You will prepare and submit a term paper on Review the books named middlemarch and the surrounded. Your paper should be a minimum of 1000 words in length. On the other hand, it is an established ideology that literature is the reflection of human life. Therefore, if we take into consideration the two plots inherent in the books, Middlemarch: A Study of Provincial Life by George Eliot and The Surrounded by William D’Arcy McNickle, we can easily link and trace out the theories outlined in the Aristotelian ethics to probe into the real and inherent meaning and event of a fruitful life and judge the ways justifying the ethical discourses undertaken by various agents within the mentioned story lines. Thesis Statement The essay intends to apply the Aristotle’s theory to Rosamond’s decision to speak to Dorothea in the novel Middlemarch and Catherine’s decision to change her religion in The Surrounded. The essay also intends to focus on the appropriation of the nature of the ethical theories of Aristotle followed through the implementation in the two different situations and characters from two diverse stories. Middlemarch: A Report In the book Middlemarch, Chapter Eighty-One envisages an ethical theory from Aristotle which ponders upon the theories pertaining to ethical dilemma mentioned in the Book VI, Chapter I. The book focuses on the right reasons for acting. However, before implementing the theories of Aristotle propounded upon the agents and situation of the story in Middlemarch, it is very important to comprehend the decision making mechanism operating and depending upon the perception and categorical facts. Aristotle tries to establish a very simple fact in his Book II, Chapter IX regarding the intermediate that focuses on the fact that it is not a very easy task to undertake a middle path or a moderate means. Aristotle propagates that getting angry is very easy. Anyone can get angry, but getting angry with the right person and to the right extent with a proper pace and motif and expressing the anguish in a right way is not an action for everyone, and also everyone will not be able to execute it in the right way. If there are chances of executing wrong anguish, then only by taking control of oneself and one’s own inner conflict and anguish, a person can take control of the right kind of action. Aristotle’s theory can be applied to the action of Dorothea pertaining to his second visit to Rosamond. Dorothea meets the initial requirement of the philosophy propounded by Aristotle. She tries to attain the best kind of life from the very outset of the novel. She also conforms to the view of Aristotle which ponders upon acting from reason. Dorothea maintains rationality in her actions throughout. However, Dorothea is lacking somewhere in the spirit to aim for the best life because she is confused in the methodology of aiming at the actual way for the attainment of a good life overall. Dorothea also failed in following the moderate way of right action or doing things. She could not restrain her inner emotional turbulence from taking over her rationale and ultimately succumbed to a wrong perception regarding the actuality of the situation she is in. Seeing Rosamond and Ladislaw together, Dorothea perceives the situation under a wrong light and battles with her inner turbulence. As mentioned in the novel as well, Dorothea tries to confirm the third statement, as suggested by Aristotle, conforming to the ways to win over one’s inner emotions.

I will pay for the following article Economic development of India and China. The work is to be 7 pages with three to five sources, with in-text citations and a reference page. In the case of China, there is consensus that, in the past three decades, the country’s leadership adopted policies aimed at accumulation of wealth for rapid industrialisation and export of industrial goods (Zhijun and Jing, 2011). Prior to 1979, the country’s national planning was a catastrophe. This led to poor showing on economic scales. In India’s case, poor economic performance in the 1960s throughout 1970s has been associated with several issues including poor policies, and license-permits (Kshetri, 2011). Yet India’s poor infrastructure and lack of demand also contributed to the country’s industrial growth. The two countries adopted policies aimed at addressing their challenges, which have effectively turned around their economies since 1980s. Overview of both economies On the key economic developments in recent times, China and India occupy the first and second positions in Asia respectively (Dong et al, 2013). The two nations are by their big population size, global economic powerhouses. Whereas they develop the industries, it is clear that their growth will have deep impacts, not just within the countries but for the better part of the global economy. Such impacts which are already on record include. new market opportunities, stemming from improved purchasing power and higher competitiveness of the two greatest economies in Asia known for particular industrial commodities (Zhou et al, 2010. Prime et al, 2012). China and India have had very rapid economic development which has led to significant achievements, especially on poverty reduction. The two countries also experience problems arising from rapid economic development such as the increasing gap between rural and urban income earners and pollution of the environment (Das, 2012). Afan (2013) indicated that increasing incomes trigger structural transformation in the agricultural sector and food industry as the economy encounters changes in demand and consumer preferences. Concomitantly the effects will impact on trade, business and investment. Both global economic giants have undergone positive growth in the agricultural sector, followed by fast-developing industrial sectors and a huge slump in relative poverty. Das (2012) pointed to the difference in the preconditions and the triggering economic factors behind growth in the two countries. Massive agricultural production Both China and India have massively invested in agriculture (Dorn, 2013). The Chinese economy manifests the significant impact of agriculture on the country’s economic mix, especially in the 1980s and 1990s, when major economic reform took effect in the country (Liu, Liu, and Wei, 2005). In India, the lesser industrialized power of the two, agricultural production continues to occupy a very important part of the economy. While agriculture’s portion in the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) has been on a downward trend, the industry still provides massive employment opportunities for the locals (Agrawal, and Khan, 2011. Bensidoun, Lemoine, and Unal, 2009). Economic contribution in this sector is undeniably of tremendous significance for prospective policies and measures aimed at the realization of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). This is especially true for the need to alleviate abject poverty and food insecurity in the economy by 2015 (Winters, and Yusuf, 2007. Gupta, and Wang, 2009). Appropriate economic responses China’s and India’s economic growth can be attributed to the tactful manner in which they have responded to new global adjustments such as free trade, globalization, agricultural production, rural growth and poverty alleviation (Das, 2012).