I need help creating a thesis and an outline on FAT32 File System for Computers. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide. An abstract is required.

For purposes of convincing a user who has expressed a preference for the FAT32 file system to the NTFS file system for use in desktop computers in a workgroup, this document will compare the different features of the two file systems. The user will be convinced why it is highly recommended currently to use the NTFS file system instead of the FAT32 file system for computers in workgroups.FAT32 is one of the most common types of file system to keep track of the hard disk. FAT32 was invented in 1977 by Microsoft but found its way in PC-DOS of IBM PCs in 1981 (Phillips, 2008).

Later on, the file system was carried to MS-DOS, where it has been used in every system as a standard format in hard drives and floppy disks. However, as technology continued to advance and users demanding more functionality on the file system, Microsoft came up with a new version of the file system called NTSF in 1993. Despite its invention in the early 1990s, the NTFS file system was not used in most consumer PCs until the development of Windows XP in 2001 (Domingo, 2013). Since then, the NTFS file system is used in most recent operating systems, including Windows 7, 8, and Vista as a default format.

Therefore, being a new technology file system, NTFS has additional features that make it suitable for use for desktop computers in a workgroup.Firstly, it is important to begin by stating that computers used in workgroups require a high level of security. This is because such computers are prone to attack by malicious users. For this reason, when considering a file system for use on a computer in a workgroup, a user needs to choose a file system that has high-security features. Fortunately, it is only the NTFS and not FAT32 file system with extra security&nbsp.features that can help safeguard computers used in workgroups.

I need some assistance with these assignment. postmodernism- derrida, foucault and rorty Thank you in advance for the help!

of the Philosophy of the Concerned 4 December Postmodernism- Derrida, Foucault and Rorty Though Derrida, Foucault and Rorty tend to differ in an array of ways, still their postmodern views do evince a similarity in the sense that their philosophies do starkly come out as being a potent reaction against the salient philosophical values and assumptions that the modern period of the Western history does affiliate to. The philosophies of Derrida, Foucault and Rorty do convey a straightforward and emphatic denial of the values, norms, and beliefs that were considered to be a staple during the age of enlightenment.

The philosophies of Derrida, Foucault and Rorty do carry a single thread in the sense that they are marked by a stark skepticism and a pervasive suspicion of the power of reason. All the three philosophers do exhibit a marked sensitivity to the role played by ideology in reinforcing and stabilizing the political power.

The strategy of deconstruction contrived by Derrida does practically amount to a staunch critique of the philosophical traditions that hitherto signified the Western philosophy.

The strategy of deconstruction not only does tend to expose any literary or philosophical text, but by doing so it also does vehemently try to subvert it by exposing the varied binary oppositions that envelop the salient Western ways of thinking about and perceiving reality. The technique of deconstruction tends to attempt a textual interpretation of a text, with the intent to bring to fore the alternative meanings hidden in that text. It is not a surprise that Derrida’s “idea of “deconstructing text” has had a very wide influence (680).

”

In continuation of a similar skeptical sentiment, Foucault did study the salient power structures that governed an array of social institutions. He was emphatically interested in the effect that these power structures and the consequent social institutions did have on the micro-politics that determined the potency and scope of social and political power. Foucault was particularly interested in understanding as to how people did develop a sense of social order by learning to govern them.

The skepticism of Foucault did evince itself in identifying and unraveling the sense of social control that lurked behind an array of sociological situations. Foucault believed that the individuals do come to accept contractual ideologies to allow for a regulation of the imminent social order and the contrivance of a consequent social body.

In that context it is indeed interesting to note that Rorty did deny the dominance of all types of mental powers that happened to be privileged in their scope and that allowed for a direct and straightforward insight into the nature of reality.

Thereby, by doing so, Rorty did make way for a philosophy of approaching language, which included and imbibed within its scope the evolutionary principles of Darwin. “Rorty’s denial that truth is correspondence to some independent reality (696)” did come down heavily on the Western notion of representation.

Hence, all these three postmodern philosophers those are Derrida, Foucault and Rorty do evince a marked sense of skepticism and revolt against the salient conventions of Western thinking and way of understanding reality.

They stand united in ascribing that the distinctions made by many of the philosophers before them did happen to be vague and illusory.

Questions

1. How do the three philosophers that are Derrida, Foucault and Rorty differ in their views?

2.