Write a 3- to 4-page paper, not including title page or references page addressing the issue and upload it by the end of this module.

/in /by

A Critique of Lockheed Martin

In this assignment you will be asked to review Chapter 4, the final chapter of Terris’ book, and to spend some time applying your critical thinking skills in evaluating Lockheed Martin’s efforts.

1.   What do you think about the notion presented by Terris that Lockheed’s ethics program does little to prevent ethical breaches at the highest level of the organization?

2.   Are the efforts put forth—such as making sure higher level executives participate in training—enough to help executives navigate what Terris calls the ‘ethical minefield’ faced by leadership in such an organization?

3.   What are some things that could be done to address the issue related to ethics at higher executive levels of the organization?

4.   Terris points out that the company’s program is overly focused on individuals and that it doesn’t really address group dynamics that can impact ethical situations. For instance, there can be a tendency for groups to ‘go with the flow’ of the group decision making process and overlook ethical issues in the process. What would you recommend that Lockheed Martin do to address this situation?

(Hint: reviewing p. 128 and the following pages – before section headed “Personal Responsibility, Collective Innocence” – of the text might be helpful).

Write a 3- to 4-page paper, not including title page or references page addressing the issue and upload it by the end of this module.

Your paper should be double-spaced and in 12-point type size.

Your paper should have a separate cover page and a separate reference page.  Make sure you cite your sources.

Use APA style, and proofread your paper.

Required Reading

Terris, D. (2013). Chapter 4: Vulnerabilities. In Ethics at work: Creating virtue at an American corporation. Waltam, MA: Brandeis University Press. Retrieved from the Trident Online Library (ProQuest Ebook Central). Read pages 117-154.

Popa, M., & Salanta, I. (2014). Corporate social responsibility versus corporate social irresponsibility. Management & Marketing, 9(2), 117-154. Available from ProQuest Central in Additional Library Resources.

Lindgreen, A., & Swaen, V. (2010). Corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 1-7. Retrieved from the Trident Online Library.

Mujtaba, B. G., & Cavico, F. J. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and sustainability model for global firms. Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics, 10(1), 58-75.

The following tutorial provides detailed information that can be applied to the topics of this course. There are a number of videos and lessons on ethics.

https://courses.lumenlearning.com/epcc-introethics-1/chapter/do-you-have-to-be-an-expert-to-practice-ethics/

  Explain how this new position could benefit the company in at least three ways. 3.     Describe how this position will work collaboratively with other positions in the company.

/in /by

Organizations periodically need to create a new position. The need for this new position might be due to:

  • Changes in the market/industry
  • Creating an internal position for work that had previously been outsourced
  • Organizational growth that necessitates the addition of a new specialty or managerial position

I serve as the Human Resource Manager for an auto insurance company called Premium Auto Insurance. Up until this point, the Claims Department has consisted of a small number of Claims Representatives who reported directly to the Finance Director.

Claims volume has recently jumped, resulting in the hiring of more Claims Representatives. You, as the Human Resource Manager, feel that a new position of Claims Supervisor is needed in order to manage the expanding claims operation.

I have decided to develop a proposal that I will submit to the CEO recommending the creation of this new position and providing the justification.

In a minimum of 2 pages, create a proposal. In your proposal, include the following:

1.     A description of the new position you will be creating with a list of the main responsibilities of the position.

2.     Explain how this new position could benefit the company in at least three ways.

3.     Describe how this position will work collaboratively with other positions in the company.

4.     Remember that this is a proposal. Make sure to format the paper properly for the proposal. A proposal is a persuasive document, so make sure to use proper language and tone. Remember, as the HR Manager, you are writing to the CEO so use a tone in your proposal that is specific to your audience (the CEO).

5.     Include an APA formatted title page and reference page with at least 2 credible sources. Make sure to include APA in-text citations for any information used from outside sources.

“Conduct academic research using the library’s databases, like Business Source Complete via EBSCO and Business via ProQuest, as well as reliable webpages”

Summarize the issue of the case, and then explain the employment law that was violated. Evaluate the type of impact the violation had on the organization then determine two (2) ways the organization could mitigate the issue. Justify your response.

/in /by

Assignment 4: Employment Law Case Brief

Due Week 10 and worth 200 points

Using the Internet, select and research an employment law case no greater than five (5) years old.

Write a three to four (3-4) page brief in which you:

  1. Summarize the issue of the case, and then explain the employment law that was violated.
  2. Evaluate the type of impact the violation had on the organization then determine two (2) ways the organization could mitigate the issue. Justify your response.
  3. Based on your research, determine if a policy was or was not in place during the violation. Then, recommend a communication for all employees to enhance the knowledge of the policy. Support your response.
  4. As a HR Manager, explore an organization you worked for or familiar with, then suggest three (3) ways you could make the organization violation free from employment law issues. Justify your response.
  5. Use at least three (3) quality academic resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic resources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

  • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
  • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

  • Determine employment laws that apply to the selection, development, and management of employees.
  • Evaluate policies and processes that promote a diverse workforce.
  • Develop policies that are compliant with employment laws.
  • Use technology and information resources to research issues in employment law.
  • Write clearly and concisely about employment law using proper writing mechanic.

There are two parts to this assignment. 1)  Answer each of the following questions of the quiz first.  Then review the analysis of your answers to each of the questions.  2) For this assignment, do you agree or disagree with the analysis?

/in /by

Chapter 11 Journal Assignment

There are two parts to this assignment. 1)  Answer each of the following questions of the quiz first.  Then review the analysis of your answers to each of the questions.  2) For this assignment, do you agree or disagree with the analysis?  Be sure to have a response for each of the questions.   Also, be sure to answer each question completely and work to incorporate material from the text, course exercises and discussions. Answers must integrate course terminology and personal experience.

Part One

  1. Take the quiz: Communication Assessment (http://www.positive-way.com/communic.htm (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.)
  2. Analysis: The answer “b” to all questions indicates more effective communication.  The more b’s you have, the better you’re doing.  The a’s indicate an opportunity to improve.  The following explains why “b” is the better answer for each question:
  1. Intimacy and conflict go hand in hand. If you want real intimacy with your mate, then there will be real conflict. People just don’t agree on everything at all times. How you handle the resulting disagreements is more important than whether or not you have them. The most successful couples work through their disagreements and conflicts together and develop a stronger relationship as a result of that teamwork.
  2. No one is a mind reader and it is really impossible for your partner to know what you are thinking and feeling no matter how long you have known each other. It is important that you agree to say what is important and to talk until you both agree that youunderstand.
  3. Dropping hints waste your time and your partner’s time and it usually leads to misunderstanding and disappointment. Get right to the point so your partner won’t have to guess what your concerns are in the relationship. State how you feel by using “I” statements instead of “you” statements.
  4. Concentrating on what you like about your mate and your relationship will lead to a more positive relationship. If you concentrate on the things you don’t like, it’s easy to overlook the good things. Negativity breeds negativity which then makes communication and problem solving more difficult. Use positive elements of the relationship as a foundation upon which to learn and grow. We get more of what we concentrate on!
  5. Communication requires two people. Issues will remain unsettled unless you and your partner agree to communicate. We recommend that you agree to communicate with the guidelines of understanding, kindness, honesty and respect as ground rules. These guidelines will serve to reduce tension and remind you both that you are on the same team. As a couple agree to your own discussion rules which can include such things as time-outs for cooling off or thinking.
  6. Most of us don’t pick up on hints so don’t expect your partner to guess what you do or don’t want. Make clear and direct statements. Follow the guidelines of understanding, kindness, honesty and respect. These guidelines make it easier to state your desires in a positive way and are more likely to be understood and well received.
  7. Successful communication requires good listening. No one wants to be interrupted while they are speaking. We all want our feelings and thoughts to be heard, valued and understood. Listen for understanding. Rephrase what you have heard your partner say and then ask if this is correct. Save your side of the discussion until you have validated your partner’s feelings. Validating your partner’s feelings and thoughts is the key to success.
  8. Blame fuels the fire of disagreement. Most of the time we believe that our position is acceptable and tend to blame the other person for any misunderstanding rather than to see our own flaws in communicating. Analyze your part in fueling a problem and avoid blaming others. Be responsible for your role in the relationship.
  9. We tend to learn by example. If your parents were poor communicators more than likely you have learned and now act out some ineffective ways of communicating. These habits may seem quite comfortable to you even if they are not working. It is up to you to learn new positive ways to communicate. Be persistent and practice until they become habit.

Part Two:

  1. Do you agree/disagree with your results?
  2. Please go through all 9 questions and explain your logic and reasoning for your decision.