Texts And Criticism

 

2. What does Brooks mean by “resistance to generalization” in poetry? Why does he think that such resistance is a sign of good poetry?

3. What does Brooks mean when he says that irony is “the acknowledgment of the pressures of context”(805)? Why does he think that such a notion of irony might resist what he calls “a public corrupted by Hollywood”(805)?

Reuben A. Brower, “The Mirror of Analogy: The Tempest

1. Early in his essay, Brower says that there are “recurrent analogies (or continuities)”(225) in The Tempest that are central to the overall design of the play. Use one or more of Brower’s list of what he calls “the six main continuities in the play”(226) to try to explain what he means when he suggests that an “analogy” is a “continuity” (he uses the terms interchangeably).

2. What does Brower think is the “key metaphor” of the play? What, specifically, does he think is significant about this “key metaphor”?

3. What similarities are there in how Cleanth Brooks and Brower conceive of literature?

George Will, “Literary Politics” and Stephen  Greenblatt, “The Best Way to Kill Our Literary Inheritance Is to Turn It into a Decorous  Celebration of the New World Order”

1. Does Will’s attack on the goals of contemporary literary critics seem justified? If so, why? If not, why not?

2. How do Will and Greenblatt differ in their understanding of what the worth of literature might be?

3. Why does Will assume that it’s ridiculous to think that The Tempest should be understood in terms of colonialism? Are you persuaded by Greenblatt’s response to what Will says about The Tempest? Why or why not?

Narrate a moment when people who you underestimated acted kindly or wisely.

Writing Assignment for Description: Describe yourself to someone who has never met you.

Writing Assignment for Description

Topic:  Describe yourself to someone who has never met you.

Structure of the 5-para Essay

1. Introduction

a. Hook: 1 sentence; attract the reader’s attention

· Question

· Statement: facts/statistics

b. Background Information: 1-3 sentence

· General info of the topic; explain a key term

c. Thesis Statement: 1 sentence; last sentence of Intro para; provides 3 reasons that will be discussed in the Body paras

· Reason 1, Reason 2, and Reason 3……………………………….

· ………………………………. Reason 1, Reason 2, and Reason 3

· …………… Reason 1, Reason 2, and Reason 3 …………………

2. Body 1: Reason 1

a. Mini-introduction: on Reason 1 (at least 1 sentence)

b. Supporting Detail 1/Example 1 (at least 1 sentence)

c. Supporting Detail 2/Example 2 (at least 1 sentence)

d. Supporting Detail 3/Example 3 (at least 1 sentence)

e. Mini-conclusion on Reason 1/Transition to Reason 2 (at least 1 sentence)

3. Body 2: Reason 2

=Repeat Body 1 structure=

4. Body 3: Reason 3

=Repeat Body 1 structure=

5. Conclusion

What Is The Main Idea Of The Article “Heroes With Solid Feet”.

Read the article “Heroes With Solid Feet” and the article “Where I Find My Heroes” and respond to the following questions.

1. What is the main idea of the article “Heroes With Solid Feet”. Explain in a 200 word response how the author, Kirk Douglas, defines what it means to be a hero. Include a quote from the article in your response to support your statement. 2. What is the main idea of the article “Where I Find My Heroes”? Explain in a 200 word response how the author, Oliver Stone, defines what it means to be a hero. Include a quote from the article in your response to support your statement. 3. How do you define a hero? Explain in a 200 word response including examples and details from your personal experiences.

Summer Assignment for English III: Heroes

English III CP Summer Assignment 2017-2018 School Year

Read the article “Heroes With Solid Feet” and the article “Where I Find My Heroes” and respond to the following questions.

1. What is the main idea of the article “Heroes With Solid Feet”. Explain in a 200 word response how the author, Kirk Douglas, defines what it means to be a hero. Include a quote from the article in your response to support your statement. 2. What is the main idea of the article “Where I Find My Heroes”? Explain in a 200 word response how the author, Oliver Stone, defines what it means to be a hero. Include a quote from the article in your response to support your statement. 3. How do you define a hero? Explain in a 200 word response including examples and details from your personal experiences.

 

Heroes With Solid Feet

by Kirk Douglas

BEVERLY HILLS, Calif. — Recently, I journeyed to Berlin to accept the Golden Bear, a lifetime achievement award, from the Berlin Film Festival. Those awards make me smile — lifetime achievement? Is this the end? Not long ago my son Michael received a lifetime achievement award. If you last long enough, you may get dozens.

I accepted the Golden Bear because I was curious to see Berlin again. During my earlier visits there, the city had been divided by a wall.

In a press conference at the film festival, one journalist asked loudly, “As a Jew, how does it affect you to be in Berlin?” A montage of pictures we have all seen raced through my mind. Shattering glass windows, Hitler salutes, Jews being herded into freight cars, piles of emaciated Jews, ovens, dark smoke coming out of chimneys.

“The last century has been a disaster,” I said. “My generation did not do a good job — so many wars, so much killing and of course, here in Germany, the Holocaust, perhaps the worst crime of all, the attempt to annihilate a people as a final solution.”

They were all listening.

“But I don’t think children should be punished for the sins of their fathers. We should do all we can to give our children that chance.”

The questioner persisted. “So why did you come back to Berlin?” I ignored him. But the question bothered me. I didn’t know a proper reason for a Jew to be in Berlin.

The audience at the awards ceremony gave me a standing ovation when I gave my speech in German, a language I learned when I made two movies in Germany. The papers were filled with my smiling face. The television reports were very complimentary. That night my wife and I had a wonderful Wiener schnitzel with some friends and a Jewish friend of theirs, Inge Borck, who lived in Berlin throughout the war. She was such a happy person, smiling and laughing. But when I was told that her parents and grandparents had all been killed in the concentration camps, I blurted out, “So why do you stay in Berlin?”

Smiling, she gave me this answer: “I owe that to the little heroes.”

“I don’t understand,” I said. With a sigh, she came over and sat closer.

“When the Gestapo came to get them, my parents sent me to a small hotel to save my life. The owner was the first little hero. She kept me safe for a couple of nights. When it became dangerous, I met my second little hero. Or should I say heroine? She was our former housekeeper. She hid me for a while and endangered her own life. Then I lived in a cloister. My little heroes were the nuns who took care of me when I was very sick. They never asked questions. When the situation became dangerous, my next little hero was a policeman who didn’t agree with the Nazis. All through the war, I was lucky to find little heroes who helped me till the Russians came in.”

“So, why do you stay here?” I asked again. She looked at my perplexed face and said, “I thought about it, but I feel I owe it to the little heroes who helped me. Not everyone here was wicked.”

Her story had a great impact on me. Of course, we are always looking for a big hero to emulate, and very often we see them topple from clay feet. How much better to reach for the little heroes in life — and to try to be one. It’s not always as hard as it was for the people in wartime Berlin. You aren’t obligated to save a life — you only need to try to help other people.

And if everyone tried — well, just think of the lifetime achievements.

 

WHERE I FIND MY HEROES by Oliver Stone

It’s not true that there are no heroes anymore—but it is true that my own concept of heroism has changed radically over time. When I was young and I read the Random House biographies, my heroes were always people like George Washington and General Custer and Abraham Lincoln and Teddy Roosevelt. Men, generally, and doers. Women—with the exception of Clara Barton, Florence Nightingale, and Joan of Arc—got short shrift. Most history was oriented toward male heroes.

But as I’ve gotten older, and since I’ve been to war, I’ve been forced to reexamine the nature of life and of heroism. What is true? Where are the myths?

The simple acts of heroism are often overlooked—that’s very clear to me not only in war but in peace. I’m not debunking all of history: Crossing the Delaware was a magnificent action. But I am saying that I think the meaning of heroism has a lot to do with evolving into a higher human being. I came into contact with it when I worked with Ron Kovic, the paraplegic Vietnam vet, on Born on the Fourth of July. I was impressed by his life change, from a patriotic and strongwilled athlete to someone who had to deal with the total surrender of his body, who grew into a nonviolent and peaceful advocate of change in the Martin Luther King, Jr., and Gandhi tradition. So heroism is tied to an evolution of consciousness,….

Since the war, I’ve had children, and I’m wrestling now with the everyday problems of trying to share my knowledge with them without overwhelming them. It’s difficult to be a father, to be a mother, and I think that to be a kind and loving parent is an act of heroism. So there you go—heroes are everyday, common people. Most of what they do goes unheralded, unappreciated. And that, ironically, is heroism: not to be recognized.

Who is heroic? Scientists who spend years of their lives trying to find cures for diseases. The teenager who says no to crack. The innercity kid who works at McDonald’s instead of selling drugs. The kid who stands alone instead of joining a gang, which would give him an instant identity. The celebrity who remains modest and treats others with respect, or who uses his position to help society. The student who defers the immediate pleasure of making money and finishes college or high school. People who take risks despite fears. People in wheelchairs who don’t give up….

We have a lot of corruption in our society. But we mustn’t assume that everything is always basely motivated. We should allow for the heroic impulse—which is to be greater than oneself, to try to find another version of oneself, to grow. That’s where virtue comes from. And we must allow our young generation to strive for virtue, instead of ridiculing it.

Global Ethics And Corporate Responsibility Discussion

Global Ethics and Corporate Responsibility Discussion

A common debate in ethics is universalism versus relativism of ethics and moral codes.  A frequently asked question is “Does a universal moral code exist regardless of an individual’s culture?”, is if  a universal moral code exists regardless of an individual’s culture.  As organizations are becoming increasingly global,  and understanding of universalism versus relativism of culture ethics is important.

· Compare and contrast universalism and relativism.

· Evaluate how universalism and relativism affect global social corporate responsibility.

Your response must be a minimum of 300 words.

Please use at least one scholarly or credible source in your discussion.

· The Scholarly, Peer Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources Preview the document table offers additional guidance on appropriate source types. If you have questions about whether a specific source is appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor. Your instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source for a particular assignment.

Guided Response: Review several of your classmates’ posts and respond to at least two of your peers by 11:59 p.m. on Day 7 of the week. You are encouraged to post your required replies early during the week to promote more meaningful interactive discourse in the discussion.

Your responses to peers must be a minimum of 150 words.

 

Reply to Jeffrey:

 

· Compare and contrast universalism and relativism.

Moral universalism is the belief that the same rules or system of ethics apply to all cultures universally. In other words, the same ethics apply universally and do not change regardless of culture, religion, nationality, or race. Ethical universalism views the world in an idealistic way.

Moral relativism is the belief that differences in moral judgments will be found in different cultures and across different people. It also believes that there may be objective differences between right and wrong, nobody is right or wrong, and that differences in behavior should be tolerated. Ethical relativism views the world in a more realistic way by understanding that different cultures can view the same actions differently.

Evaluate how universalism and relativism affect global social corporate responsibility.

Trebilcock (2016) wrote a paper that traced the evolution in thinking over universal themes such as universalism and its rise and fall. His paper primarily focused on law and development. However, it can also be applied to global social corporate responsibility. He argued that universalism prevailed during post-war eras up until the 1990’s when it produced disappointing outcomes. Universalism came to recognize that there is no general blueprint that can be used across all countries; especially developing countries. Trebilcock argued that while it’s a good to reject universalism, there are also some dangers in succumbing to an extreme form of relativism.

More recently, it has come to be widely recognized that a country’s specific features will shape what is desirable and feasible. Some of these factors include: the country’s history, geography, culture, demographics, economic structure, religion(s), politics, and ethnic composition. Different cultures and people create their own moral recommendations. Some argue that there is no way to prove that one is morally preferable over another and that one set cannot be universally used. Cultural relativism is the understanding that different cultures have different values and that they cannot be dismissed as inferior or wrong.

In regards to global social corporate responsibility, bribery can be used as an example to evaluate universalism versus relativism. In many countries, bribery is a common way of doing business. However, a universalism approach would be that all bribery is bad. American companies are actually not allowed to give or receive bribes because the 1977 Foreign Corrupt Practices Act prohibits it. A relativism approach would be to understand specific cultures and what is deemed to be acceptable. Certain cultures may allow gifts but not bribes. However, it can be difficult to determine the difference between these two for a given situation.

Reference:

Trebilcock, M. (2016). Between universalism and relativism: reflections on the evolution of law and development studies. University of Toronto Law Journal, 66(3), 330-352.

Reply to Edward:

· Ethic universalism deals with implications from an activity applies to anybody within any situation. In business, organizations can use the universal approach when making ethical decisions, meaning if it seeks fairness and integrity for one person, it will do the same for everyone. “Universalism is one of the major ingredients in American cultural value, which influences the American perception into the world and the formulation of American foreign cultural, military and political policies” (Luo, 2010, p. 57). The bill of rights can is based of universalism because the first amendment allows freedom of speech from all races and religions and the fourth amendment states that no one can be searched or arrested by law without probable cause.

Relativism on the other hand, proclaims that the same truth cannot be spread across different groups of societies and cultures. For instance, corporations that have strong views on religion may manage their businesses differently. Chick-fil-a is a restaurant that is ran by a Christian ceo that has a policy which allows the restaurants to be closed on Sundays for people to worship God which is considered a universal approach. If every restaurant used that universal approach in business, there would be conflict because consumers like to enjoy eating fast food or sitting down in a restaurant on Sundays whether they go to church or not.

Since Chick-fil-a has strong beliefs with Christianity, the owner has spoken out against same sex marriages, which other people found offensive including colleagues and customers. While the owner demonstrated his freedom of speech which is based of universalism when he made that comment, he upset the gay community which caused backlash. restaurant that uses a relativism approach will avoid conflict with its colleagues and customers because they understand that spreading the same truth across genders and sexual preferences will affect how the way they make money.

References

Luo, J. (2010). Universalism in America: A religious perspective. Petroleum – Gas University of Ploiesti Bulletin, Educational Sciences Series, 62(1B), 57-65.

 

RESOURCES FOR DISCUSSION:

Gonzalez-Padron, T. (2015). Business ethics and social responsibility for managers  [Electronic version]. Retrieved from https://content.ashford.edu/

· Chapter 10: Looking Forward