New 3 Page Paper Latin American

write an essay on ANY SUBJECT between 1820 and 1940s, that means, between the Monroe Doctrine and the Good Neighbor Policy. It does not have to be the Monroe Doctrine or the Good Neighbor Policy specifically, but instead any subject, theme, topic, event, process, or development that took place between those too, including them if that is your preference.

3 pages you pick the event to cover as long as its between the years 1820 and 1940

Euthanasia – Topic Selection and Discussion

Required Resources
Read/review the following resources for this activity:

Textbook: Chapter 5, 6
Lesson
Minimum of 2 scholarly sources (in addition to the course textbook)
Instructions
This assignment is the first step in a three part project. You only need to focus on part one at this point. Each step will build on earlier steps. However, it is not a matter of providing a rough draft of all or even part of the entire project here in week three. That is, further steps might require completely new and original text.  At the same time, completing each step will aid you in completing a future step or future steps. And, you should use the same topic in all steps.

First, select a topic of moral controversy, debate, disagreement, and dispute, Examples of such topics are euthanasia,  cloning, etc. You can pick any such topic. It need not be listed here.

Next, detail the positions of each side of the ethical debate. Note at least two moral reasons each side presents to show their view on the topic is correct.

Now, we want to evaluate these positions using the moral theories we studied this week:

What would an Ethical Egoist say about this topic? What side would the Ethical Egoist take? What would the Ethical Egoist say to justify their moral position? Is there a conflict between loyalty to self and to community relevant to your topic? If so, how so? Note what you feel is the best course of action.
What would a Social Contract Ethicist say about this topic? What side would the Social Contract Ethicist take? What would the Social Contract Ethicist say to justify their moral position? Does your topic involve a collision between personal obligations and national ones? If so, how so? Note what you feel is the best course of action.
Finally, reference and discuss any professional code of ethics relevant to your topic such as the AMA code for doctors, the ANA code for nurses, or any other pertinent professional code. State whether and how your chosen topic involves any conflicts between professional and familial duties.

Cite the textbook and incorporate outside sources, including citations.

Writing Requirements (APA format)

Length: 3-4pages (not including title page or references page)
1-inch margins
Double spaced
12-point Times New Roman font
Title page
References page (minimum of 2 scholarly sources in addition to the course textbook)

goal that you recently achieved

please answer this 3 questions above
1) Describe an important goal that you recently achieved.
2) Identify the steps you had to take to achieve this goal, in the order in which they were taken, and estimate the amount of time each step took.
3) Describe how you felt when you achieved your goal.

Suffrage Reflection #6: Anti-Suffragists

I need a one page Journal answer these questions from the text provided.

What does Manuela Thurner argue is the reason women campaigned against their own suffrage?

Splintered Sisterhood: Gender and Class in the Campaign Against Women Suffrage.  How is Susan Marshall’s interpretation of the Antis different from Thurners?

Analyze the Anti-suffrage leaflet on page 215. Whose argument does that primary source best support?