MiniMartian Objection to Compatibilism.

Section 1

  1. Present and Explain the Hard Determinism argument for Incompatibilism. Provide a story to help illustrate
    your explanation. Then, Present and Explain the Dilemma of Determinism.
  2. Present and Explain the Hard Determinism argument for Incompatibilism, and then Evaluate that argument
    from the point of view of the Compatibilist. Present and Explain the Compatibilist Parody of the Hard
    Determinism argument.
  3. Present and Explain a Compatibilist Definition of Freedom. Then, Present, Explain, and Evaluate the MiniMartian Objection to Compatibilism.
    Section 2
  4. Re-read Chapter 4 of Think on The Self, especially the section “The Self as Bundle”. Why does David Hume
    believe that there is no such thing as the self? What is the self according to Hume? Call Hume’s theory the
    Bundle Theory of the self, then Present, Explain, and Evaluate what Blackburn calls the “standard problem”
    with the Bundle Theory, namely, that if the Bundle Theory of the self were true, then there would exist a
    perception without a perceiver. But the idea of a perception without a perceiver is incoherent. Therefore, the
    Bundle Theory of the self is not true. It would be a good idea to explain Blackburn’s discussion about dents.
    Section 3
  5. Read the chapter in Blackburn’s Think on God, pp. 149-192. Also Read Bertrand Russell’s essay “Why I am
    not a Christian”. Write down the second of Saint Thomas Aquinas’ First Cause Arguments exactly as it appears
    in the document “First Cause Arguments”, then carefully explain each line of the argument. Elaborate in a way
    that shows you have read Blackburn and Russell and understand the argument. Remember, you’re explaining
    the argument here, not criticizing it. Finally, criticize the argument. In particular, tell what Russell has to say in
    response to the First Cause Argument.
  6. Read the chapter in Blackburn’s Think on God, pp. 149-192. Also Read Bertrand Russell’s essay “Why I am
    not a Christian”. Write down the Argument from Design exactly as it appears in the document “Argument from
    Design”, then carefully explain each line of the argument. Elaborate in a way that shows you have read
    Blackburn and Russell and understand the argument. A “Watchmaker” analogy might help. Remember, you’re
    explaining the argument here, not criticizing it. Finally, criticize the argument. In particular, tell what Russell has
    to say in response to the Argument from Design.
  7. Read Chapter 5 of Blackburn’s Think on God, and then explain Pascal’s Wager. First, describe the Western,
    Judeo-Christian conception of God with which Pascal is working. Then lay out the “cost/benefit” analysis
    Pascal presents. Tell what conclusion Pascal thinks he has reached. Finally, evaluate Pascal’s Wager, showing
    that you have read and understood Blackburn’s objections.

Sample Solution

The post MiniMartian Objection to Compatibilism. appeared first on use litetutors.

Strategic Management (Walt Disney Company analysis)

Use the work you completed for Parts, I, II, and III with your CLC group to inform your analysis for this assignment.
Write a 500-750-word analysis of the significance of the three Matrices regarding their relevance for strategic
planning. Describe the key information for each of the three matrices and how information from each will
influence recommendations for strategic plans to improve the position of the company.
Without prematurely determining and formalizing strategic goals and objectives, begin thinking about possible
strategies to capitalize and add value to the organization based on the analysis of this information.
Be sure to cite three to five relevant and credible sources in support of your content. Use only sources found at
the GCU Library, corporate websites, or those provided in Topic Materials.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar
with the expectations for successful completion.

Sample Solution

The post Strategic Management (Walt Disney Company analysis) appeared first on use litetutors.

Why Canada is a mixed economy

1.In your own words, describe the circular flow model of how economies work
2.Explain with examples why Canada is a mixed economy
3.Explain how economic recession in the United States can affect the Canadian Economy
Communication [6 marks]
4.Create an economic system continuum by drawing a line and putting the label “centrally planned economy”
on the left and “market economy” on the right.
Placed the following countries on the continuum: Canada, United States, China, Cuba, United Kingdom, and
Venezuela.
Explain the reasons for the positioning of countries
Thinking / Inquiry [6 Marks]
5.In your opinion, where is Canada currently on the business cycle?
Provide 3 reasons for your answer
Application [5 Marks]
6.Assume that two countries are trading: Canada and Australia. They can each produce only two produces
using half of their resources for each.
Use the following table to answer the following questions
Country Coats Sweaters
Canada 30 6
Australia 10 20
a. How many coats and sweaters are produced?
b. In which good does Canada and Australia has comparative advantage
c. In which good does Canada and Australia has absolute advantage
d. If both countries decide to specialize in the good, they have absolute advantage in, and trade.
Create a new trade table showing how production units will change.
e. If both countries decide to specialize in the good, they have comparative advantage in, and trade.
Create a new trade table showing how production units will change.

Sample Solution

The post Why Canada is a mixed economy appeared first on use litetutors.

Any topic (writer’s choice)

Search the news for an article on whistleblowing.
Go to news.google.com
Click on the Business link along the left side
Search on the term whistleblowing
Search for a case where an insider blew the whistle on their own company
Scan some of the articles that come up until you find something interesting.  Write a reflection piece of about 200-300 words based on the questions below.
Begin by describing the issue of whistleblowing in the article.  Note that I’m not looking for your homework to be merely a summary of the case.  You can probably summarize the issue in a couple of sentences.
According to Bok, is whistleblowing justified in this case?
At the end, copy and paste the URL of the article.