Posts

Description of Nuclear Family or Variant Family Form

/in /by

nursing essay

Family Analysis Project Submit by 2359 Saturday of Module 5. NOTE: You will create and upload an original Word file for this assignment instead of typing directly into this document. Overview Select one (1) family based on personal/professional acquaintance, to complete a comprehensive, written assessment/analysis using the criteria listed below (based on class notes and readings). DO NOT use your family of orientation (family of origin) or your nuclear (conjugal) family. (For definitions, see the Glossary of Terms in Friedman et al, Family Nursing textbook. Objectives • Examine the impact of functional patterns and role structure on the family. • Examine family relationships and communication patterns.
• Identify influences on family health promotion. N3352 Legacy of the Family ©2013 University of Texas at Arlington Page 2 of 5 Grading Rubric Family Analysis Project Target 60 points max Acceptable At least 42 points Unacceptable Less than 42 points Introduction (5 points) Introduction is present and forecasts content of the paper.
(4-5 points) Introduction is present and forecasts the content of the paper. (3-4 points) Introduction is present. (0-1 point) Description of Nuclear Family or Variant Family Form (8 points) Comprehensive description of nuclear family or variant family form; demographic trends (composition, form, ages, educational level); developmental stage (7-8 points) Adequate description of nuclear family or variant family form; demographic trends (composition, form, ages, educational level); developmental stage (4-6 points) Minimal description of nuclear family or variant family form; demographic trends (composition, form, ages, educational level); developmental stage. Some elements may be missing. (0-3 point) Sociocultural Data: Cultural/Ethnic Asessment; Social Class Status (5 points) Comprehensive description of the sociocultural data, including an assessment of cultural/ethnic and social class status (4-5 points) Adequate description of the sociocultural data, including an assessment of cultural ethnic and social class status (2-3 points) Minimal description of the sociocultural data, including an assessment of cultural ethnic and social class status (0-1 point) Genogram & Ecomap (14 points)

Identify two (2) cognitive skills used in critical thinking the RN should have applied in this scenario

/in /by

Nursing

Review the article Critical thinking at the bedside: Providing safe passage to patients (Robert & Petersen, 2013).
Scenario:
Adam is a 10-year-old scheduled for discharge from the Emergency Department after a bicycle incident resulted in a fractured right ulna and radius. His arm has been casted, is immobilized and in a sling. Adam states, “My arm feels better now, and I am sleepy. The pain medicine makes me feel like I will vomit.” The RN is reviewing medications with Adam and his mother when the mother states, “We have a two (2) hour drive home from this emergency room. Can you give Adam something for nausea so he does not throw up in the car?” The RN has already completed the discharge paperwork, and the orthopedic physician who casted the arm has left the Emergency Department. The RN states, “No orders are available for Adam to have nausea medicine. I can give him another dose of pain medicine if you think that will help him sleep on the way home. Then he might not vomit.”
Initial Discussion Post:

  • Identify two (2) cognitive skills used in critical thinking the RN should have applied in this scenario
  • Provide an alternative nursing intervention to ensure safe patient care in this scenario.

Base your initial post on your readings and research of this topic. Your initial post must contain a minimum of 250 words. References, citations, and repeating the question do not count towards the 250 word minimum.

What are the tough choices that parents have to make based on income and health insurance when it comes to the health needs of their children?

/in /by

Discussions

Note: I need 250 words answer for each discussion below, but 300 words answer for the last discussion. Must support your each answer with 2-3 credible sources cited in APA. Must provide 100% original Answer.
HS Discussion 1 (250 words, 2-3 credible references cited in APA)
Discuss whether or not you feel health planners, government officials, and healthcare organizations are using social issues/pressures or health statistics to determine strategies? Which is more reliable?
Readings:
•         http://www.nlm.nih.gov/nichsr/usestats/importance.html
•         http://www.nlm.nih.gov/nichsr/usestats/uses.html
HDS DISCUSSION 2 (250 words, 2-3 credible references cited in APA)
What are the tough choices that parents have to make based on income and health insurance when it comes to the health needs of their children? Do you feel that many parents delay or deny their children medical care? Is there any argument you can use to justify either of these courses of action?
CC DISCUSSION 3 (250 words, 2-3 credible references cited in APA)
According to Airhihenbuwa, “negative enablers” are sociocultural factors that impede the adoption of a desired health behavior.
Please share with the class which cultural group you chose for your SLP (My selected cultural group is African American, and health issue is diabetes) and provide some examples of negative enablers that might influence the health behaviors of members of that cultural group. How might they lead to health disparities? Be specific — provide an example
HRM Discussion 4 (300 words, 2-3 credible references cited in APA)
For the employee handbook, create a policy for employee use of technology because new sources of social media and more advanced electronic devices are regularly being introduced to the market. In your policy, discuss the following:

  • 1.      Refraining from workplace commentary on social media
  • 2.      Maintaining a professional image
  • 3.      What can be shared and what not to share on social media
  • 4.      Harassment
  • 5.      Privacy
  • 6.      IT security

NURS6521 week 11 Discussion: Off-Label Drug Use in Pediatrics

/in /by

NURS6521 week 11 Discussion: Off-Label Drug Use in Pediatrics
The unapproved use of approved drugs, also called off-label use, with children is quite common. This is because pediatric dosage guidelines are typically unavailable since very few drugs have been specifically researched and tested with children.
When treating children, prescribers often adjust dosages approved for adults to accommodate a child’s weight. However, children are not just “smaller” adults. Adults and children process and respond to drugs differently in their absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion. Children even respond differently during stages from infancy to adolescence. This poses potential safety concerns when prescribing drugs to pediatric patients. As an advanced practice nurse, you have to be aware of safety implications of the off-label use of drugs with this patient group.
To prepare:

  • Review the Bazzano et al. and Mayhew articles in the Learning Resources. Reflect on situations in which children should be prescribed drugs for off-label use.
  • Think about strategies to make the off-label use and dosage of drugs safer for children from infancy to adolescence. Consider specific off-label drugs that you think require extra care and attention when used in pediatrics.

With these thoughts in mind:
By Day 3
Post an explanation of circumstances under which children should be prescribed drugs for off-label use. Then, describe strategies to make the off-label use and dosage of drugs safer for children from infancy to adolescence. Include descriptions and names of off-label drugs that require extra care and attention when used in pediatrics.
By Day 6
Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses and respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days who provided a different rationale than you did, in one or more of the following ways:

  • Offer and support an alternative perspective using readings from the classroom or from your own research in the Walden Library.
  • Validate an idea with your own experience and additional research.

NURS6501 week 11 Discussion: Disorders of the Reproductive Systems
While the male and female reproductive systems are unique to each sex, they share a common function—reproduction. Disorders of this system range from delayed development to structural and functional abnormalities. Since many reproductive disorders not only result in physiological consequences but also psychological consequences such as embarrassment, guilt, or profound disappointment, patients are often hesitant to seek treatment. Advanced practice nurses need to educate patients on disorders and help relieve associated stigmas. During patient evaluations, patients must feel comfortable answering questions so that you, as a key health care provider, will be able to diagnose and recommend treatment options. As you begin this Discussion, consider reproductive disorders that you would commonly see in the clinical setting.
To Prepare

  • Review Chapter 22 and Chapter 23 in the McPhee and Hammer text, as well as Chapter 32 in the Huether and McCance text.
  • Select two disorders of the male and/or female reproductive systems that interest you. Consider the similarities and differences between the disorders.
  • Select one of the following factors: genetics, ethnicity, age, or behavior. Think about how the factor you selected might impact the diagnosis of and treatment for the reproductive disorders.

By Day 3
Post a description of the two reproductive disorders you selected, including their similarities and differences. Then explain how the factor you selected might impact the diagnosis of treatment for the reproductive disorders.
Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses.
By Day 6
Respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days who selected different disorders or factors than you, in one or more of the following ways:

  • Share insights on how the factor you selected impacts the pathophysiology of the disorder your colleague selected.
  • Offer alternative diagnoses and prescription of treatment options for the disorder your colleague selected.
  • Validate an idea with your own experience and additional research.