ESSAY: INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING AND TAX PLANNING STRATEGY ASSIGNMENT

ESSAY: INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING AND TAX PLANNING STRATEGY ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS OVERVIEW For this assignment, you will be submitting an essay on the effect the adoption of IFRS has had, a

ESSAY: INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING AND TAX PLANNING STRATEGY ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONSOVERVIEWFor this assignment, you will be submitting an essay on the effect the adoption of IFRS has had, and will continue to have, on tax planning strategy. While reporting under IFRS will not be required until 2015 or 2016, we are already beginning to see changes in the tax industry, particularly when considering planning for the future. The purpose of this assignment is for you to consider how and to what extent the adoption of IFRS in the United States will affect current tax planning strategy, both in the short-term and the long-term. INSTRUCTIONSThe essay should be written in APA (current edition) format and be submitted in the form of a Microsoft Word document, labeled as follows: lastname_essay2.doc. The body of this essay must be 2–3 pages (double-spaced) in length, not counting the title page and reference page. A minimum of 6 scholarly research sources must be cited in the essay.If you are not familiar with IFRS, begin by watching the presentation provided in the Learn section(file attached). This presentation presents a basic introduction to IFRS, which you can use as a springboard for deeper research. As this is an essay, and not a comprehensive research project, limit your analysis to three or four standards and/or strategies that will be affected by the adoption of IFRS. Cite at least two separate research sources per issue analyzed. Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

Wells Fargo Case Study

Saturday Nov 27th

Wells Fargo Case Study

BACKGROUND:

In fall of 2016 federal regulators accused Wells Fargo of falsely opening over 2 million customer credit card and checking accounts to meet unrealistic sales quotas (http://money.cnn.com/2016/09/08/investing/wells-fargo-created-phony-accounts-bank-fees/?iid=EL, September 4, 2017). Since then, Wells Fargo has also been accused of forcing over 500,000 customers into auto insurance policies they did not need, and the actual total number of fake customer accounts opened between January 2009 and mid-year 2015 has increased to 3.5 million, approximately.

Based on your knowledge of internal controls, you know that there are certain policies and procedures management can put in place to detect and prevent these type of errors. You are also aware of auditing procedures the auditors can use to test for and detect these same errors.

ASSIGNMENT:

Your assignment is to write a (A).persuasive argument for your opinion on the following questions: (B)Who is more at fault management or the auditor? Often, there is a shared responsibility for such failures. However, (C)your task is to determine whose failure was greatest and why. (D) You will need to acknowledge why the other side failed (the side you are not arguing for) and (E) then defend why your side’s failure was greater. (F) You will need to demonstrate that you understand and can apply the information learned in class up to this point.

This is an individual assignment.

You will be graded on the content of your report; how well-written your report is and your ability to effectively communicate your argument using the principles covered during this course.

REQUIREMENTS:

  1. You will need to specifically list which Wells Fargo failure you have chosen to address (the fake accounts, mortgage fraud or the auto insurance) AND you must state who you feel is more at fault upfront in the introduction.
  1. When discussing the failure, you have chosen, you must (briefly) discuss the consequences of that failure and all the parties that were affected by the failure (or scandal) and how they were affected. Please use the most current sources. Your case facts must be accurate. Don’t assume, look it up. A lot of information and events have occurred since 2016. The word briefly is important here, no more than a 1 to 1.5 pages on this background.
  1. You will need to address what policies or procedures (controls) must have failed in order for the scandal to have taken place. In others words, you must discuss what policies and procedures could have detected your scandal and what policies and procedures could have prevented your scandal. n your opinion on what policies or procedures (controls) that should have been in place to have prevented or better detect this failure. When discussing the controls, you must identify if the controls are preventative or detective and why you believe they are (either preventative or detective)
  2. PLEASE NOTE: the majority of this paper should be discussing actual internal controls. Actual policies and procedures that management or employee should have done or should be doing.
  3. The reports must be turned in on time. No exceptions. No late assignments accepted.
  4. The reported must be 5 to 7 pages doubled spaced using either MLA or APA style.
  5. The report must be written as a persuasive report. This means there is a clear introduction, body and conclusion. The use of titles and subtitles is expected and appropriate in this assignment. There should be a clear thesis statement, topic sentences for each paragraph and facts to support your stance. If you are unsure how to write a persuasive report please seek available resources (https://www.ncas.rutgers.edu/writingcenter, http://www.wikihow.com/Write-a-Persuasive-Essay, or whatever is available to you).
  6. You must do your own work. Any students found to be violating Rutgers academic code by plagiarizing or “buying” their assignment will receive disciplinary action in accordance with the Rutgers Academic Integrity Policy.
  7. There is no required number of sources for this assignment. HOWEVER, any sources used must be properly documented (cited and referenced). Failure to do will result in a severe reduction in your grade and possibly a ZERO if any part of the paper has deemed to be plagiarized. (Note: you can not make a persuasive argument without facts, so sources are expected). You MUST properly cite and reference all facts, quotes, etc.
  8. This paper should be your own words. No large quotations that take up a large amount of space should be used. In fact direct quotes from sources should be avoided. However, if you are using factual numbers, amounts or policies in this paper that originate from a different source, they those should be cited.

Feel free to research and find your own sources. Below I have listed just a few articles that might be helpful to start with. BUT REMEMBER you have to use the most current sources. The sources below are NOT CURRENT. (obviously, Wikipedia or equivalents of that are not acceptable sources). All sources must be PROPERLY cited WITH A PROPERLY CITED WORKS CITED PAGE.

https://www.complianceweek.com/blogs/accounting-auditing-update/senators-press-pcaob-for-answers-on-kpmg-audit-of-wells-fargo#.WahLgGOa3ZY

http://www.reuters.com/article/wells-fargo-kpmg-idUSL1N1HX1YX

http://money.cnn.com/2017/08/31/investing/wells-fargo-fake-accounts/index.html

http://money.cnn.com/2017/07/28/investing/wells-fargo-auto-insurance-car-loans/index.html

http://money.cnn.com/2017/10/03/investing/wells-fargo-hearing-ceo/index.html

http://money.cnn.com/2017/07/13/investing/elizabeth-warren-wells-fargo-janet-yellen-board/index.html

http://money.cnn.com/2017/08/11/investing/wells-fargo-small-business-credit-card-fees/index.html

http://money.cnn.com/2017/06/15/investing/wells-fargo-mortgage-modification-lawsuit/index.html

Aspects of the ethical argument

please make a reply of 200-250 words to this thread with two citations. When replying, try to address different aspects of the ethical argument with Bible integrations. Often, these situations are no

please make a reply of 200-250 words to this thread  with two citations. When replying, try to address different aspects of the ethical argument with Bible integrations. Often, these situations are not as black and white as they seem, particularly when responsibilities such as independence and confidentiality come into play.

  1. How would you respond to Coleman’s request? Be sure to cite research that supports your position.

I would inform Coleman that I would not be able to complete his request. Ethically and professionally, I could not conceal the stability of the building during a transaction I was handling. Per the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct, I have a responsibility to be professional in all matters. Section 0.300.040.03 states that a member is to be “honest and candid within the constraints of client confidentiality. Service and the public trust should not be subordinated to personal gain (2019).” I would inform Coleman if he still wanted me to remain silent regarding the stability of the building; I would have to remove myself from the transaction.

  1. What if you have already told the other side that the building is fine when you      learn about the problems?

Per AICPA professional code of conduct 0.300.020, “in carrying out their responsibilities as professionals, members should exercise sensitive professional and moral judgements in all their activities (2019).” I would inform Coleman that I had only done what I felt was morally right. I informed the other party about the stability of the building because it was the ethical and moral response. I was also relay to Coleman that if I had known the stability of the building was to be concealed; I would not have taken part of the transaction.

  1. What other potential ethics issues do you see in this situation?

I believe one primary ethical issue is ignoring the public interest. Per section 0.300.030.01, “members should accept the obligation to act in a way that will serve the public interest honor the public trust and demonstrate a commitment to professionalism (2019).” Per Jenkins, Popova and Sheldon (2018), “the public interest in accounting relates to protecting the business community, clients, shareholders, regulators, government, and society as a whole from (un)intentional harmful actions by members of the profession.” If I conceal the stability of the building by omission or a lie; I would be failing the public interest.  Other ethical issues are the lack of integrity, lack of professionalism and the lack of honesty.

  1. Which AICPA Code(s) of Professional Conduct rules apply in this situation (explain how and why they apply)?

The General Standard Rule applies to this situation. The General Standard Rule 1.300.001.01a-b covers this situation. A member is to act with professional competence and due professional care (2019). By concealing or lying about the stability of the building I would not be acting in a professional manner. Ignoring the stability of the building would not be practicing due professional care for my client and the public. “Due professional care requires auditors to carry out professional skepticism, of questioning mind Kertajasa et al. 2019).” Concealing the stability of the building would be failing in providing due professional care to both parties in the transaction.

  1. Cite the specific verse(s) for at least one Biblical principle that you feel is relevant to the situation (explain how and why it applies).

I feel that Matthew 7:12 is the most relevant verse to this situation. “In everything, therefore, treat people the same way you want them to treat you, for this is the Law and the Prophets (2012).” Aa a professional and a Christian, I cannot withhold important information that could affect the well-being of the buyer or their company. The simple truth is I would not want to be treated that way. And that type of behavior would not be very Godly.

Which AICPA Code(s) of Professional Conduct rules apply in this situation

please make a reply of 200-250 words to this thread with two citations. When replying, try to address different aspects of the ethical argument with Bible integrations. Often, these situations are no

please make a reply of 200-250 words to this thread  with two citations. When replying, try to address different aspects of the ethical argument with Bible integrations. Often, these situations are not as black and white as they seem, particularly when responsibilities such as independence and confidentiality come into play.

Scenario – You are negotiating a transaction for your client, Shark Corporation. Parties on the other side of the deal ask you for information about the structural stability of a building, which is a significant part of the transaction. Coleman, Shark’s tax director, tells you to say that everything is all right when the building has substantial hidden damage. Coleman tells you to say this because it would be more favorable to Shark’s position in the transaction.

  1. How would you respond to Coleman’s request? Be sure to cite research that supports your position.

My response to Coleman would be that I would not lie about the damage of the building. One of the Principles of Professional Conduct is Integrity which means being honest and candid while also maintaining client confidentiality. This principle also notes that members should perform all professional responsibilities with the highest sense of integrity, which is the best course of action to maintain the public trust. I am not only responsible to represent Shark Corporation, but also, I am responsible to maintain honesty and integrity with the other parties. By lying about this transaction, I would also be violating the principle of Responsibility which states that members should always exercise moral and professional judgement during their work and career. My responsibility is to provide professional service, and an obligation to uphold the standards of the profession. Also, the Due Care Principle states that I should constantly try to improve my ethical competence and act to the best of my ability when it comes to ethical standards.

  1. What if you have already told the other side that the building is fine when you learn about the problems?

The Bible teaches us in Proverbs 10:9 “Whoever walks in integrity walks securely, but he who makes his ways crooked will be found out.” I must conduct myself with integrity and I must inform the other side about the damages of the building. I must also be responsible to tell the other side that the information I provided before is incorrect and that the building has such problems.

  1. What other potential ethics issues do you see in this situation?

Another potential ethic issue that I find in this case is that Mr. Coleman is the Tax director of this company, and he wants me to act in an unethical way. This is an indication that Shark Corporation does not have a good ethical environment. An ethical workplace environment supports a positive reputation for your company while improving the morale of your employees. Violations of basic ethics can hurt your business or cost your company money due to actions such as lawsuits or theft of good and ideas (Shelley Frost). This unethical behavior shown by Mr. Coleman puts in risk the reputation of the Corporation and can cost them a lot of money. I might also consider leaving this client because I do not want to put my reputation in risk.

  1. Which AICPA Code(s) of Professional Conduct rules apply in this situation (explain how and why they apply)?

Rule 102. AICPA (2011, p. 1757) would apply to this situation. This rule is about Integrity and Objectivity which states that in the performance of any professional service, a member shall maintain objectivity and integrity, shall be free of conflicts of interest, and shall not knowingly misrepresent facts or subordinate his or her judgment to others. This rule means that I shall conduct myself with integrity in the performance of my services as a professional, and that I shall not help this client to conduct this transaction because I am completely aware that there is a problem with it. In this case, the building has structural damage.

  1. Cite the specific verse(s) for at least one Biblical principle that you feel is relevant to the situation (explain how and why it applies).

The Bible verse that I feel is relevant to this situation is Luke 8:17 “For there is nothing hidden that will not be disclosed, and nothing concealed that will not be known or brought out into the

open.” Mr. Coleman thinks that he can keep this secret and that nobody will find out, but the

truth is that God knows everything, and He brings everything to light.