Equilibrium Case

Number of Pages: 3 (Double Spaced)

Number of sources: 3

Writing Style: APA

Type of document: Lab Report

Academic Level:Undergraduate

Category: Chemistry

 

CHEMICAL KINETICS
Assignment Overview
Note: You must install Adobe Shockwave Player and Quicktime onto your computer in order to view these videos and tutorials. They are available for free online at http://www.adobe.com/products/shockwaveplayer.html & https://support.apple.com/downloads/quicktime). Google Chrome browser does NOT work for the Pearson links; please use Mozilla Firefox in this case.

In the following activity, you will be working with an equilibrium simulation activity and completing the questions on the lab activity below.

Equilibrium

When a reversible reaction reaches equilibrium, the amount or concentration of products and reactants level off due to the fact that the forward reaction changes reactants into products at the same rate that the reverse reaction changes products into reactants.

Stress

When a system at equilibrium is stressed, the chemicals in the closed system respond to the stress and make either more products or reactants. Once again, the concentrations will level off and a new equilibrium with different concentrations will be established.

Shift

The term shift simply indicates the direction (forward or reverse) of a reaction that increases in rate when a stress is applied. For example, if a reaction shifts to the right as a result of a stress being applied, the forward reaction rate increases and the concentration of the products increase. Logically, the concentration of the reactants must decrease.

What are we doing in the following exercise?

In this activity, your job is to examine how stress (temperature, pressure, and concentration) causes a system at equilibrium to shift and establish a new equilibrium.

You should hypothesize about which direction the equilibrium will shift after you apply the stress.

Keep careful track of what’s going on so that you can look back and discuss what happened.

In this video, Paul Andersen defines the rate of a reaction as the number of reactants that are consumed during a given period of time. The rate of the reaction can be affected by the type of reaction as well as the concentration, pressure, temperature and surface area. Be sure to watch the entire video to watch his discussion of the PhET video you will be working with in this case assignment.
Rate of Reactions. Bozeman Science. Accessed at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mAqX31RRJU on June 8, 2017.

Learn more about Le Chatelier’s Principle in the following video:

Le Chatelier’s Principle. FuseSchool. Accessed at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zuUV455zFs on June 8, 2017.

For this Case study, you will be completing the word doc assignment below on Equilibrium. Complete the interactive simulation (link provided in document) then answer the questions contained in the word document below.

Once you have completed the answers contained with the Equilibrium assignment below, save the word document and upload the final version to the Case Assignment dropbox area of Module 3.

Equilibrium Case

Exploring Equilibrium

Login to the computer and open a web browser. Go to https://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulation/legacy/reactions-and-rates . Open or download the simulation.

When the simulation is open, click on the “Many Collisions” tab.

Look at the screen and observe everything you can find out about the reaction pictured, A + BC ( AB + C.

Click “Show stopwatch”.

Turn on the bar chart.

Let each experiment run for 600 seconds to allow enough time for equilibrium to be established.

1) Predict what will happen when 50 A’s are added to the box and 50 BC’s are added.

2) In the box labeled “current amounts,” enter 50 for A and 50 for BC.

a) Was your prediction correct? Describe and explain any differences.

b) Describe the nature of dynamic equilibrium when small numbers of particles (such as 50, as compared to 6.022 x 1023) are present.

3) Predict what will happen when the temperature is raised so it is NOT above the activation energy max but IS above the energy level of the products.

4) Raise the temperature as described. Did your prediction come true? Describe and explain any differences.

5) Predict what will happen when the temperature is raised so it is above the activation energy max.

6) Raise the temperature as described. Again, was your prediction correct? Describe and explain any differences.

7) What did you notice about the rate at which reactants/products fluctuated between the three different temperatures? If you didn’t notice anything, hit “reset all” and test it again.

8) Did temperature affect equilibrium position? Did it affect it in the way you expected? Explain.

9) Did temperature affect reaction rate? Did it affect it in the way you expected? Explain.

Le Châtelier’s Principle

Instructions: Now choose the “Rate Experiments” tab. As you play with the sim, answer the questions below.

11) In the previous lab (“Exploring Equilibrium”) you investigated the effect of temperature on equilibrium position; you may have found that temperature did not affect equilibrium in quite the way you expected. Add 80 A’s and 80 BC’s to the box for the first reaction and begin the experiment; let the reactions run until equilibrium is reached. Knowing Le Châtelier’s Prinicple, now predict and explain what will happen to the equilibrium position when the temperature is raised and lowered. Then test your ideas using the sim and explain your observations. Give numerical data to support your claims.

Maternal 4

 

Fatime Sanogo is a 23-year-old G1P0 female from Mali. She arrived at the mother/baby unit 30 minutes ago, following a spontaneous vaginal birth.

When she was admitted to labor and delivery yesterday at 0600 hours, she was at 41 4/7 weeks of gestation, her cervix was dilated 1 cm, 50% effaced, and at -2 station. Labor began shortly after at 0800 hours, and she did not receive any pain medication during labor. At 0100 hours today, she progressed to complete dilatation. She began to actively push at 0215 hours.

After a prolonged second stage, where both mother and fetus were stable, she delivered a girl at 0535 hours. The baby was stable with Apgar scores of 9 and 9, and weight of 9 lb 0 oz. Fatime got a second-degree perineal laceration in the course of delivery; this has been repaired. The placenta was delivered spontaneously at 0550 hours by Dr. Schultz, with some bleeding afterward. At arrival in the mother/baby unit, the fundus was firm, midline, at umbilicus, and lochia was dark red and small.

Fatime received some pain medication just before arrival. Her breasts are soft with no nipple damage, and labor and delivery reports that breastfeeding is going fine. A saline lock has been placed in her forearm. She was just up to the bathroom and couldn’t void. Right now, Fatime and the baby are dozing, and the father is sitting at the bedside. Fatime does not speak English fluently, as she has only been in the country for 7 months.

Documentation Assignments

 

1. Document your initial assessment data for Ms. Sanogo, including vital signs, fundal assessment (consistency, position, location), lochia assessment (amount, color, odor, consistency), and pain (location, quality, severity).

2. Document the medication(s) that you administered and evaluate each drug’s effectiveness.

3. Document your situation-background-assessment-recommendation (SBAR) communication to Ms. Sanogo’s provider during this simulation activity.

4. Document the nursing interventions carried out during this simulation, including the time for each intervention, and evaluate the effectiveness of these measures in resolving the problem.

5. Document the education that was provided to Ms. Sanogo during this scenario.

6. Record the communication that was expressed to Ms. Sanogo’s husband.

From vSim for Nursing | Maternity. © Wolters Kluwer Health.

Peps C3

Pediatric Case 6: Eva Madison (Complex)

Guided Reflection Questions

Opening Questions

How did the simulated experience of Eva Madison’s case make you feel?

Describe the actions you felt went well in this scenario.

 

Scenario Analysis Questions[footnoteRef:1] [1: The Scenario Analysis Questions are correlated to the Quality and Safety Education for Nurses (QSEN) competencies: Patient-Centered Care (PCC), Teamwork and Collaboration (T&C), Evidence-Based Practice (EBP), Quality Improvement (QI), Safety (S), and Informatics (I). Find more information at: http://qsen.org/]

EBP List in order of priority your initial nursing actions identified for Eva Madison based on physical findings and family interaction.

EBP When initiating a fluid bolus for a dehydrated child, what type of fluid should be given and why?

EBP What complications might Eva Madison face if her symptoms are not recognized and treated in a timely manner?

PCC What measures should be initiated to decrease anxiety in Eva Madison’s mother while simultaneously caring for Eva?

S/QI Reflect on ways to improve safety and quality of care based on your experience with Eva Madison’s case.

S/QI What infection control measures should be taken in this case and why?

T&C/I What key elements would you include in the handoff report for this patient? Consider the situation-background-assessment-recommendation (SBAR) format.

Concluding Questions

Reflecting on Eva Madison’s case, were there any actions you would do differently? If so, what were these actions, and why would you do them differently?

Describe how you would apply the knowledge and skills you obtained in Eva Madison’s case to an actual patient care situation.

From vSim for Nursing | Pediatric. © Wolters Kluwer Health.

Unit 8 Pharmacology Self-Reflection Assignment

This self-reflection paper should:

  • 2-3 pages long (not including cover sheet and references)
  • Times New Roman 12 pt font
  • Include a cover page
  • Include references (must have at least two references only one textbook).
  • Haveles, E. Applied Pharmacology for the Dental Hygienist. [Bookshelf Ambassadored]. Retrieved from https://ambassadored.vitalsource.com/#/books/9780323595391/
  • APA 7th edition

See rubric for the assignment below.
1.Meaningfully synthesizes connections among experiences outside of the formal classroom to deepen understanding of fields of study and to broaden own points of view

2.Independently synthesizes or draws conclusions by combining examples, facts, or theories from more than one field of study or perspective

.3.Adapts and applies, independently, skills, abilities, theories, or methodologies gained in one situation to new situations to solve difficult problems or explore complex issues in original ways

.4. Fulfills the assignment(s) by choosing a format, language, or graph (or other visual representation) in ways that enhance meaning, making clear the interdependence of language and meaning, thought, and expression.

5.Envisions a future self (and possibly makes plans that build on past experiences) that have occurred across multiple and diverse contexts.6.APA formatting is used with no errors.