If a question must be answered that has significant negative psychological impact on the subject, such as in the Stanford prison study, is it more ethical to use human or animal subjects?
Human research is common in the field of psychology, which raises many ethical questions.
1). If a question must be answered that has significant negative psychological impact on the subject, such as in the Stanford prison study, is it more ethical to use human or animal subjects?
2). Are there some research questions that should simply not be evaluated because of the potential for negative psychological impact the research would have on the human subjects?
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Trackbacks & Pingbacks
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More here to that Topic: uselitetutors.com/2018/05/08/if-a-question-must-be-answered-that-has-significant-negative-psychological-impact-on-the-subject-such-as-in-the-stanford-prison-study-is-it-more-ethical-to-use-human-or-animal-subjects/ […
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on to that Topic: uselitetutors.com/2018/05/08/if-a-question-must-be-answered-that-has-significant-negative-psychological-impact-on-the-subject-such-as-in-the-stanford-prison-study-is-it-more-ethical-to-use-human-or-animal-subjects/ [..…
Leave a Reply
Want to join the discussion?Feel free to contribute!