Research on Intimate Partner Violence and the Duty to Protect
Please read the case below and answer the attached questions! Must be APA Format! Should use Ethics Codes as references! Must use 300 words per question!
Case 4. Research on Intimate Partner Violence and the Duty to Protect
Dr. Daniela Yeung, a health psychologist, has been conducting a federally funded ethnographic study of couples in which the male part
| Title
ABC/123 Version X |
1 |
| Case Study Four Worksheet
PSYCH/660 Version 3 |
1 |
University of Phoenix Material
Case Study Four Worksheet
Respond to the following questions in 1,500 to 1,750 words.
1. Why is this an ethical dilemma? Which APA Ethical Principles help frame the nature of the dilemma?
1. Does this situation meet the standards set by the duty to protect statue? How might whether or not Dr. Yeung’s state includes researchers under such a statute influence Dr. Yeung’s ethical decision making? How might the fact that Dr. Yeung is a research psychologist without training or licensure in clinical practice influence the ethical decision?
1. How are APA Ethical Standards 2.01a b, and c; 2.04; 3.04; 3.06; 4.01; 4.02; and 10.10a relevant to this case? Which other standards might apply?
1. What are Dr. Yeung’s ethical alternatives for resolving this dilemma? Which alternative best reflects the Ethics Code aspirational principle and enforceable standard, as well as legal standards and Dr. Yeung’s obligations to stakeholders?
1. What steps should Dr. Yeung take to ethically implement her decision and monitor its effects?
Reference
Fisher, C. B. (2013). Decoding the ethics code: A practical guide for psychologists. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Copyright © XXXX by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2018 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
Case Study
Four
Worksheet
PSYCH/660
Version
3
1
Copyright ©
201
8
by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
University of Phoenix Material
Case Study
Four
Worksheet
Respond to the following questions in
1,500 to 1,75
0 words.
1.
Why is this an ethical dilemma? Which APA
Ethical Principles help frame the nature of the
dilemma?
2.
Does this situation meet the
standards set by the duty to protect statue? How might whether or
not Dr. Yeung’s state includes researchers under such a statute influence Dr. Yeung’s ethical
decision making? How might the fact that Dr. Yeung is a research psychologist without training o
r
licensure in clinical practice influence the ethical decision?
3.
How are APA Ethical Standards 2.01a b, and c; 2.04; 3.04; 3.06; 4.01; 4.02; and 10.10a relevant
to this case? Which other standards might apply?
4.
What are Dr.
Yeung’s
ethical altern
ative
s
for resolving this dilemma? Which alternative best
reflects the Ethics Code aspirational principle and enforceable standard,
as well as
legal
standards and Dr.
Yeung’s
obligations to stakeholders?
5.
What steps should Dr.
Yeung
take to ethically
implement her decision and monitor its effects?
Reference
Fisher, C. B. (2013).
Decoding the ethics code: A practical guide for psychologists
. Thousand Oaks,
CA
:
Sage.
Case Study Four Worksheet
PSYCH/660 Version 3
1
Copyright © 2018 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
University of Phoenix Material
Case Study Four Worksheet
Respond to the following questions in 1,500 to 1,750 words.
1. Why is this an ethical dilemma? Which APA Ethical Principles help frame the nature of the
dilemma?
2. Does this situation meet the standards set by the duty to protect statue? How might whether or
not Dr. Yeung’s state includes researchers under such a statute influence Dr. Yeung’s ethical
decision making? How might the fact that Dr. Yeung is a research psychologist without training or
licensure in clinical practice influence the ethical decision?
3. How are APA Ethical Standards 2.01a b, and c; 2.04; 3.04; 3.06; 4.01; 4.02; and 10.10a relevant
to this case? Which other standards might apply?
4. What are Dr. Yeung’s ethical alternatives for resolving this dilemma? Which alternative best
reflects the Ethics Code aspirational principle and enforceable standard, as well as legal
standards and Dr. Yeung’s obligations to stakeholders?
5. What steps should Dr. Yeung take to ethically implement her decision and monitor its effects?
Reference
Fisher, C. B. (2013). Decoding the ethics code: A practical guide for psychologists. Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
ner has been paroled following conviction and imprisonment for intimate partner violence (IPV). Over the course of a year, she has had individual monthly interviews with 25 couples while one partner was in jail and following their release. Aiden is a 35-year-old male parolee convicted of seriously injuring his wife. He and his wife, Maya, have been interviewed by Dr. Yeung on eight occasions. The interviews have covered a range of personal topics including Aiden’s problem drinking, which is marked by blackouts and threatening phone calls made to his wife when he becomes drunk, usually in the evening. To her knowledge, Aiden has never followed through on these threats. Dr. Yeung has the impression both Aiden and Maya feel a sense of social support when discussing their life with Dr. Yeung. One evening Dr. Yeung checks her answering machine and finds a message from Aiden. His words are slurred and angry: “Now that you know the truth about what I am you know that there is nothing you can do to help the evil inside me. The bottle is my savior and I will end this with them tonight.” She calls both Aiden’s and Maya’s cell phone numbers, but no one answers.
Ethical Dilemma
Dr. Yeung has Aiden’s address, and after 2 hours, she is considering whether or not to contact emergency services to suggest that law enforcement officers go to Aiden’s home or to the homes of his parents and girlfriend.
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
