Compare and contrast Prokaryotic and Eukaryotic cell

/in /by

Final Exam

Bio 101
Lawrence Torres
Name: ____________________
1. Compare and contrast Prokaryotic and Eukaryotic cell. Provide examples of each cell and include cell structure for both cells.
2. Compare and contrast mitosis and meiosis. This includes a description of each phase and an explanation of what could happen when the processes does not go as planned.
3. Describe the idea of dominant and recessive alleles (genes). Explain how Gregor Mendel’s experiments influenced the foundations of genetics.
4. What is evolution? Include the person responsible for this idea along with why evolution is so important. Summarize how the theory of evolution was developed. Identify common misconceptions about the theory of evolution. Finally, what ensure evolution will take place.
5. Describe the idea of hierarchical organization of animals (cell to organism). Make sure to describe the process associated with each increment (Give Examples). Explain the importance of biodiversity.

6. Explain how organisms evolved physiologically to become suited to their environment. Identify the structures and functions of the main organs in animals.

7. What is Ecology? Why is Ecology so important for species survival? Give specific examples.

8. Describe how the interaction of biotic and abiotic environmental components affect population growth and regulation. Analyze the effects of human activities on ecosystems and the biosphere. Describe the flow of energy and materials in an ecosystem.

Intro to Physical Anthropology

/in /by
Anthropology 212: Intro to Physical Anthropology
Research Abstract Instructions
Step 1: 
First, read any scientific article found in a peer reviewed academic journal that is rooted in the discipline of physical anthropology.  You may use the online database entitled Academic Search Complete found at the Hayden Memorial Library webpage to find an article http://libguides.citruscollege.edu/library.  A few examples of topics that relate to our class are; natural selection, evolution, bipedalism, primatology, speciation, the human fossil record, etc.
Step2: 
After thoroughly reading the article you choose type a 2 page (minimum) review of the article you read.   Your paper should be a clear and concise summary of the article, discussing both its thesis and findings.  In your conclusion that should be one full paragraph long (at least 5 sentences) discuss how the article relates to the material covered thus far in class and in your text.  The conclusion should be full of key terms from the textbook and lecture material to prove your overall comprehension of the article, as well as its relation to the study of physical anthropology.
Format:
Your paper should be in MLA format (typed, 12 point times new roman font, double spaced, with 1 inch margins). Your paper MUST provide a MLA Formatted work cited page referencing the article that you read.  The required length of your paper is two full pages of content. Anything less will cause a deduction in your score.
Grading Rubric
Length– Paper is at least 2 page of content = 2 points
Format–  Paper is typed and and formatted in MLA style (12 point Times New Roman font with 1 inch margins at top, bottom, left, and right. = 1 point
Content– The article chosen is related to the field of biological anthropology, and the writing clearly summarizes the thesis and findings of the academic article.  =9 points
Relation to Class Material– The conclusion of your paper should provide a one paragraph discussion of how you understand the article to relate to our class lectures, discussions, and readings. =5 points
Work Cited– A work cited page is included in either MLA or Chicago style format. = 5 points
Grammar- Sentence structure, spelling, and = 3 points 

Identify and describe the steps of the scientific method

/in /by
Written Assignment 1: Trace the Scientific Method in a Primary Scientific Article
Addresses course outcomes 1 and 4:

  • recognize and explain how the scientific method is used to solve problems
  • weigh evidence and make decisions based on strengths and limitations of scientific knowledge and the scientific method

Before starting this assignment you might want to revisit the Scientific Method Tutorial in the Science Learning Center under the Content area.
Please review one of the provided Science Daily articles and the corresponding peer-reviewed scholarly written article below.

  1. Identify and describe the steps of the scientific method. Which observations do you think the scientists made leading up to this research study? Given your understanding of the experimental design, formulate a specific hypothesis that is being tested in this experiment. If a hypothesis is stated, please rewrite it IN YOUR OWN WORDS. Describe the experimental design including control and treatment group(s), and dependent and independent variables. Summarize the results and the conclusion (50 points)
  2. Criticize the research described. Things to consider: Were the test subjects and treatments relevant and appropriate? Was the sample size large enough? Were the methods used appropriate? Can you think of a potential bias in a research study like this? What are the limitations of the conclusions made in this research study? Address at least two of these questions in your critique of the research study (20 points).
  3. Discuss the relevance of this type of research, both for the world in general andfor you personally (20 points). Proper grammar will count for 10 points.
  4. Write a paper with title page, introduction, paragraphs addressing the questions, conclusion and references. You must write in your own words and paraphrase information from the selected information sources, addressing each of the questions for your chosen topic. Your paper should consist of less than 10% direct quotes. Your paper should be 500 – 750 words, excluding references and title page. Use APA style for references, see https://www.umuc.edu/library/libhow/apa_tutorial.cfm

 
Multivitamins in pregnancy may be linked to lower autism risk in children
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/10/171004190457.htm. An international research team set out to assess whether nutrient supplementation during pregnancy is associated with reduced risk of autism spectrum disorder, with and without intellectual disability.
Journal Reference: DeVilbiss, E. A., Magnusson, C., Gardner, R. A.,Rai, D., Newschaffer, C.J. Lyall, K., Dalman, C. Lee, B.K., Antenatal nutritional supplementation and autism spectrum disorders in the Stockholm youth cohort: population based cohort study. BMJ, 2017 Oct 4;359:j4273. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.j4273

Identify and discuss the effectiveness of Jane Goodall’s message in her 2002 TED talk

/in /by

Discussion 3

Directions:
Your responses should be no more than a paragraph or two. Be sure to respond to another student’s post. Have your initial response done by the due date and your response done before the close date (two days after due date).
Prompt:
Identify and discuss the effectiveness of Jane Goodall’s message in her 2002 TED talk. She continues her tireless campaign, and some of you may have seen her give at talk called ‘Gombe & Beyond’ a year ago, last spring (April 20, 2016). Her message has stayed remarkably consistent over the years, as she has transitioned from pioneering primatologist to a more public figure and world advocate for conservation.
In concert with the two required short New York Times articles recently published, discuss effective ways we can raise consciousness about Goodall’s conservation efforts to a public that seemingly could not care less. How can we heed her words in everyday practice and inspire our peers and our children to become more aware about the marked similarities, and unique gifts our cousins provide, and the urgency we face in terms of their survival.  How does conservation today relate to the primate fossil (or subfossil) record of the future?  Will our conservation efforts, or lack thereof, affect how future anthropologists will study the primates that we know and love today? Feel free to bring outside examples into the discussion.