Critically review the progress whichThanethas made over the last 10 years in reviving its destination product and image and develop your own set of strategic actions to continue the process of revival over the next 10 years.

/in /by

Understanding of the core concepts and insightful analysis of the destination;
    Appropriate and skilled use of destination data;
    Understanding and use of the literature, clarity of sources and interpretation of evidence;
    Standard of presentation and written English, including references.

Ideally, you will be able to demonstrate:

    Excellent understanding of destination marketing, policy and management, sustainable impact management and product development in theory, and in practice in Thanet;
    Excellent understanding of Thanet’s recent development, its achievements, and the challenges it still faces;
    Accurate selection and interpretation of data from appropriate destination sources;
    Evidence of detailed research using a wide range of relevant academic and secondary sources;.
    Highly-skilled development of links between evidence about Thanet and literature.

Make sure your work:

    Is presented in report format with error-free numbering of sections, tables, figures and pages, an executive summary, and a table of contents;
    Has references and the bibliography presented completely accurately in the Harvard System format;
    Has clear and concise explanations, written in a very high standard of English.

Any topic (writer’s choice)

/in /by

There are two questions. You should present your answer to each question in the form of an essay of not more than 750 words per question. One of the questions is about Statute Law and Common Law while the other one is about liability of the partners/members, in connection with various types of partnership. The document attached provides further guidance on the assessment

Corporate and Management Law

/in /by

There are two questions. You should present your answer to each question in the form of an essay of not more than 750 words per question. A question is about Statute and Common Law, the other is about liability of the partners/members. The document attached provides further guidance to the assessment.

Feasibility Analysis on Shark Tank Episode: Scrub daddy

/in /by

Guide lines:
This is where feasibility analysis fits in. Your job is to conduct a mini-feasibility analysis of a professional pitch from the Shark Tank TV show.

This assignment should be no more than three pages total (single-spaced, 11-point font). As with the case assignments, it is imperative that you connect to the course literature as part of the assignment. In other words, be sure to include in-text citations, references and a reference list (as appropriate).

Also, you are encouraged to access outside industry or market reports, competitorsweb pages, or other information to inform your feasibility.
Your submissions (crafted in Microsoft Word, please!) should answer the questions found below, individually and in the order they are posed. Please clearly mark when you start a new question by starting a new paragraphdont intermingle the questions, please!

2) Describe the main opportunity(s) involved in your selected pitch. Highlight parts of the feasibility of the business concept involved in your chosen pitch by describing the characteristics of the opportunity and related concept (or at least the entrepreneurs understanding of the issues) below. If they are not explicit about these, please infer and justify why as appropriate. Help do a bit
of feasibility analysis for the entrepreneur (see week 3 asynch materials and applicable readings). Please use outside sources such as industry or consumer reports, competitors web pages, or statistics about the market to amplify any information you might need. Be sure to note any references and citations.

Some of the main issues are:
a. That they have the right customer
b. That they have the appropriate way to reach that customer
c. Their main source of differentiation and value-add over the next best alternative
d. Customers willingness to pay the price (in line with point c above regarding value-add)
e. The price-cost relationship (such as margins, profitability, tech development, etc.)
f. Industry features and dynamics
g. Their ability to deliver on the concept as described

3) What are your conclusions about the feasibility of the opportunity(s)? What factors lead you to make this assessment? Be specific and address each opportunity. You dont have to agree with the sharks on this; they might be looking at different factors than you are.

4) What are the three or four overall takeaways (lessons learned) from watching this pitch and the comments of the Sharks for your own entrepreneurial career and feasibility analysis? This is an important part of the assignment, so make sure you put inappropriate thoughts and connections.

Shark tank video link:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k3PY_p_M-8w

In the attachment are the assignment guidelines, the three readings, and notes that are required to reference back to. I also started a first drift  (attached here Draft 1 with helpful notes and pointers and there’s another attachment called paper notes)