Identify 2 additional articles (1 must be from the Herzing Library Database) that could be used to support the Thesis/Claim statement included in the summary.

/in /by

Practice: NotetakingEvaluation Title: Notetaking

Select one of these articles for your assignment from the Herzing University Library database.

Article Choices:

Chapman, B., Erdozaim, M. S., & Powell, D. (2017). Going public: early disclosure of food risks for the benefit of public health. Journal of Environmental Health, 79(7), 8+. Retrieved from http://go.galegroup.com.prxherzing.lirn.net/ps/i.do?p=AONE&sw=w&u=lirn50909&v=2.1&it=r&id=GALE%7CA483929867&asid=b1e06b2cd03c7e93decba66ed572ea3f (Links to an external site.)

Etchegary, H., Bishop, L., Street, C., Aubrey-Bassler, K., Humphries, D., Vat, L. E., & Barrett, B. (2017). Engaging patients in health research: identifying research priorities through community town halls. BMC Health Services Research, 17(1). Retrieved from http://go.galegroup.com.prxherzing.lirn.net/ps/i.do?p=AONE&sw=w&u=lirn50909&v=2.1&it=r&id=GALE%7CA485047658&asid=8e2af3a345db1d309573ca163cfc87ad (Links to an external site.)

Michaelis, T. L., & Markham, S. K. (2017, March-April). Innovation training: making innovation a core competency: a study of large companies shows that, although managers see human capital as central to innovation success, most aren’t providing innovation training. Research-Technology Management, 60(2), 36+. Retrieved from http://go.galegroup.com.prxherzing.lirn.net/ps/i.do?p=AONE&sw=w&u=lirn50909&v=2.1&it=r&id=GALE%7CA487431647&asid=8e5306a1b58b8578b3459457df11df89 (Links to an external site.)

Miller, K. L. (2017, March). What we talk about when we talk about “reasonable cybersecurity”: a proactive and adaptive approach. The Computer & Internet Lawyer, 34(3), 1+. Retrieved from http://go.galegroup.com.prxherzing.lirn.net/ps/i.do?p=AONE&sw=w&u=lirn50909&v=2.1&it=r&id=GALE%7CA483743679&asid=bd0f63af3132e3bea47730789cab551e (Links to an external site.)

Read the article using your chosen model of note taking (from Unit 2).Using the identified article, provide the following information:

  • A title page in APA format
  • A 1-2 page summary-includes the APA reference for the article chosen.
  • An abstract for the article
  • A Thesis/Claim statement
  • Identify 2 additional articles (1 must be from the Herzing Library Database) that could be used to support the Thesis/Claim statement included in the summary.

Provide the APA reference for each article.

Set up the assignment as follows:

I. Title PageII. 1-2 page SummaryIII. AbstractIV. Thesis Claim StatementV. Article reference

Defend your point of view by raising specific issues or aspects of the argument. Offer your own opinion. Explain what you think about the argument. Describe several points with which you agree or disagree.

/in /by

locate and review a scholarly article found in a peer-reviewed journal related to HR recruiting, unions, labor relations, or international human resources management. In peer-reviewed journals, the articles were reviewed by other professionals in the field to ensure the accuracy and quality of the articles, which is ideal when writing an article critique.

Research tip: When researching using the databases, you can limit your search to only peer-reviewed articles. To do this, look for the phrase “limit results,” and select “peer-reviewed articles.”

There is a minimum requirement of 500 words for the article critique.

  • Format your critique in APA style.
  • Begin with an introduction that defines the subject of your critique and your point of view. You will first need to identify and explain the author’s ideas. Include specific passages that support your description of the author’s point of view.
  • Take into consideration how you would approach a recruiting program for your company based on the author’s ideas on the subject matter.
  • What challenges would you face if your company were a global conglomerate?
  • Defend your point of view by raising specific issues or aspects of the argument. Offer your own opinion. Explain what you think about the argument. Describe several points with which you agree or disagree.
  • Explain how the passages support your opinion.
  • Conclude your critique by summarizing your argument and re-emphasizing your opinion.
  • For each of the points you mention, include specific passages from the text (you may summarize, quote, or paraphrase, being sure to include proper in-text citations) that provide evidence for your point of view.

What, if any, role was played by third parties in resolving this bargaining dispute? What was the identity of the third party?

/in /by

Written Assignment 1 (25 points) 4 pages or more, not including cover or References pages

Locate an article describing a collective bargaining situation that has arisen within the past two years. This article should be from a newspaper, an academic journal, or a credible online news source. Use a minimum of two additional references to support your discussion and to respond to the questions in the assignment.

a. Using APA guidelines, state the proper citation for the article.

b. State the nature of the collective bargaining dispute.

c. What are the underlying causes of the dispute?

d. What economic or ethical pressures has each side attempted to use to prevail in the dispute?

e. If there is any evidence of any illegal or unethical conduct on either side, describe it in detail.

f. Was the dispute resolved? If so, how?

g. What, if any, role was played by third parties in resolving this bargaining dispute? What was the identity of the third party?

h. In retrospect, could this dispute have been resolved in a more constructive fashion? If so, how?

RUBRIC FOR WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT 1

Criteria 1

Exceeds Expectations 5 points

Meets Expectations 4 points

Meets Some Expectations 3 points

Does Not Meet Expectations 2 points

Not Included 0 points

Addresses nature of the collective bargaining dispute and the underlying causes of the dispute.

Discusses the environment, trends, influences, challenges, current trends

Effectively addresses the nature of the collective bargaining dispute and the underlying causes of the dispute.

Discusses the environment, trends, influences, challenges, current trends.

Addresses the nature of the collective bargaining dispute and the underlying causes of the dispute although not as comprehensively as it should be.

Discusses the environment, trends, influences, challenges, current trends; however, makes some indistinct or incomplete connections regarding relevance and workplace connections.

Identifies some of the key issues of the nature of the collective bargaining dispute and some of the underlying causes of the dispute.

Some elements of the article are missing or inappropriately identified.

Doesn’t identify at least the nature of the collective bargaining dispute and the underlying causes of the dispute.

The topic is loosely connected; linkages not made; fails to identify relevance.

Criteria 2

Exceeds Expectations 5 points

Meets Expectations 4 points

Meets Some Expectations 3 points

Does Not Meet Expectations 2 points

Not Included 0 points

Identifies the economic or ethical pressures each side has attempted to use to prevail in the dispute

Identifies the economic or ethical pressures each side has attempted to use to prevail in the dispute.Makes strong, logical connections

Identifies some the economic or ethical pressures each side has attempted to use to prevail in the dispute. Makes some logical connections.

Identifies at least some of the economic or ethical pressures each side has attempted to use to prevail in the dispute. Makes some loose connections.

Little or no identification of the economic or ethical pressures each side has attempted to use to prevail in the dispute. Makes no logical connections.

Criteria 3

Exceeds Expectations 5 points

Meets Expectations 4 points

Meets Some Expectations 3 points

Does Not Meet Expectations 2 points

Not Included 0 points

What, if any, role was played by third parties in resolving this bargaining dispute? What was the identity of the third party?

Discussed the role, if any, played by third parties in resolving this dispute and identified the third party.  Reader can easily follow the author’s logic and flow.

Discussed, although not comprehensively, the role, if any, played by third parties in resolving this dispute and identified the third party. While overall well-organized, at times the writing forces the reader to determine the author’s train of thought.

Discussed the role, if any, played by third parties in resolving this dispute; however, did not identify a third party.  Consistent organization is lacking causing the reader to have difficulty in following the author’s train of thought.

Did not discuss the role, if any, played by third parties in resolving this dispute and didn’t discuss or identify a third party.

Paper lacks a sense of organization or plan to the presentation of ideas.

Criteria 4

Exceeds Expectations 5 points

Meets Expectations 4 points

Meets Some Expectations 3 points

Does Not Meet Expectations 2 points

Not Included 0 points

Was the dispute resolved? In retrospect, could this dispute have been resolved in a more constructive fashion? If so, how? 

Discussed if the dispute was resolved and if it could have been resolved in a more constructive manner

Reader can easily follow the author’s logic and flow.

Discussed, although not comprehensively, if the dispute was resolved and if it could have been resolved in a more constructive manner.

While overall well-organized, at times the writing forces the reader to determine the author’s train of thought.

Discussed if the dispute was resolved although not if it could have been resolved in a more constructive manner.

Consistent organization is lacking causing the reader to have difficulty in following the author’s train of thought.

Did not discuss  if the dispute was resolved or not and didn’t suggest if it could have been resolved in a constructive manner.

Paper lacks a sense of organization or plan to the presentation of ideas.

Criteria 5

Exceeds Expectations 5 points

Meets Expectations 4 points

Meets Some Expectations 3 points

Does Not Meet Expectations 2 points

Not Included 0 points

Use of current and relevant sources, citation and mechanics.

The author has identified and selected a minimum of three very appropriate and current resources.

The author has identified and selected at least two sources that are appropriate for this assignment.

The author has identified and selected one source that is commercial rather than academic or from a business sources such as vendor Web sites.

The author has not identified or selected an article that is appropriate; it is commercial rather than academic or from a business sources such as vendor Web sites.

Accurate use of APA style for in-text citations and References

The paper correctly cites in-text and lists resources on the References page.  If additional sources are used, they are included correctly.

The majority of in-text citations and the reference are properly cited; formatting is inconsistent / inaccurate in a few cases.

References are cited but incorrectly under APA style. The student has either used another format or incorrectly applied the APA style guidelines.

Inconsistent or missing in-text citations; fails to attribute an author’s word through APA citations.

Create a hypothetical conflict or describe a recent conflict situation in which an individual or group from the culture you have been studying was involved.

/in /by

In a total of 750-1,000 words, explain how someone from the culture you have been studying is likely to handle interpersonal conflict (according to cultural conflict ethics).

  • Create a hypothetical conflict or describe a recent conflict situation in which an individual or group from the culture you have been studying was involved.

Be sure to write out the details of the conflict as communicated by the source of the story and give a consultation for how to resolve/manage the conflict.

  • Based on your research in intercultural conflict and the conflict ethics/styles of the cultural group, explain why the conflict arose. Explain how the ethics or expression of conflict was influenced by the individuals’ culture/worldview.
  • Write out a consultation outlining what the communicators in the conflict scenario need to know, or do, to best handle the conflict.
  • Also include one recommendation that comes from the Christian Worldview, or scripture.

Be specific in your recommendations and justify them with scholarly evidence (when you justify, explain what ethical considerations should be taken into account when handling the situation described in the case study). Two academic sources are required for the consultation.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit the case study and the consultation to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

This assignment measures the following competency: Comp 4.1: Evaluate the connection between ethical communication and different worldviews.