Why is whether or not human nature exists an important question to answer?
Early in his essay, Toward A Universal Ethics, Michael Gazzaniga considers whether human nature exists. He quotes authorities who deny that there are instincts or anything like a human nature and assert that the brain has no predisposition but is adaptable to “a full range of behaviors.” Argue a case FOR human nature. Consider the role recent studies of brain physiology might play in this debate. Why is whether or not human nature exists an important question to answer?
Leave a ReplyWant to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!