum experience and enter every patient you see each day. You can access your time log from the Welcome Page in your Meditrek account. You will track time individually for each patient you work with. Please make sure to continuously input your hours throughout the term. Assessment and Care of Patients with Neurologic and Orthopedic Conditions and Plastic/Reconstructive Surgery Essay Assignment Papers
Assessment and Care of Patients with Neurologic and Orthopedic Conditions and Plastic/Reconstructive Surgery Essay Assignment Papers

Novice Emerging Proficient
HPI Statement
(0%) – 5 (5%)
Poorly written HPI statement. Incomplete ideas and sentences. Lacks basic history taking skills
(6%) – 10 (10%)
Well written HPI statement but may be missing 1-2 key components from the history
11 (11%) – 15 (15%)
Clearly written HPI statement with comprehensive information gathering from case questions.
Objective testing and physical exam
(0%) – 5 (5%)
Poorly written physical examination. May be missing 3 or more key exam findings that are critical to patient’s diagnosis. Includes 3 or more inappropriate exams or tests.
(6%) – 10 (10%)
Well written physical examination but may be missing 1-2 key exam findings critical to patient’s diagnosis. May include 1-2 unnecessary exams or tests.
11 (11%) – 15 (15%)
Clearly written physical examination covering all critical components of a focus exam. Tests that are ordered are appropriate for patient and cost effective.
Assessment
(0%) – 10 (10%)
Differential diagnosis list too brief and inconclusive. May be missing 3 or more critical components. Priority list may be out of order. Primary diagnosis may be wrong.
11 (11%) – 19 (19%)
Well written differential diagnoses. May be missing 1-2 critical components. Correct primary diagnosis identified.
20 (20%) – 25 (25%)
Clearly written differential diagnoses. Primary diagnosis identified.
Plan for patient
(0%) – 15 (15%)
Poorly written plan. May be missing 3 or more key issues that are critical to patient’s diagnosis.
16 (16%) – 25 (25%)
Well written plan but may be missing 1-2 key issues critical to patient’s diagnosis.
26 (26%) – 30 (30%)
Clearly written plan covering all critical components for patient’s final diagnosis.
Clinical Questions
(0%) – 10 (10%)
Correctly answered 0-69% of the clinical question
11 (11%) – 13 (13%)
Correctly answered 70-89% of the clinical question
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Correctly answered 90-100% of the clinical questions

 
Assessment and Care of Patients with Neurologic and Orthopedic Conditions and Plastic/Reconstructive Surgery Essay Assignment Papers

Outstanding Performance Excellent Performance Competent Performance Room for Improvement Poor Performance
Content-Main Posting
30 (30%) – 30 (30%)
-Main posting addresses all criteria with 75% of post exceptional depth and breadth supported by credible references
27 (27%) – 29 (29%)
-Main posting addresses all criteria with 75% of post exceptional depth and breadth supported by credible references
24 (24%) – 26 (26%)
Main posting meets expectations. All criteria are addressed with 50% containing good breadth and depth.
21 (21%) – 23 (23%)
Main posting addresses most of the criteria. One to two criterion are not addressed or superficially addressed.
(0%) – 20 (20%)
Main posting does not address all of criteria, superficially addresses criteria. Two or more criteria are not addressed.
Course Requirements and Attendance
20 (20%) – 20 (20%)
-Responds to two colleagues’ with posts that are reflective, are justified with credible sources, and ask questions that extend the discussion.
18 (18%) – 19 (19%)
-Responds to two colleagues’ with posts that are reflective, are justified with credible sources, and ask questions that extend the discussion.
16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Responds to a minimum of two colleagues’ posts, are reflective, and ask questions that extend the discussion. One post is justified by a credible source.
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Responds to less than two colleagues’ posts. Posts are on topic, may have some depth, or questions. May extend the discussion. No credible sources are cited
(0%) – 13 (13%)
Responds to less than two colleagues’ posts. Posts may not be on topic, lack depth, do not pose questions that extend the discussion
Scholarly Writing Quality
30 (30%) – 30 (30%)
-The main posting clearly addresses the discussion criteria and is written concisely. The main posting is cited with more than two credible references that adhere to the correct format per the APA Manual 6th Edition. No spelling or grammatical errors. ***The use of scholarly sources or real life experiences needs to be included to deepen the discussion and earn points in reply to fellow students.
27 (27%) – 29 (29%)
-The main posting clearly addresses the discussion criteria and is written concisely. The main posting is cited with more than two credible references that adhere to the correct format per the APA Manual 6th Edition. No spelling or grammatical errors.
24 (24%) – 26 (26%)
-The main posting clearly addresses the discussion criteria and is written concisely. The main posting is cited with a minimum of two current credible references that adhere to the correct format per the APA Manual 6th Edition. Contains one to two spelling or grammatical errors. Assessment and Care of Patients with Neurologic and Orthopedic Conditions and Plastic/Reconstructive Surgery Essay Assignment Papers
21 (21%) – 23 (23%)
-The main posting is not clearly addressing the discussion criteria and is not written concisely. The main posting is cited with less than two credible references that may lack credibility and/or do not adhere to the correct format per the APA Manual 6th Edition. Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
(0%) – 20 (20%)
-The main posting is disorganized and has one reference that may lack credibility and does not adhere to the correct format per the APA Manual 6th Edition or has zero credible references. Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Professional
Communication
Effectiveness
20 (20%) – 20 (20%)
-Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues and response to faculty questions are answered if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas effectively written in Standard Edited English -Responses posted in the discussion demonstrate effective professional communication through deep reflective discussion which leads to an exchange of ideas and focus on the weekly discussion topic.
18 (18%) – 19 (19%)
-Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. -Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas effectively written in Standard Edited English -Responses posted in the discussion demonstrate effective professional communication through deep reflective discussion which leads to an exchange of ideas and focus on the weekly discussion topic . -Responses are cited with at least one credible reference per post and a probing question that extends the discussion. Adheres to the correct format per the APA Manual 6th Edition. No spelling or grammatical errors.
16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
-Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas effectively written in Standard Edited English. -Responses posted in the discussion demonstrate effective professional communication through deep reflective discussion which leads to an exchange of ideas and focus on the weekly discussion topic. -Responses are cited with at least one credible and/or contain probing questions that extends the discussion. Adheres to the correct format per the APA Manual 6th Edition. May have one to two spelling or grammatical errors.
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
-Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Provides opinions that may not be concise or ideas not effectively written in Standard Edited English. -Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication that does not extend the discussion, leads to an exchange of ideas and/or not focused on the weekly discussion topic. -Responses are not cited and/or do not contain a probing question. May not adhere to the correct format per the APA Manual 6th Edition. May have more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
(0%) – 13 (13%)
-Communication may lack professional tone or be disrespectful to colleagues. Provides opinions that may not be concise or ideas not effectively written in Standard Edited English -Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication through discussion that does not extend the discussion, do not lead to an exchange of ideas and/or not focused on the weekly discussion topic. -Responses are not cited and do not contain a probing question. May not adhere to the correct format per the APA Manual 6th Edition. May have multiple spelling or grammatical errors.
Timely Submission
(0%) – 0 (0%)
All criteria met: Initial post submitted on time. Response to two peer initial posts. Response on 3 separate days.
-5 (-5%) – 0 (0%)
5 points deducted for responding to less than two peers or 5 points deducted for responding less than three days
-10 (-10%) – -5 (-5%)
5 points deducted for responding to less than two peers and 5 points deducted for responding less than three days
-10 (-10%) – -10 (-10%)
10 points deducted for Initial post submitted late
-20 (-20%) – -15 (-15%)
Initial post submitted late and 5 points deducted for responding to less than two peers and/ or 5 points deducted for responding less than three days

Assessment and Care of Patients with Neurologic and Orthopedic Conditions and Plastic/Reconstructive Surgery Essay Assignment Papers