Probability distributions

This assignment is divided into four (4) sections. In section A, please select two of the available 3 problems to answer. In section B, question 4 is required, but you may choose between question 5 and 6. In section C, you may select either questions 7 or 8. Question 9 in part D is required.

Correction: Question #5 should read as
“Assume 20 people take the drug. Determine the range of people in which the likelihood of finding that number of people who felt relief is 75%. (i.e. in every group of 20 people, there is a 75% chance of finding ___ to ___ people who feel relief).”

Any topic (writer’s choice)

Topic /Faculty’s and Students Perceptions of Mobile Learning Management Systems (LMS) in higher education.

Literature Review paper:
* Learning Management Systems/ (One page length), use article number 1,2 and3.
* Learning Management Systems in Higher Education/ (One page length), use article number 4and 5 summarize each study and talk about the most important points.
*Mobile Learning Management Systems/(One page length), use article number 6 and 7 summarize each study and talk about the most important points.
*Effective of use Mobile Learning Management Systems in Higher Education:
-Collaboration/ (One page length), use article number 8 and 9 summarize each study and talk about the most important .
-Usability /(One page length), use article number 10 and 11 summarize each study and talk about the most important
* Mobile Learning Management Systems and Social Constructivism theory / (One page length), use article number 12 and 13.

English

Choose one of those paragraphs and explain if the paragraph is coherent. Here is a example for a review of the movie Easy Rider.

“Hopper and Fonda spent much of the rest of their lives squabblingboth in print and in courtover credit for dreaming up its story. According to Fonda, the pair plotted most of the film together, sitting out on Fondas tennis court, while his daughter, Bridget, pedaled her tricycle around them. Hopper (less credibly) liked to claim that he wrote the entire thing himself in 10 days. Considering how thin the plot is, its hard to see what they were getting so worked up about. The film follows two buddies, played by Fonda and Hopper, who strike it rich in a drug deal and then use the proceeds to motorcycle across the country to Mardi Gras, meeting colorful charactershippies, rednecks, an ACLU lawyeralong the way. After dropping acid in a graveyard with two prostitutes, the duo set out eastward again, only to be shot dead by hillbillies on the highway.”

This paragraph is somewhat coherent. The first part develops the claim that the actors Dennis Hopper and Peter Fonda “squabbled” and follows with their claims about writing the movie. But then there is a shift to another point and that is that the plot of the movie is “thin.” This could be seen as shifting to a new point, but this is somewhat relevant to the first part of the paragraph because it develops the notion that the squabble was unnecessary.

English

Choose a paragraphs and explain if the paragraph is coherent. Here is an example for a review of the movie Easy Rider.

“Hopper and Fonda spent much of the rest of their lives squabblingboth in print and in courtover credit for dreaming up its story. According to Fonda, the pair plotted most of the film together, sitting out on Fondas tennis court, while his daughter, Bridget, pedaled her tricycle around them. Hopper (less credibly) liked to claim that he wrote the entire thing himself in 10 days. Considering how thin the plot is, its hard to see what they were getting so worked up about. The film follows two buddies, played by Fonda and Hopper, who strike it rich in a drug deal and then use the proceeds to motorcycle across the country to Mardi Gras, meeting colorful charactershippies, rednecks, an ACLU lawyeralong the way. After dropping acid in a graveyard with two prostitutes, the duo set out eastward again, only to be shot dead by hillbillies on the highway.”

This paragraph is somewhat coherent. The first part develops the claim that the actors Dennis Hopper and Peter Fonda “squabbled” and follows with their claims about writing the movie. But then there is a shift to another point and that is that the plot of the movie is “thin.” This could be seen as shifting to a new point, but this is somewhat relevant to the first part of the paragraph because it develops the notion that the squabble was unnecessary.