Hi, need to submit a 750 words paper on the topic Catfish. If Yaniv wanted to see the story through ethically, he would have dealt with her with “full disclosure” right from the start that he already know and that Meg was Angela. He has to make a full disclosure of his intention because his intention was to see the story through and Angela’s role transformed from being a prospective girlfriend to a subject of research, albeit in a journalistic sense. Instead, they put Angela in a situation where she has to lie about Meg and in a way, mocking her for all her lies (Joost and Schulman). Ethical investigators or researchers do not do that. They treat their subject with respect and does not hide facts that could demean the person of their subjects even if the subject initially lied. The best ethical or philosophical standard that can be applied in the situation is the ethical standard that researchers have to follow in conducting research that involves human beings. This ethical standard or philosophy of ethical research involving human beings are enunciated in National Institute of Health (NIH) guidelines for investigators involving human subjects that states they should follow the following philosophical principles. a. Respect for persons – meant that the subject of research which are persons should be treated as autonomous agents and persons with diminished autonomy are entitled to additional protections. In the case of Angela, they already know that she has psychological issues and they could have prevented from aggravating it by being truthful. b. Beneficence – persons are treated in an ethical manner not only by respecting their decisions and protecting them from harm, but also by making efforts to secure their well being. Such treatment falls under the principle of beneficience. To cover acts of kindness or charity that goes beyond strict oblication. c. Justice – requires that individuals and groups be treated fairly and equitably in terms of bearing the burdens and receiving the benefits of research and this includes being truthful to the subject of research (NIH). With how Yaniv conducted his investigation to see the story through, the research became “stigmatizing” to the subject because letting Angela continue with her lie and later confronting it is in a way belittling or insulting her and such, considered unethical by investigators who follows the prescribed ethical standard in conducting research. 2. What is the significance of the film’s title, Catfish? Who is the “catfish” in the movie? Support your response with evidence from the film The film’s mirror’s our inner desire to be the person that we wanted to be. If we cannot be the ideal person that we wanted to be in our real lives, then at least we can have the satisfaction through another medium such as the internet. Angela admitted this when he was confronted by Yaniv that she made some mistakes in her life that made her feel not to be the person she wanted to be and Meg represented her ideal self. Angela was the catfish in the film because she fitted the description of of Vince when he talked to Yaniv about live cod that were shipped to Asia from North America. Catfish tend to have mushy flesh when they are inactive but when they placed together with other cods, they become active and do not emit the undesirable mushy flesh.