There is a heavy focus on achieving statistical significance when evaluating outcomes. Often in research or EBP projects, there is no statistical significance, only possible clinical significance.

Module 6 DQ 1 and DQ 2
Tutor MUST have a good command of the English language
These are two discussion questions
Your DQ1 and DQ2 posts must be at least 150 words and have at least one reference cited for each question. In-text citation, please
Tutor MUST have a good command of the English language
Sources need to be less than five years old and journal/scholarly articles. 
Use only articles that are published between 2013-2018 (except for your theory articles which will be older as you must cite primary sources).
No textbook or direct quotes
There need to be a Thesis 
Rubric Requirements must be met
Topic 6 DQ 1
There is a heavy focus on achieving statistical significance when evaluating outcomes. Often in research or EBP projects, there is no statistical significance, only possible clinical significance. When is it appropriate to deem a project’s outcomes successful only using clinical significance as the only measure of success?
Topic 6 DQ 2
The three components of EBP include clinical expertise, best evidence, and patient preference. Often, patient preference and clinical expertise are at odds with each other. Describe a scenario where you might need to mediate this issue and what is the solution when this occurs. It can be a real-life example as well.