Compose a 2250 words assignment on monitoring drought and controlling soil moisture.

/in /by

Compose a 2250 words assignment on monitoring drought and controlling soil moisture. Needs to be plagiarism free! Based on the report by NIWA, the droughts that occurred in 2012 and 2013 were actually the worst in the whole of New Zealand in the last 70 years. Moreover, due to global warming, there have also been serious changes involving the frequency and amount of rainfall as well as drastic changes in temperature in New Zealand (State of the Climate, 2013).

Considering these things in mind, there is therefore a need for monitoring of soil conditions as well as plant stress, especially during these drastic weather changes. Technological intervention is the answer to this need. This may then be effectively carried out using a network of wireless sensors. These sensors gather necessary data and process these before sending them to a base station. Data such as relative humidity, luminance, soil moisture content, and ambient temperature are the ones that are gauged, monitored, and analyzed. The processing and analysis of such data will then require special software that will finally determine whether a particular environmental condition such as drought is basically identified. If so, an alert message will then be sent to the user in any way possible.

This particular chapter discusses the various environmental factors in New Zealand as believed to have been affected by global warming. These factors include drought, temperature, rainfall, and soil moisture deficits. Global warming has caused most drought conditions in the world, and the climate is getting hotter and hotter too because of greenhouse gas emissions over the years.

In order to deal with these effects of global warming, communities, cities, and countries are expected to coordinate with the state health departments and with other health agencies in developing targeted climate adaptation plans. These climate adaptation plans are actually multifaceted plans whose purpose is to define the responsibilities of various agencies in order to prepare the&nbsp.city or community for the health effects of climate change.

Write 3 pages thesis on the topic discussion questions and participation questions week 1.

/in /by

Write 3 pages thesis on the topic discussion questions and participation questions week 1. The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) was founded in 1973. “The mission of the FASB is to establish and improve standards of financial accounting and reporting that foster financial reporting by nongovernmental entities that provides decision-useful information to investors and other users of financial reports” (Fasb, 2011). One of the most important functions that the FASB serves is formulating the generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The accounting profession is self-regulated and accountants depend on the generally accepted accounting principles to guide their work. The structure of the FASB is independent of other businesses or organizations. The FASB has seven full time employees. Each of them may serve up to two five year terms. Fasb.org (2011). Facts About FASB. Retrieved August 12, 2011 from http://www.fasb.org/facts/ 2. The accounting profession in the United States would be loss without the existence of the FASB. This organization has been helping accountants decipher the guidelines to apply in their work for over 38 years. You mentioned in your response that the FASB is managed by the Securities and Exchange Commission. For the SEC the FASB represents an organization whose mission and goals are aligned with the objectives of the SEC. Both the non-profit and profit industries are served by the FASB. 3. A capital lease is different than an operating lease because a capital lease transfers substantially all the benefits and risk of ownership of the lessee. In capital leases the present value of all cash payments for the lease are capitalized and recorded as an asset. The journal entry to record leased asset and lease liability is illustrated below: Leased Asset – Equipment 10000 Lease Liability 10000 Sometimes accounts referred to lease contracts as off-balance sheet liability. Operating leases are different from capital leases in that the intended use for the asset is temporary. 4. I agree with you that the FASB has helped improved the relevance, reliability, comparability, and consistency of accounting information. Due to the existence of the FASB users of accounting information in the United States are able to compare the financial statements of different corporation because the FASB obligates all firms to prepare the financial statements in the same manner. The use of GAAP is the key element that makes accounting information comparable and consistent. Outside the United States there are other accounting frameworks such as the IFRS, but I believe that US GAAP is the most complete and accurate accounting framework that exists. 5. I liked the five factors you mentioned in your response concerning the importance of the FASB. Improving the relevance and reliability of financial information is very important. The investor community is highly dependent on the financial information released by companies to make buy or sell decisions. The standard setting process of the FASB attempts to eliminate any deficiencies in accounting reporting. I believe that the work of the FASB has been extremely instrumental in the economic success the United States has had during the past four decades. 6. The generally accepted accounting principles are derived from various sources with the FASB being the organization most involved in the standard setting process. There are different types of sources other than the FASB that deal with GAAP. Two additional sources of GAAP are the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) and the FASB Emerging Issues Task Board (EITB). The SEC has contributed to standard setting most notably through its contributions in the formation of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. 7. Participation Question #7 is the same participation question as #3 8. I believe that the FASB has been the most instrumental organization in the development of the accounting profession in the United States. The FASB help legitimize the profession further and it has contributed to the refinement of accounting rules over the years. Despite the power and influence of the FASB its scope is limited to the United States. An organization that has the potential to surpass the FASB in level of importance is the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) because this organization has the potential to affect the profession in a lot of countries around the world. 9. APB No.4 clearly shows that the generally accepted accounting principles are not written in a stone like the 10 commandments. They have evolved over the years and accountants have adapted to the changes accordingly. I already learned from this course that the GAAP formation is not limited to the contributions of the FASB. Accountants have to keep up with the latest news on accounting theory because it is expected of them to comply with continued educational course requirements. 10. The first week of this course was a great learning experience. The organization that was showcased in the classroom participation was the FASB. I learned that this organization has been monitoring the accounting profession for over 38 years. The week one individual paper helped me understand the history behind the convergence project between the FASB and the IASB. I got an opportunity this week to think about my future and how the MSA program is going to help me achieve my career and professional goals. This class so far during the first week has been very challenging because the topics discussed in the class are not general business knowledge.

submit a 750 words paper on the topic Conflict between Federalist and Anti-Federalist: Manifestation in American Politics Today.

/in /by

Hi, need to submit a 750 words paper on the topic Conflict between Federalist and Anti-Federalist: Manifestation in American Politics Today. The existence of federalism and anti-federalism is covertly found in American politics today and will continue to stay.In the realm of current politics, the debates that are taking place show some manifestation of federalism and anti-federalism. There are some people found who are not happy with the federal government. They demand the size of the federal government to become reasonable so that it could be maintained easily. These people are those who want things such as decrease in taxes and the like. Whereas there are people who want a massive government, that is, they want more power for the federal government. These people can be found to demand increase in taxes and other like activities. Hence, the effect of the historical conflict between the federalists and anti- federalists in America is still present. A Little History: Who were the Federalist and Anti-Federalist? Originally, the United States of America was run and was held together by the Articles of Confederation. In 1787, Constitution Convention was formed and it was the first written Constitution for America replacing the Articles of Confederation and the beginning of the Constitutional System. Before the Constitution came into effect, all the states were required to ratify the Constitution. Some states favored the new Constitution. however, debates occurred in other states regarding the new Constitution. Group of states who advocated the ratification of the new Constitution came to be known as the Federalist group. On the other hand, group who showed opposition were called the Anti-Federalist. Both the groups had their reasoning and viewpoints that gave rise to conflict. The Anti- Federalists argued the following reasons: 1. They wanted to Bill of Rights. 2. The national government was given too much power comparatively to the state governments. 3. The executive branch also held too much power. 4. Congress also held power. 5. The army was to be maintained by the national government. Among all these reasons, the non- existence of the Bill of Rights was the main reason of conflict. It would take the rights of the American citizens again as they had previously fought for it. The Federalists had the following reason to advocate the ratification of the new constitution: 1. Power was divided among three separate branches which were independent of each other. And thus, the rights of the people were protected. All the three branches were equal in power so they were unlikely to become dominant over each other. Furthermore, each branch of power dealt with different areas of issues of the people. However, some states ratified to the new Constitution after the reformation of the Bill of Rights. The bill was not considered a part of the new Constitution but played a vital role in protecting the rights of the people. The federalists were mostly the business men whereas the anti-federalist group consists of farmers and workers. The most famous federalist was John Adams. George Mason, also known as the “Father of the Bill of Rights”, was among the anti-federalist group. (Encyclopedia Britannica). It was one common interest between the Federalist and Anti-Federalist that brought about a solution to the conflict. This common reason was that America be controlled by the people. Both had consensus in the opinion that people should have liberty and independence. These two groups existed until the late1820’s. however, their remnants and effects are still seen today in American politics. The Manifestation of the Conflict in Current Politics In current American politics looking at the debates that arise, one may notice two groups having different viewpoints. There is a group of people who do not appreciate the federal government becoming too big in order to start controlling the people.

prepare and submit a paper on sovereignty in the world model. The United States of America supports a federal type of system wherein the state government functions as a separate entity and has got nothing to do with the central government.

/in /by

Your assignment is to prepare and submit a paper on sovereignty in the world model. The United States of America supports a federal type of system wherein the state government functions as a separate entity and has got nothing to do with the central government. The United States prefers what we call “clipped sovereignty”. It needs to be noted than in terms of constitutional sovereignty, the federal law is supposed to be placed at a higher pedestal when compared with state law. Hence, if the need of the hour demands the state government to tone down their policies and legal status with regards to the federal system, they would have no choice but to comply. The clipped sovereignty has been showcased in a perfect manner through a relevant sentence in Article IV of the constitution. (Bloom and Johnson 2001) (American Philosophical Association, Sage School of Philosophy, JSTOR 1964)

“This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof. and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land. and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.” (Bloom and Johnson 2001)

European countries, with special regards to Germany, Switzerland, Austria, Belgium, and the European Union, follow an Upper Federal House System. Out here, there is no election but the composition is based on the governments of their constitution. In Germany Adolf Hitler viewed federalism as an obstacle and he wrote about it in his book Mein Kampf. He wrote, “National Socialism must claim the right to impose its principles on the whole German nation, without regard to what were hitherto the confines of federal states.” (Hitler 1998)

“Those uncomfortable using the “F” word in the EU context should feel free to refer to it as a quasi-federal or federal-like&nbsp.system. Nevertheless, for the purposes of the analysis here, the EU has the necessary attributes of a federal system. It is striking that while many scholars of the EU continue to resist analyzing it as a federation. most contemporary students of federalism view the EU as a federal system.”&nbsp.&nbsp.