The Chicken Or The Egg: Hatching A New And Innovative Product
Case Questions: Would you decide to “hatch” Chicken
Sensations? Put yourself in Vicki’s shoes. Prepare an analysis
that will guide PFVC’s decision on whether to launch
Chicken Sensations.
1. Economic feasibility analysis: Perform an economic cost-
benefit analysis of whether PFVC should launch Chicken
Sensations. Clearly state your decision and conclusion
from your analysis. (You can use an Excel spreadsheet to
complete these tasks in an organized, neat appendix to
your case analysis. A reader of your case should be able
to follow your work and computations. The results of
your appendix analyses can be referenced in the body of
your case to support your decision.) To aid your analysis,
perform the following tasks:
a. Quantity, revenue, and cost conversions: Take Vicki’s
data from Table 1 and compute the quantity, revenue,
and cost conversions to complete Table 1. For
example, calculate annual sales revenues (in cases),
sales revenue and variable cost amounts per case, and
annual fixed cost amounts.
b. Forecasted contribution margin income statement:
Prepare a forecasted Chicken Sensations contribution
margin format income statement for year 1 based on
the projected data gathered by Vicki.
c. Breakeven analysis: Prepare a breakeven point
analysis (in cases and sales dollars) for the year 1
forecasts of Chicken Sensations.
d. Margin of safety: Prepare a margin of safety analysis
(in cases and sales dollars) for the year 1 forecasts of
Chicken Sensations.
e. Sensitivity analyses: Prepare sensitivity analyses to
examine how robust year 1 results are to changes in
projections for (1) the sales volume of cases, (2) the
sales price per bag, and (3) the cost per pound of
chicken. Assume that these amounts can change for
three different projection levels as reported in Table 2:
(1) a pessimistic level, (2) the original level, and (3) an
optimistic level. Table 2 shows that the sales volume
(in cases) will be 75% of the original year 1 sales
forecast, the sales price per bag will only be 90% of
the original forecast (or $2.70/bag = $3.00/bag × 90%),
and the cost per pound of chicken will rise to 112.50%
of the original forecast (or $2.25 /lb. = $2.00/lb. ×
112.50%) for the pessimistic level. The original level
reports the results using the original projections in
the case. Under the optimistic level, the sales volume
forecast (in cases) will be 125% of the original year 1
sales forecast, the sales price per bag will increase to
110% of the original forecast (or $3.30/bag = $3.00/
bag × 110%), and the cost per pound of chicken will
decrease to 87.50% (or $1.75 /lb. = $2.00/lb. × 87.50%).
Report your sensitivity analysis results in Table 3.
THE CHALLENGE
Parson Foods Vegetable Company (PFVC) is a newly
created, wholly owned subsidiary of Parson Foods, one of the
oldest and largest fluid milk processors in the United States.
Parson was founded in 1925 and grew through a series of
acquisitions, first in milk processing and later in frozen and
canned vegetables.
Parson’s operating strategy was to provide capital and
management expertise to acquired entities while giving local
management significant decision-making autonomy. This
strategy worked well with fluid milk processors who tended
to compete in local or regional areas. As Parson moved into
frozen and canned vegetables, it increasingly found that
these firms were competing nationally. Multiple vegetable
companies under the Parson Food umbrella were competing
for the same business, often undercutting one another on
price to “win” business. These activities threatened financial
performance, resulting in lower profits and even losses in
many of these vegetable companies.
Parson’s management decided that a strategic change
was needed to return its vegetable companies to profitability.
This resulted in the creation of PFVC where all the
vegetable companies were consolidated. Richard Lawson
was named CEO of the new company. His charge was to
improve the lagging performance in the vegetable group.
Changes were expected and fast. Richard and his new
executive team were feeling the pressure to find a way to
“turn this thing around.”
THE OPPORTUNITY
Richard knew he and his team faced many challenges. In recent
months, they had been working on operational and structural
changes designed to reduce administrative and selling costs. He
also realized that continuing the turnaround requires the firm to
improve sales of continuing and new products.
Several months ago, Carlos Rico, the company’s
marketing manager, approached Richard with an idea for a
revolutionary nutritious convenience frozen food product.
The new product, Chicken Sensations—consisting of
frozen vegetables, spaetzels (a coated seasoned pasta),
and chicken—would compete against frozen pizza and
microwaveable dinners. Based on initial projections, Chicken
Sensations had the potential to be a homerun with company
sales, expected to increase by 20% and with gross margins
double current vegetable offerings.
While the potential for Chicken Sensations was
palpable, Richard was a realist given PFVC’s history of new
product introduction. The most recent, Soup-in-a-Flash—a
microwaveable soup starter kit—failed miserably with the
company writing off $10 million in unsold finished goods.
As a result, corporate executives were not enthusiastic about
investing in another PFVC new product launch. Richard
mused, “If Chicken Sensations fails, my tenure as CEO may
be short-lived.”
IMA EDUCATIONAL CASE JOURNAL VOL. 10 , NO. 2 , ART. 3 , JUNE 20171
ISSN 1940-204X
The Chicken or The Egg: Hatching a New and Innovative Product
©2017 IMA
Robert Rankin
Texas A&M Commerce
Martin Stuebs
Baylor University
THE TEAM
Richard decided to assemble a cross-functional team of
PFVC’s best sales, production, and financial professionals to
evaluate the feasibility of Chicken Sensations. Along with
Carlos, team members included Gary Smits, the production
manager, and Vicki Hoerning, the chief financial analyst. At
the team’s first meeting Richard began: “Congratulations and
welcome. You have been selected to evaluate the feasibility
of a new product, Chicken Sensations. This product has the
potential to create a new category of convenience frozen
foods and to dramatically increase company profits. Our
challenge is to objectively evaluate the potential of this
product idea. Introducing a product and having it fail is not
an option. Carlos had the idea for this product, so I will let
him explain.”
Carlos stood up and moved to the front of the
conference room. “Thanks, Richard. Good afternoon. As
many of you are aware, we currently produce Pasta Done,
a microwaveable product consisting of frozen vegetables
and spaetzels. This new product idea takes that concept
one step further. We are going to add protein, in this case
chicken, into the microwaveable bag with the vegetables
and spaetzels. Competing products separate chicken, frozen
vegetables, and a sauce in multiple pouches. Combining
all of the ingredients enhances convenience and simplifies
the cooking process for consumers. They simply empty the
contents into a bowl, add a tablespoon of water, microwave
for six minutes, and voila! Dinner is ready.
“That delicious aroma you smell coming from the test
kitchen is a sample of Chicken Sensations. Let’s eat!”
While the team was sampling the product, Richard
continued, “Thanks, Carlos. I think this could be a winner,
but we need to make certain it is financially feasible. If we
launch Chicken Sensations, we need to produce a price-
competitive, high-quality product that delivers a profit
superior to our current offerings. We know that a significant
challenge to launching Chicken Sensations is getting USDA
approval to handle meat in our processing facility. We have
limited institutional knowledge of the process, because it
was 30 years ago when we last applied for USDA approval.
We also need to consider how our competitors will react to
the new product and document market issues related to
product costs and distribution. At our next meeting, I want
to review your initial findings on the financial feasibility of
Chicken Sensations.
“Carlos, I would like for you to evaluate the selling prices
of current convenience frozen food products; propose a
selling price; recommend the mix of chicken, spaetzels, and
vegetables; forecast first-year sales; and quantify incremental
sales and marketing costs.
“Gary, I would like you to estimate the costs associated
with retrofitting (preparing) your facility for USDA approval
and estimate product costs.
“Vicki, would you work with Carlos and Gary to generate
a financial feasibility analysis? You will probably need to
perform analyses to evaluate the expected overall first-year
profitability, breakeven sales level, and margin of safety.
‘What-if’ analyses can assess the impact of sales forecast
errors and changes in the sales price, product costs, and
quantity inputs. With our recent history of new product
introduction, our goal is to far exceed breakeven in the first
year. Anything less would not be acceptable to Parson’s
corporate executives.”
Vicki commented, “Richard you can count on me. I think
I speak for the entire team when I say we are excited to be
part of the team and will do everything possible to ensure
the success of Chicken Sensations.”
Addressing the entire team, Richard reiterated, “I do
not think I need to remind you of the importance of this
project. Because of the failure of Soup-in-a-Flash and limited
financial resources, corporate executives will be reluctant to
authorize the launch of any new products. We need to ensure
our analysis is rock-solid before requesting any funds.”
TWO WEEKS LATER
“Good afternoon gentlemen,” Vicki began addressing Carlos
and Gary. “I know you have been busy with your Chicken
Sensations assignments. My goal today is to discuss the
information you have gathered so that we can put together
the initial feasibility analysis that Richard wants. I will record
and summarize the information you provide. Carlos, what
did you determine about pricing and other expected costs
associated to launch Chicken Sensations?”
“First, I looked at comparable frozen convenience food
products with package sizes ranging from 20 to 30 ounces,
the retail price per ounce is from $0.16 to $0.20—or $3.20
to $6.00 per package. Since I expect consumers to assign a
higher nutritional value on Chicken Sensations than other
products, I suggest we target a retail sales price of $0.1875
per ounce or $3.75 per bag for a 20-ounce bag. With retailers
IMA EDUCATIONAL CASE JOURNAL VOL. 10 , NO. 2 , ART. 3 , JUNE 20172
requiring a minimum 20% gross margin for new products, I
recommend that our selling price to them be $3 per bag or
$36 per case of 12.”
Carlos further explained some of the sales expenses
and other expected costs, “To encourage consumer trial of
Chicken Sensations, we will have to offer coupons of $0.20
per bag or $2.40 per case for all cases sold in the first year. To
gain access to convenience frozen food distribution channels,
we will have to pay a brokerage commission of 6% of our
sales price. In addition, retailers (in total) require a one-time
slotting allowance of $6 million to purchase shelf space.”
Vicki noted that the slotting allowance costs would need to
be expensed in the first year.
Continuing, Carlos explained estimates for other costs:
“Package design costs for artwork and photography expected
to be $2 million will have to be paid in the first year. To
support Chicken Sensations, we will need to hire additional
salespeople at total annual cost of $400,000. I anticipate we
will sell 65,000 cases in the first month with sales increases of
15,000 cases per month for the first year when we will reach a
maximum of 230,000 cases per month.”
“Great. Before we discuss the production and cost
assumptions, Gary do you have any questions for Carlos?”
Vicki asked.
“Thanks for asking. I do have a few questions. Based on
your comments, it looks like our case configuration would
be 12, 20-ounce bags or a 15-pound case. Is that correct,
Carlos?” Gary questioned.
“Yes, I feel a 20-ounce bag allows for us to be competitive
on a price per ounce with other convenience frozen food
products,” Carlos clarified.
“That package size works great. We anticipate producing
Chicken Sensations at the Oakdale facility where we already
make spaetzels and have the capability and capacity to
package 20-ounce bags. Are you comfortable with your sales
forecast? As I recall, the sales forecast for Soup-in-a-Flash
was overly optimistic, causing us to over-produce a product
that never sold.” Gary said.
“Yes, I am confident, Gary,” Carlos replied tersely, “I
am not certain if you are aware that prior to joining PFVC,
I successfully introduced several new frozen pizza products
at another company. The forecast I provided is consistent
with first-year sales volumes for those new products. In my
experience, for new product introductions, sales forecast
errors are generally incorrect by 25%, so I would plan for
sales to range from 75% to 125% of my forecast.”
“Awesome, one more question,” Gary interjected.
“Carlos, what are consumers’ expectations about the amount
of protein to be included?”
“For frozen pizza, consumers expect no less than 10%
protein content. If the protein content (e.g., chicken, beef,
pork) exceeds 20%, consumers are unwilling to pay the
increased price for the product. Since we want consumers
to have an initial positive impression of our product, I
recommend we include 20% chicken, 65% vegetables, and
15% spaetzels for Chicken Sensations.”
“Thanks, Carlos. That works great. If anything, I
presume once we have consumer acceptance of Chicken
Sensations we might substitute vegetables at $0.50 per
pound or spaetzels at $0.15 per pound for chicken at $2.00
per pound to increase our profits,” Gary finished.
“Carlos, thanks for addressing Gary’s concerns. Now let’s
discuss the production and cost inputs,” Vicki commented.
“Sure, Vicki. Based on the case configuration of 12,
20-ounce bags, packaging cost will be $0.20 per bag for
shipping to retailers. Each cardboard shipping box has a cost
of $0.30 per box. At our processing facility, direct labor and
variable manufacturing overhead costs per pound are $0.30
and $0.40, respectively. To retrofit the facility for USDA
compliance, I anticipate spending an additional $2 million,
which we will depreciate over five years with no salvage
value,” Gary summarized.
“I have everything I need from you,” Vicki commented.
The data Vicki gathered from Carlos and Gary are presented
in Table 1. “I should be able to prepare the preliminary
financial feasibility analysis within the next few days. When
we meet with Richard, I am confident he will want to discuss
the impact of your assumptions on the financial feasibility of
Chicken Sensations. When we are done with our meeting with
Richard next week, I anticipate he will request a meeting with
Parson’s corporate executives to review our plans and request
permission to launch Chicken Sensations. I am excited about
the potential for Chicken Sensations. It’s nutritious and tastes
good, too. Thanks, again. See you soon.”
IMA EDUCATIONAL CASE JOURNAL VOL. 10 , NO. 2 , ART. 3 , JUNE 20173
IMA EDUCATIONAL CASE JOURNAL VOL. 10 , NO. 2 , ART. 3 , JUNE 20174
Pounds per Case 15 Expected pounds per case Bags per Case 12 Expected number of bags per case
Cases Sold Annual Sales
Cases First Month Sales Volume 65,000 Initial sales forecast for the first month Monthly Sales Growth Year 1 15,000 Sales growth per month for the first year Months per year in Year 1 12 Number of months in a year Sales Forecast Error Percent 25% Percent possible sales forecast error December Sales Volume First Year Sales Volume Annual Sales Volume after Year 1
Bags/Case Per Case Sales Price to Retailers ($ per bag) 3.00$ Based on sales price / bag and number of bags / case Coupon Costs ($ per bag) 0.20$ Based on coupon per bag and number of bags per case Commission (percent) 6.00% Percentage of sales price paid to brokers
Total Cost ($) Useful Life Annual
Slotting Costs 6,000,000$ 1 Expected slotting costs to be expensed over n years Package Design Costs 2,000,000$ 1 Expected packaging design costs paid in the first year Sales Salaries 400,000$ Expected annual additional sales and marketing salaries to be paid
Case Configuration: Panel A: Sales and Marketing Data
Sales Price/Coupon Costs/Commissions:
Slotting/Package Design/Sales Salaries:
Forecasted Sales Volume (Cases):
Table 1: Chicken Sensation Feasibility Data
Percent Cost/LB Per Case ($) Chicken 20.00% 2.0000$ Expected cost of chicken per Chicken Sensations pound Vegetables 65.00% 0.5000$ Expected cost of vegetables Chicken Sensations per pound Spaetzels 15.00% 0.1500$ Expected cost of spaetzels per Chicken Sensations pound Total (Must be 100 percent) 100.00% Total must be 100 percent Weighted Average Raw Material Cost Weighted average cost per pound of Chicken Sensations Pounds per Case
Total Raw Material Cost per Case Chicken Sensations cost per case (15 pounds per case)
Cost per Bag/Box ($) Qty/Case Per Case ($) Bags 0.20$ Based on price / bag and number of bags per case Box 0.30$ 1 Expected price per box with 1 box per case
Total Packaging Cost per Case Total packaging costs of bags and boxes per case Total Direct Material Costs per Case Total Chicken Sensations materials and packaging costs
Cost Per Lb ($) Lbs/Case Per Case ($) Direct Labor 0.30$ Based on labor costs per pound and number of pounds per case Variable Manufacturing Overhead 0.40$ Based on var. mfg. overhead per pound and number of pounds per case
Total Coversion Cost per Case Total conversion costs per case
Total Variable Product Cost per Case Total direct material and conversion costs per case
Total Cost ($) Useful Life Annual
Depreciation
Retrofit Costs 2,000,000$ 5 Expected retrofit costs and depreciable life
Raw Material Percents/Costs (per lb):
Packaging Costs:
Conversion Costs:
Retrofit Costs:
Panel B: Production and Cost Data
Case Questions: Would you decide to “hatch” Chicken
Sensations? Put yourself in Vicki’s shoes. Prepare an analysis
that will guide PFVC’s decision on whether to launch
Chicken Sensations.
1. Economic feasibility analysis: Perform an economic cost-
benefit analysis of whether PFVC should launch Chicken
Sensations. Clearly state your decision and conclusion
from your analysis. (You can use an Excel spreadsheet to
complete these tasks in an organized, neat appendix to
your case analysis. A reader of your case should be able
to follow your work and computations. The results of
your appendix analyses can be referenced in the body of
your case to support your decision.) To aid your analysis,
perform the following tasks:
a. Quantity, revenue, and cost conversions: Take Vicki’s
data from Table 1 and compute the quantity, revenue,
and cost conversions to complete Table 1. For
example, calculate annual sales revenues (in cases),
sales revenue and variable cost amounts per case, and
annual fixed cost amounts.
b. Forecasted contribution margin income statement:
Prepare a forecasted Chicken Sensations contribution
margin format income statement for year 1 based on
the projected data gathered by Vicki.
c. Breakeven analysis: Prepare a breakeven point
analysis (in cases and sales dollars) for the year 1
forecasts of Chicken Sensations.
d. Margin of safety: Prepare a margin of safety analysis
(in cases and sales dollars) for the year 1 forecasts of
Chicken Sensations.
e. Sensitivity analyses: Prepare sensitivity analyses to
examine how robust year 1 results are to changes in
projections for (1) the sales volume of cases, (2) the
sales price per bag, and (3) the cost per pound of
chicken. Assume that these amounts can change for
three different projection levels as reported in Table 2:
(1) a pessimistic level, (2) the original level, and (3) an
optimistic level. Table 2 shows that the sales volume
(in cases) will be 75% of the original year 1 sales
forecast, the sales price per bag will only be 90% of
the original forecast (or $2.70/bag = $3.00/bag × 90%),
and the cost per pound of chicken will rise to 112.50%
of the original forecast (or $2.25 /lb. = $2.00/lb. ×
112.50%) for the pessimistic level. The original level
reports the results using the original projections in
the case. Under the optimistic level, the sales volume
forecast (in cases) will be 125% of the original year 1
sales forecast, the sales price per bag will increase to
110% of the original forecast (or $3.30/bag = $3.00/
bag × 110%), and the cost per pound of chicken will
decrease to 87.50% (or $1.75 /lb. = $2.00/lb. × 87.50%).
Report your sensitivity analysis results in Table 3.
IMA EDUCATIONAL CASE JOURNAL VOL. 10 , NO. 2 , ART. 3 , JUNE 20175
Table 2: Sensitivity Analysis Levels
Parson Vegetable Company Sensitivity Analysis Levels (Percent of Original Projections)
Chicken Sensations
Pessimistic Original Optimistic
Sales Volume Case Forecast 75.00% 100.00% 125.00% Sales Price per Bag 90.00% 100.00% 110.00% Cost per Pound of Chicken 112.50% 100.00% 87.50%
2. Impacts: Assess the impacts of your decision:
a. Benefits and harms: What benefits/harms result and to
whom?
b. Rights: What rights are being exercised or denied and
by/to whom?
c. Result: Do these impacts modify or change your
decision? How?
3. Responsibilities: What responsibilities are present and
how do these responsibilities influence your decisions
and actions?
a. PFVC management: What responsibilities do Richard
Lawson and PFVC management have in this situation
and to whom?
b. Vicki Hoerning: What are Vicki’s responsibilities in
this situation and to whom? You can apply the general
standards in the IMA Statement of Ethical Professional
Practice (https://www.imanet.org/insights-and-trends/
business-leadership-and-ethics/ima-statement-of-
ethical-professional-practice?ssopc=1) to help you
identify specific responsibilities for Vicki in this
situation.
IMA EDUCATIONAL CASE JOURNAL VOL. 10 , NO. 2 , ART. 3 , JUNE 20176
Table 3: Reported Sensitivity Analysis Results
Parson Vegetable Company Sensitivity Analysis Results
Chicken Sensations
Pessimistic Original Optimistic
Operating Income Contribution Margin Ratio Profit Margin Breakeven Sales (in Cases) Margin of Safety (in Cases) Margin of Safety Ratio
ABOUT IMA® (INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTANTS) IMA®, the association of accountants and financial professionals in business, is one of the largest and most respected associations focused exclusively on advancing the management accounting profession. Globally, IMA supports the profession through research, the CMA® (Certified Management Accountant) program, continuing education, networking and advocacy of the highest ethical business practices. IMA has a global network of more than 85,000 members in 140 countries and 300 professional and student chapters. Headquartered in Montvale, N.J., USA, IMA provides localized services through its four global regions: The Americas, Asia/Pacific, Europe, and Middle East/India. For more information about IMA, please visit www.imanet.org.