Any topic

Some historians views wars as catalysts for profound social, political, and economic change. Others believe that wars entrench the status quo. Looking at the major wars in two periods of European history (defined above), with which side (if any) do you most agree and why? [If you agree with neither, what conclusions would you draw about the impact of wars, and why?]

persuasive paper (any topic is fine)

This is a two part project. The first part is about learning the P.O.W.E.R. writing strategy and choose a topic of your choice and persuade your audience as to why they should want to read, listen or watch your topic. Then write a paper to persuade readers to view or not the topic your chose. This assignment is about writing a persuasive paper (try to get others to see your viewpoint) and using the writing strategy process to complete the project. 

Argumentative essay over the material we discussed in the past 2 weeks

Hi! You did my paper last time and it was phenomenal! I got an A and would love it if you could write my next one due tomorrow! It is  an argumentative essay again over one or more of the readings we have discussed in the past 2 weeks. These are the material/readings we were assigned:
1. Topic: Spinoza on religion, superstisition, and freedom. Reading: Theological Political Treatise- Chapter 4-5, & 12-15.
2. Topic: Spinoza on Democracy. Readings: Theological Political Treatise- Chapter 20. And Political Treatise- Chapter 6 & 11.
3. Topic: Religious toleration. Reading: Locke’s letter on toleration
4. Topic: Divine Right Theory and its critics. Reading: Locke’s First Treatise on Government- chapter 1-2 & 8.

I’ve attached the rubric/guidelines she provided for us that I gave you last time, as well as the essay you wrote last time.

Any topic

Defining Europe has long vexed historians, politicians, philosophers, others. Present-day debates over membership in the EU attest to this conundrum. Address the development of Europe in two different historical periods (defined above). How have its geopolitical, geographical, and cultural parameters shifted? What do these shifting assignations signify? How are they useful for historians? How do they illuminate or obscure important themes in European development?