In  1940,  newly-elected president Manuel vila Camacho  declared  that  the  Revolution  had  entered  into  an  evolutionary  phase.    As  a  result,  the  institutional  revolution  would  embark  on  a  new  path  starting  in  the  1940s.    Often  referred  to  as  the  Mexican  miracle,  the  country  would  experience  unprecedented  growth, industrialization, and political stability.    How did  the  state go  about  constructing this miracle?    How did the state manage  to  keep  this  development drive  going  and  who  ultimately paid  the  price  for  it?    Why  did  the  miracle finally collapse in 1982in other words, what  went  wrong?  All in all, how much of this miracle would you say was fact and how much was fiction?

Reference to a reading can be made by using the authors last name (e.g., Sackett shows . . .) no page citations or works cited page are required.

Doremus and Sackett articles are more useful sources, but if you think any other two readings can provide a better quality paper then please use it. Thank you!

nstructions
Do not write your name in the test itself just your student ID.
The lengths for each answer will d But the total number of words should not exceed 1600.
Footnotes should be used for citations only.
All you need to answer these questions are the texts and your note I discourage you from using any outside sources. But if you do, make sure to cite them.
Though you are free to discuss answers to these questions with your classmates, the written material must be your own and stated in your own words. Any suspected plagiarism will be submitted to the Academic Integrity Office.
Failure to follow all of these directions will result in a penalty.

How to Cite
When citing an author, just quote the text, footnote it, and reference the author and the title of the piece youre quoting from. For example:

1 Buchanan, Allen Theories of Secession, p.35

If the next citation uses the same source and but a different page, just write ibid. followed by the new page number. So, for example, suppose in footnote 2, you again want to cite something  Buchanan said in Theories of Secession but this time, from p. 40. Because in footnote 1 you already cited the author and paper, you can just write:

2 ibid., p.40

If after this you cite a different author, do so in full (as in the example of footnote 1). If after that you once again cite Buchanan, you do so in full.

 
Test Questions
Answer all questions.

1. Robert Fullinwider criticizes Judith Thomsons principle that innocent, involuntary beneficiaries can bear compensatory duties. He does this by arguing that it yields counterintuitive results in his Driveway example. A) Explain this example. B) Describe Daniel Butts strategy for defending that principle against Fullinwiders criticisms. C) What relevance does this exchange have to the ethics of affirmative action?

2. A) Describe what George Hull calls the Wrong People argument against affirmative action. B) Explain how the distinction he draws between compensation and rectification is supposed to address the Wrong People argument. In doing so, be sure to explain what compensation and rectification are.

3. one argument in favor of open borders is that unrestricted immigration will typically yield a net benefit to the economy of the country accepting the immigrants. Chandran Kukathas (in his article The Case for Open Borders’) thinks that this argument is inadequate. A) Explain his reasoning. Kukathas admits that some will end up doing worse economically as a result of open borders. B) Why does he think this fails to provide a decisive reason against open borders? C) Do you agree with him? Why or why not?

The test is answering the questions listed above. No plagiarism please. and you don’t have to write the beginning and conclusion paragraph. Simply just answering the question will be enough. Readings and reading outlines are related to the question by author’s name.