Political Development Of Western Europe

  • Choose ONE question and answer in 6-7 pages:
  • Explain the sovereign paradox sources lectures
  • Explain the Bates analysis lectures and Bates
  • Explain the role and function of the states.
  • must use lecture notes or  textbook to answer the question, and resource must from notes or textbook to give cite
  • Double spacing,
  • 11 or 12 point font (Times, Helvetica, Calibri, etc.),
  • 1-inch margins,
  • No more than 1 inch of space dedicated to title and header,
  • No extraneous space between paragraphs or headers.

    1

    Introduction

    In late-century Africa, things fell apart. By way of illustra-tion, consider Figure 1.1, which lists civil wars in African countries from 1970 to 1995, as judged by the World Bank.

    As time passes, the list grows. Angola, Chad, Namibia,

    Nigeria, and Sudan enter the 1970s war-torn; in the mid-1970s,

    Sudan exits the list, but Equatorial Guinea and Zimbabwe join

    it; by 1980, Zimbabwe departs from the ranks of the war-torn,

    but is replaced by Mozambique, Nigeria, and Uganda. The

    pattern – a few dropping off, a larger number entering in –

    continues into the early 1990s. Only one country that was con-

    flict ridden in 1990 becomes peaceful by 1992, while eleven

    others crowd into the ranks of Africa’s failed states.

    Humanitarians, policymakers, and scholars: Each de-

    mands to know why political order gave way to political con-

    flict in late-century Africa. Stunned by the images and realities

    of political disorder, I join them in search of answers. In so

    doing, I – a political scientist – turn to theories of the state and

    3

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.001 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    year 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95

    Burundi

    Chad

    Congo

    Djibouti

    Ethiopia

    Kenya

    Liberia

    Mali

    Mozambique Namibia

    Nigeria Rwanda

    Senegal

    Sierra Leone Somalia Sudan

    Uganda Congo

    Zimbabwe

    Figure 1.1. Civil wars, Africa 1970–1995. Source: World Bank (Sambanis 2002).

    4

    h ttp

    s://d o

    i.o rg

    /10.1017/C B

    O 9781316423974.001

    to th

    e C am

    b rid

    g e C

    o re term

    s o f u

    se, availab le at h

    ttp s://w

    w w

    .cam b

    rid g

    e.o rg

    /co re/term

    s. D

    o w

    n lo

    ad ed

    fro m

    h ttp

    s://w w

    w .cam

    b rid

    g e.o

    rg /co

    re. A ccess p

    aid b

    y th e U

    C San

    D ieg

    o Lib

    rary, o n

    07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, su

    b ject

     

     

    Introduction

    locate the sources of political disorder midst the factors that

    lead states to break down.

    I anchor this book in the work of Weber (1958) and view

    coercion as the distinctive property of politics. As will become

    clear in the next chapter, I depart from Weber – and his “struc-

    turalist” descendants1 – by turning to the theory of games.

    Driven by the realities of Africa, I view political order as

    problematic: In light of the evidence Africa offers, political

    order cannot be treated as a given. Rather, I argue, it results

    when rulers – whom I characterize as “specialists in violence” –

    choose to employ the means of coercion to protect the creation

    of wealth rather than to prey upon it and when private citizens

    choose to set weapons aside and to devote their time instead

    to the production of wealth and to the enjoyment of leisure.2

    When these choices constitute an equilibrium, then, I say,

    political order forms a state.3

    To address the collapse of political order in late-century

    Africa, I therefore return to theory – the theory of the state – and

    to theorizing – the theory of games. I do so because proceeding

    in this fashion points out the conditions under which political

    order can persist – or fail. I devote Chapter 2 to an informal

    1 Evans, P., T. Skocpol, and D. Rueschmeyer (1985), Bringing the State Back In, Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press provides perhaps the best-known example.

    2 I am drawing on Bates, R. H., A. Greif, et al. (2002), “Organizing Violence,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 46(5): 599–628.

    3 The ambiguous phrasing is intended.

    5

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.001 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    Introduction

    derivation of those conditions. In the remaining chapters, I

    turn from deduction to empirics and explore the extent to

    which these conditions were to be found, or were absent, in

    late-century Africa. The evidence leads me to conclude that

    in the 1980s and 1990s, each of three key variables departed

    from the levels necessary to induce governments and citizens

    to choose in ways that would yield political order.

    The Literature

    Following the outbreak of conflict in Serbia, Somalia, Rwanda,

    and elsewhere, the study of political violence has once again

    become central to the study of politics. Familiar to many, for

    example, would be the attempts by Collier and Hoeffler (2004)

    and Fearon and Laitin (2003) to comprehend the origins of civil

    wars. Also familiar would be studies of the impact of ethnic-

    ity (Fearon and Laitin 2003), democracy (Hegre, Gates et al.

    2001; Hegre 2003), and natural-resource endowments (e.g.,

    Ross 2004). In my attempts to comprehend why things fell

    apart in late-century Africa, I draw upon these writings. But I

    also take issue with them, for virtually all share common prop-

    erties from which I seek to depart.

    Consider, for example, the assumption that civil war can be

    best treated as the outcome of an insurgency. When thinking

    about the origins of political disorder in Africa, I can find no

    way of analyzing the origins of insurrection without starting

    6

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.001 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    Introduction

    with the behavior of governments. The conditions that led

    to the breakdown of order in Africa include the authoritarian

    nature of its states and their rulers’ penchant for predation. By

    rendering their people insecure, they provoked insurgencies.

    While both insurrectionaries and incumbents must necessar-

    ily feature in the analysis of political disorder, in this instance it

    makes sense not to focus exclusively on the rebels but to stress

    as well the behavior of those whom they seek to drive from

    power.

    Recent contributions exhibit a second common feature:

    the methods that they employ. Utilizing cross-national data,

    they apply statistical procedures to isolate and measure the

    relationship of particular variables with the onset and duration

    of civil wars. I, too, make use of cross-national data; but rather

    than collecting data for all countries in the globe, I restrict my

    efforts to Africa. I do so in part because Africa provides an

    unsettling range of opportunities to explore state failure and

    because political disorder is so important a determinant of the

    welfare of the continent. I also do so because I find it necessary

    to draw upon my intuition. To employ that intuition, I need

    first to inform it, be it by immersing myself in the field or in

    qualitative accounts set down by observers. I have therefore

    made use of a selected set of cases – those from the continent

    of Africa – and my knowledge of their politics.4

    4 The use of a subset of countries also eases the search for exogenous vari- ables, and thus causal analysis. For example, given the small size of Africa’s

    7

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.001 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    Introduction

    Lastly, if only because they are based on the analysis of

    cross-national data, contemporary studies exhibit a third

    property: Their conclusions take the form of “findings.” These

    findings are based upon relationships between a selection of

    key variables and the outbreak or duration of civil wars. Collier

    and Hoeffler (2004), for example, stress the importance of

    “opportunities,” that is, chances to secure economic rewards

    and to finance political organizations. Noting that the magni-

    tude of primary product exports, the costs of recruiting, and

    access to funding from diasporas relate to the likelihood of

    civil war, they conclude that “economic viability appears to be

    the predominant systematic explanation of rebellion” (p. 563).

    Fearon and Laitin (2003), by contrast, conclude that “capa-

    bilities” play the major role: “We agree that financing is one

    determinant of the viability of insurgency,” they write (p. 76).

    But they place major emphasis on “state administrative, mil-

    itary, and police capabilities” (p. 76), measures of which bear

    significant relationships to the outbreak of civil wars in their

    global set of data.

    In this work, I proceed in a different fashion. I start by

    first capturing the logic that gives rise to political order. While

    I, too, test hypotheses about the origins of disorder, I derive

    economies, I can treat global economic shocks as exogenous – something that yields inferential leverage when seeking to measure the impact of economic forces on state failure.

    8

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.001 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    Introduction

    these hypotheses from a theory. By adopting a more deductive

    approach, I depart from the work of my predecessors.

    Key Topics

    Energized by such works as Kaplan’s “The Coming Anarchy”

    (1994), students of Africa have focused on the relationship

    between ethnic diversity and political conflict. At least since

    the time that William Easterly and Ross Levine penned “Africa’s

    Growth Tragedy” (1997), empirically minded social scientists

    have sought to capture the impact of ethnicity on the eco-

    nomic performance of Africa’s states. Interestingly, however,

    they have found it difficult to uncover systematic evidence of

    the relationship between measures of ethnicity and the likeli-

    hood of political disorder.5

    In this study I, too, find little evidence of a systematic rela-

    tionship. And yet, the qualitative accounts – be they of the

    killing fields of Darfur or of the tenuous peace in Nigeria – con-

    tinue to stress the central importance of ethnicity to political

    life in Africa. In response, I argue that ethnic diversity does

    not cause violence; rather, ethnicity and violence are joint

    5 For a discussion, see Bates, R. H., and I. Yackolev (2002), Ethnicity in Africa, in The Role of Social Capital In Development, edited by C. Grootaert and T. van Bastelaer, New York: Cambridge University Press; and Fearon, J., and D. Laitin (2003), “Ethnicity, Insurgency and Civil War,” American Political Science Review 97(1): 75–90.

    9

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.001 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    Introduction

    products of state failure. Their relationship is contingent: It

    occurs when political order erodes and politicians forge polit-

    ical organizations in the midst of political conflict.

    The political significance of resource wealth has also

    attracted much attention. Analyzing their data on civil wars,

    Collier and Hoeffler (2004) report that “dependence upon pri-

    mary commodity exports” constituted “a particularly power-

    ful risk factor” for the outbreak of civil war (p. 593). Africa

    is, of course, noted for its bounteous natural endowments of

    petroleum, timber, metals, and gemstones. And scholars and

    policymakers have documented the close ties between the dia-

    mond industry and UNITA (National Union for the Total Inde-

    pendence of Angola) in Angola (Fowler 2000), the smuggling

    of gemstones and the financing of rebels in Sierra Leone (Reno

    2000), and the mining of coltan and the sites of rebellion in

    eastern Zaire (present-day Democratic Republic of the Congo)

    (Kakwenzire and Kamukama 2000).

    And yet, using Collier and Hoeffler’s (2004) own data,

    Fearon (2005) has demonstrated that their findings are frag-

    ile, depending in part on decisions about how to measure

    and classify cases. In this study, too, I fail to find a signifi-

    cant relationship between the value of natural resources and

    the likelihood of state failure.6 Once again, then, there arises

    6 For both Fearon (2005) and myself (this work), only the value of petroleum deposts is related to political disorder. Even here the relationship is fragile, however.

    10

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.001 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    Introduction

    a disparity between the evidence from cross-national regres-

    sions and that from qualitative accounts. I shall argue that the

    disparity suggests that the exploitation of natural resources

    for war finance is a correlate rather than a cause of political

    disorder.

    A third factor plays a major role in the literature: democ-

    ratization. Qualitative accounts, such as those of Mansfield

    and Snyder (Mansfield and Snyder 1995; Snyder 2000) sug-

    gest that democratization produces political instability and

    leads to the mobilization of what Zakaria (1997) calls “illib-

    eral” political forces. Careful empirical researchers, such as

    Hegre (Hegre, Gates et al. 2001; Hegre 2004), confirm that new

    democracies and intermediate regimes – those lying some-

    where between stable authoritarian and consolidated demo-

    cratic governments7 – exhibit significantly higher rates of civil

    war. As demonstrated by Geddes (2003), many of these inter-

    mediate regimes are the product of the “third wave” of democ-

    ratization (Huntington 1991) and the collapse of communist

    regimes and are therefore themselves new and vulnerable to

    disorder.

    In the 1980s and 1990s, many of Africa’s governments

    reformed. Regimes that once had banned the formation

    of political parties now faced challenges at the polls from

    7 Using Polity coding. Available online at: http://www.cidcm.umd.edu/ polity/.

    11

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.001 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    Introduction

    candidates backed by an organized political opposition. And

    in the late 1980s and early 1990s, militias assembled, states

    failed, and Africa faced rising levels of political disorder. The

    experience of Africa thus appears to conform to what the liter-

    ature has recorded: Electoral competition and state failure go

    together.

    In analyzing the impact of political reform, I employ two

    measures: the movement from military to civilian rule and the

    shift from no- or one- to multiparty systems. In discussions of

    democracy, the followers of Schumpeter (1950) argue for the

    sufficiency of party competition; those of Dahl (1971) contend

    that party competition is necessary but not sufficient. Without

    an accompanying bundle of political and civil rights, the latter

    argue, contested elections are not of themselves evidence of

    democratic politics. In debates over the relationship between

    party systems and democracy, I concur with the followers of

    Dahl. When addressing political reform, I pay no attention to

    the number of political parties, their relative vote shares, or

    the conditions under which the opposition is allowed to cam-

    paign. I therefore address not the relationship between democ-

    racy and political conflict but rather the relationship between

    political reform and political disorder.

    Lastly, there are those who emphasize the impact of pov-

    erty. That poverty and conflict should go together is treated

    as noncontroversial, as if disorder were simply an expected

    12

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.001 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    Introduction

    corollary of the lack of economic development.8 But consider:

    If, as many argue, lower per capita incomes imply lower wages

    and therefore lower costs of rebellion, so too do they imply

    fewer gains from predation; income thus cancels out the ratio

    between the costs and benefits. From the theoretical point of

    view, moreover, there is simply little that can be said about the

    relationship between the average level of income – or, for that

    matter, poverty – and incentives for violence. As I will argue

    in Chapter 2, for our purposes, discussions of private income

    can be set aside; for the logic of political order suggests that

    the focus be placed not on private income but rather on public

    revenues. Economic shocks will indeed play a major role in this

    analysis, but the focus will be on their impact on the revenues

    of states, not on the incomes of individuals.9 In this work, when

    I measure the impact of income per capita, I treat it as a control

    variable, rather than as a variable of theoretical interest.

    In Chapter 2, I parse the logic of political order. I recount the

    theory informally, portraying the interaction between govern-

    ments and citizens and among citizens as well. Presented as a

    8 Indeed, see Sambanis, N., and H. Hegre (2006), “Sensitivity Analysis of Empirical Results on Civil War Onset,” The Journal of Conflict Resolution 50(4): 508–35. The authors point to per capita income as one of the very few variables that bears a robust relationship with civic violence.

    9 See the arguments in Hirshleifer, J. (1995), Theorizing About Conflict, in Handbook of Defense Economics, edited by K. Hartley and T. Sandler, New York: Elsevier.

    13

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.001 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    Introduction

    fable, the argument is based upon rigorous foundations and

    points to the conditions under which governments choose to

    engage in predation and citizens choose to take up arms.10

    Chapters 3 through 5 set out the conditions that prevailed

    prior to the collapse of political order. They document the

    social and political configurations that were in place at the

    time of the impact of the economic and political shocks that

    dismantled the state in Africa. In Chapter 6, states fracture

    and political disorder engulfs nations in Africa. Chapter 7

    concludes.

    10 The informed reader will note the parallels between my analysis and that of Azam, J.-P., and A. Mesnard (2003), “Civil War and the Social Contract,” Public Choice 115(3–4): 455–75; Snyder, R., and R. Bhavani (2005), “Diamonds, Blood and Taxes: A Revenue-Centered Framework for Ex- plaining Political Order,” The Journal of Conflict Resolution 49(4): 563– 97; and Magaloni, B. (2006), Voting for Autocracy, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    14

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.001 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    2

    From Fable to Fact

    I devote this chapter to the exposition of a fable.1 Whilediminutive, it is incisive: It captures the incentives that drive the choices that lead to the failure of states. It is also

    suggestive, for it points to the conditions under which polit-

    ical order should, or should not, prevail. After expositing this

    fable, I determine whether it is also informative. It can be

    so only insofar as the forces that animate its central char-

    acters find their parallel in late-century Africa. I devote the

    last portions of the chapter to arguing that they do and that

    the story communicated by the fable can therefore bear the

    weight of the tragedy that befell the continent. The fable can

    be used – with help – to explore the foundations of political

    disorder.

    1 A rigorous presentation appeared as Bates, R. H., A. Greif, et al. (2002), “Organizing Violence,” The Journal of Conflict Resolution 46(5): 599– 628.

    15

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.002 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    Introduction

    A Fable

    Consider the following scenario: A community is peopled by a

    “specialist in violence” and two groups of citizens. Headed by

    powerful patrons, the groups can act in a unified manner.2 The

    specialist in violence earns his living from the use of force; he

    either seizes the wealth of others or pockets funds they pay for

    their protection. Sheltered behind their patrons, the citizens

    generate incomes by engaging in productive labor; but they

    too can be mobilized either to seize the income of others – or

    to defend their incomes from seizure. The three personages in

    this drama repeatedly interact over time. The question is: Can

    political order prevail in such a setting?

    The answer is: Yes. Under certain circumstances, the spe-

    cialist will chose to use his control of the means of violence to

    protect rather than to despoil private property. And the groups

    of citizens will chose to devote their time and energies to labor

    and leisure and forswear the use of arms, while rewarding the

    specialist in violence for protecting them against raids by oth-

    ers. In addition, under certain well-specified conditions, these

    choices will persist in equilibrium, rendering political order a

    state.

    The primary reason for this outcome is that the players

    interact over time. The specialist in violence and political

    2 That is, they have solved the collective action problem.

    16

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.002 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    From Fable to Fact

    organizations can therefore condition their future choices on

    present behavior; that is, they can make threats and inflict pun-

    ishments and thus shape the behavior of others. Should one

    group raid or withhold tax payments, the specialist can retal-

    iate by changing from guardian to predator. And should the

    specialist opportunistically seize the wealth of the member of a

    group, his defection would trigger punishment by that citizen’s

    confederates: They can withhold tax payments or mobilize for

    fighting. If not sufficiently paid for the provision of security,

    the specialist in violence can pay himself: he can turn from

    guardian to warlord. And if preyed upon or left undefended,

    then the citizens can furnish their own protection; they can

    take up arms.

    When both the specialist and the citizens turn to pun-

    ishment, political order breaks down. People become inse-

    cure. They also become poor; having to reallocate resources

    to defense, they have fewer resources to devote to produc-

    tive activity. The resultant loss of security and prosperity stays

    the hand of a specialist in violence who might be tempted to

    engage in predation or of a group that might be tempted to

    forcefully seize the goods of another or withhold tax payments,

    thus triggering political disorder.

    To better grasp the incentives that animate this story, focus

    on the choices open to the specialist in violence, as commu-

    nicated in Figure 2.1. In this figure, the vertical axis repre-

    sents monetary gains or losses. The further above zero, the

    17

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.002 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    Introduction

    Payoffs

    +

    0

    Time

    Payoffs on the equilibrium path

    Payoffs from defection and subsequent punishment

     

    Figure 2.1. Payoffs from strategy choices.

    greater the payoffs; the further below, the greater the losses.

    The horizontal axis designates time, with the more immediate

    payoffs occurring near the origin and the more distant ones

    further to the right. The dotted line represents the flow of pay-

    offs that result from tax payments; the flow is steady, mod-

    erate, and positive in value. The dashed line represents the

    18

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.002 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    From Fable to Fact

    flow of payoffs that result from predation. Predation yields an

    immediate benefit: The dashed line leaps above the dotted

    line, indicating that the income from predation significantly

    exceeds that from tax payments. But that one period spike

    then gives way to a stream of losses, as illustrated by the plunge

    below the zero point that separates gains from losses. Insofar

    as a decision maker is forward looking, the losses that accrue

    in the punishment phase caste a shadow over the returns from

    defection and so temper any wish to engage in predation.

    If summed over time, each line – that representing the

    returns to taxation and that the returns to predation – yields an

    expected payoff. What would determine their magnitudes? In

    particular, what would determine whether the value of the vari-

    able path, generated by predation, will be more or less attrac-

    tive than that of the steady path, generated from tax payments?

    The factors that determine the relative magnitude of these pay-

    offs determine whether the specialist in violence will adhere

    to the path of play and continue to behave as guardian or veer

    from that path, engage in predation, and trigger the re-arming

    of the citizenry and subsequent disorder.

    The Conditions of Political Order

    One factor is the level of tax revenue. If too low, the benefits of

    predation may be tempting despite the subsequent costs.3 A

    3 But they may also be if too high. See the discussion in Bates, R. H., A. Greif, et al. (2002), “Organizing Violence.”

    19

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.002 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    Introduction

    second is the magnitudes of the rewards that predation might

    yield. If sufficiently bounteous, the specialist in violence might

    choose to deviate despite the losses. A third is the special-

    ist’s rate of discount. A specialist in violence who is impatient,

    greedy, or insecure will discount the future payoffs that accrue

    along the path of play; and she will also discount the penal-

    ties that follow an opportunistic deviation. She may therefore

    find the prospect of predation more attractive than if she were

    patient, prosperous, or secure.

    The fable thus suggests that the possibility of political order

    rests on the value of three variables: the level of public revenues,

    the rewards from predation, and the specialist’s rate of dis-

    count. The interplay of these forces helps to determine whether

    governments safeguard or prey upon the wealth of the land;

    whether groups of citizens take up arms; and whether there is

    political order – or state failure.

    The tale may be engaging; elsewhere it has been shown

    to be logically consistent (Bates, Greif et al. 2002). But it is

    informative only insofar as it captures and incorporates key

    features of Africa’s political landscape. Only insofar as it does

    so will it offer insight into the tribulations of that continent.

    Features of Late-Century Politics

    Recall that the scenario was populated by a specialist in vio-

    lence and by citizens who could, should they choose, take up

    20

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.002 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    From Fable to Fact

    0� 5�

    10� 15� 20� 25� 30� 35� 40�

    1970-� 74 �

    1�975�-� 79�

    1980-� 84�

    1985�-� 89�

    1990-� 95�

    Percentage�

    Figure 2.2. Percentage country years in which country ruled by mili-

    tary head of state.

    arms. Now note a characteristic feature of late-century poli-

    tics in Africa: A significant portion of Africa’s states were ruled

    by their military. Turning to Figure 2.2, we find that from the

    beginning of the 1970s to the end of the 1980s, in more than

    30 percent of the observations, Africa’s heads of state came

    from the armed forces.4 In the 1990s, U.S. president William

    Clinton and British prime minister Tony Blair heralded the

    emergence of a “new generation” of African rulers – Yoweri

    Museveni in Uganda, Paul Kagame in Rwanda, Meles Zenawi

    in Ethiopia, and Isaias Afwerki in Eritrea – while failing to men-

    tion that each had come to power as the head of an armed

    insurgency. In many states, then, power came from the barrel

    of a gun (Ottaway 1999).5

    4 For details of the sample, see Table A.1 in the Appendix. 5 Lest readers regard the link between coercion and politics to be distinc-

    tive of politics in Africa, they might first recall the note sent by the father

    21

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.002 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    Introduction

    Not only were heads of states specialists in violence, the cit-

    izens, too, frequently took up arms. By way of illustration, con-

    sider the case of Chad. At the beginning of our sample period,

    1970, Francois Tombalbaya, head of the Parti Progressive Tcha-

    dien (PPT), was president of Chad. Tombalbaya belonged to

    the Sara, an agriculturalist people in the southern portions of

    the country; the eastern and northern portions were popu-

    lated by pastoralist peoples. As Tombalbaya consolidated his

    rule, he posted administrators from the south to govern these

    other regions. There they imposed policies designed to propa-

    gate Sara culture and imposed new taxes on cattle. In response,

    the pastoralists mounted protests, fomented riots, and formed

    militias: the Front for the Liberation of Chad (FLT) in the east

    and the Front for National Liberation (FROLINAT) in the north.

    It was only by calling for military assistance from France that

    Tombalbaya remained in power.6

    of Frederick the Great to the young man’s tutors: “[I]n the highest mea- sure . . . instill in my son a true love of the military . . . and impress on him that nothing in the world can give a prince such fame and honor as the sword and that he would be the most despicable creature on earth if he did not revere it and seek glory from it. . . . ” (p. 18 of Asprey, R. B. (1986), Frederick the Great, New York: Ticknor and Fields). Recall, too, the rueful words of the dying Louis IV: “I have loved war too much.” (http://encarta.msm.com).

    6 For accounts, see Buijtenhuijs, R. (1989), Chad, in Contemporary West African States, edited by D. B. Cruise O’Brien, J. Dunn, and R. Rath- bone, Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press; May, R. (2003), Internal Dimensions of Warfare in Chad, in Readings in African Poli- tics, edited by T. Young, Oxford: James Currey; Lemarchand, R. (1981), “Chad: The Roots of Chaos,” Current History (December); Nolutshungu,

    22

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.002 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    From Fable to Fact

    Whereas the militarization of Chad marks the opening of

    the sample period, conflict between militias in Congo (Braz-

    zaville) marks its end. In 1992, a southerner, Pascal Lissouba,

    became president of Congo(B); in the run up to the next pres-

    idential election, the strongman and former president, Denis

    Sassou-Nguesso, declared his candidacy. As political tensions

    mounted, each politician mobilized a private army: the Cobras,

    who supported Sassou-Nguesso, and the Zulus, who sup-

    ported Pascal Lissouba. Kindled in the provincial towns, fight-

    ing between these groups erupted in the capital where the

    mayor, Bernard Kolelas, had organized his own militia, the

    Njinjas. Combat between these militias lay waste to one of

    the major cities of French-speaking Africa.7

    As seen in Figure 2.3, over the course of the sample period

    1970–1995, reports of the formation of militias became more

    common. With increasing frequency, citizens took up arms

    and states lost their monopoly over the means of violence.

    The scenario depicted at the outset of this chapter

    thus incorporates two major features of the politics of late

    S. C. (1996), Limits of Anarchy, Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia; and Azam, J.-P. (2007), The Political Geography of Redis- tribution, Chap. 6 in The Political Economy of Economic Growth in Africa, 1960–2000: An Analytic Survey, edited by B. Ndulu, P. Collier, R. H. Bates, and S. O’Connell, Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.

    7 One of the best accounts appears in Bazenguissa-Ganga, R. (2003), The Spread of Political Violence in Congo-Brazzaville, in Readings in African Politics, edited by T. Young, Oxford: James Currey.

    23

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.002 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    Introduction

    .1

    .2

    .3

    .4

    .5

    1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 year

    95% CI Fitted values

    Figure 2.3. Reports of militias by year, percent of observations.

    twentieth-century Africa: rule by specialists in violence and

    the militarization of civic society. In accounting for political

    disorder, it pointed to three key variables: the level of public

    revenues received by governments; the magnitude of tempta-

    tions they face, as determined by the rewards for predation;

    and the relative weight placed upon them. A moment’s reflec-

    tion leads to the recognition of the possible significance of

    these variables for the politics of late-century Africa.

    Revenues

    In the 1970s, a sharp increase in the price of oil triggered global

    recession. The increased price of energy led to higher costs of

    production in the advanced industrial economies, resulting in

    24

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.002 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    From Fable to Fact

    the laying off of labor and a lowering of incomes. For Africa,

    the result was a decrease in the demand for exports.

    In Africa, as in many other developing regions, taxes on

    trade constitute one of the most important sources of public

    revenue. As the value of exports from Africa declined, so too

    did the taxes collected by Africa’s governments. In the latter

    decades of the twentieth century, then, while Africa’s people

    faced a “growth tragedy” (Easterly and Levine 1997), its states

    faced a crisis of public revenues. The break in the global econ-

    omy was sharp and unanticipated; and the recovery of pub-

    lic finance required comprehensive and protracted restructur-

    ing, involving changes not only in tax rates but also in policies

    toward trade and industrial development.

    The economic forces at play in late-century Africa thus

    aligned with the conditions in the fable, reducing the revenues

    of governments. Within the framework of the fable, the decline

    in public revenues represents a decline in the rewards from

    public service. In the face of such a reduction, those who con-

    trol the means of violence find the income derived from the

    protection of civilians declining relative to the returns from

    predation. By the logic of the fable, they would therefore be

    more likely to turn to predation. Rather than providing secu-

    rity, those who controlled the state would become a source of

    insecurity, as they sought to extract revenue from the wealth

    of their citizens.

    25

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.002 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    Introduction

    Discount Rate

    In the fable, if the government becomes more impatient or

    insecure, the rewards that accrue to those who act as guardians

    decline in value; so, too, the penalties that would be imposed

    were they to revert to predation. As the “shadow of the future”8

    thus dissipates, the level of temptation rises: Immediate ben-

    efits weigh more heavily than future losses, and incumbents

    may become more predatory, provoking state failure.

    Returning to the empirical record, in the late 1980s, Africa

    underwent a period of political reform. With the end of the

    Cold War, the “third wave” of democratization9 swept across

    the continent and governments that in the 1980s had been

    immune to political challenges now faced organized polit-

    ical opponents. As seen in Figure 2.4, whereas from the

    early 1970s to the mid-1980s, more than 80% of the country-

    year observations contained no- or one-party systems, by the

    mid 1990s, more than 50% experienced multiparty systems.

    With the shift to multiparty politics, those who presided over

    Africa’s authoritarian governments faced an unanticipated

    increase in the level of political risk. Few had prepared them-

    selves to compete at the polls; some surely would have chosen

    8 The phrase comes from Axelrod, R. (1985), The Evolution of Cooperation, New York: Basic Books.

    9 Huntington, S. P. (1991), The Third Wave, Norman, OK: Oklahoma Uni- versity Press.

    26

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.002 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    From Fable to Fact

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    1970- 74

    1975- 79

    1980- 84

    1985- 89

    1990- 95

    Percentage of Country Years

    No-Party

    One-Party

    Multiparty

    Figure 2.4. Political competition over time.

    to govern with more restraint had they known that they might

    someday be forced from political office and shorn of the pro-

    tection it afforded. Incumbents became less secure. And by the

    logic of the fable, they would therefore find the modest rewards

    that accrue to political guardians less attractive, and the fear

    of future punishment less daunting, increasing the temptation

    to engage in predation.

    Resources

    To a degree that exceeds any other region of the world, the

    economies of Africa are based on the production of precious

    minerals, gemstones, petroleum, and other precious com-

    modities. These resources pose a constant temptation to those

    with military power. Were they to shift from guardian to preda-

    tor, their future prosperity would nonetheless be ensured,

    underpinned by the income generated by natural resources.

    27

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.002 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    Introduction

    Consider the case of Nigeria, where, in the words of Bill

    Dudley (1982, p. 92): “[T]he oil boom was a disaster . . . ” – one

    made worse by military rule. As Dudley states:

    [T]he effect of the oil boom was to convert the military polit-

    ical decision-makers . . . into a new property-owning, rentier

    class working in close and direct collaboration with foreign

    business interests with the sole aim of expropriating the sur-

    pluses derived from oil for their private and personal benefit

    (Dudley 1982, p. 116).

    Consider, too, the Sudan or Chad, following the discov-

    ery of oil. In both, incumbent regimes turned to repression,

    the one harrying the Dinka and the other the Sara. Resource

    wealth thus appears to shape the behavior of elites. In the

    face of dwindling public resources or insecure political futures,

    given the availability of wealth from appropriable resources,

    they could greet with equanimity a future of political disorder.

    Those immersed in environments richly endowed by nature

    would therefore be willing to take actions that rendered others

    insecure, thus triggering state failure.

    Conclusion

    The logic of the fable highlights the importance of public

    revenues, democratization, and natural resources and the

    manner in which they impinge upon the possibility of political

    order. As we have seen, the elements that affect political order

    28

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.002 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    From Fable to Fact

    in the fable parallel political forces that shaped the politics of

    the continent in the later decades of the twentieth century.

    While many who have studied Africa have emphasized

    the political importance of economic collapse, the “resource

    curse,” and the relationship between political competition and

    political conflict, this account focuses on the logic that system-

    atically links these forces to the political incentives that under-

    lie state failure. Being abstract, the logic is also adaptable; it

    can play out in a variety of forms. Consider the nature of the

    groups that may – or may not – transmute into militias. In

    one setting, they may be the youth wings of political parties;

    in another, regional coalitions; and in a third, ethnic groups.

    The same applies to the specialists in violence. In some set-

    tings, the military rule; clearly the military specialize in the

    use of violence. In other instances, it is civilians who gov-

    ern. Even a civilian head of state presides over police, public

    prosecutors, and a prison system; by bringing them to bear

    upon citizens, he too can transform the state into an instru-

    ment for predation. In still other instances, the civil service

    assumes the role of a specialist in violence, using its command

    of the bureaucracy to redistribute income from the citizens

    to themselves. Different actors can thus fulfill the major roles

    in the fable, but their parts are inscribed in a common script.

    By the choices they make, they animate the sources of political

    order, induce state failure, thereby enacting the tragedy that

    engulfed late-century Africa.

    29

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.002 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.002 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    Part Two

    Sowing the Seeds

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    3

    Political Legacies

    B y convention, 1960 marks the year of independence inAfrica.1 Shortly after independence, Africa’s new states faced two withering critiques, one mounted by Franz Fanon

    (1963) and a second by Rene Dumont (1962). Although their

    indictments overlap, Fanon’s targeted their politics whereas

    Dumont’s focused on their policies. In this chapter, I ana-

    lyze the nature of post-independence politics, emphasizing

    in particular the nature of political institutions. In Chapter 4,

    I address the policies chosen by Africa’s governments in the

    post-independence era.

    As reported in Chapter 2, by the late 1970s, in more than

    eighty percent of the country years,2 opposition parties failed

    to challenge incumbent heads of state, most often because

    it was illegal for them to do so (Figure 2.4), and in roughly

    1 Of the forty-six states in our sample set of countries, only six had achieved independence prior to 1960; in 1960 alone, fifteen became sovereign.

    2 The sample covers a panel of forty-six countries over twenty years. A single observation therefore constitutes a country year, e.g., Zimbabwe in the year 1970. Thus the origins of this awkward term.

    33

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.003 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    Sowing the Seeds

    one-third of the country years, military officers served as

    heads of state (Figure 2.2). The political institutions of post-

    independence Africa were thus authoritarian. For late-century

    Africa, the consequence was an increased likelihood of politi-

    cal disorder.

    Throughout this chapter, I repeatedly draw illustrations

    from Zambia’s political history. Box 3.1 provides a synopsis,

    to which the reader may refer while seeking to master the sev-

    eral narratives. Map 3.1 outlines the boundaries of Zambia’s

    provinces, whose political leaders jockeyed for top positions

    in the ruling party and national government.

    The Incumbent’s Dilemma

    When colonial regimes departed from Africa, they orchestrated

    their retreat by holding elections and exiting midst the polit-

    ical din. While competitors for office championed the cause

    of independence and denounced the evils of colonialism, a

    notable feature of their campaigns was the stress they placed

    on seizing the “fruits of independence.”

    In a careful study of the city of Abidjan, Michael Cohen

    (1974) explores the use of power in Cote d’Ivoire. Rural back-

    ers of the ruling party, he noted, used their political connec-

    tions to move from provincial towns to the national capital

    (Cohen 1974). Some had been appointed to the boards of state-

    owned corporations, which produced “palm oil, hardwood,

    34

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.003 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    Political Legacies

    Box 3.1. Political highlights, post-independence Zambia

    – Zambia achieved independence in 1964, with the UNIP (the United National Independence Party) as the governing party and ANC (the African National Congress) as the opposition.

    – High office in the governing party translated into high posts in the gov- ernment. Kenneth David Kaunda, president of UNIP, became presi- dent of Zambia as well, and Reuben Kamanga, a politician from the Eastern Province and vice president of UNIP, served also as vice president of Zambia.

    – In 1967, UNIP held internal party elections. A Bemba-speaking bloc captured a majority of the seats in the Central Committee of the ruling party and Simon Kapwepwe, a Bemba-speaker from Northern Province, displaced Reuben Kamanga as vice president.

    – In the subsequent general election, Barotse Province (also known as Western Province) joined the Central and Southern provinces in support of ANC.

    – In 1969, the president dissolved the quarrelsome Central Committee of UNIP, Eastern Province politicians resumed their posts, and Reuben Kamanga returned as vice president.

    – In 1971, the Bemba-speaking politicians, led by Simon Kapwepwe, defected from UNIP, the ruling party, and joined the opposition.

    rubber . . . and construction equipment” (ibid., pp. 24–5). Oth-

    ers received prized plots of land in the low-density town-

    ships, where they built homes, and in the high-density areas,

    where they constructed new enterprises. As they worked their

    way up the political hierarchy, Cohen writes, the backers of

    35

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.003 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    Sowing the Seeds

    Map 3.1. Provinces of Zambia. Note: Ndola is the capital of the

    Copperbelt. Source: www.answers.com/topic/ZM-Provinces.png.

    the ruling party achieved even more desirable addresses.

    “[A]dministrative and political control of urban land conces-

    sions . . . turns out to be an extraordinarily sensitive measure

    of political status within the ruling class,” he writes: “Admin-

    istrative appointments or promotions are often accompanied

    by approval of an individual’s application for land. . . . ” (ibid.,

    pp. 44–5). Cohen concludes with a depiction of a housing pyra-

    mid, in which the “ministers live in luxurious European-style

    villas” (p. 47) while their subordinates dwelt in “smaller but

    36

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.003 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    Political Legacies

    very luxurious homes in Cocody,” a prosperous suburb (p. 48).

    To the powerful, he writes, went the rewards: “[T]he winning

    coalition” used its power to achieve “wealth and position . . . ”

    (p. 6).

    Cote d’Ivoire achieved independence in 1960; Zimbabwe,

    two decades later. As documented by Norma Kriger (2003),

    freedom fighters, political organizers, and rank-and-file mem-

    bers of Zimbabwe’s ruling party began agitating for the rewards

    of independence. Under intense political pressure from the

    ruling party, the Ministry of Home Affairs hired 3,500 freedom

    fighters; the Ministry of Local Government, 2,600 more. The

    Ministry of Health had to sign on 2,000 and the Central Intelli-

    gence Organization more than 1,000 (ibid., p. 178). Once they

    secured jobs, Kriger writes, the militants agitated for additional

    benefits: compensation for losses incurred during the strug-

    gle for independence, pensions, loans, and land. The political

    movement that seized the state thus subsequently “built a vio-

    lent and extractive political order” (ibid., p. 5), as the victors

    continued to agitate for the fruits of independence.

    The pattern has been documented for socialist Zambia

    (Szeftel 1978) as well as capitalist Nigeria (Schatz 1977). As

    described by Dumont (1962) and Fanon (1963), independence

    represented the capture of the state by local political elites who

    then used power to accumulate wealth.

    The ambitions of the elites was equaled by the aspirations

    of the electorate. Thus Barkan, in his study of elections in

    37

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.003 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    Sowing the Seeds

    post-independence Kenya (1976, 1986); Hayward and Kandeh,

    in their study of Sierra Leone (1987); and Hayward, when he

    turned to the study of Ghana (1976), report that constituents

    viewed politicians as their agents whose job it was to bring

    material benefits to the local community – jobs, loans, or cash.

    Those in Kenya, Barkan notes, stoked the fires of political ambi-

    tion, inciting candidates to bid for political support by con-

    tributing funds for the construction of local projects (Barkan

    1976). The result, as Allen writes of Benin, was “the exchange

    of blocs of votes . . . for valued goods. . . . ” (1989, p. 22). Com-

    petitive elections came to resemble a political marketplace, in

    which votes were exchanged for material benefits.

    Analysis

    In 1983, Gerald Kramer (1983) explored the nature of political

    competition in a world in which incumbents and challengers

    compete by distributing material benefits.3 In his analysis, the

    voters value private consumption and party labels and the

    politicians control a fixed stock of material goods. In the com-

    petition for votes, the incumbents move first: They distribute

    benefits in a way designed to return to office, while preserving

    as large a portion as possible for their own consumption. Once

    3 See also Groseclose, T., and J. M. Snyder (1996), “Buying Supermajorities,” American Political Science Review 90(2): 303–15.

    38

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.003 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    Political Legacies

    the governing party has proposed its allocation, the opposition

    then responds with a counteroffer. In this competition, Kramer

    asks, how will incumbents and challengers behave? How will

    they play the game?

    When seeking to unseat the incumbent and to do so at least

    expense, Kramer argues, the challenger will bid for the support

    of those who may be disadvantaged under the incumbent’s

    rule. By offering slightly more than what the incumbent has

    provided, the challenger can capture their votes and weaken

    the incumbent’s coalition. He can then devote the rest of his

    resources to obtaining the additional votes necessary to secure

    a majority. The costs of this strategy will of course be higher the

    greater the degree to which the voters identify with the party

    in power.

    Anticipating the strategy of the challenger, Kramer argues,

    the incumbent’s best strategy will be to distribute benefits

    widely. Should he fail to give a segment of the electorate bene-

    fits equal to those enjoyed by others, then he simply will have

    lowered the costs to the challenger of assembling a sufficient

    number of votes to unseat him.4 The incumbent will therefore

    distribute his resources uniformly across all members of the

    electorate.

    4 In addition, if he spends more on one segment of the electorate than upon others, he could lower his own costs – and increase the resources that he could retain for his own consumption – by reducing the differential.

    39

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.003 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    Sowing the Seeds

    Turning to the voters, Kramer advances the argument an

    additional step by asking: What if they were to behave stra-

    tegically? What if they were to back political parties instru-

    mentally, rather than out of an unreasoned sense of loyalty?

    Behaving strategically, Kramer argues, the voters, in pursuit of

    private benefits, would reduce their level of party loyalty. The

    incumbent can purchase the votes of those who strongly iden-

    tify with the ruling party relatively cheaply; the support of those

    less loyal would command a higher price. As Kramer demon-

    strates, when the voters learn to play the system to their advan-

    tage they will then extract all the benefits on offer. Thus the

    incumbent’s dilemma: Pursuing power to accumulate wealth,

    they find themselves having to surrender their ill-gotten gains

    to retain political office.

    Did not the history of political competition in Zambia lend

    support to Kramer’s argument, it would be easy to dismiss his

    analysis as overstylized, abstract, and therefore divorced from

    the realities of African politics.

    The Example of Zambia

    When Zambia became independent in 1964, it was governed

    by UNIP (the United National Independence Party), which

    had won majorities in all but Central and Southern provinces,

    where the opposition ANC (the Africa National Congress)

    held sway. In local council elections, legislative elections,

    40

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.003 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    Political Legacies

    bi-elections, and general elections, the governing party relent-

    lessly targeted the opposition’s bailiwick. In each round of the

    elections, it flooded the two provinces with organizers, provid-

    ing them with housing, running money, and access to petrol

    from the government’s stores. Most relevant for this discus-

    sion was the theme of the government’s campaigns: “It pays to

    belong to UNIP.” From the government’s point of view, those

    who supported the opposition had merely increased the price

    of their political loyalty. By refurbishing schools, grading roads,

    and distributing public monies through local development

    agencies, the government vigorously bid for votes from the

    heartland of the opposition.

    Naturally, political leaders in other regions deciphered the

    lesson to be drawn from the government’s efforts. Most rele-

    vant is the response of those from Luapula, a province long

    loyal to the governing party. While politicians from the North-

    ern Province dominated the Central Committee and therefore

    the cabinet as well, the government built a well-surfaced road,

    a railway, and an oil pipeline through Northern Province to the

    coast. Political leaders from Luapula Province began to feel

    that their colleagues from Northern Province were reaping a

    disproportion of the benefits from holding office. By lowering

    the level of their loyalty to UNIP, the politicians from Luapula

    reasoned, they could increase the price of their support for

    the incumbent regime and secure a larger share of the spoils

    (Bates 1976). The flirtation of the “Luapulaists” with defection

    41

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.003 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    Sowing the Seeds

    adumbrated later revolts, as other regional blocs listed their

    grievances and maneuvered to extract benefits from those in

    power.

    From the government’s point of view, the costs of retaining

    office had risen. Threatened with additional provincial defec-

    tions and thus with the loss of power, the president empan-

    elled a commission to explore the electoral rules; he charged

    the commission with enquiring into the merits of single-party

    rule. As documented by Larmer (2006), the commission

    solemnly convened hearings in each and every region. Having

    heard testimony in favor and against the abolition of opposi-

    tion parties, it sensibly performed the task for which it had in

    fact been convened: It recommended that Zambia become a

    one-party state.

    While the case does not map as clearly onto the matrix of

    Kramer’s model as does that of Zambia, the post-indepen-

    dence politics of Benin suggests similar forces at play. “Re-

    sources,” Allen writes (1989), “were necessarily limited, but ex-

    pansion and retention of support implied an ever-increasing

    pressure for allocation of resources. . . . ” (p. 25). The compe-

    tition for support led to a twenty percent increase in public

    employment and a forty percent increase in public expendi-

    ture – all in the first five years of independence. But then the

    government encountered a critical constraint: the unwilling-

    ness of the central bank, which was controlled by France, to

    underwrite further increases in spending. By the late 1960s,

    42

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.003 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    Political Legacies

    Allen writes, it had become apparent to all that the system

    based on the competitive supply of “pork” could no longer be

    sustained (ibid.). The governing elite then put an end to elec-

    toral competition.

    As in Zambia, in Benin – and elsewhere – incumbents

    formed single-party regimes. In other instances, and espe-

    cially under military rulers, the incumbents formed no-party

    systems. In the single-party regime, the cabinets were dom-

    inated by top officials from the ruling party; in the no-party

    system, the presidents formed cabinets as if picking a per-

    sonal staff. In either case, in response to the crisis of clien-

    telism, in Allen’s phrasing (Allen 1989), or to the high costs

    of securing wealth from power, in the language of this study,

    incumbents changed the structure of the political game. They

    created authoritarian governments.

    The New Political Game

    Even after the banning of party competition, competitive polit-

    ical forces remained, but they played out within the regime. It

    was the head of state, rather than the voter, who now became

    the object of competitive bidding, as minor apparatchiks jock-

    eyed for recognition and competed for political favor and,

    while doing so, marked down the price of their political loy-

    alty. Political sycophancy replaced constituency service as the

    best strategy for those with ambitions for office.

    43

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.003 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    Sowing the Seeds

    Given the new structure of political competition, it was the

    supplier rather than the demander of political favors who now

    held the advantage. In the game of authoritarian politics, the

    head of state controlled both access to material benefits and

    control of the means of coercion. And it was to the chief exec-

    utive that wealth and power now flowed.

    In most African states, major financial institutions fell

    under the control of the chief executive. Allen (1989) notes

    that presidents in Francophone West Africa kept the ministry

    of planning in their portfolios, not because they were com-

    mitted to the formulation of development plans but rather

    because these ministries received, and disbursed, foreign aid;

    by controlling them, the president controlled a major source

    of foreign exchange. In the case of Benin, he noted, the foreign

    aid channeled through this ministry totaled $600 million in

    1980–83 and “thus matched the size of the recurrent budget”

    (Allen 1989, p. 52). In countries outside of the Francophone

    zone, the president often controlled the central bank. Accord-

    ing to Erwin Blumenthal,5 the national bank of Zaire main-

    tained such accounts in Brussels, Paris, London, and New York

    registered in the name of the national president (Blumenthal

    1982).

    5 Blumenthal had been dispatched by the International Monetary Fund to restructure and manage the finances of Zaire.

    44

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.003 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    Political Legacies

    In addition to the financial bureaucracy, the president con-

    trolled the means of coercion. Policing remains a national, not

    a local, activity throughout most of Africa. The office of the

    president oversaw the ministry of interior. The attorney gen-

    eral, the official prosecutor for the state; the special branch;

    and the prison system – in most countries, these agencies

    lodged within the office of the president. In addition, the pres-

    ident controlled special military forces, many organized to

    suppress internal opposition rather than to defend against

    external threats. Examples would include Robert Mugabe’s

    Fifth Brigade, which unleashed a reign of terror in opposi-

    tion areas within five years after independence, or Kwame

    Nkrumah’s President’s Own Guard Regiment (POGR), some-

    times referred to as his “private army” (Meredith 2005, p. 19).

    Consider, too, the military units that reported to the president

    of Zaire. Among them numbered:

    A Civil Guard, commanded by his brother-in-law, Kpama

    Baramoto;

    A Special Research and Surveillance Brigade, commanded

    by General Blaise Bolozi, also related to the President by

    marriage;

    A Special Action Forces, a paramilitary unit, commanded

    by Honore Ngabanda Nzambo-ku-Atumba, a close aide

    of Joseph Desire Mobutu and his chief of intelligence;

    45

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.003 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    Sowing the Seeds

    and a Special Presidential Division, by all accounts the

    most effective unit of them all, commanded by Gen-

    eral Nzimbi Ngabale, also a “close relative” (Nzongola-

    Ntalaja 2002, p. 154).

    With control over wealth and the means of coercion,

    authoritarian regimes were able to play a game that differed

    from that played in the era of multiparty politics. As a mo-

    nopoly supplier of political favors, the president could indi-

    vidually tailor his political offers. Thus Kenneth Kaunda could

    secure the loyalty of Mainza Chona at lower cost, given the

    latter’s lack of a strong political base, than he could Simon

    Kapwepe, who enjoyed a large following. Or Joseph Desire

    Mobutu could recruit Barthelemy Bisegimana to serve as his

    chief of staff at low cost, given the latter’s ambiguous standing

    as a “citizen” of Rwandan extraction, but had to tolerate the

    barbs and indulge (some of ) the whims of Étienne Tshiesekedi

    with his strong local backing (Nzongola-Ntalaja 2004). And

    rather than having to allocate resources in a universalistic and

    egalitarian manner, the chief executive could employ them to

    assemble a team of just sufficient political weight for winning.

    With control over the means of coercion, the president was

    positioned to make take-it-or-leave-it offers; with control over

    bounteous benefits and fearsome sanctions, he could prevent

    efforts by others to collude. The winning coalition would there-

    fore not be egalitarian and universalistic, but rather unequal

    46

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.003 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    Political Legacies

    and minimum winning (Baron and Ferejohn 1989). And by

    assembling a ruling coalition of small size, the president could

    divert a larger portion of the “national pie” to his own bank

    account.

    The Shrinking Political Arena

    In post-independence Africa, most states became authoritar-

    ian (see Figures 2.2 and 2.4): Rather than having to distribute

    benefits in a universalistic manner, incumbents could now

    allocate them more narrowly, thereby retaining a greater por-

    tion for themselves.

    Once thus reconfigured, the political order appeared in-

    creasingly to narrow; in the words of Kasfir (1976), in the 1970s,

    it was “shrinking” in size.6 In search of resources to consume

    and to expend in the pursuit of power, elites continued to en-

    gage in extraction; their taxes were levied universally. But by

    channeling benefits to those whom they favored, the elites

    could offset the costs they inflicted upon those in whose loyalty

    they sought to invest. The value of the (net) benefits would

    increase as the number of clients declined, thus generating

    incentives for the insiders to narrow the definition of what it

    meant to be loyal.7 Incentives thus dictated a logic of exclusion.

    6 The phrase is taken from Kasfir, N. (1976), The Shrinking Political Arena, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    7 This analysis draws upon Adam, C. S., and S. A. O’Connell (1999), “Aid, Taxation, and Development in Sub-Saharan Africa,” Economics and

    47

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.003 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    Sowing the Seeds

    The criterion for exclusion varied. Politicians often played

    the nationality card: They thereby sought to exclude foreigners

    from employment, as in Cote d’Ivoire (Cohen 1974), or from

    ownership of land, as in Zaire (Lemarchand 2003; Nzongola-

    Ntalaja 2004). In Zambia and Cote d’Ivoire, they invoked

    national origins to discredit presidential candidates – Kenneth

    Kaunda and Alassane Öutarra, respectively – arguing that they

    had been born to immigrant parents.

    Politicians also sought to restrict the benefits provided by

    government to members of the ruling party. In single-party

    states, those who were not members could not aspire to pub-

    lic office or to a position in the public portion of the economy.

    In Sierra Leone, Kpundeh records, clause 139 (3) of the cons-

    titution of the ruling party provided that “no one can be

    appointed or continue to be a permanent secretary ‘unless he

    is a member of the recognized party’” that is, of the All People’s

    Congress (APC), the governing party (Kpundeh 1995, p. 65). So,

    too, in Zaire: When drafting the 1973 regulations for the ser-

    vice, the civil service commissioner stated “special emphasis,

    among the conditions required for recruitment, is placed on

    party militancy and Zairian nationality” (Gould 1980, p. 67).

    And in Senegal, Boone writes, “licenses were granted to the

    Politics 11(3): 225–54; and Bueno de Mesquita, B., A. Smith, et al. (2003), The Logic of Political Survival, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. See also Kasara, K. (2007), “Tax Me If You Can,” American Political Science Review 101(1): 159–72.

    48

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.003 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    Political Legacies

    bons militants of the UPS [the Senegalese Progressive Union,

    the ruling political party]” (Boone 1990, as quoted in Tangri

    1999, p. 75).

    To achieve a deeper familiarity with the meaning of single-

    party rule, I turn once again to the case of Zambia. After Pres-

    ident Kaunda reinstated the Eastern Province politicians to

    their posts in UNIP’s Central Committee (see Box 3.1), sev-

    eral Bemba-speaking leaders defected and formed an oppo-

    sition party. The government responded by filing trumped-

    up charges of murder and assault and detained the dissident

    leaders.

    When Simon Kapwepwe, the Bemba-speaking vice presi-

    dent, also defected from UNIP, the government realized that

    it stood to lose political support in the Luapula, Northern, and

    Copperbelt provinces – all dominated by Bemba-speakers –

    and so it could be left in control of fewer than one-half of

    the provinces in Zambia. The government therefore sought to

    manipulate the electoral process. Seats in Parliament, it was

    ruled, belonged to the party, not the person; and when a mem-

    ber crossed the floor, her seat then became vacant, neces-

    sitating a bi-election, which it contested vigorously and vio-

    lently, supporting its candidates with the resources of the state.

    The government also reverted to repression. When those who

    defected from the ruling party sought reelection to Parliament,

    they found their permits for meetings denied, their campaign

    posters defaced, and their supporters intimidated by gangs

    49

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.003 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    Sowing the Seeds

    of youths and squads of police. In January 1972, one such

    gang assaulted Simon Kapwepwe. In February, the government

    banned his party and rounded up and imprisoned more

    than 100 of its leaders. Many were beaten, some were tortur-

    ed, and, as already noted, Zambia became a one-party state

    (Gertzel, Baylies et al. 1984; Larmer 2006).

    Following the end of multiparty politics, membership in the

    ruling party became a form of citizenship. In 1970, the Provin-

    cial Conference of UNIP resolved that “the UNIP membership

    card should be made a legal document for the purpose of iden-

    tification and holders of the card should be given preferential

    treatment over non-holders in such spheres as employment,

    promotions, markets, loans, business, housing and all socio-

    economic activities” (Larmer 2006, pp. 36–7). Ordinary people

    could not board public transport, cross bridges or pontoons,

    or transact in public markets without producing a party card.

    Those with educations and finances could not hold director-

    ships or posts in state industries, qualify for bursaries or loans,

    or secure the kinds of positions to which they aspired: ones

    with a housing allowance, a limousine, and opportunities for

    travel abroad. By tightly circumscribing the range of poten-

    tial political beneficiaries, Zambia’s political elite more tightly

    restricted access to economic opportunities.

    In some instances, the logic that drove the politics of exclu-

    sion appears to have culminated in the formation of a truly

    50

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.003 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    Political Legacies

    miniscule elite. In Rwanda, for example, President Juvenel

    Habyarimana, close family members, and senior members of

    the family of his wife dominated the financial ministries, the

    security services, and the ruling party. That the word akasu, or

    small house, came to refer to this group underlines the diminu-

    tive size of the inner circle (Prunier 1998). In Kenya, Jomo

    Kenyatta, his sons, his wives, and their relatives were referred

    to as the “royal family.” Burundi was governed by a small group

    from Bururi; Zaire by the “Ngbandi” clique from Equateur; and

    Togo by the Kabye from Kara in the north.

    To comprehend the capacity of such small groups to remain

    in power, it is useful to recall that the security services in

    Kenya were headed by the president’s in-law; that Equateur,

    Bururi, and Kara provided the military elite in Zaire, Burundi,

    and Togo, respectively; and that the akasu headed a security

    apparatus that in April 1994 proved capable of killing 800,000

    Rwandans.

    The restructuring of African political institutions thus trig-

    gered a logic of exclusion, resulting in political privilege and

    economic inequality. Implicit in these transformations lay as

    well the strengthening of incentives for political elites to deal

    in private rather than public goods.

    Consider a district of 20,000 people, each expecting “his”

    or “her” politician to provide one dollar in benefits. The crea-

    tion of one public good, producing a dollar’s worth of benefits

    51

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.003 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    Sowing the Seeds

    for each resident, would be likely to cost less than the placing

    of a dollar in the pocket of each resident. In general, as the

    number of persons who claim benefits from the political elite

    rises, the cost advantage to politicians of providing benefits in

    the form of public rather than private goods increases as well.

    As Africa’s political elite restricted the scope of those entitled

    to the benefits of independence, this advantage declined. The

    shrinking of the political arena thus led to a reduction in the

    incentives for those who sought positions of power to reward

    their followers with public goods. Private benefits drove out

    public goods as the coin of the political realm.8

    Conclusion

    In this chapter, I have argued that searching for wealth and

    power, political elites reconfigured African political institu-

    tions, transforming them from multi- to single- or no-party sys-

    tems or replacing civilian governments with military regimes.

    They also narrowed the range of those entitled to political ben-

    efits. Rather than political independence serving the collec-

    tive welfare, then, it instead conferred narrowly circumscribed

    privileges upon those who won out in the competition for polit-

    ical office.

    8 This analysis builds upon Adam, C. S., and S. A. O’Connell (1999), “Aid, Taxation, and Development in Sub-Saharan Africa,” Economics and Poli- tics 11(3): 225–54; and Bueno de Mesquita, B., A. Smith, et al. (2003), The Logic of Political Survival, Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.

    52

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.003 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    Political Legacies

    During the struggle for independence, Africa’s citizens

    had embraced politics. In response to the political realities

    about them, however, in the post-independence era, they

    increasingly came to view their leaders as a source of insecurity

    and the state as a source of threat rather than of well-being.

    53

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.003 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.003 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    4

    Policy Choices

    F ocusing on the determinants of economic growth in thepost-independence period, researchers from the Africa Economic Research Consortium (AERC) isolated a set of “anti-

    growth” syndromes: styles of policymaking that reduce the rate

    at which national economies could grow (Ndulu, Collier et al.

    2007). Most common is the combination of policies that they

    designate as “control regimes,” which led to:

    1. A closed economy.

    2. The distortion of key prices in the macroeconomy.

    3. The promotion and regulation of industries.

    4. The regulation of markets.

    In this chapter, I shall describe these policies and discuss

    their origins and their consequences. Control regimes are eco-

    nomically costly, and I shall explain why incumbents nonethe-

    less retained them, even after their costs were known. The

    reason, I argue, is that the policies generated political ben-

    efits for Africa’s authoritarian regimes. They provided elites

    55

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.004 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    Sowing the Seeds

    with sources of income and furnished means for transform-

    ing even declining economies into political organizations,

    enabling politicians to recruit political dependents, willing to

    fight – if necessary – to keep them in power. While yielding

    political advantages, however, these policies contributed to

    the subsequent collapse of Africa’s states.

    The Content of Control Regimes

    As reported by the AERC researchers, governments that adopt

    control regimes regulate trade, manipulate the interest and

    exchange rates, and develop close ties with urban-based

    industries.

    The Control of Trade

    In the post-independence period, governments imposed tar-

    iffs and quantitative controls on a wide range of industrial pro-

    ducts. To sell their goods in Africa’s markets, foreign firms then

    had to “jump over” these barriers and to invest in the plant and

    equipment that would enable them to produce and thus mar-

    ket their goods locally. These policies most frequently targeted

    the goods most commonly consumed by the residents of poor

    societies: processed foods, beverages, textiles, shoes, blankets,

    kerosene, and other consumer products. In at least one case,

    56

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.004 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    Policy Choices

    Zambia, the government severely restricted the importation of

    automobiles; and for a brief and inglorious moment, automo-

    biles were produced in Livingstone, a small urban center on

    the southern border of the country (Elliott 1971).

    Macroeconomic Policies

    Given the low level of industrialization, investors wishing to

    establish new firms had to import plant and equipment from

    abroad. To lower the costs of such investments, governments

    restructured financial markets. Creating banks that targeted

    “commerce,” “industry,” or more broadly “development,” they

    made available loans at low rates of interest to those seeking

    to invest in projects to which they accorded a high priority.

    Outside of the Franc zone, they issued their own currencies.

    Many then employed their control over the banking system to

    set the rate at which this currency could be exchanged for cur-

    rencies from abroad. By overvaluing their currency, they set

    the exchange rate to the advantage of importers: Because they

    could purchase foreign “dollars” more cheaply, those seeking

    to invest in local industry could then import plant and equip-

    ment at lower cost. Trade barriers having already been set in

    place, their goods remained protected against foreign compe-

    tition, whose products would have gained a price advantage

    as a result of the revaluation of the local currency.

    57

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.004 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    Sowing the Seeds

    Industrial Regulation

    Governments that implemented control regimes also imple-

    mented regulatory policies that enhanced the profitability

    of firms. By licensing, they discouraged entry and protected

    established producers. When governments themselves owned

    firms, the governments were certain to prevent new firms

    from competing with established producers; public enter-

    prises then remained as the monopoly suppliers of their prod-

    ucts. Moreover, because governments subsidized the costs of

    capital, many firms adopted capital-intensive technologies;

    they then tended to operate most profitably when producing

    near full capacity. Because the protected markets of Africa were

    small, the result was the creation of highly concentrated indus-

    tries, with but one or two large firms in each, with firms operat-

    ing at low capacity and therefore at high cost. But because the

    noncompetitive structure of the domestic market conferred

    on firms the power to set prices, they could remain privately

    profitable, even while highly inefficient.

    The Incidence of Costs and Benefits

    When governments artificially increased the value of their cur-

    rencies, the benefits that they conferred upon the importers

    of capital equipment were matched by the costs they inflicted

    58

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.004 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    Policy Choices

    on exporters. When foreign dollars converted into fewer cedi

    (the unit of currency of Ghana), or other African currencies,

    exporters experienced a reduction in their incomes. In Africa’s

    agrarian economies, most exporters were farmers, who pro-

    duced coffee, cocoa, sugar, cotton, sisal, and other crops for

    foreign markets. When governments artificially increased the

    value of their currencies, they may have protected the prof-

    its of industrial firms by imposing tariffs and quantitative

    restrictions on imports, but they rarely offered similar pro-

    tection to farmers. Producers of rice in West Africa therefore

    found themselves competing in local markets with imports

    from Louisiana, and producers of cassava in Central Africa

    faced competition from bakers advantaged by the low costs of

    imported wheat. Trade policies were thus biased against the

    exporters of cash crops and the producers of food crops as

    well.

    When governments regulated urban industries, they pro-

    tected the profits of urban firms: By limiting competition,

    they granted them the power to set prices to their advantage.

    When governments regulated agriculture, they conferred mar-

    ket power on consumers: They created monopsonies for the

    purchase of both export and food crops. Governments pur-

    chased the cash crops at a low domestic price, sold them at

    the prices prevailing in international markets, and deposited

    the difference in the public treasury. They purchased the food

    59

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.004 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    Sowing the Seeds

    crops at prices set to ensure that soldiers, bureaucrats, and

    urban workers would be assured of low cost food.

    In the 1960s, the majority of Africa’s population lived in

    the rural areas and agriculture constituted the largest single

    industry. The policies thus favored the interests of a minority

    over those of the vast majority of the population in most states.

    As noted by Dumont (1966), “In May 1961 a number of farmers

    north of Brazzaville said to me: ‘Independence isn’t for us; it’s

    only for the city people’” (p. 17). It was precisely this property

    of post-independence policies that Dumont condemned.

    Control regimes thus benefited the urban and industrial

    sector; indeed, given the aspiration for industrial development

    that motivated many policymakers, this was their intent. But

    they did so at the expense of the great majority of Africa’s pop-

    ulation – those who lived in the rural areas – and the greatest

    of Africa’s industries – agriculture.

    For these policies to persist, opposition to them had to be

    demobilized. The most likely opponents would be farmers;

    and because they constituted a political majority, the farmers

    were dangerous. The political commitment to control regimes

    could persist, then, only insofar as political challengers

    lacked an incentive to pursue electoral majorities. Authoritar-

    ian institutions thus underpinned the imposition of control

    regimes.

    The relationship between political institutions and public

    policies is captured by the data in Figures 4.1 and 4.2.

    60

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.004 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    Policy Choices

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    Military Civilian All

    P e

    rc e

    n t

    O b

    s e

    rv a

    ti o

    n s

    Percent Control Regimes

    Figure 4.1. Control regimes and military government.

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    No-Party One-Party Multiparty All

    P e

    rc e

    n t

    O b

    s e

    rv a

    ti o

    n s

    Percent Control Regimes

    Figure 4.2. Control regimes and party system.

    As indicated in Figure 4.1, military governments were far

    more likely than civilian ones to adopt control regimes. From

    the period 1970–1995, in more than 50% of the country years,

    if the data registered the presence of military regimes, they

    registered the presence of control regimes as well. As shown

    in Figure 4.2, one- and no-party regimes were also more likely

    to adopt control regimes, with more than 50% of the observa-

    tions that centered on no- or single- party systems exhibiting

    control regimes as well, as compared with but 30% of those

    with multiparty systems. In this study, I label as authoritarian

    governments that are headed by soldiers rather than civilians

    61

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.004 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    Sowing the Seeds

    and those civilian regimes that have banned the formation of

    opposition parties. The data thus suggest an elective affinity

    between authoritarian politics and interventionist policies in

    the post-independence period.1

    Economic Costs and Political Benefits

    Given that agriculture is the largest single industry in most

    African countries, it is not surprising that the economies of

    countries that imposed control regimes appear to have grown

    more slowly than others. The AERC research team measured

    the economic impact of four major “anti-growth” syndromes

    (Ndulu, Collier et al. 2007). The first was state failure. Next

    came “inter-temporal redistribution,” which most commonly

    occurred when governments would consume rather than save

    the proceeds of resource booms. A third was ethnic or regional

    redistribution, when governments became the political agents

    of subnational minorities. The fourth was the adoption of con-

    trol regimes.

    Controlling for a variety of factors that might affect growth –

    the growth rate of trading partners, for example – and

    1 See, too, the Appendix. Turn as well to Chapters 4 and 11 of the first vol- ume of Ndulu, B., P. Collier, et al. (2007), The Political Economy of Economic Growth in Africa, 1960–2000, 2 vols, Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univer- sity Press.

    62

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.004 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    Policy Choices

    correcting for the impact of the growth rate on the choice

    of policies, the researchers confirmed what most would have

    expected: that state failure was the most damaging to growth.

    When states failed in late-century Africa, growth rates fell

    between 1.8% and 1.9% per annum. More surprising, perhaps,

    was that they found that the imposition of a control regime

    led to a loss of roughly 1.6 percentage points per annum in the

    growth rate, thus rivaling the impact of state failure. State fail-

    ure was relatively rare, occurring in just more than 10% of the

    country years, 1970–1995. The imposition of control regimes,

    however, was most decidedly not: They appear in more than

    60% of the country year observations in the late 1970s and

    early 1980s. The adoption of control regimes thus imposed

    high costs on Africa’s economies.

    If the policies harmed the economic interests of most

    Africans and lowered the growth rate of national economies,

    then why were they chosen? And, once chosen, why did they

    remain in place? The answer, I argue, is that the policies served

    political rather than economic interests.The interventionist

    style of policymaking enabled governments to target benefits

    to important constituencies, thus – in the short term, at least –

    promoting political order. And by transforming industries and

    markets into political organizations, it enabled governments

    to spin webs of political obligation and thus forge the political

    machines that kept them in power.

    63

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.004 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    Sowing the Seeds

    Political Benefits

    In West Africa, the richer regions lie in the southern portions,

    which are heavily forested. The Sahelian regions – dry and with

    uncertain rainfall – have little to offer the international econ-

    omy2; lying inland from the coast, what little they have to offer

    has necessarily to be shipped at high cost, leaving few prof-

    its for producers. Throughout West Africa, then, there exists a

    disparity between the economies of the coast and interior.

    Illustrative is the case of Nigeria. At the time of indepen-

    dence, the economy’s most important exports – cocoa, palm

    oil, and other agricultural products – flowed from the south.

    Not only did the south have prosperous farmers, but it also was

    home to the merchants, bankers, and lawyers who provided the

    services for the export industries. While the north was not rich,

    it was powerful. It contained more than one-half of Nigeria’s

    population. It was relatively homogeneous: The great major-

    ity of its people followed Islam and considered themselves to

    be Hausa-Fulani. And its emirates provided a means for orga-

    nizing its people. While relatively poor, then, the region could

    marshal formidable political forces.

    By dint of the north’s large size and degree of organization,

    following independence, its politicians assumed control of the

    executive branch of the federal government. Pursuing a policy

    2 The exception is cotton, which long has faced high tariff barriers in global markets.

    64

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.004 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    Policy Choices

    of import substituting industrialization (Helleiner 1966; Little,

    Scitovsky et al. 1970; Schatz 1977), the government promoted

    the formation of domestic industries, many of which it con-

    vinced to locate in the north. It also placed a disproportion of

    its development projects in the region. The costs of these ini-

    tiatives fell largely upon the south, whose consumers paid the

    higher prices that resulted from tariff protection and whose

    farmers paid the taxes that financed public investments.

    The south’s reaction is captured in a statement issued in

    1964 by the government of the eastern region:

    Take a look at what they [the North] have done. . . . Kainji Dam

    Project – about £150 of our money when completed – all in the

    North. . . . Bornu Railway Extension – about £75 million of our

    money when completed – all in the North. . . . Military training

    and ammunition factories and installations are based in the

    North, thereby using your money to train Northerners to fight

    Southerners. . . . Building of a road to link the dam site and the

    Sokoto cement works – £7 million, when completed – all in the

    North. . . . Total on all these projects about £262 million (italics

    in original Gboyega 1997, p. 161).

    The regional tensions that marked the politics of Nigeria

    found their parallel elsewhere in Africa. In Togo, General

    Gnassingbé Eyadéma held power for thirty-eight years; him-

    self from the north, Eyadéma used the powers of the state to

    extract the wealth of the south for the benefit of his family, the

    military, and his region. In Ghana and Cote d’Ivoire, it was the

    65

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.004 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    Sowing the Seeds

    south that tended to control the national government; but by

    choosing northerners for the vice presidency (as in the case of

    Ghana) or by intervening in the economy and channeling pub-

    lic funds into the interior (as in Cote d’Ivoire), political leaders

    sought to ease regional tensions.3

    Turning to East Africa, Uganda, too, was marked by north-

    ern poverty and southern prosperity. In Tanzania, the pro-

    ducers of export crops cluster at the higher elevations, where

    they enjoy bounteous and reliable rainfall and moderate

    temperatures; the dry climate and arid lands at lower eleva-

    tions sustain subsistence production. Both Milton Obote in

    Uganda and Julius Nyerere in Tanzania built their political

    base in the poorer regions, propounded socialist principles,

    and imposed control regimes in an effort to redistribute the

    wealth of the prosperous regions to the semi-arid zones.

    While these examples are suggestive, the evidence from

    Zambia is more compelling. It enables one to observe “in real

    time,” as it were, the process by which regional tensions shaped

    policy choices. Within a half decade of independence, the

    United National Independence Party – UNIP, the governing

    party – was wracked by conflict between regional blocs of

    3 For an analysis of similar tensions in Cameroon, see Bayart, J.-F. (1989), Cameroon, in Contemporary West African States, edited by John Dunn, Donal B. Cruise O’Brien, and Richard Rathbone, London: Oxford Uni- versity Press; and Levine, V. T. (1986), Leadership and Regime Changes in Perspective, in The Political Economy of Cameroon, edited by M. G. Schatzberg and I. W. Zartman, New York: Praeger.

    66

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.004 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    Policy Choices

    politicians, each of whom sought to seize high offices in the

    ruling party and thus in the government as well. Politicians

    from the Bemba-speaking districts made up one faction. They

    came from the Northern and Luapula provinces, and also

    from Copperbelt Province, the mineral rich region to which

    Bemba speakers had long migrated in search of employment

    (see Map 3.1). Another faction consisted of politicians from

    the Nyanja-speaking provinces: Eastern Province and Lusaka

    (which includes the city of Lusaka, the national capital). To

    the side stood the leaders from Barotse, or Western Province,

    in the southwest; the Central and Southern provinces, largely

    controlled by the opposition party; and the North-Western

    Province, which was sparsely inhabited.

    At the time of independence, 1964, politicians from the

    Eastern Province held the vice presidency and the largest sin-

    gle bloc of seats in the Central Committee (see Box 3.1). Three

    years later, the Bemba-speaking politicians coalesced with

    those from Central and Southern provinces to seize the vice

    presidency and capture the Central Committee. The result was

    a political crisis within the ruling party, as the losers sought to

    lay claim to the offices they once had held, and to the govern-

    ment posts, with their attendant perquisites, that went with

    them. In response to this crisis, the president, Kenneth Kaunda,

    introduced the first of what became known as “economic

    reforms.” In this instance, the reforms involved the takeover of

    foreign-owned companies. The distribution and management

    67

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.004 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    Sowing the Seeds

    of their assets provided a resource to compensate those who

    lost out in the competition for power.

    In the general elections that followed those within the rul-

    ing party, Barotse, whose leaders had allied with the Nyanja-

    speaking bloc, defected to ANC (the Africa National Congress),

    thus joining the Central and Southern provinces in the ranks

    of the opposition. To consolidate support in the six provinces

    that remained loyal, President Kaunda struck once again, this

    time nationalizing the copper industry. In 1969, the newly

    elected vice president of UNIP resigned, sparking rumors of

    the withdrawal of the Bemba-speaking bloc from the govern-

    ing party. The president responded with yet another economic

    “reform,” adding the banking and insurance industries to the

    government’s portfolio (see Elliott 1971; Szeftel 1978; Burdette

    1988).

    In the years following independence, regional conflict thus

    punctuated the politics of Zambia. In response to the open-

    ing of each political fissure, the president extended the scope

    of the government’s control of the economy. By nationalizing

    firms, gaining control over key sectors, and building a regu-

    latory apparatus about publicly owned firms,4 the president

    multiplied the political resources at his command. He posted

    4 The firms were known as INDECO (Industrial Development Corporation), FINDECO (Finance and Development Corporation), and MINDECO (Min- ing Development Corporation), all under ZIMCO (Zambia Industrial and Mining Corporation).

    68

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.004 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    Policy Choices

    politicians to the boards of each firm in which the government

    held an interest. And he staffed the bureaucracy that superin-

    tended each group of firms with directors chosen from within

    the ruling party.

    Interventionist policies, the example of Zambia suggests,

    confer upon governments the resources with which to ame-

    liorate political tensions, many arising from conflicts between

    regions. Control regimes may be expensive, then; they may

    reduce the rate of economic growth of the national econ-

    omy. But their costs appear to represent the costs of forging

    viable political bargains. In Africa, political order is expensive

    to maintain.

    The Maintenance of Authoritarian Regimes

    If conflicts between regional political delegations help to

    account for the adoption of control regimes, the question still

    remains: Why, once chosen, did they remain in place?

    A major reason for the retention of these policies, I would

    argue, is that they were economically rewarding for those in

    power – and politically useful as well. They provided the liga-

    ments that bound together Africa’s authoritarian regimes.

    As we have seen, when imposing control regimes, govern-

    ments often pegged their currency at a value higher than that

    which would have been generated by a competitive market.

    When doing so, they created an excess demand for foreign

    69

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.004 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    Sowing the Seeds

    “dollars.” Those in possession of local currency could then

    purchase foreign currencies at a price that lay below that pre-

    vailing in currency markets. Because the demand for foreign

    exchange exceeded the supply at official prices, the foreign

    currencies then had to be rationed: Whoever controlled their

    allocation was now in a position to reward his political follow-

    ers, his family, and his friends. Control over the central bank

    creates the opportunity to increase one’s wealth and to build

    a political network.

    By appreciating the value of the domestic currency, gov-

    ernments that intervened in currency markets increased the

    demand for imports. When the currency was set at an artifi-

    cially high level, those who secured it at the official price could

    purchase foreign goods more cheaply. By importing those

    goods and selling them in the domestic market, they could

    then pocket in local currency the benefit created by the gov-

    ernment’s manipulation of the exchange rate. But because the

    currency was set at an artificially high level, those who export

    earned less in foreign markets: Each dollar earned abroad gen-

    erated less local income. With the demand for imports increas-

    ing and the incentives to export decreasing, governments that

    set the value of their currency too high soon began to incur

    trade deficits. To stem these deficits, they began to regulate

    imports. They blocked the importation of “luxuries” to facili-

    tate the continued importation of “essential” goods, banning

    the import of liquor, for example, to enable the purchase of

    70

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.004 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    Policy Choices

    medicines or banning the importation of motorcars to safe-

    guard the purchase of tractors.

    Governments that sought to control the value of their

    money in international markets thus soon found themselves

    regulating the flow of trade as well. One result was the growth

    of a bureaucracy to ration access to foreign exchange and the

    importation of foreign goods. Another was the growth of politi-

    cal machines, as those who controlled and enforced trade regu-

    lations conferred the right of access to foreign markets, thereby

    creating clients: people who owed them their economic for-

    tunes and whose political loyalty they could therefore expect

    in return.

    The intersection of the borders between Rwanda, Uganda,

    and eastern Zaire (present-day Congo) provides an apt illustra-

    tion. In 1973, General Juvenal Habyarimana deposed Gregoire

    Kayibanda as president of Rwanda. Already commander of

    the armed forces, the new president sought control over the

    economic bureaucracy as well, including – and perhaps espe-

    cially – the central bank.

    To the west of Rwanda lie some of the most productive

    lands of Zaire: temperate, well watered, and endowed with

    rich, volcanic soils. There grows some of the best coffee pro-

    duced in East Africa. Near the border also lie deposits of gold

    and some of the last major herds of elephants in Africa. Able to

    purchase hard currencies at advantageous rates, those upon

    whom Habyarimana conferred access to foreign exchange at

    71

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.004 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    Sowing the Seeds

    the official rate were at an advantage in the scramble for the

    riches of eastern Zaire. The president targeted his largesse on

    his family, his wife’s family, and his subordinates in his mili-

    tary, many of whom, like Habyarimana and his wife, came from

    the northern districts of the country. Funded by members of

    Rwanda’s inner circle, traders and businessmen crossed the

    border to Zaire and purchased coffee, ivory, and gold. Trans-

    porting these goods to the coast, they returned laden with

    luxuries: liquor, automobiles, appliances, and expensive cloth-

    ing, to be sold in shops, boutiques, and showrooms owned

    by friends of the president.5 Each member of the president’s

    circle then assembled his own political retinue from among

    those to whom they had extended favors: the granting of for-

    eign exchange, the “right” to market shoes or liquor purchased

    abroad, or to sell their coffee to private buyers instead of to the

    state monopoly. The politicians thus cast webs of political obli-

    gation about the informal markets to which the government’s

    interventionist policies gave rise.

    Recall that the ruling elite controlled not only the economic

    agencies but also the security services. The political ties that

    ramified about the regulated economy were forged not only

    from selective benefits but also from targeted sanctions. Many

    5 Meredith, M. (2005), The State of Africa: A History of Fifty Years of Independence, London: Free Press. Interviews by the author, Rwanda, 2000.

    72

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.004 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    Policy Choices

    of the most valuable sources of wealth were illegal: Riches were

    gleaned in the “shadow economy.” Those who secured their

    income illegally were liable to seizure, prosecution, and deten-

    tion – or worse, and their vulnerability grew in proportion to

    their bank accounts. Given that they had violated the law, their

    prospects – financial and political – lay at the discretion of those

    who controlled the coercive apparatus of the state.

    Conclusion

    In this chapter, I have argued that there is an elective affin-

    ity between political institutions and policy choices in post-

    independence Africa. The banning of opposition parties and

    the end of multiparty politics enabled political elites to adopt

    and retain economic policies that harmed farmers, even

    though in many states the rural producers formed a major-

    ity of the population. Because politicians competed for the

    favor of the state house rather than for the backing of citizens,

    the numerical supremacy of Africa’s rural population posed no

    threat to those in power and so failed to alter their choice of

    policies.

    Because of the incidence of the costs, control regimes effec-

    tively constituted a tax on agriculture. If only because agricul-

    ture represented the single largest industry in most of Africa’s

    economies, the policies thereby lowered the continent’s rate of

    73

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.004 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    Sowing the Seeds

    economic growth. That these policies nonetheless remained

    in place reflects the political advantages that they conferred:

    resources that authoritarian elites could employ to ameliorate

    political tensions, to recruit political clients, and to build polit-

    ical machines, and thereby remain in power.

    74

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.004 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    5

    Subnational Tensions

    B eneath the political surface of Africa’s authoritarianregimes, there were forces at work that sowed the polit- ical landscape with multitudinous opportunities for conflict.

    The economies of Africa’s rural communities rendered them

    politically expansionary, and therefore generated competing

    claims for land. So long as political order reigned at the national

    level, and so long as the incumbent regimes could marshal

    the resources with which to purchase or to compel political

    restraint, the resultant conflicts could be contained. When

    states began to fail, however, local conflicts then acquired

    national significance. They offered opportunities to politicians

    The argument in this chapter should be viewed as a contribution to the study of Africa’s “political geography,” as pioneered by Herbst, J. (2000), States and Power in Africa, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; Boone, C. (2003), Political Topographies of the African State: Rural Authority and Institutional Choice, Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press; and Azam, J.-P. (2007), The Political Geography of Redistribution, Chapter 6 in The Political Economy of Economic Growth in Africa, 1960–2000, edited by B. Ndulu, P. Collier, R. H. Bates, and S. O’Connell, Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.

    75

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.005 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    Sowing the Seeds

    seeking to consolidate political followings, and as national

    elites were drawn to parochial disputes, Africa’s rural citizens,

    in search of political champions, flocked about them. When

    political order declined in late-century Africa, it therefore did

    so precipitously. Competition between local communities thus

    increased the costs of governing by authoritarian regimes and

    the pace with which they subsequently collapsed.

    Rural Dynamics

    To apprehend the forces at play, consider a family and its

    choice of where to settle.1 The family will naturally choose to

    farm the highest-quality land, where its efforts will result in

    the greatest return. Alternatively, by working such lands, it

    can secure sufficient food to feed itself at least effort. Now let

    another family arrive and the population increase. This fam-

    ily must choose between being the second family to settle on

    the highest-quality land or the first to settle on the land of the

    next-best quality. Where it settles depends upon the relative

    magnitude of the output that it can secure in the two loca-

    tions. For purposes of argument, assume that the differential

    in land quality is such that this second family, as did the first,

    1 This analysis follows Ricardo, D. (1821), On the Principles of Political Econ- omy and Taxation, London: John Murray.

    76

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.005 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    Subnational Tensions

    secures a higher return to its labor in the highest-quality land.

    It will then choose to locate adjacent the first family. As the

    cycle repeats itself over time, a settlement will therefore grow

    in the lands of higher quality.

    A second pattern will also emerge, however: a trickle of set-

    tlers to the periphery. Because of diminishing returns, as more

    families crowd onto the lands of high quality, the increment

    in production that results from each additional unit of labor

    declines. New arrivals will therefore eventually find it more

    attractive to be the first to settle on the lands of lesser quality

    rather than to be the last to settle on lands of superior quality.

    There therefore begins a process of dispersal in the settlement

    pattern.

    Arable and Pastoral Production

    In Africa, as elsewhere, agriculture involves more than the

    planting and harvesting of crops. It also involves the breed-

    ing and herding of livestock, and this activity too induces the

    shifting of population to the periphery. When livestock graze,

    they make extensive use of land. As the core becomes more

    densely settled, land becomes scarce; it therefore increases in

    value. To conserve on the use of this resource, farmers there-

    fore tend to shift their livestock to less densely settled areas. In

    addition, when grazing, cattle, goats, and sheep may wander

    77

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.005 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    Sowing the Seeds

    into the fields, and pastoralism can therefore lower the return

    from arable production. Farmers therefore seek to separate

    the two activities, shifting their livestock from the core to the

    periphery. In the absence of “mixed farming,”2 the two activi-

    ties – arable and pastoral production – will be most productive

    if managed apart.

    Investment

    Families combine persons of different genders, ages, and gen-

    erations, and this property furnishes an additional reason for

    territorial expansion: the opportunity to invest and thereby

    escape a future dominated by diminishing returns.

    As time passes and population increases, without technical

    change, each additional unit of labor adds less to the total prod-

    uct. If labor is paid its marginal product, then wages fall. Even

    were the total product to be divided equally, insofar as output

    increases more slowly than does population, per capita con-

    sumption will fall. In either case, the society becomes poorer

    with the passage of time.

    In the face of diminishing returns, out-migration offers an

    escape from poverty. Because migration is costly, it is likely to

    2 This is the change that marked the commercial revolution in European agriculture. See, for example, Timmer, C. P. (1969), “The Turnip, the New Husbandry, and the English Agricultural Revolution,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 83: 375–96.

    78

    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316423974.005 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Access paid by the UC San Diego Library, on 07 Jan 2020 at 19:42:32, subject

     

     

    Subnational Tensions

    be the younger rather than the older generation that migrates,

    for the younger generation can amortize the costs of migra-

    tion over a longer stream of earnings. To treat migration as a

    choice made solely by the younger generation, however, is to

    fail to recognize other incentives at play. The elders, too, are

    subject to the consequences of diminishing returns; as popu-

    lation grows, they, too, experience a fall in the wage rate and

    in average income. As elders, they may be less likely to emi-

    grate. But they, too, would benefit from the out-migration of

    the young, as their departure would reduce the quantity of

    labor and therefore raise the earnings of workers in the core.

    Diminishing returns thus creates an incentive for the elders

    to invest in the out-migration of the young. The search for an

    escape from diminishing returns strengthens the incentives to

    invest in expansion in Africa’s rural economies.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"