CORAL BAY HOSPITAL
Cases in Healthcare Finance, 5th Edition Copyright 2014 Health Administration Press 12/6/2013 CASE 20 QUESTIONS CORAL BAY HOSPITAL Traditional Project Analysis 1. What are the NPV, IRR, MIRR, and payback of the proposed ambulatory surgery center? Do the measures indicate acceptance or rejection of the proposed ambulatory surgery center? 2. Inflation is one of the most difficult factors to deal with in project analysis. a. Complete the inflation impact table shown in Exhibit 20.2. b. What management information is provided by the inflation impact table? 3. One board member wants to make sure that a complete risk analysis, including sensitivity and scenario analyses, is performed before the proposal is sent to the board. a. Perform a sensitivity analysis. b. What management information is provided by the sensitivity analysis? 4. a. Perform a scenario analysis. b. What management information is provided by the scenario analysis? c. Why is the expected NPV obtained in the scenario analysis different from the base case NPV? 5. A board member is interested in the utilization breakeven of the Center. a. What are the breakeven values of the three input variables that are highly uncertain? b. What management information is provided by the breakeven analysis? 6. To help with the risk-incorporation phase of the analysis, Jules consulted with Mark Hauser, the hospital’s CFO, about both the risk inherent in the hospital’s average project and how the hospital typically adjusts for risk. a. What is the project’s differential risk-adjusted NPV? b. Assess the corporate risk of the project. (No calculations are required. Think about correlation of the surgery center and hospital cash flows.) 7. Jules Bergman is aware that there are some qualitative factors that are relevant to the surgery center decision. a. What qualitative factors might support project acceptance? b. What qualitative factors might preclude project acceptance? c. Can you think of any costs that might be associated with the project that have not been included in the analysis? d. Are there any potential benefits that have not been included? e. What additional data would you seek from other hospital staff members to conduct a more thorough analysis? 8. Considering all points, would you build the ambulatory surgery center? 9. In your opinion, what are three key learning points from this case?
CASE19
CASE 20 | Student Version | Copyright 2014 Health Administration Press | ||||
7/13/16 | ||||||
CORAL BAY HOSPITAL | ||||||
Traditional Project Analysis | ||||||
This case illustrates a complete capital budgeting analysis, including cash flow analysis | ||||||
and profitability measures. Note the model extends to Column I. | ||||||
The model consists of a complete base case analysis—no changes need to be made | ||||||
to the existing MODEL-GENERATED DATA section. However, all values in the student | ||||||
version INPUT DATA section have been replaced with zeros. Thus, students must determine | ||||||
the appropriate input values and enter them into the model. These cells are colored red. | ||||||
When this is done, any error cells will be corrected and the base case solution will appear. | ||||||
Note that the student version does not contain any risk analyses, so students will have to | ||||||
create their own if required by the case. Furthermore, students must create their own | ||||||
graphics (charts) as needed to present their results. | ||||||
INPUT DATA: | KEY OUTPUT: | |||||
Land initial cost | $150,000 | NPV | $875,020 | |||
Land opportunity cost (and salvage value) | $200,000 | IRR | 12.9% | compare to cost of capital | ||
Building/equipment cost | $10,000,000 | MIRR | 11.8% | |||
Build/equipment salvage value | $5,000,000 | Payback | 4.1 | Years to getting profit break even | ||
Procedures per day | 20 | can be tried with 25,and 15 | ||||
Average net patient revenue per procedure | $1,000 | |||||
Labor costs | $918,000 | |||||
Utilities costs | $50,000 | |||||
Incremental overhead | $36,000 | |||||
Supply cost ($/procedure) | $200 | |||||
Inflation rate on net patient revenue | 3.0% | |||||
Inflation rate on costs | 3.0% | tray 6% for different scenario analysis | ||||
Tax rate | 40.0% | |||||
Revenues lost from inpatient surgeries | $1,000,000 | |||||
Reduction in inpatient surgery costs | $500,000 | |||||
Cost of capital | 10.0% | tray 14% and 4%for different scenario analysis | ||||
MODEL-GENERATED DATA: | ||||||
Depreciation Schedule: | ||||||
MACRS | Deprec. | End of Year | ||||
Year | Factor | Expense | Book value | |||
1 | 0.20 | $2,000,000 | $8,000,000 | |||
2 | 0.32 | 3,200,000 | 4,800,000 | |||
3 | 0.19 | 1,900,000 | 2,900,000 | |||
4 | 0.12 | 1,200,000 | 1,700,000 | |||
5 | 0.11 | 1,100,000 | 600,000 | |||
6 | 0.06 | 600,000 | 0 | |||
Net Cash Flows: | ||||||
Project Cash Flows | ||||||
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
Land opportunity cost | ($200,000) | |||||
Building/equipment cost | (10,000,000) | |||||
Net patient revenue (including inpatient loss) | $4,000,000 | $4,120,000 | $4,243,600 | $4,370,908 | $4,502,035 | |
Less: Labor costs | 918,000 | 945,540 | 973,906 | 1,003,123 | 1,033,217 | |
Cost savings on inpatients | (500,000) | (515,000) | (530,450) | (546,364) | (562,754) | |
Utilities costs | 50,000 | 51,500 | 53,045 | 54,636 | 56,275 | |
Supplies | 1,000,000 | 1,030,000 | 1,060,900 | 1,092,727 | 1,125,509 | |
Incremental overhead | 36,000 | 37,080 | 38,192 | 39,338 | 40,518 | |
Depreciation | 2,000,000 | 3,200,000 | 1,900,000 | 1,200,000 | 1,100,000 | |
Income before taxes | $496,000 | ($629,120) | $748,006 | $1,527,447 | $1,709,270 | |
Taxes | 198,400 | (251,648) | 299,203 | 610,979 | 683,708 | |
Project net income | $297,600 | ($377,472) | $448,804 | $916,468 | $1,025,562 | |
Plus: Depreciation | 2,000,000 | 3,200,000 | 1,900,000 | 1,200,000 | 1,100,000 | |
Plus: Net land salvage value | 180,000 | |||||
Plus: Net building/equipment salvage value | 3,240,000 | |||||
Net cash flow | ($10,200,000) | $2,297,600 | $2,822,528 | $2,348,804 | $2,116,468 | $5,545,562 |
Cumulative net cash flow | ($10,200,000) | ($7,902,400) | ($5,079,872) | ($2,731,068) | ($614,600) | $4,930,962 |
(For payback calculation) | ||||||
Profitability and Breakeven Measures: | ||||||
Net present value (NPV) | $875,020 | |||||
Internal rate of return (IRR) | 12.9% | |||||
Modified IRR (MIRR) | 11.8% | |||||
Payback | 4.1 | |||||
END |
Sheet1
CASE 20 | Student Version | Copyright 2014 Health Administration Press | ||||
7/13/16 | ||||||
CORAL BAY HOSPITAL | ||||||
Traditional Project Analysis | ||||||
This case illustrates a complete capital budgeting analysis, including cash flow analysis | ||||||
and profitability measures. Note the model extends to Column I. | ||||||
The model consists of a complete base case analysis—no changes need to be made | ||||||
to the existing MODEL-GENERATED DATA section. However, all values in the student | ||||||
version INPUT DATA section have been replaced with zeros. Thus, students must determine | ||||||
the appropriate input values and enter them into the model. These cells are colored red. | ||||||
When this is done, any error cells will be corrected and the base case solution will appear. | ||||||
Note that the student version does not contain any risk analyses, so students will have to | ||||||
create their own if required by the case. Furthermore, students must create their own | ||||||
graphics (charts) as needed to present their results. | ||||||
INPUT DATA: | KEY OUTPUT: | |||||
Land initial cost | $150,000 | NPV | $875,020 | |||
Land opportunity cost (and salvage value) | $200,000 | IRR | 12.9% | compare to cost of capital | ||
Building/equipment cost | $10,000,000 | MIRR | 11.8% | |||
Build/equipment salvage value | $5,000,000 | Payback | 4.1 | Years to getting profit break even | ||
Procedures per day | 20 | |||||
Average net patient revenue per procedure | $1,000 | |||||
Labor costs | $918,000 | |||||
Utilities costs | $50,000 | |||||
Incremental overhead | $36,000 | |||||
Supply cost ($/procedure) | $200 | |||||
Inflation rate on net patient revenue | 3.0% | |||||
Inflation rate on costs | 3.0% | |||||
Tax rate | 40.0% | |||||
Revenues lost from inpatient surgeries | $1,000,000 | |||||
Reduction in inpatient surgery costs | $500,000 | |||||
Cost of capital | 10.0% | |||||
MODEL-GENERATED DATA: | ||||||
Depreciation Schedule: | ||||||
MACRS | Deprec. | End of Year | ||||
Year | Factor | Expense | Book value | |||
1 | 0.20 | $2,000,000 | $8,000,000 | |||
2 | 0.32 | 3,200,000 | 4,800,000 | |||
3 | 0.19 | 1,900,000 | 2,900,000 | |||
4 | 0.12 | 1,200,000 | 1,700,000 | |||
5 | 0.11 | 1,100,000 | 600,000 | |||
6 | 0.06 | 600,000 | 0 | |||
Net Cash Flows: | ||||||
Project Cash Flows | ||||||
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
Land opportunity cost | ($200,000) | |||||
Building/equipment cost | (10,000,000) | |||||
Net patient revenue (including inpatient loss) | $4,000,000 | $4,120,000 | $4,243,600 | $4,370,908 | $4,502,035 | |
Less: Labor costs | 918,000 | 945,540 | 973,906 | 1,003,123 | 1,033,217 | |
Cost savings on inpatients | (500,000) | (515,000) | (530,450) | (546,364) | (562,754) | |
Utilities costs | 50,000 | 51,500 | 53,045 | 54,636 | 56,275 | |
Supplies | 1,000,000 | 1,030,000 | 1,060,900 | 1,092,727 | 1,125,509 | |
Incremental overhead | 36,000 | 37,080 | 38,192 | 39,338 | 40,518 | |
Depreciation | 2,000,000 | 3,200,000 | 1,900,000 | 1,200,000 | 1,100,000 | |
Income before taxes | $496,000 | ($629,120) | $748,006 | $1,527,447 | $1,709,270 | |
Taxes | 198,400 | (251,648) | 299,203 | 610,979 | 683,708 | |
Project net income | $297,600 | ($377,472) | $448,804 | $916,468 | $1,025,562 | |
Plus: Depreciation | 2,000,000 | 3,200,000 | 1,900,000 | 1,200,000 | 1,100,000 | |
Plus: Net land salvage value | 180,000 | |||||
Plus: Net building/equipment salvage value | 3,240,000 | |||||
Net cash flow | ($10,200,000) | $2,297,600 | $2,822,528 | $2,348,804 | $2,116,468 | $5,545,562 |
Cumulative net cash flow | ($10,200,000) | ($7,902,400) | ($5,079,872) | ($2,731,068) | ($614,600) | $4,930,962 |
(For payback calculation) | ||||||
Profitability and Breakeven Measures: | ||||||
Net present value (NPV) | $875,020 | |||||
Internal rate of return (IRR) | 12.9% | |||||
Modified IRR (MIRR) | 11.8% | |||||
Payback | 4.1 | |||||
END |
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
