what do you recommend as a social environmental policy for this topic? (2 pages).

/in /by

Introduction: in this section, your core task is to frame a position for a larger piece of work. your goal is to build a case as to the vitality of choosing an issue pertaining to social environment for analysis. in it, you will lay out a road map and prescription of analysis (one page). you should have roughly five sources to build your case. you can easily find academic sources using google Scholar and having good search terms.

Background research: the research section is designed to analyze and pull together all of the empirical research that has been conducted on your topic. it is to your advantage to organize this section in a comprehensive and organize manner. once you have red through the material, the last paragraph should spell out two or three key questions that you will analyze in the remaining sections of this project. You should fine 5-10 academic references for this section (2-3 pages).

Data and analysis: in this section, your task is to examine the data there should be two, and maybe three, forms used. first, you should identify the historical trends and directional patterns of this crime. second, you should be able to spell out the social, demographic, and criminal history predictors of the administrative issue. finally, you should dig deeply into the data (even qualitative type) to tell a story. the data will directly impact the nature of your policy recommendation letter (2-3 pages).

conclusion, implications and recommendation: in this section, and based upon all of your previous work, what are the social, political, and theoretical implication of your findings. based upon a thorough examination of your own work, what do you recommend as a social environmental policy for this topic? (2 pages).

APA Format, title and reference page, double spaced. 5-7 pages range.

Topics for this paper should be related to American Community Survey data that you have been exploring on the American Factfinder website.

/in /by

Econ Paper Guidelines

Topics for this paper should be related to American Community Survey data that you have been exploring on the American Factfinder website.  Examples of topics include how immigration, educational attainment, an aging population, occupational distribution, population density, or poverty influence metropolitan area development.

Duringthe semester, you will submit this paper in five sections. This document is intended to provide you with an overview of this assignment.  I will provide more detail in class about the five sections of this paper.  After you submit each section of this paper, you will not receive a grade but will receive feedback on how to improve your submission. You can revise these sections before you submit your final paper at the end of the semester at which timeit will receive a grade on the paper.

The first section of this paper is the introduction.  In this section, you will provide some background or a problem statement related to the topic of your choice about metropolitan area development and how testing your hypothesis will shed light on this topic.  The American Factfinder assignments that you are completing this semester provides you with data that you can use to complete this paper. Your topic will need to be able to be analyzed using American Community Survey data. This introduction should be no longer than one page.

Next, you will submit a three-page literature review. This literature review will have between three and five citations and will be similar to a paper you have written for your first-year seminar.  This literature review will highlight issues related to your topic.

The next two sections will be your data and methods section and results. These are two distinct but related sections. The data and methods section is similar to the road map used to analyze the data to test yourhypothesis. By following this road map, another person could recreate your analysis. In the data and methods section, you first provide an overview of the American Community Survey.  In another paragraph, you will identify the American Factfinder tables that you are using for this analysis and the transformation of the data that you make. You will then identify that you will construct scatter plots with these data to test your hypothesis. In the results section, you will create and interpret the results of the scatterplot (e.g., the percentage foreign bornin metropolitan areas is related to an increase in the regions’ medianhousehold income).  The data and methods section should be one page and the results section should consist of one page for each hypothesis tested.

The last section of the paper is the discussion. It is here that you connect the previous parts of your paper. The results should be discussed in relation to the motivation or problem statement identified in your introduction, the previous research identified in your literature review, and with any policy issues related to this course.

At least one week before each of these sections will be submitted, I will spend class time providing more details onhow to write these sections. Therefore, it is important to be present for these classes.  After providing an overview of this paper assignment after the first exam, I will develop a timeline for submission of the sections of the paper.  The final paper is to be submitted on the last day of class.

 present and explain, in your own words, what it takes to be a person rather than just a human (according to Warren) (this is also the part where you say whether Warren thinks fetuses count as people)

/in /by

The purpose of this assignment is to have you practice the skills necessary in completion of Student, these are:

1. Understand and apply the criteria of correct philosophical reasoning

2. Understand the difference between a rhetorically good argument and a rationally good argument

3. Identify, reconstruct and evaluation arguments posed by philosophers

In doing this also, you will be practicing the skills necessary to present a solution to a philosophical problem. But, in a round-about way, each of the outcomes is present.

Task:

In her paper On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion, Mary Anne Warren argues for the moral permissibility of abortion. She handles this by going on two routes:

1. The permissibility of abortion even if we classify fetuses as people.

2. Showing that fetuses are not in fact people.

As was explained in the lecture, the main question behind whether abortions are permissible concerns on whether fetuses are people. Your task is to take a route that she takes and then answer the following:

This is the route that you could take. If you go this way you need to:

(A) present and explain, in your own words, the traditional argument against abortions (this is found in paragraph 23 of the reading)

(B) explain, in your own words, why, according to Warren, this argument is bad

(C) present and explain, in your own words, what it takes to be a person rather than just a human (according to Warren) (this is also the part where you say whether Warren thinks fetuses count as people)

(D) say whether you think Warren’s argument is good and why you think that.

Each of these should take you around a paragraph to answer. Each of them are worth 5pts. Labeling your paragraphs with ‘(A)’ through ‘(D)’ according to what part you are talking about in them will make grading very fast and easy for me. Since this is worth 20pts, this is worth 5% of your total grade.

Submission:

To submit this assignment, I only accept .pdf, .doc, .odt, and .docx. I do not accept .pages. You can find where to submit in the upper right of this screen. As for all assignments in this class, the standard is Times New Roman, 12pt font, double spaced, 2-3 pages (that is, at least a few words onto the second page to the bottom of the third).

Devise a strategy for how you will present the plan to the community. Consider how you will respond to their potential concerns.

/in /by

Presenting a Program Implementation Plan and Budget

As per the week four discussion and assignment, imagine that you have  been appointed to serve as the health department liaison to a community  group mobilizing to make change. You have been working with the  community for a few months and your supervisor is very happy with your  efforts so far.
You have made some progress gaining access to  and the trust of the community, but some people in the community are  still wary of the health department’s involvement. In the past, the  health department has come into the community and implemented health  promotion programs without taking the community’s needs or wants into  account. Many of the programs were perceived of by the community as  being offensive and hurtful. For example, many older members of the  community remember programs run by the health department that coerced  low-income women of color to be sterilized as a way to decrease  unplanned pregnancy. (See Krase, 2014 (Links to an external site.)  for a review of some of these programs.) Thus, they remain suspicious  about why you and the health department want to work with them.
Unaware of some of the complexities of the health department and  community’s relationship, your supervisor has decided to reward your  work by granting the community program $5,000. However, the money comes  with a stipulation that you may not use it to pay people (i.e. for  salaries; you are the staff person who will need to implement the chosen  intervention, and your salary is already budgeted) and it must be used  to address alcohol and drug abuse, which your supervisor perceives to be  an issue in the community with which you are working. In addition, the  money must be used within the next two months, prior to the end of the  fiscal year. The money is “use it or lose it”. If not used within the  next two months, the money will be gone and your supervisor may think  you and the community do not want or need funding to do your work.
Your supervisor has requested you submit by Thursday a one-page  overview of the intervention you plan to implement and an associated  budget that lays out how you will spend the money. This leaves you no  time to talk with community leaders about what they think about the  offer for program funding or what should be done with the money. You  have a meeting with community leaders scheduled for Thursday night and  will need to present them with the proposal you develop this week.
The textbook outlines several intervention strategies, including health  communication, health education, health policy/enforcement, and  environmental change. Based on the analysis you did of the community in  week four, choose one or more of these strategies that you think would  be most successful given the community’s work to date. In your post:

  • Outline the primary program components that you will spend the money on.
  • Create a budget that explains how the funding will be used.
  • Devise a strategy for how you will present the plan to the community. Consider how you will respond to their potential concerns.