Discuss how an industry, other than healthcare, can use your aforementioned strategy to improve operations.

Unit outcomes addressed in this Assignment:
• Evaluate dimensions of quality in healthcare
• Assess business strategies from various industries
Course outcomes addressed in this Assignment:
HA540-1: Evaluate business strategies for quality management and continuous improvement of operations.
Instructions:
In this Assignment, you will be evaluating dimensions of quality in healthcare and how various industries can apply these concepts to improve operations. Using the resources available to you, research the priorities in the current publication of the National Quality Strategy.
Requirements
• Select and discuss one (1) priority that is the most important to healthcare today.
• Discuss how an industry, other than healthcare, can use your aforementioned strategy to improve operations.
• Report your findings with a 3-4 page fact sheet for the general community.

Analyze potential interprofessional alternatives to an initial intervention overview with regard to their possibilities to meet the needs of the project, population, and setting.

For the first section of your final capstone project you will develop a proposal for an intervention plan to fulfill a need within a specific population. This assignment is meant to capture your initial thoughts about the need and impacting factors to help focus your in-depth analysis later on in the course. The discussion from Unit 1 will have helped you brainstorm and crystallize some of your ideas for this assignment, specifically ideas around needs, a target population, and some initial support from the literature and other sources of evidence. The problem statement is an important part of your capstone project as it will help illustrate the importance of your project, as well as help to clarify your project’s scope.
Some examples of appropriate projects are:
•Community-based intervention to address teen pregnancy among Native Americans.
•School-based intervention to address adolescent obesity.
•Educational program to help nurses implement IV best practices in the emergency room.
•Policy proposal to remove barriers for government aid recipients to receive breast cancer treatment at a private clinic.
•Training program for new nurses working with the Hmong community.
•Curriculum to educate young Latina women, ages 18–24, about HIV prevention.
•Web site to educate adult patients recently diagnosed with diabetes about proactive self-care.
Instructions
Your problem statement will focus on presenting information related to the problem-intervention-comparison-outcome-time (PICOT) approach to nursing research. You will also present a brief literature review that supports the need you identified in your problem statement and the appropriateness of your broad intervention approach. Provide enough detail so that the faculty member assessing your problem statement will be able to provide substantive feedback that you will be able to incorporate into the other project components in this course, as well as the final draft of your project. At minimum, be sure to address the bullet points below, as they correspond to the grading criteria. You may also want to read the scoring guide and the Guiding Questions: Problem Statement (PICOT) document (both linked in the Resources) to better understand how each criterion will be assessed.
Part 1: Problem Statement (2–3 pages)
Need Statement (1 paragraph).
•Analyze a health promotion, quality improvement, prevention, education, or management need.
Population and Setting (1–2 paragraphs).
•Describe a target population and setting in which an identified need will be addressed.
Intervention Overview (1–2 paragraphs).
•Explain an overview of one or more interventions that would help address an identified need within a target population and setting.
Comparison of Approaches (1 or 2 paragraphs).
•Analyze potential interprofessional alternatives to an initial intervention overview with regard to their possibilities to meet the needs of the project, population, and setting.
Initial Outcome Draft (1 paragraph).
•Define an outcome that identifies the purpose and intended accomplishments of an intervention for a health promotion, quality improvement, prevention, education, or management need.
Time Estimate (1 paragraph).
•Propose a rough time frame for the development and implementation of an intervention to address an identified need.
Part 2: Literature Review (10–15 resources, 3 pages).
•Analyze current evidence to validate an identified need and its appropriateness within the target population and setting.
•Evaluate and synthesize resources from diverse sources illustrating existing health policy that could impact the approach taken to address an identified need.

What are typical pressures on the members of a group as they form into a new team?

What are typical pressures on the members of a group as they form into a new team?
•What qualities should a leader consider when building a team? How might the considerations be different when the team is built to deal with a crisis?
•What are examples of behaviors exhibited by three or more of your team members? To answer this, use the list in Figure 4.1, page 74 of the Levi text. (PLEASE USE ATTACHED PHOTO FOR THIS!)
Write a succinct initial post of at least 150 words. Demonstrate clarity of thought and precision in writing. Support your discussion with at least one reference other than the required readings.

Discuss the regulatory legal and credentialing requirements for Advance Practice Nurses (APN).

Paper instructions:
Strictly APA by the publication manual of the American psychological association 6th edition second practice. Write in Third person only. Special attention to the reference page full reference. Verb/noun agreement. DNP [doctor of nursing practice level writing). Introduction and conclusions required. Use headings when needed. Thesis statement pivotal conclusion critical. Please look at objectives below. Follow grading rubric strictly.
NU 610 Guidelines for Role Paper
The purpose of this paper is to explore the advanced practice nurses role in relation to healthcare policy politics and advocacy (Unit 1 objective).
The paper should be carefully written in formal style based on primary resources provide an integration of ideas. Organized flow logical progression of ideas and clarity in thought are essential. Paper should be no more than 3 pages in length excluding the title page and reference page. Liberal number of references (minimum of 8 references).
Grading Rubric
Criteria
Points
Introductory paragraph (one paragraph). There must be a thesis statement that tells the reader purpose of paper and what will be discussed.
/0.5
Identify and discuss driving forces propelling the advanced practice nurse into the healthcare policy politics and advocacy arena.
/3
Discuss ways the advanced practice nurse can influence and advocate for healthcare policy and politics.
/3
Discuss the role of professional nursing organizations.
/3
Conclusions: Summarizes the essential points of the paper in one paragraph.
/0.5
Total Points
/10
Deductions:
0.25 point = each APA grammar punctuation and spelling error
1 point = Document not submitted as pdf or not named per file naming policy (see syllabus)
1 point = No turnitin report paper and turnitin report not merged or not merged in correct order
1 point = Over the page limit
Up to 20% of points = for lack of scholarship
20% deduction = Plagiarism or incorrect paraphrasing
Please upload your paper into the designated Assignment. Name your document per the course file naming policy merge turnitin report and submit as a single pdf document. Assignments not submitted properly will not be graded. If this occurs you will be notified via email and will have 48 hours to resubmit correctly (after 48 hours pass deductions will be made for late submission).
Papers must be submitted to turnitin.com and students are to review the report generated by this software system. Students will be given the opportunity to submit revisions of the paper to turnitin.com. The final report is to be saved as a pdf document and merged with the paper (in other words you will be submitting one document).
The faculty is really sticklers about plagiarism nonintentional and otherwise. We take this very seriously and are actively checking assignments. Submit your paper to turnitin.com in adequate time to get multiple reports back if needed. The first report comes back very quickly. Subsequent reports if you need to resubmit because your similarity index is high take longer 24 hours maybe more. Of course 0% similarity is best but realistically there will be names of people reports commissions groups models books etc. that come back highlighted.
These are nothing to worry about since we cannot change these things (faculty do not worry
about those and neither should you). What we look for is text/content that comes back
highlighted and matches another source (even if the content is referenced appropriately). The
turnitin report is to be used as a learning tool therefore it is essential that you look at the reports
percentage as well as what is highlighted. Simply looking at the score does not determine
whether sentences or correct paraphrasing was done it only tells you a number. You need to look
at the specific areas highlighted. Look at your work and see what content is highlighted and
determine if you can change the wording without changing the meaning. If you can then you
need to re-word accordingly. If your paper is similar to another students work and you feel there
was no way you could have known this person used these same words you still need to revise
your wording. Each students submission to turnitin is unpublished at the time and could
potentially be published just as your own work could be published. At some point if you were
to submit your work for publication and not revise the content highlighted originally in your
turnitin report a plagiarism violation could occur if the other students work is also published.
Delete your title page and reference pages before submission so you can get a true snapshot of
your paper and possible problem areas. Use the revision opportunities with turnitin.com if you
have highlighted areas of similar content. Instructors check those and theres no need to have a
red flag on your paper. Also refer to the section in the APA formatting manual about plagiarism
it has some good points. Plagiarism.org is another good resource.
Scholarship Expectations
Up to 20% of points will be deducted from grade for lack of scholarship. Scholarship is
evidenced by organized and logical progression of ideas; effort and attention to detail is evident;
communicates effectively all aspects of discussion. Correct grammar spelling and word choice.
Liberal number references (minimum of 4 references). References are current appropriately
paraphrased and cited. Correct use of APA. Correct title page.
You are clinical nurse scholars in the making. You are the advanced practice nurses/DNPs and
members of the highly literate profession of advanced practice nursing who will chart the future
of health care. Good writing ability is as much a required skill for nurses in advanced practice as
performing clinical functions. Therefore precision and scholarship is expected in all
assignments.
UNIT objectives
Broadly outline the history of healthcare policy politics and nursing in the United States
2. Discuss the regulatory legal and credentialing requirements for Advance Practice Nurses (APN).
3. Discuss the advanced practice nurses role in relation to healthcare policy politics and political advocacy.
4. Outline the legislative policy process how a bill becomes a law.