Review the Ethical Decision Making Models Presentation

Review the Ethical Decision Making Models Presentation. (attachment)

Read Case Study Ten text. (attachment)

 

How does your concept of personal ethics differ from those defined by the APA Ethics Code decision-making process? What are  some similarities?

Respond in 500 words with three or more scholarly references. Use citations, cite your references. Please use attachment to answer question. Cite every sentence with content from your sources. There are a few ways to do that including just putting the citation at the end of each sentence.

Case 10. Handling Unexpected Disruptive

Member Behavior During Group Therapy

Esther Hernandez, Ph.D., a specialist in the psychology of addictions, conducts

group therapy sessions for patients treated at a local methadone Medicaid clinic.

She has been meeting with a group of 12 women on a weekly basis for 2 months

and has been pleased that, for the most part, members attend the meetings regularly.

Although the women take methadone as a substitute for their heroin habits,

many also take other illicit drugs. At the initial session, Dr. Hernandez and group

members agreed on a rule that members should not come to a session if they are

high or intoxicated. The rule has been enforced several times during the past

2 months.

At the beginning of the most recent session, Angela, one of the group members,

walks in late and is obviously intoxicated. Dr. Hernandez reminds Angela about the

rule, noting that Angela must leave but will be welcome back at the next meeting if

she is sober. Angela starts crying and begs to stay. Dr. Hernandez expresses sympathy

and then restates the rule. Angela stands up and states that a drug dealer to

whom she owes money has found out where she lives and she is afraid for her life.

Then as she rushes out of the building, she tells the group “You will all be sorry

when I’m dead.”

The other group members are obviously shaken by Angela’s behavior. Some in

the group feel Dr. Hernandez should end the group meeting and try to find Angela

to make sure she is okay. Others think Dr. Hernandez should call the police. Still

others in the group believe that Angela was trying to manipulate Dr. Hernandez

into permitting her to break the rule. They note that in the past she has tried to get

around other group rules.

Ethical Dilemma

Dr. Hernandez is shaken and does not know how best to handle this situation.

Discussion Questions

1. Why is this an ethical dilemma? Which APA Ethical Principles help frame the

nature of the dilemma?

2. Who are the stakeholders and how will they be affected by how Dr. Hernandez

resolves this dilemma?

3. Is Angela’s current situation one that Dr. Hernandez should have anticipated

in establishing group therapies designed to treat addiction and substance

dependence? Does Dr. Hernandez have a professional responsibility for

Angela’s safety outside the group therapy context?

4. How should Dr. Hernandez immediately address the group members concerns,

keeping in mind that group members have voiced different opinions

about the situation?

FOR THE USE OF UNIVERSITY OF PHOENIX STUDENTS AND FACULTY ONLY.

NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION, SALE, OR REPRINTING.

ANY AND ALL UNAUTHORIZED USE IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED.

Copyright © 2013 by SAGE Publications, Inc.

372——DECODING THE ETHICS CODE

5. From a treatment perspective, how important is it for Dr. Hernandez to uphold

the group’s self-generated and agreed-upon rules regarding intoxication? Do

group members have the same confidentiality obligations as Dr. Hernandez?

6. What legal concerns should Dr. Hernandez consider?

7. How are APA Ethical Standards 2.01a, 2.01e, 4.01, 4.05, 4.06, 10.03, and 10.10

and the Clinical Practice Guidelines for Group Psychotherapy relevant to this

dilemma? Which other standards might apply?

8. What are Dr. Hernandez’ ethical alternatives for resolving this dilemma? Which

alternative best reflects the Ethics Code aspirational principles and enforceable

standards, legal standards, and obligations to stakeholders? Can you identify

the ethical theory (discussed in Chapter 3) guiding your decision?

9. What steps should Dr. Hernandez take to implement her decision and monitor

its effect?

Suggested Readings

American Psychological Association. (2007). Guidelines for psychological practice with girls

and women. American Psychologist, 62, 949–979.

Bernard, H., Burlingame, G., Flores, P., Greene, L., Joyce, A., Kobos, J. C., . . . American Group

Psychotherapy Association. (2008). Clinical practice guidelines for group psychotherapy.

International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 58(4), 455–542.

Brabender, V. (2006). The ethical group psychotherapist. International Journal of Group

Psychotherapy, 56(4), 395–414.

Lasky, G. B., & Riva, M. T. (2006). Confidentiality and privileged communication in group

psychotherapy. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 56(4), 455–476.

Vannicelli, M. (2001). Leader dilemmas and countertransference considerations in group

psychotherapy with substance abusers. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy,

51(1), 43–62.

Incidental Teaching Assignment

Academic Intervention-Incidental Teaching Page | 1

 

Academic Intervention

Incidental Teaching

 

Many teachers and parents struggle with how to best teach preacademic and academic skills to young students with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and ensure that the skills generalize to a variety of settings, people, and materials. Incidental teaching is a strategy that can be used to address these issues. It applies methods of applied behavior analysis to preacademic skills taught in typical preschool or home settings.

This topic introduces you to how you can teach preacademic skills such as colors, size, and shape to children with ASD in typical settings, within the daily routines. Specifically, you will learn how to apply the strategy and develop data collection methods, receive suggestions for materials to teach adjectives, read a case study, find the answers to frequently asked questions, and take a short quiz.

What is Incidental Teaching?

Incidental teaching involves structuring and sequencing educational objectives so that they occur within ongoing, typical activities and take advantage of student interests and motivation (McGee, Daly, & Jacobs, 1994). Incidental teaching uses strategies from the field of applied behavior analysis (ABA) to present learning objectives within typical early childhood activities, instead of sitting face to face with the child at a table in a clinical setting. Teachers arrange the environment by placing preferred toys and activities of each student within sight, but not within reach, to encourage the student to initiate teaching sessions based on preplanned learning objectives. Once the child shows an interest in the materials by gesturing or requesting an item or activity, the teacher prompts an elaboration on the initiation. The child subsequently obtains the desired item upon generating the elaboration. For example, a student may say, “barn,” to request a toy barn, followed by the teacher’s question, “what color barn?” When the student says, “red barn,” she is allowed to play with the barn for a couple of minutes. A nonverbal student might work on the skill of asking for help using a gesture. For example, the teacher could place the child’s favorite toy, a dump truck, in a plastic container that the child could not open. Once the child attempts to open the box, the teacher physically prompt him to hand the box to her for help.

There are several advantages to incidental teaching. First, it is thought that teaching within the context of typical preschool activities promotes generalization of skills (McGee, Morrier, & Daly, 1999). In addition, social initiations, a deficit of many children with ASD, are an integral part of incidental teaching. The basis for incidental teaching lies in the student initiating a teaching session. Lessons involve interactions in which the child expresses interest and the adult responds with prompts and praise.

Families are also able to integrate incidental teaching into typical daily routines by finding ways to encourage their children to elaborate during everyday activities (e.g., dinner time, outside play, bed time). For example, Johnna’s mother wants to teach her to be able to name body parts. Initially, she targets this skill during bath time, an activity Johnna enjoys, by getting the washcloth soapy and waiting for Johnna to indicate (e.g., pointing, pulling mom’s hand toward her) what part she wants washed. Her mother then prompts her to repeat the name of that part (e.g., “wash arm”).

 

 

Steps

The following are essential steps in carrying out incidental teaching:

1. The teacher or parent chooses an educational objective. Example:Labeling the letters of the alphabet.

2. The adult arranges the natural environment to promote student motivation and interest in the materials related to teaching the objective. For example, the child can see the materials, but does not have access to them, or the adult sees the child playing with a toy and gently takes the toy and plays with it. Example: Joshua enjoys puzzles. His teacher, Miss May, finds a puzzle with the letters of the alphabet. During center time while Joshua is working on puzzles, Miss May puts the puzzle on the table with the letters in a clear container that Joshua is unable to open.

3. The child shows interest in the materials through verbalization or gesture, thus initiating the teaching session. Example:Joshua points to the box and says, “letters.”

4. The adult encourages the child to elaborate on his or her initiation, based on the student’s developmental level. If the adult does not understand what item or activity the child wants, the adult first asks, “What do you want?” Ways to encourage elaborated responses include:

· Ask a question (e.g., “What color car do you want?” or, “Where is the car?”)

· Make a gesture, sound, or word (e.g., point to the blue car)

· Model the desired response (e.g., “blue car”) Example: Miss May opens the box and holds up the letter R, asking, “What letter do you want?”

5. If the child responds correctly to the prompt, the adult provides specific praise and gives the child brief access to the desired materials. Example: Joshua says, “Letter R,” so Miss May says, “That’s right! It’s the letter R!,” and allows him to put the letter in the puzzle.

6. If the child does not respond or responds incorrectly, the adult provides up to three more prompts, such as providing the necessary words. Once the child responds correctly, he or she receives specific praise and brief access to the materials. Example: Joshua repeats, “Letter,” so Miss May says, “Letter R.” Joshua repeats, “Letter R.” Miss May says, “Right, that’s R!,” and allows him to put the letter in the puzzle.

7. The adult “takes a turn” with the materials (i.e., replaces them on the shelf or plays with them, or, says, “I want the green car” and picks up the green car), The steps begin again. Example: Miss May closes the box again and waits for Joshua to say, “Letter,” or point to the box.

The incidental teaching session should end with success (i.e., child responds correctly and receives access tot he materials). The session should be brief and end once the child loses interest.

See Wetherby and Prizant’s (1989) “communicative temptations for a communication assessment” and Susan Boswell’s suggestions for “communication incentives” at http://www.teacch.com/teacchco.htm for more ideas on how to elicit communicative initiations.

Evaluation

To ensure that generalization takes place, evaluation should take place not only during teaching sessions, but also within other settings, with all those with whom the child communicates, and with a wide range of instructional materials. Data should be collected frequently, weekly at minimum, to make certain that the child is making progress. In some situations it would be helpful to collect data within each teaching session. If the data do not show improvement, another strategy should be considered or the method of delivery should be assessed to judge if changes are necessary.

Data Collection: Initial Lessons

When assessing a child’s skills, data should not be collected in the middle of a teaching session or the adult will be uncertain if the student truly learned the objectives or is simply displaying short-term memory skills. Instead, probe data should be used (McGee, Krantz, & McClannahan, 1985). Whereby data collection takes place before a teaching session begins and in the setting in which prior teaching has taken place. The order of presentation of the materials should be random, so the adult can be sure that the child has not simply learned a pattern of responding. The child may receive reinforcement (e.g., praise, edibles), but it should not be connected to the correctness of responses (e.g., provide praise for following directions). When collecting probe data, unlike in the middle of a teaching session when the adult would wait for the child to initiate the session by showing interest in an item with a gesture or verbalization, the adult initiates the data collection session by asking the child elaboration questions (e.g., “where is the juice?” might be asked to check for use of prepositions).

Correct responses occur when the child uses a correct elaboration spontaneously or within approximately 5 seconds of the adult’s question (McGee, Krantz, & McClannahan, 1985). For example, the child sees the cookies on the shelf and says, “I want the chocolate cookie.” The following exchanges would also be recorded as a correct response:

Example 1: Adult: “Where is the juice?” Child: “In the cup.” “On the table.”

Example 2: Adult: “What shape are the cookies?” Child: (2-second pause) “Square cookie.”

Errors are those exchanges in which the child does not respond, responds more than approximately 5 seconds after the adult’s question, or responds incorrectly (e.g., asks for a circle cookie when the cookies are squares). In the case of an error during data collection, the adult would not prompt a correct response and the child would not receive the item. It is important to keep the data collection sessions short to prevent frustration.

The following data collection sheet is useful in collecting probe data.

http://www.autismnetwork.org/modules/academic/incidental/table1.gif

Data Collection: Checking for Generalization

Few skills are useful if children do not generalize their use to settings, materials, and communicative partners other than those in which the skills were initially taught. In addition to collecting data at the beginning of teaching sessions, therefore, it is essential also to collect data on the child’s generalization of the skills. Teaching and testing for generalization must be planned.

Example: Asa was initially taught colors through the use of toy trains. He previously learned how to label favorite toys and would initiate sessions by asking for “train” at free play. His teacher, Ms. Alexander, then taught him to label the colors of train cars by asking, “what color car?” until he consistently asked for “yellow train car.” To promote generalization of expressive color labeling, Ms. Alexander set up sessions using different colors of gummy bears, toy cars, blocks, and crayons. Starting with gummy bears, Asa’s favorite candy, Ms. Alexander offered them as an after lunch snack. In order to teach color labels, when Asa said, “Gummy bear, please,” Ms. Alexander asked, “What color?” Once Asa was consistently asking for, “Blue gummy bear,” the teacher moved on to working on the same skill at art time, withholding paints and crayons until Asa asked for them by saying, “Purple paint.”

Materials to teach adjective

Adjective use is one example of incidental teaching that is frequently implemented in schools and home settings. The following are some ideas for materials to use to teach adjectives. Incidental teaching may also be used to teach such objectives as nouns, verbs, pronouns, and initiating and sustaining conversations.

Colors Shapes Size
Candy

Rainbow-colored cookies

Toy train cars

Blocks

Painting

Blocks

Crackers

Cookies

Puzzle pieces

Shape lotto

Balls

Toy cars and trucks

Bear manipulatives

Pieces of favorite foods

Blocks

 

Case Study

Eli is a 4 year-old student with pervasive developmental disorder- not otherwise specified (PDD-NOS). He has a limited functional vocabulary; however, he often recites scenes from favorite storybooks and movies. He often engages in echolalia (i.e., immediately repeats words and phrases said by others). He has previously learned to request preferred foods and toys by using single words. His parents and teacher, Ms. Markin, want him to use color adjectives and targeted the color yellow, his favorite color cookie (vanilla wafers). A recent teaching session went as follows during snack time:

Ms. Markin: (holding bag of cookies, eats one) Eli: (reaching for cookie) “Cookie” Ms. Markin: “What color cookie do you want?” Eli: (reaches for cookie again) Ms. Markin: (modeling) “Yellow cookie” Eli: “Yellow cookie” Ms. Markin: (gives Eli the cookie) “Yes, that’s a yellow cookie. Great!” The next three trials went similarly with Ms. Markin providing a prompt. The following trial went as follows: Ms. Markin: (holding bag of cookies, eats one) Eli: (reaching for cookie) “Yellow cookie” Ms. Markin: (gives Eli a cookie) “Wonderful! You asked for the yellow cookie.”

Once Eli could consistently request yellow cookies without prompts, Ms. Markin and his parents added another color, again finding items that were motivating to him. For example they began teaching brown with chocolate cookies and red and blue with favorite toy cars.

Quiz

 

Top of Form

1. Incidental teaching sessions must take place in a clinical setting, with the teacher and student seated face-to-face at a table.

True False

 

2. Incidental teaching applies strategies of applied behavior analysis (ABA) within typical activities.

True False

 

3. Incidental teaching requires that teaching sessions be designed around students’ interests.

True False

 

4. Who initiates incidental teaching sessions?

A. Teacher B. Student C. Administrator

 

5. The student can show an interest in the materials by:

A. Speaking B. Walking out of the room C. Gesturing D. A and C E. A and B

Bottom of Form

Signal Detection Theory

Assignment 3: Signal Detection Theory

Signal detection theory originally grew out of the development of radar and communications technology. It was adapted by psychologists to explain certain aspects of sensation and perception processes that previous theories did not encompass. Signal detection theory models the decision-making process you would use when you want to decide between two different categories of stimuli. For example, you have to decide whether a person seen in a café (the stimulus) is a friend or a stranger (the categories).

Throughout this course, you will access a Cognitive Psychology Online Laboratory (CogLab) demonstration to explore some of the theories and processes of sensation and perception through a hands-on approach. This assignment is your first CogLab activity.

Click here to download the CogLab program.zip file to install this program. You may also download the CogLab Instructionsfile. After installing the program, launch it. Then, refer to the CogLab Student Manual.

Access the CogLab demonstration “Signal Detection” and follow the instructions to complete the demonstration.

Using the CogLab manual, the textbook and module readings, the Argosy University online library resources, and the Internet, research signal detection theory.

Based on the CogLab demonstration and your research, address the following:

  • Define the following terms in relation to signal detection theory: hit, miss, false alarm, and correct rejection.
  • An individual’s hit rate is .79 and correct-rejection rate is .71. Find out his/her miss rate and false alarm rate.
  • Examine your individual sensitivity measures for each of the three conditions (144, 400, and 900 noise dots). Describe what these numbers indicate regarding your accuracy rates.
  • Signal detection theory assumes that a signal is always accompanied by a certain amount of noise. Identify the “noise” that was present when you completed the task. Explain how it affected your performance on the task. Identify at least two sources of noise for the detection of an audio signal.
  • Name at least three jobs that require the employee to accurately detect signals to effectively do the job. This means that signal detection methods could be used to evaluate performance.
  • Summarize at least two other research methods for measuring detection. Give your opinion on whether the signal detection theory is superior to these. Give reasons to support your answer.

Write a 2–3-page paper in Word format. Be sure to include a title page and a reference page. Apply APA standards to citation of sources. Use the following file naming convention: LastnameFirstInitial_M1_A3.doc. For example, if your name is John Smith, your document will be named SmithJ_M1_A3.doc.

By Wednesday, October 19, 2016, deliver your assignment to the M1: Assignment 3 Dropbox.

Cognitive Psychology Online Laboratory. CogLab 2.0 Online Laboratory. Wadsworth.

Assignment 3 Grading Criteria 
Maximum Points
Accurately defined the terms related to signal detection theory.
4
Calculated the miss rate and the false rate based on the hit rate and correct-rejection rate.
12
Evaluated your individual sensitivity measures with regard to accuracy rates.
16
Identified the noise present while completing the task and explained how it affected the performance on the task.
16
Identified three jobs that require the employee to accurately detect signals to effectively do the job and where signal detection methods were used to evaluate performance.
16
Summarized two other research methods for measuring detection and examined if signal detection theory is superior to those methods.
16
Wrote in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation.

Psychology Case 6

Respond to the following questions in  at lease 1,250 words. APA format and References CITES are to be APA format as well

 

 

 

  1. Why is this an ethical dilemma? Which APA Ethical Principles help frame the nature of the dilemma?

     

     

     

     

     

  2. To what extent, if any, should Dr. Vaji consider Leo’s ethnicity in his deliberations? Would the dilemma be addressed differently if Leo self-identified as non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, on non-Hispanic Black?

     

     

     

     

     

  3. How are APA Ethical Standards 1.08, 3.04, 3.05, 3.09, 7.04, 7.05, and 17.05 relevant to this case? Which other standards might apply?

 

 

4. What are Dr. Vaji’s ethical alternatives for resolving this dilemma? Which alternative best reflects the Ethics Code aspirational principle and enforceable standard, as well as legal standards and obligations to stakeholders?

 

 

 

5. What steps should Dr. Vaji take to ethically implement his decision and monitor its effects?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reference

 

 

 

Fisher, C. B. (2013). Decoding the ethics code: A practical guide for psychologists. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.