Writing assignment on do manufacturers of products for children have special obligations to consumers and society

I need some assistance with these assignment. do manufacturers of products for children have special obligations to consumers and society Thank you in advance for the help!

In addition to the meritorious use of factors of production and other facilities belonging to the society, manufacturers must ensure that they are socially responsible by producing products that are not harmful to consumers and particularly children. This creates a symbiotic relationship between manufacturers and consumers, which eventually reinforces the creation of a noble reputation that translates to increased sales.

Manufacturing must be closely intertwined with the current enlightened philosophy of marketing where products are expected to meet customer wants, needs, preferences and marketing in a socially responsible manner that is pleasing and beneficial. Manufacturers, such as Mattel Corporation, who manufacture products for children have the responsibility of ensuring that the products are safe in both intended and non-intended uses so as to protect children from harm since, ordinarily, children lack the literacy to comprehend the complete functioning of a product. Moreover, the manufacturers must ensure that society’s apprehensions on children’s privacy and rights are upheld as this will somewhat guarantee business perpetuity. What’s more, the manufacturers have the responsibility of ensuring that the components used in manufacturing the product are meet the health and safety standards and accurate information indicated on the products label. For instance, the age that is supposed to use the product and the chemical components should be clearly indicated.

The Edward Snowden story has captured the interest of constitutionalists around the country. Edward Snowden’s conduct related to his role with the NSA is controversial, on many levels. This assignment seeks to vet those issues, from a 4th Amendment privacy perspective. Review the following videos. Using this information, as well as your own independent research, submit a 2-3 page paper, in APA formatting, addressing the following: Conduct a “yes” and “no” analysis of the role of electronic surveillance in 4th Amendment jurisprudence. Listen to the following NPR program:  1.- Debate: Does Mass Phone Data Collection Violate The 4th Amendment? (Approximately 50 minutes). First, articulate, in your own words, what you believe to be the strongest argument in favor of the debate question (the “yes” perspective), and what you believe to be the weakest argument against the debate question (the “no” perspective). Remember, the debate question is: Does Mass Phone Data Collection Violate the 4th Amendment?

The Edward Snowden story has captured the interest of constitutionalists around the country. Edward Snowden’s conduct related to his role with the NSA is controversial, on many levels. This assignment seeks to vet those issues, from a 4th Amendment privacy perspective. Review the following videos. Using this information, as well as your own independent research, submit a 2-3 page paper, in APA formatting, addressing the following:

  1. Conduct a “yes” and “no” analysis of the role of electronic surveillance in 4th Amendment jurisprudence. Listen to the following NPR program:  1.- Debate: Does Mass Phone Data Collection Violate The 4th Amendment? (Approximately 50 minutes). First, articulate, in your own words, what you believe to be the strongest argument in favor of the debate question (the “yes” perspective), and what you believe to be the weakest argument against the debate question (the “no” perspective). Remember, the debate question is: Does Mass Phone Data Collection Violate the 4th Amendment?
  2. Based on the NPR presentation, and what you’ve learned about 4th Amendment law, articulate your position on the issue, providing support in your response.
  3. Finally, review this 2.-  short video of Edward Snowden, of NSA fame, and provide an opinion as to whether you agree with his position regarding the 4th Amendment’s protections. Make sure to support your position.

1. https://www.npr.org/2014/10/14/356127807/debate-does-mass-phone-data-collection-violate-the-4th-amendment

2. https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/edward-snowden-interview/snowden-fourth-amendment-n116881

Using Vans “Off The Wall” company as an example, write a 1-2 page paper and compare and contrast the American business culture versus foreign business cultures; explain why this is a strategic issue. Include a cover page and a reference page in the assignment. Follow APA, with table of contents, introduction, conclusion, and reference page. Include at least two sources other than the textbook (David, F.R. & F. David (2016). Strategic Management: Concepts (16th ed.). NJ: Prentice Hall, ISBN-13: 978-0-13-4-15397-1) for the assignment.

Using Vans “Off The Wall” company as an example, write a 1-2 page paper and compare and contrast the American business culture versus foreign business cultures; explain why this is a strategic issue. Include a cover page and a reference page in the assignment. Follow APA, with table of contents, introduction, conclusion, and reference page. Include at least two sources other than the textbook (David, F.R. & F. David (2016). Strategic Management: Concepts (16th ed.). NJ: Prentice Hall, ISBN-13: 978-0-13-4-15397-1) for the assignment.

Write 2 pages thesis on the topic social class in the us. Sawhill, Isabel (2006) in a Policy Brief stated that while the US economy performed well, most of the benefits of such success were reaped by those at half top of the income distribution strata, especially those at the top one percent (or those with an income of more than about $400,000 in 2006).

Write 2 pages thesis on the topic social class in the us. Sawhill, Isabel (2006) in a Policy Brief stated that while the US economy performed well, most of the benefits of such success were reaped by those at half top of the income distribution strata, especially those at the top one percent (or those with an income of more than about $400,000 in 2006).

In the same Policy Brief, Sawhill confirms that indeed, the class still matters in the American

Society, stressing that it takes at least five generations to totally free one from circumstances of birth or family background. Sawhill adds that as the gap widens among the income levels or groups, it has become harder for people to move up, as the topmost of the ladder becomes more and more solid and strong, accumulating more and more wealth.

Immigrants, illegal or otherwise, represent cheap, reliable labor for American businesses. The documented and legal immigrants mostly have no education or reached only high school level, which makes it harder for them to land on high-paying jobs. Even their children tend to not continue to go to school but instead engage in jobs to augment their families’ incomes.

Education, they say, is the great leveler. However, the US does not provide equal access to quality education to its people. The majority of the immigrants’ kids go to public schools which are below par the other schools across the nation. Even the funding for Bilingual Education has been debated upon, most probably towards its abolition.

It is therefore no wonder that recent trends had been that these immigrants are going back to their homes, primarily to seek better opportunities at their homelands, and secondly to be near their loved ones back home. The US may be a land of opportunity to some, but definitely not for everyone. It is not really a matter of the hardworking, persistent winning the race. It is still a matter of who one’s parents were, where one went to school, how much power does one hold, among other factors that really matter in order to live the American Dream.