Explain the benefits and limitations of different communication strategies such as e–mail, text, voice mail, and face–to–face.

Assignment Instructions
For this assignment, use the following case study:
You have been charged with facilitating the launch of an interprofessional team that will work together on a number of challenging cases. The team members will come from several different areas within the organization. The team is expected to have its orientation meeting in two weeks and then work together collaboratively for the next 6 months.
Preparation Use the Internet to research examples of interprofessional team charters, communication strategies and conflict resolution strategies for teams, and methods and technologies used in team communication.
Directions
Your submitted assignment should contain two distinct sections: Team Charter Recommendations and Communication and Collaboration Strategies. Offer thorough and detailed recommendations and support each of your recommendations using examples, references, and citations from your research.
1.Team Charter Recommendations:
◦Explain methods to establish ground rules and set expectations.
How might differences in personality, expectations, and experience affect team efficiency?
◦Describe conflict resolution strategies for interprofessional teams.
◦Identify effective ways to address issues of team leadership. How will the team decide who will lead them?
What happens if the team leader is ineffective?
2.Communication and Collaboration Strategies:
◦Describe best practices for effective interprofessional collaboration. What types of technology can be used to support collaboration?
◦Explain the benefits and limitations of different communication strategies such as e–mail, text, voice mail, and face–to–face.
When is it appropriate to use each type of communication?
This assignment should be 3–5 pages in length, not including the title page and reference page. Be sure to include an introduction that gives an overview of the case study and a conclusion that summarizes your recommendations.
Use at least 3 resources to support your recommendations and follow APA guidelines for style and format. In addition:
•Include a title page and reference page.
•Use Times New Roman font, 12 point.
•Double–space.

Write a 1000 words using one nursing care intervention to compare two case studies.

Write a 1000 words using one nursing care intervention to compare two case studies.
Topic : Nursing Care Interventions
Length: 1000 words
Reference: APA
Time frame: 12 – 15 hours
Instructions
For this paper, you are required to write a 1000 words using one nursing care intervention to compare two case studies. This means you will use one nursing care intervention for each of the case studies provided. This is a comparative essay. See comparative essay example in blue font.

Summarize briefly the 2004 EPA and FDA fish consumption advisory, including the advice for pregnant and nursing women and women who could become pregnant.

Prepare a 2-page report in a Microsoft Word document addressing the following: Summarize briefly the 2004 EPA and FDA fish consumption advisory, including the advice for pregnant and nursing women and women who could become pregnant.
Fish contains beneficial nutrients such as docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) that promote healthy brain development in the fetus. However, unfortunately most fish contain mercury. This poses a dilemma for pregnant women because mercury is a toxic metal pollutant that causes neurological and other health problems. The toxicity of inorganic mercury pollution is magnified in the environment because bacteria biotransform it into highly toxic methylmercury. Children who are exposed prenatally to methylmercury are especially vulnerable to the chemical’s neurotoxic effects.
For this assignment:
Read the prenatal fish consumption advisory issued jointly by the EPA and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2004 (available at http://water.epa.gov/scitech/swguidance/fishshellfish/outreach/advice_index.cfm). Take a special note of the advice about the types of fish. Since mercury bioaccumulates (i.e., not easily excreted from the body), larger predatory fish, which eat many fish containing small amounts of mercury, contain higher levels of mercury (e.g., shark, swordfish, king mackerel, and tilefish).
Go to the seafood section of your local grocery store, a local fish market, or a local seafood restaurant. Determine if shark, swordfish, king mackerel, or tilefish are for sale. Examine the displays, packaging, or menu warnings about fish consumption and pregnancy and breastfeeding.
Read the following article:Oken, E., Radesky, J. S., Wright, R. O., Bellinger, D. C., Amarasiriwardena,
C. J., Kleinman, K. P., … Gillman, M. W. (2008). Maternal fish intake
during pregnancy, blood mercury levels, and child cognition at age 3
years in a US cohort. American Journal of Epidemiology, 167(10),
1171–1181.
This study was able to separate the potential nutritional benefits of fish consumption during pregnancy from the potential harmful effects of low-level mercury exposure from fish. Review the abstract and the mothers’ blood mercury levels according to the amount of fish consumed per week (top of Table 1, page 1175). The introduction to the paper summarizes the nutritional benefits from fish, e.g., as a source of DHA that many women otherwise lack in their diets. In addition, review Figure 1, which shows childhood cognitive test results for mothers who consumed more fish and for mothers with higher blood mercury levels.
Conduct research on the Internet to learn more about Minamata disease and its origins. The population was exposed to high levels of methylmercury by consuming fish that contained very high levels of the pollutant as a result of industrial discharge into Minamata Bay. The first signs that something was wrong were that fish swam crazily, sea birds were unable to fly, and cats began dancing strangely. Congenital Minamata disease was the first transplacental toxic disorder that was scientifically established; before that time, it was believed that the placenta protected the fetus from hazardous chemicals.
Prepare a 2-page report in a Microsoft Word document addressing the following:
Summarize briefly the 2004 EPA and FDA fish consumption advisory, including the advice for pregnant and nursing women and women who could become pregnant.
Summarize briefly the key findings of the study by Oken et al. Briefly describe the ways in which the mercury-associated adverse cognitive effects measured in the three-year-old children in the study differ from the syndrome of congenital Minamata disease.
Report what you found when you looked for fish consumption advisories and for shark, swordfish, king mackerel, and tilefish at your local grocery store, a local fish market, or a local seafood restaurant. Devote approximately one-third to one-half of a page to this section of your report.
Justify your answers to the following questions using information from the above mentioned sources and relevant information from any other reputable sources:
What advice about fish consumption would you give to pregnant and nursing women?
What would be your advice for women who could become pregnant?
In what way, if any, should the public health system become involved in disseminating the fish consumption advisory to women? Devote approximately two-thirds of a page to this section of your report.

Determine an evidence-based quantitative article from the search that contains an evidence-based randomized control trial.

Evidence-Based Clinical Question Search Assignment
Purpose:
The purpose of this Assignment is to give you a practical application to implement your PICOT idea, supported by the evidence-based research you have obtained in during your systematic review. You will apply evidence-based research findings, discovered from your clinical question, and then integrate those to support your suggested change in nursing practice.
Directions:
Identify your refined PICOT question.(TBI patients and their families)
Using PubMed and the Cochrane collaboration database, do a systematic review of your clinical question.
Describe your systematic review and include an errors analysis.
Determine an evidence-based quantitative article from the search that contains an evidence-based randomized control trial.
Summarize the case study selected.
Describe the study approach, sample size, and population studied.
Apply the evidence from this review to your practice specifically in your overview.
Evaluate the outcomes, identifying the validity and reliability.
Discuss if the study contained any bias.
Determine the level of evidence identified in the review.