Explore the National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR) website: http://www.ninr.nih.gov/ Review its publication Bringing science to life: NINR strategic plan (2011, p. 7) to identify the current priorities for nursing research.

Tasks:Each response to a task below should be 500-1000 words. �All responses should be combined into a single document for submission. �APA formatting required. 1. Explore the National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR) website: http://www.ninr.nih.gov/ Review its publication Bringing science to life: NINR strategic plan (2011, p. 7) to identify the current priorities for nursing research. Do you agree with the priorities or would you recommend addition or elimination of some of the priorities? What effect do the nursing research priorities have on nursing researchers? 2. What criteria must be met in order to consider a practice, evidence-based? Provide examples. Explain the role quality plays in evidence-based practice. 3. Based on the information you learned to this point, write a research proposal that relates to the topics you chose for a previous assignment. Be sure to include the following information in your proposal: �Hypothesis �Theory �Design model �Method �Anticipated results �Potential Dissemination Avenues

Find a research article from a nursing journal (or any other source) and discuss briefly: ◦Population used in the study

Find a research article from a nursing journal (or any other source) and discuss briefly: ◦Population used in the study
•Find a research article from a nursing journal (or any other source) and discuss briefly: ◦Population used in the study
◦Sampling method
◦Any measurement used
◦How data was collected.
◦Be sure to include title of the article and authors and journal in which was published. Also, mention type of research: quantitative OR qualitative.
•Discuss this with your peers. Express your experience: how difficult or simple was for you to do this search. Discuss also significance of the study.
•Article must be submitted.(PLEASE ,YOU HAVE TO SUBMIT THE DISCUSSED ARTICLE TO ME, MY PROFESSOR HAS REQUESTED IT !!!! ).

Hans Hofmann, Rising Sun Wassily Kandinsky, The Path To Abstraction Piero Di Cosimo, The Visitation With Saint Nicholas And Saint Anthony Abbot

Rubric to assignment
 
A) Browse the sets and other students’ posts to see which interests you and which has not already been reserved. DO NOT select a set that another student has already selected.
B) To reserve a set copy the set links, click New Post, in the subject area type the set letter, in the message area paste the set links. When you are ready open your post, click reply, and then type in your response.
C) DO NOT present this as an outline. Present it in paragraph form as you would any paper.
1) Begin the post by identifying which of the three within the set chosen aesthetically appeals to you the most and why. 1 point
2) Referencing the subject matter lesson, determine which is realistic, which is abstract (or semi-abstract), and which is nonobjective. Underlinethese terms in the post. 6 points
3) For each discuss why the objects within each work reinforce the type you determined. 18 points
4) Use objective reasoning to discuss the reasons for your choice in number one. 5 points
In the first paragraph identify the one from the set that most appeals to you and why it appeals to you. Do not use terminology in this portion. Using terminology will make the statement invalid. But, make sure you can apply terminology to support your reasons for choosing it in the conclusion. You may want to write this part after completing the rest of the assignment, but it needs to be presented first. (part 1 of the above rubric)
In the second paragraph identify each painting. One of the works is realistic, one is nonobjective, and one is either semi-abstract or abstract. Use the terms. Note that there are 6 points for this part so it should be developed accordingly. (part 2 of the above rubric)
In the third paragraph you will be discussing what the painting looks like. Using those images discuss what makes one realistic, one nonobjective, and the other semi-abstract or abstract. Do not simply use the definitions, but describe the objects within the painting. Make sure that when you are done it isn’t so general that it could be applied to many works rather than this specific one. Note that there are 18 points for this part so it should be developed accordingly. (part 3 of the above rubric)
The last paragraph will reference the choice from the first paragraph. What about the fact that it is realistic, abstract (semi-abstract), or nonobjective contributed to your choosing that work? Underline this term in this concluding paragraph as well. How did the way it looked (use one of those four terms) contribute to that choice? Again, you may want to develop this before you actually write the beginning paragraph. (part 4 of the above rubric)

Compare and contrast quantitative and qualitative research. Include an explanation of the following questions in your response: Which, in your opinion, is most valuable?

1. Compare and contrast quantitative and qualitative research. Include an explanation of the following questions in your response: Which, in your opinion, is most valuable? Or are they equally valuable? What are the best types of studies for each method? What issues you should keep in mind when applying these to an actual study? For example, what role does bias play? 2. Visit the Center for Disease Control Emerging Infectious Disease website: http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/EID/ Choose one journal, article, or case study and explain the type of research design that was used in this study. Summarize your source, and be sure to include an explanation of the following questions in your response: Is it evident that primary, secondary, or meta-analysis was used? What role did surveys play, if any? Explain. Were there any flaws or discrepancies in the data? Why or why not? 3. Review the PowerPoint comparing Desсrіptive and Analytical Epidemiology. Locate two journal articles, one that uses desсrіptive epidemiology, and the other that uses analytic epidemiology. Summarize each article and compare and contrast the research designs.